Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

02.05.2023

Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer

verfasst von: Mythili Shastry, PhD, Erika Hamilton, MD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Opinion statement

It has become clear that patients whose cancers have progressed post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (CDK4/6i) are not deriving the same magnitude of benefit to subsequent standard endocrine therapy as historical studies would suggest. For example, anticipated duration of benefit to fulvestrant prior to CDK4/6i historically was ~ 5–6 months, and data from the VERONICA and EMERALD trials report less than 2 months. This has magnified our need for novel endocrine agents. Some have argued that patients post-CDK4/6i may just have more endocrine-resistant tumors and perhaps should just receive chemotherapy. While this may be appropriate for some, we do not currently have an assay that reliably predicts whose cancers remain endocrine sensitive and whose are endocrine resistant. ESR1 mutations can enrich for patients whose tumors are more likely to be heavily dependent on estrogen, but this is certainly not the whole answer and many patients without ESR1 mutations continue to derive benefit from subsequent endocrine agents. Most patients would strongly prefer the side effect profile of endocrine agents compared to chemotherapy, and thus, premature use of cytotoxic agents when subsequent ER targeting can control disease is not preferred. These novel ER targeting agents (PROTAC, SERD, SERCA, CERAN) hold great promise to not only outperform standard agents like fulvestrant, but also offer the promise of agents with a different side effect profile that may be more advantageous when compared to menopausal symptoms, hot flashes, arthralgias, and sexual side effects so commonly seen with AIs. We also are likely to see these novel agents move to earlier lines, whether that be 1st line in combination with CDK4/6i or even adjuvant disease.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel HK, Bihani T. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:1–24.PubMedCrossRef Patel HK, Bihani T. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:1–24.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heldring N, Pike A, Andersson S, et al. Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:905–31.PubMedCrossRef Heldring N, Pike A, Andersson S, et al. Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:905–31.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall JM, McDonnell DP. Coregulators in nuclear estrogen receptor action: from concept to therapeutic targeting. Mol Interv. 2005;5:343–57.PubMedCrossRef Hall JM, McDonnell DP. Coregulators in nuclear estrogen receptor action: from concept to therapeutic targeting. Mol Interv. 2005;5:343–57.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger TR, Eeckhoute J. Genome- wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1289–97.PubMedCrossRef Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger TR, Eeckhoute J. Genome- wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1289–97.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda K, Horie-Inuoe K, Inuoe S. Identification of estrogen-responsive genes based on DNA binding properties of estrogen receptors using high-throughput sequencing technology. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36:24–31.PubMedCrossRef Ikeda K, Horie-Inuoe K, Inuoe S. Identification of estrogen-responsive genes based on DNA binding properties of estrogen receptors using high-throughput sequencing technology. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36:24–31.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottardis MM, Robinson SP, Satyaswaroop PG, Jordan VC. Contrasting actions of tamoxifen on endometrial and breast tumor growth in the athymic mouse. Cancer Res. 1988;48:812–5.PubMed Gottardis MM, Robinson SP, Satyaswaroop PG, Jordan VC. Contrasting actions of tamoxifen on endometrial and breast tumor growth in the athymic mouse. Cancer Res. 1988;48:812–5.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Love RR, Mazess RB, Barden HS, et al. Effects of tamoxifen on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:852–6.PubMedCrossRef Love RR, Mazess RB, Barden HS, et al. Effects of tamoxifen on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:852–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonnell DP, Wardell SE, Norris JD. Oral selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs), a breakthrough endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Med Chem. 2015;58:4883–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McDonnell DP, Wardell SE, Norris JD. Oral selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs), a breakthrough endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Med Chem. 2015;58:4883–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL. Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:631–43.PubMedCrossRef Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL. Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:631–43.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeselsohn R, Yelensky R, Buchwalter G, et al. Emergence of constitutively active estrogen receptor-α mutations in pretreated advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1757–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jeselsohn R, Yelensky R, Buchwalter G, et al. Emergence of constitutively active estrogen receptor-α mutations in pretreated advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1757–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawell SE, White R, Hoare S, et al. Inhibition of estrogen receptor-DNA binding by the "pure" antiestrogen ICI 164,384 appears to be mediated by impaired receptor dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:6883–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fawell SE, White R, Hoare S, et al. Inhibition of estrogen receptor-DNA binding by the "pure" antiestrogen ICI 164,384 appears to be mediated by impaired receptor dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:6883–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dauvois S, White R, Parker MG. The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Sci. 1993;106:1377–88.PubMedCrossRef Dauvois S, White R, Parker MG. The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Sci. 1993;106:1377–88.PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Long X, Nephew KP. Fulvestrant (ICI 182,780)-dependent interacting proteins mediate immobilization and degradation of estrogen receptor. