nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.10.2018 | Original Paper

Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white

verfasst von: Ignacio Almorín-Fernández-Vigo, Inés Sánchez-Guillén, José I. Fernández-Vigo, Ana Macarro-Merino, Bachar Kudsieh, Cristina Fernández-Vigo, José A. Fernández-Vigo

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To provide normal corneal elevation data for a large Caucasian population and to determine the impacts on these data of age, sex, axial length (AXL) and horizontal white-to-white (WW).

Setting

Centro Internacional de Oftalmología Avanzada, Madrid, Spain.

Design

Retrospective, cross-sectional, observational.

Methods

In this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, anterior and posterior corneal elevations were measured in 789 right eyes of subjects with no ocular disease at the thinnest corneal location in relation to a fixed 8-mm best-fit sphere using the Pentacam, and AXL and WW were measured with the IOLMaster. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the effects of age, sex, AXL and WW on the elevation data.

Results

Mean subject age was 50.5 ± 15 years (range 17–93 years); 64% were women. Mean anterior and posterior corneal elevations were 1.99 ± 1.75 µm (− 7 to 10 µm) and 7.70 ± 5.7 µm (− 6 to 28 µm). Anterior corneal elevations were higher by 0.165 μm and 0.033 μm for every mm reduction in AXL and every year reduction in age, respectively. Sex and WW were not significant predictors of anterior elevations (R² = 7.7%). Posterior corneal elevation increased by 0.186 μm/year of age, 0.707 μm/mm reduction in WW and 0.819 μm/mm reduction in AXL. This variable was also 0.866 μm greater in men (R² = 34.4%).

Conclusion

Anterior corneal elevations decrease with age and are higher for shorter AXL but are not influenced by sex or WW. Posterior corneal elevations increase with age, decreasing AXL, decreasing WW and are higher in men.

Wen D, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I et al (2017) Postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of laser corneal refractive surgery: a network meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 178:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013 CrossRefPubMed

Santhiago M, Giacomin N, Smadja D, Bechara S (2016) Ectasia risk factors in refractive surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 10:713–720. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s51313 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L et al (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology 115:1534–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.020 CrossRefPubMed

Ambrósio R, Faria-Correia F, Ramos I et al (2013) Enhanced screening for ectasia susceptibility among refractive candidates: the role of corneal tomography and biomechanics. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 1:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-012-0003-z CrossRef

Bae GH, Kim JR, Kim CH et al (2014) Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentacam. Am J Ophthalmol 157(103–109):e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.014 CrossRef

Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ et al (2015) Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea 34:359–369CrossRefPubMed

Kim JT, Cortese M, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr, Khachikian SS (2011) Tomographic normal values for corneal elevation and pachymetry in a hyperopic population. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2:130. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9570.1000130 CrossRef

Ambrósio R, Randleman JB (2013) Screening for ectasia risk: what are we screening for and how should we screen for it? J Refract Surg 29:230–232. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20130318-01 CrossRefPubMed

Kovács I, Miháltz K, Ecsedy M et al (2011) The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 89:e251–e256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02053.x CrossRef

10.

Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Dañin D (2014) Corneal elevation values in normal eyes, forme fruste keratoconus and keratoconus at different stages measured by Scheimpflug imaging. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis 3:36–39. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1075 CrossRef

11.

Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K et al (2013) Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1348–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.023 CrossRefPubMed

12.

de Sanctis U, Aragno V, Dalmasso P et al (2013) Diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus using posterior elevation measured with 2 different methods. Cornea 32:911–915. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3182854774 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hernández-Camarena JC, Chirinos-Saldaña P, Navas A et al (2014) Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between three different Scheimpflug systems in measuring corneal and anterior segment biometry. J Refract Surg 30:616–621. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20140815-02 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Khachikian SS, Belin MW (2009) Posterior elevation in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 116:816CrossRefPubMed

15.

Guilbert E, Saad A, Grise-Dulac A, Gatinel D (2012) Corneal thickness, curvature, and elevation readings in normal corneas: combined Placido–Scheimpflug system versus combined Placido–scanning-slit system. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.033 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR et al (2013) Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 29:274–281. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20130318-07 CrossRef

17.

Mostafa EM (2017) Comparison between corneal elevation maps using different reference surfaces with Scheimpflug–Placido topographer. Int Ophthalmol 37:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0291-7 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Feng MT, Belin MW, Ambrósio R et al (2011) International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1817–1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.030 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gilani F, Cortese M, Ambrósio RR et al (2013) Comprehensive anterior segment normal values generated by rotating Scheimpflug tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1707–1712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.042 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N et al (2014) Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Am J Ophthalmol 158(32–40):e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.018 CrossRef

21.

Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M et al (2016) Corneal elevation and keratoconus indices in a 40- to 64-year-old population, Shahroud Eye Study. J Curr Ophthalmol 27:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2015.10.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Orucoglu F, Toker E (2015) Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by Scheimpflug tomography. J Ophthalmol 2015:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925414 CrossRef

23.

Correia FF, Ramos I, Lopes B et al (2012) Topometric and tomographic indices for the diagnosis of keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis 1:92–99CrossRef

24.

Ying J, Wang Q, Belin MW et al (2016) Corneal elevation in a large number of myopic Chinese patients. Contact Lens Anterior Eye J Br Contact Lens Assoc 39:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2016.01.005 CrossRef

25.

Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V et al (2015) Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.052 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Gatinel D, Malet J, Hoang-Xuan T, Azar DT (2011) Corneal elevation topography: best fit sphere, elevation distance, asphericity, toricity and clinical implications. Cornea 30:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3181fb4fa7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Mahroo OA, Oomerjee M, Williams KM et al (2014) High heritability of posterior corneal tomography, as measured by Scheimpflug imaging, in a twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:8359–8364. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15043 CrossRefPubMed

28.

López-Montemayor P, Valdez-García JE, Loya-García D, Hernandez-Camarena JC (2017) Safety, efficacy and refractive outcomes of LASIK surgery in patients aged 65 or older. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0614-3 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hashemi M, Falavarjani KG, Aghai GH et al (2013) Anterior segment study with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera in refractive surgery candidates. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 20:212. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.114793 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white
verfasst von: Ignacio Almorín-Fernández-Vigo
Inés Sánchez-Guillén
José I. Fernández-Vigo
Ana Macarro-Merino
Bachar Kudsieh
Cristina Fernández-Vigo
José A. Fernández-Vigo
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2018
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1028-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

08.04.2024 | Therapieverfahren in der Augenheilkunde | CME

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white

Abstract

Purpose

Setting

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Setting

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Surgical intervention for paediatric blepharoptosis: a 6-year case series

The impact of duration on the recurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: optimal cutoff value

The efficacy of propranolol in very preterm infants at the risk of retinopathy of prematurity: Which newborn and when?

Response to the letter to the editor by Tsatsos et al. “To remove or not to remove (the AC-IOL)? This is the question. Letter regarding article Endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a retained angle-supported intraocular lens by Droutsas et al.”

Efficacy of fixation of the amniotic membrane on a symblepharon ring with continuous suturing in acute ocular chemical burn patients

Unusual microbiological presentations in polymicrobial post-operative endophthalmitis and their clinical correlations

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde