Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Esophagus 2/2019

01.04.2019 | Original Article

Novel prognostic score of postoperative complications after transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 90 consecutive patients

verfasst von: Takahiro Saito, Kimitaka Tanaka, Yuma Ebihara, Yo Kurashima, Soichi Murakami, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Satoshi Hirano

Erschienen in: Esophagus | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer, but has a high rate of postoperative complications. Some studies reported the various scoring system to estimate the postoperative complications. However, there were according to various surgical methods and included intra- and post-operative factors. Recently, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is becoming the first-line treatment for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors of postoperative complications and to establish a useful system for predicting postoperative complications after transthoracic MIE.

Methods

From 2007 to 2015, 90 patients who underwent transthoracic MIE at our department were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative complication: patients with major complications (n = 32) and without major complications (n = 58). Major complication was defined as ≥ IIIa in the Clavien–Dindo classification.

Results

Multivariate analysis identified four independent risk factors for predicting postoperative complications: age [≥ 70 years; odd ratio (OR) 6.88; p = 0.001]; sex (male; OR 5.24; p = 0.031); total protein level (< 6.7 mg/dl; OR 6.51; p = 0.002), and C-reactive protein level (≥ 0.15; OR, 6.58; p = 0.001). These four factors were used to establish a score. The complication rate for scores 0–4 were 0, 11, 36, 71, 100%, respectively. The frequency of major complications was significantly associated with the score (p < 0.001). Receiver operator characteristic curves to predict the score with regard to major complications showed an area under the curve value of 0.798 (95% confidence interval: 0.696–0.871, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our novel score may help to decide surgical intervention for esophagectomy and provide appropriate resources for perioperative management.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, et al. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1893–907.CrossRef Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, et al. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1893–907.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, et al. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut. 2011;60:1449–72.CrossRefPubMed Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, et al. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut. 2011;60:1449–72.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13.CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;21:1662–9.CrossRef Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;21:1662–9.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Hiroaki M, Ozawa Soji, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1821–7.CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi H, Hiroaki M, Ozawa Soji, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1821–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi H, Hiroaki M, Mitsukazu G, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRef Takeuchi H, Hiroaki M, Mitsukazu G, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, Maris AK, et al. Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1938–45.CrossRefPubMed Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, Maris AK, et al. Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1938–45.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson MK, Celauro AD, Prachand V. Assessment of a scoring system for predicting complications after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:510–5.CrossRefPubMed Ferguson MK, Celauro AD, Prachand V. Assessment of a scoring system for predicting complications after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:510–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble F, Curtis N, Harris S, et al. Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1083–95.CrossRefPubMed Noble F, Curtis N, Harris S, et al. Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1083–95.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2015;45:346–54.CrossRefPubMed Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2015;45:346–54.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lv L, Hu W, Ren Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:6751–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lv L, Hu W, Ren Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:6751–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review. Surg Today. 2016;46:275–84.CrossRefPubMed Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review. Surg Today. 2016;46:275–84.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuda N, Shichinohe T, Ebihara Y, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus the lateral position (hand-assisted thoracoscopic surgery): a retrospective cohort study of 127 consecutive esophageal cancer patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27:179–82.CrossRefPubMed Fukuda N, Shichinohe T, Ebihara Y, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus the lateral position (hand-assisted thoracoscopic surgery): a retrospective cohort study of 127 consecutive esophageal cancer patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27:179–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.CrossRefPubMed Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Viklund P, Linblad M, Lu M, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg. 2006;243:204–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Viklund P, Linblad M, Lu M, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg. 2006;243:204–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, et al. Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1083–9.CrossRefPubMed Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, et al. Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1083–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatematsu N, Park M, Tanaka E, et al. Association between physical activity and postoperative complications after esophagectomy for cancer: a prospective observational study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:47–51.CrossRefPubMed Tatematsu N, Park M, Tanaka E, et al. Association between physical activity and postoperative complications after esophagectomy for cancer: a prospective observational study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:47–51.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wichmann MW, Muller C, Hornung HM, et al. Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed Wichmann MW, Muller C, Hornung HM, et al. Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuoka K, Kuroda A, Kang A, et al. Surgical results of video-assisted thoracic surgery and risk factors for prolonged hospitalization for secondary pneumothorax in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;19:18–23.CrossRefPubMed Matsuoka K, Kuroda A, Kang A, et al. Surgical results of video-assisted thoracic surgery and risk factors for prolonged hospitalization for secondary pneumothorax in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;19:18–23.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:224–44.CrossRef Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:224–44.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Groblewska M, Mroczko B, Sosnowska D, et al. Interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein in esophageal cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1583–90.CrossRefPubMed Groblewska M, Mroczko B, Sosnowska D, et al. Interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein in esophageal cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1583–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gockel I, Dirksen K, Messow CM, et al. Significance of preoperative C-reactive protein as a parameter of the perioperative course and long-term prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;21:3746–50.CrossRef Gockel I, Dirksen K, Messow CM, et al. Significance of preoperative C-reactive protein as a parameter of the perioperative course and long-term prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;21:3746–50.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nozoe T, Korenaga D, Futatsugi M, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of C-reactive protein in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus—significance as a tumor marker. Cancer Lett. 2003;192:89–95.CrossRefPubMed Nozoe T, Korenaga D, Futatsugi M, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of C-reactive protein in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus—significance as a tumor marker. Cancer Lett. 2003;192:89–95.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda M, Natsugoe S, Ueno S, et al. Significant host- and tumor-related factors for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:197–202.PubMedPubMedCentral Ikeda M, Natsugoe S, Ueno S, et al. Significant host- and tumor-related factors for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:197–202.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida N, Harada K, Baba Y, et al. Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) is useful to estimate the prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402:333–41.CrossRefPubMed Yoshida N, Harada K, Baba Y, et al. Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) is useful to estimate the prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402:333–41.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutta S, Al-Mrabt NM, Fullarton GM, et al. A comparison of POSSUM and GPS models in the prediction of post-operative outcome in patients undergoing oesophago-gastric cancer resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2808–17.CrossRefPubMed Dutta S, Al-Mrabt NM, Fullarton GM, et al. A comparison of POSSUM and GPS models in the prediction of post-operative outcome in patients undergoing oesophago-gastric cancer resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2808–17.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Novel prognostic score of postoperative complications after transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 90 consecutive patients
verfasst von
Takahiro Saito
Kimitaka Tanaka
Yuma Ebihara
Yo Kurashima
Soichi Murakami
Toshiaki Shichinohe
Satoshi Hirano
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Esophagus / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-018-0645-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Esophagus 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.