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:9607–15.PubMedCrossRef Long X, Nephew KP. Fulvestrant (ICI 182,780)-dependent interacting proteins mediate immobilization and degradation of estrogen receptor. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:9607–15.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Results of the CONFIRM Phase III Trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4594–600.PubMedCrossRef Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Results of the CONFIRM Phase III Trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4594–600.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson JF, Lindemann J, Garnett S, et al. A good drug made better: the fulvestrant dose-response story. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014;14:381–9.PubMedCrossRef Robertson JF, Lindemann J, Garnett S, et al. A good drug made better: the fulvestrant dose-response story. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014;14:381–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fribbens C, O’Leary B, Kilburn L, et al. Plasma ESR1 mutations and the treatment of estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2961–8.PubMedCrossRef Fribbens C, O’Leary B, Kilburn L, et al. Plasma ESR1 mutations and the treatment of estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2961–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison M, Laight A, Clarke D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of fulvestrant after oral, intravenous and intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2003;1:S171.CrossRef Harrison M, Laight A, Clarke D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of fulvestrant after oral, intravenous and intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2003;1:S171.CrossRef
20•.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottamal M, Kang B, Peng X, Wang G. From pure antagonists to pure degraders of the estrogen receptor: evolving strategies for the same target. ACS Omega. 2021;6:9334–43. A mini-review discussing the chemical structure anti-estrogen therapies and the development of oral SERDs.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mottamal M, Kang B, Peng X, Wang G. From pure antagonists to pure degraders of the estrogen receptor: evolving strategies for the same target. ACS Omega. 2021;6:9334–43. A mini-review discussing the chemical structure anti-estrogen therapies and the development of oral SERDs.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bentrem DJ, Dardes RC, Liu H, et al. Molecular mechanism of action at estrogen receptor α of a new clinically relevant antiestrogen (GW7604) related to tamoxifen1. Endocrinology. 2001;142:838–46.PubMedCrossRef Bentrem DJ, Dardes RC, Liu H, et al. Molecular mechanism of action at estrogen receptor α of a new clinically relevant antiestrogen (GW7604) related to tamoxifen1. Endocrinology. 2001;142:838–46.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu YL, Yang X, Ren Z, McDonnell DP, et al. Structural basis for an unexpected mode of SERM-mediated ER antagonism. Molecular Cell. 2005;18:413–24.PubMedCrossRef Wu YL, Yang X, Ren Z, McDonnell DP, et al. Structural basis for an unexpected mode of SERM-mediated ER antagonism. Molecular Cell. 2005;18:413–24.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor CE, Norris JD, Broadwater G, et al. Circumventing tamoxifen resistance in breast cancers using antiestrogens that induce unique conformational changes in the estrogen receptor. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2917–22.PubMed Connor CE, Norris JD, Broadwater G, et al. Circumventing tamoxifen resistance in breast cancers using antiestrogens that induce unique conformational changes in the estrogen receptor. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2917–22.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dardes RC, O'Regan RM, Gajdos C, et al. Effects of a new clinically relevant antiestrogen (GW5638) related to tamoxifen on breast and endometrial cancer growth in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1995–2001.PubMed Dardes RC, O'Regan RM, Gajdos C, et al. Effects of a new clinically relevant antiestrogen (GW5638) related to tamoxifen on breast and endometrial cancer growth in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1995–2001.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wardell SE, Ellis MJ, Alley HM, et al. Efficacy of SERD/SERMhybrid-CDK4/6 inhibitor combinations in models of endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015a;21:5121–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wardell SE, Ellis MJ, Alley HM, et al. Efficacy of SERD/SERMhybrid-CDK4/6 inhibitor combinations in models of endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015a;21:5121–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Garner F, Shomali M, Paquin D, et al. RAD1901: A novel, orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader that demonstrates antitumor activity in breast cancer xenograft models. Anticancer Drugs. 2015;26:948–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Garner F, Shomali M, Paquin D, et al. RAD1901: A novel, orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader that demonstrates antitumor activity in breast cancer xenograft models. Anticancer Drugs. 2015;26:948–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bihani T, Patel HK, Arlt H, et al. Elacestrant (RAD1901), a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), has antitumor activity in multiple ER1 breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4793–804.PubMedCrossRef Bihani T, Patel HK, Arlt H, et al. Elacestrant (RAD1901), a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), has antitumor activity in multiple ER1 breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4793–804.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wardell SE, Nelson ER, Chao CA, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacological activities of RAD1901, a selective estrogen receptor degrader. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 2015b;22:713–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wardell SE, Nelson ER, Chao CA, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacological activities of RAD1901, a selective estrogen receptor degrader. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 2015b;22:713–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardia A, Kaklamani V, Wilks S, et al. Phase I study of elacestrant (RAD1901), a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1360–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bardia A, Kaklamani V, Wilks S, et al. Phase I study of elacestrant (RAD1901), a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1360–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30•.
Zurück zum Zitat Bidard F-C, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3246–56. Results from the first phase III trial of an oral SERD compared to standard of care endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- MBC.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bidard F-C, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3246–56. Results from the first phase III trial of an oral SERD compared to standard of care endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- MBC.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez KG, Nangia JR, Schiff R, Rimawi MF. Elacestrant and the promise of oral SERDs. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3227–9.PubMedCrossRef Sanchez KG, Nangia JR, Schiff R, Rimawi MF. Elacestrant and the promise of oral SERDs. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3227–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaklamani VG, Bardia A, Aftimos PG et al. Subgroup analysis of patients with no prior chemotherapy in EMERALD: a phase 3 trial evaluating elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), versus investigator’s choice of endocrine monotherapy for ER+/HER2-advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol 2021;40(no. 16_suppl):1100. Kaklamani VG, Bardia A, Aftimos PG et al. Subgroup analysis of patients with no prior chemotherapy in EMERALD: a phase 3 trial evaluating elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), versus investigator’s choice of endocrine monotherapy for ER+/HER2-advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol 2021;40(no. 16_suppl):1100.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalfe C, Ingalla E, Blake R, et al. GDC-9545: A novel ER antagonist and clinical candidate that combines desirable mechanistic and pre-clinical DMPK attributes. Cancer Res. 2019;79:P5-04-07. Abstract P5-04-07.CrossRef Metcalfe C, Ingalla E, Blake R, et al. GDC-9545: A novel ER antagonist and clinical candidate that combines desirable mechanistic and pre-clinical DMPK attributes. Cancer Res. 2019;79:P5-04-07. Abstract P5-04-07.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang J, Zbieg JR, Blake RA, et al. GDC-9545 (Giredestrant): A potent and orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader with an exceptional preclinical profile for ER+ breast cancer. J Med Chem. 2021;64(16):11841–56.PubMedCrossRef Liang J, Zbieg JR, Blake RA, et al. GDC-9545 (Giredestrant): A potent and orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader with an exceptional preclinical profile for ER+ breast cancer. J Med Chem. 2021;64(16):11841–56.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Jhaveri K, Boni V, Sohn J. Safety and activity of single-agent giredestrant (GDC-9545) from a phase Ia/b study in patients (pts) with estrogen receptorpositive (ER+), HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:(no. 15_suppl):1017–7.CrossRef Jhaveri K, Boni V, Sohn J. Safety and activity of single-agent giredestrant (GDC-9545) from a phase Ia/b study in patients (pts) with estrogen receptorpositive (ER+), HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:(no. 15_suppl):1017–7.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim E, Jhaveri KL, Perez-Fidalgo JA, et al. A phase Ib study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC- 9545 alone or combined with palbociclib in metastatic ER-positive HER2- negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):1023.CrossRef Lim E, Jhaveri KL, Perez-Fidalgo JA, et al. A phase Ib study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC- 9545 alone or combined with palbociclib in metastatic ER-positive HER2- negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):1023.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JM, Lim E, Chavez MM, et al. Giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs physician choice of endocrine monotherapy (PCET) in patients (pts) with ER+, HER2–locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC): primary analysis of the phase II, randomised, open-label acelERA BC study. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl_7):S88–S121. Martin JM, Lim E, Chavez MM, et al. Giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs physician choice of endocrine monotherapy (PCET) in patients (pts) with ER+, HER2–locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC): primary analysis of the phase II, randomised, open-label acelERA BC study. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl_7):S88–S121.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Shomali M, Cheng J, Sun F, et al. SAR439859, a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), demonstrates effective and broad antitumor activity in wild-type and mutant ER-positive breast cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(2):250–62.PubMedCrossRef Shomali M, Cheng J, Sun F, et al. SAR439859, a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), demonstrates effective and broad antitumor activity in wild-type and mutant ER-positive breast cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(2):250–62.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Linden HM, Campone M, Bardia A, et al. A phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), as monotherapy and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies in postmenopausal women with ER-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): AMEERA-1. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_suppl):PD8-08.CrossRef Linden HM, Campone M, Bardia A, et al. A phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), as monotherapy and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies in postmenopausal women with ER-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): AMEERA-1. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_suppl):PD8-08.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolaney SM, Chan A, Petrakova K, et al. AMEERA-3, a phase II study of amcenestrant (AMC) versus endocrine treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with endocrine-resistant ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (aBC). Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl_7):S88–S121. Tolaney SM, Chan A, Petrakova K, et al. AMEERA-3, a phase II study of amcenestrant (AMC) versus endocrine treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with endocrine-resistant ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (aBC). Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl_7):S88–S121.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandarlapaty S, Linden HM, Neven P, et al. AMEERA-1: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with palbociclib (palbo) in postmenopausal women with ER+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(no. 15_suppl):1058–8. Chandarlapaty S, Linden HM, Neven P, et al. AMEERA-1: Phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859), an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), with palbociclib (palbo) in postmenopausal women with ER+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(no. 15_suppl):1058–8.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott JS, Moss T, Stokes S, et al. Abstract 5674: Discovery of AZD9833, an oral small molecule selective degrader of the estrogen receptor (SERD). Cancer Res. 2020;80(16_suppl):5674.CrossRef Scott JS, Moss T, Stokes S, et al. Abstract 5674: Discovery of AZD9833, an oral small molecule selective degrader of the estrogen receptor (SERD). Cancer Res. 2020;80(16_suppl):5674.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Baird R, Oliveira M, Ciruelos EM, et al. Updated data from SERENA-1: a phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_Suppl):PS11-05.CrossRef Baird R, Oliveira M, Ciruelos EM, et al. Updated data from SERENA-1: a phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_Suppl):PS11-05.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J et al. Serena-1: Updated analyses from a phase 1 study (parts C/D) of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant (AZD9833) in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):1032. Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J et al. Serena-1: Updated analyses from a phase 1 study (parts C/D) of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant (AZD9833) in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):1032.
45•.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira M, Pominchuk D, Nowecki Z, et al. Camizestrant, a next-generation oral SERD vs fulvestrant in post-menopausal women with advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: results of the randomized, multi-dose phase 2 SERENA-2 trial. Presented at SABCS 2022. December 6-10, 2022. Abstract GS3-02. Randomized phase 2 data of a novel oral SERD vs standard endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- MBC. Oliveira M, Pominchuk D, Nowecki Z, et al. Camizestrant, a next-generation oral SERD vs fulvestrant in post-menopausal women with advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: results of the randomized, multi-dose phase 2 SERENA-2 trial. Presented at SABCS 2022. December 6-10, 2022. Abstract GS3-02. Randomized phase 2 data of a novel oral SERD vs standard endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- MBC.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Jhaveri K, Juric D, Yap Y-S, et al. A phase I study of LSZ102, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, with or without ribociclib or alpelisib, in patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(21):5760–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jhaveri K, Juric D, Yap Y-S, et al. A phase I study of LSZ102, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, with or without ribociclib or alpelisib, in patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(21):5760–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Aftimos P, Neven P, Pegram M, et al. Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: updated phase 1 results and dose selection. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4 suppl):Abstract nr PS12-04.CrossRef Aftimos P, Neven P, Pegram M, et al. Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: updated phase 1 results and dose selection. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4 suppl):Abstract nr PS12-04.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinksy K, Abramson V, Chalasani P, et al. ZN-c5, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in women with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82(4_suppl):P1-17-02.CrossRef Kalinksy K, Abramson V, Chalasani P, et al. ZN-c5, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in women with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82(4_suppl):P1-17-02.CrossRef
49••.
Zurück zum Zitat Bidard FC, Hardy-Bessard AC, Dalenc F, et al. Switch to fulvestrant and palbociclib versus no switch in advanced breast cancer with rising ESR1 mutation during aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib therapy (PADA-1): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(11):1367–77. First proof of concept trial that demonstrated the benefit of utilizing plasma ctDNA monitoring to guide treatment strategy in ER+/HER2-MBC.PubMedCrossRef Bidard FC, Hardy-Bessard AC, Dalenc F, et al. Switch to fulvestrant and palbociclib versus no switch in advanced breast cancer with rising ESR1 mutation during aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib therapy (PADA-1): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(11):1367–77. First proof of concept trial that demonstrated the benefit of utilizing plasma ctDNA monitoring to guide treatment strategy in ER+/HER2-MBC.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4594–600.PubMedCrossRef Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4594–600.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurvitz SA, Park YH, Bardia A et al. LBA14 Neoadjuvant giredestrant (GDC-9545) + palbociclib (palbo) vs anastrozole (A) + palbo in post-menopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer (ER+/HER2– eBC): Interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase II coopERA BC study Ann Oncol 2021;32:S1285–6. Hurvitz SA, Park YH, Bardia A et al. LBA14 Neoadjuvant giredestrant (GDC-9545) + palbociclib (palbo) vs anastrozole (A) + palbo in post-menopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer (ER+/HER2– eBC): Interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase II coopERA BC study Ann Oncol 2021;32:S1285–6.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Campone M, Dong Y, Ling B, et al. AMEERA-4: a preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of amcenestrant or letrozole in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2− primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):528−8. Campone M, Dong Y, Ling B, et al. AMEERA-4: a preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of amcenestrant or letrozole in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2− primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):528−8.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Komm BS, Chines AA. An update on selective estrogen receptor modulators for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Maturitas. 2012;71(3):221–6.PubMedCrossRef Komm BS, Chines AA. An update on selective estrogen receptor modulators for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Maturitas. 2012;71(3):221–6.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat LaCroix AZ, Powles T, Osborne CK, et al. Breast cancer incidence in the randomized pearl trial of lasofoxifene in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010;102:1706–15.PubMedCrossRef LaCroix AZ, Powles T, Osborne CK, et al. Breast cancer incidence in the randomized pearl trial of lasofoxifene in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010;102:1706–15.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner M, Taylor A, Wei G, et al. Clinical pharmacology of multiple doses of lasofoxifene in postmenopausal women. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:52–8.PubMedCrossRef Gardner M, Taylor A, Wei G, et al. Clinical pharmacology of multiple doses of lasofoxifene in postmenopausal women. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:52–8.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Laine M, Greene M, Chang Y-F, et al. Lasofoxifene decreases breast cancer lung and liver metastasis in a mammary intraductal (MIND) xenograft model of mutant ERα+ breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(4 Suppl): Abstract nr PD7-09. Laine M, Greene M, Chang Y-F, et al. Lasofoxifene decreases breast cancer lung and liver metastasis in a mammary intraductal (MIND) xenograft model of mutant ERα+ breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(4 Suppl): Abstract nr PD7-09.
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Goetz M, Plourde P, Stover DG, et al. Open-label, randomized study of lasofoxifene (LAS) vs fulvestrant (Fulv) for women with locally advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (mBC), an estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation, and disease progression on aromatase (AI) and cyclindependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6i) inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:S1387–8.CrossRef Goetz M, Plourde P, Stover DG, et al. Open-label, randomized study of lasofoxifene (LAS) vs fulvestrant (Fulv) for women with locally advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (mBC), an estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation, and disease progression on aromatase (AI) and cyclindependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6i) inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:S1387–8.CrossRef
58•.
Zurück zum Zitat Damodaran S, Plourde PV, Moore HCF, et al. Open-label, phase 2, multicenter study of lasofoxifene (LAS) combined with abemaciclib (Abema) for treating pre- and postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic ER+/HER2− breast cancer and an ESR1 mutation after progression on prior therapies. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):1022. Preliminary data showing that combination of a novel SERM and CDK 4/6 inhibitor improves median PFS in ESR1 mutant ER+/HER2- MBC after progression on prior CDK 4/6i and fulvestrant. Damodaran S, Plourde PV, Moore HCF, et al. Open-label, phase 2, multicenter study of lasofoxifene (LAS) combined with abemaciclib (Abema) for treating pre- and postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic ER+/HER2− breast cancer and an ESR1 mutation after progression on prior therapies. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):1022. Preliminary data showing that combination of a novel SERM and CDK 4/6 inhibitor improves median PFS in ESR1 mutant ER+/HER2- MBC after progression on prior CDK 4/6i and fulvestrant.
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton E, Vahdat L, Han HS, et al. First-in-human safety and activity of ARV-471, a novel PROTAC® estrogen receptor degrader, in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82(4 suppl): Abstract nr PD13-08. Hamilton E, Vahdat L, Han HS, et al. First-in-human safety and activity of ARV-471, a novel PROTAC® estrogen receptor degrader, in ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82(4 suppl): Abstract nr PD13-08.
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurvitz S, Schott AF, Ma C et al. ARV-471, a PROTAC® estrogen receptor (ER) degrader in advanced ER-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer: phase 2 expansion (VERITAC) of a phase 1/2 study. Presented at SABCS 2022. December 6-10, 2022. Abstract GS3-03. Hurvitz S, Schott AF, Ma C et al. ARV-471, a PROTAC® estrogen receptor (ER) degrader in advanced ER-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer: phase 2 expansion (VERITAC) of a phase 1/2 study. Presented at SABCS 2022. December 6-10, 2022. Abstract GS3-03.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat He W, Zhang H, Perkins L et al. Abstract PS18-09: novel chimeric small molecule AC682 potently degrades estrogen receptor with oral anti-tumor efficacy superior to fulvestrant. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_suppl): PS18 09. He W, Zhang H, Perkins L et al. Abstract PS18-09: novel chimeric small molecule AC682 potently degrades estrogen receptor with oral anti-tumor efficacy superior to fulvestrant. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4_suppl): PS18 09.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Korpal M, Puyang X, Furman C, et al. Development of a first-in-class oral selective ERα covalent antagonist (SERCA) for the treatment of ERαWT and ERαMUT breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4 suppl): Abstract nr P1-10-08. Korpal M, Puyang X, Furman C, et al. Development of a first-in-class oral selective ERα covalent antagonist (SERCA) for the treatment of ERαWT and ERαMUT breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4 suppl): Abstract nr P1-10-08.
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Puyang X, Furman C, Banka D, et al. Discovery of selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists for the treatment of ER alpha WT and ER alpha MUT breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1176–93.PubMedCrossRef Puyang X, Furman C, Banka D, et al. Discovery of selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists for the treatment of ER alpha WT and ER alpha MUT breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1176–93.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton EP, Wang JS, Pluard T, et al. Phase I/II trial of H3B-6545, a novel selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonist (SERCA), in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-)advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4 suppl): Abstract nr PD8-06. Hamilton EP, Wang JS, Pluard T, et al. Phase I/II trial of H3B-6545, a novel selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonist (SERCA), in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-)advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(4 suppl): Abstract nr PD8-06.
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodges-Gallagher L, Sun R, Myles D, et al. OP-1250: a potent orally available complete antagonist of estrogen receptor-mediated signaling that shrinks wild type and mutant breast tumors. Eur J Cancer. 2020;138:S55.CrossRef Hodges-Gallagher L, Sun R, Myles D, et al. OP-1250: a potent orally available complete antagonist of estrogen receptor-mediated signaling that shrinks wild type and mutant breast tumors. Eur J Cancer. 2020;138:S55.CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel M, Alemany C, Mitri Z et al Preliminary data from a phase I/II, multicenter, dose escalation study of OP-1250, an oral CERAN/SERD, in subjects with advanced and/or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancerCancer Res 2022;82 (4_suppl):P1-17-12. Patel M, Alemany C, Mitri Z et al Preliminary data from a phase I/II, multicenter, dose escalation study of OP-1250, an oral CERAN/SERD, in subjects with advanced and/or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancerCancer Res 2022;82 (4_suppl):P1-17-12.
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Alemany C, Patel M, Mitri Z, et al. A phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion study of OP-1250 in adults with advanced and/or metastatic hormone receptorpositive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) Breast Cancer (NCT04505826). Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(12_suppl):P037.CrossRef Alemany C, Patel M, Mitri Z, et al. A phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion study of OP-1250 in adults with advanced and/or metastatic hormone receptorpositive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) Breast Cancer (NCT04505826). Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(12_suppl):P037.CrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton E, Meisel J, Alemany C, et al. Phase 1b results from OP-1250-001, a dose escalation and dose expansion study of OP-1250, an oral CERAN, in subjects with advanced and/or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (NCT04505826). Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:S36.CrossRef Hamilton E, Meisel J, Alemany C, et al. Phase 1b results from OP-1250-001, a dose escalation and dose expansion study of OP-1250, an oral CERAN, in subjects with advanced and/or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (NCT04505826). Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:S36.CrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne C, Richards DA, Wilks ST et al. SABCS 2020 A phase 1 study of D-0502, an orally bioavailable SERD, for advanced or metastatic HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2021;81(4 suppl): Abstract nr PS11-26. Osborne C, Richards DA, Wilks ST et al. SABCS 2020 A phase 1 study of D-0502, an orally bioavailable SERD, for advanced or metastatic HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2021;81(4 suppl): Abstract nr PS11-26.
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Jhaveri K, Jeselsohn R, Lim E et al. A phase 1a/b trial of imlunestrant (LY3484356), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (aBC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer (EEC): monotherapy results from EMBER. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):1021. Jhaveri K, Jeselsohn R, Lim E et al. A phase 1a/b trial of imlunestrant (LY3484356), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (aBC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer (EEC): monotherapy results from EMBER. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(no. 16_suppl):1021.
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Maglakelidze M, Bulat I, Ryspayeva D, et al. Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, in combination with palbociclib for ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer: phase 1 results. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(no. 15_suppl):1063. Maglakelidze M, Bulat I, Ryspayeva D, et al. Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, in combination with palbociclib for ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer: phase 1 results. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(no. 15_suppl):1063.
Metadaten
Titel
Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer
verfasst von
Mythili Shastry, PhD
Erika Hamilton, MD
Publikationsdatum
02.05.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2023
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01079-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Studie zur HIFU bei Prostatakrebs lässt viele Fragen offen

Führt eine HIFU-Ablation beim Prostatakarzinom im Vergleich mit einer radikalen Prostatektomie zu ähnlichen onkologischen, aber besseren funktionalen Ergebnissen? Interimsdaten der französischen HIFI-Studie sind uneindeutig. In einem Kommentar zur Studie werden zumindest drei allgemeine Erkenntnisse herausgearbeitet.

Adipositas als negativer Prognosefaktor bei Kindern mit Krebs

Eine kanadische Studie weist darauf hin, dass Übergewicht zum Zeitpunkt der Krebsdiagnose ein unabhängiger Risikofaktor für schlechtere Überlebenschancen bei erkrankten Kindern und Jugendlichen sein könnte. Allerdings sind nicht alle Patientinnen und Patienten gleichermaßen betroffen.


Polypen bei nahen Verwandten – erhöhtes Darmkrebsrisiko

Werden bei erstgradigen Verwandten gutartige Darmpolypen identifiziert, ist das Risiko, selbst an einem Kolorektalkarzinom zu erkranken, deutlich erhöht – vor allem das für eine früh beginnende Erkrankung. Hier könnte sich eine frühe Koloskopie besonders lohnen.

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.