nach oben

06.09.2024 | Review

Nursing care services to address unmet supportive care needs among cancer survivors: a systematic review

verfasst von: Hyun Jin Song, Hyun-Ju Seo, Eun Jeong Choi, Ji Sung Lee, Yumi Choi

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The increasing population of cancer survivors poses a significant challenge for healthcare systems globally, necessitating comprehensive post-treatment care to address diverse physical, psychological, and social needs.

Objective

This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the current evidence concerning the unmet needs for nursing services among cancer survivors, spanning various dimensions of survivorship care.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, to identify relevant studies investigating the unmet needs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) of nursing services led by nurses among cancer survivors. The final search update was conducted in June 2024. Unmet needs dimensions were categorized by the biopsychosocial-spiritual framework.

Results

Of the 9503 records searched, 18 studies were included. This review revealed mixed findings in the domains of unmet needs and interventions aimed at addressing them. While nurse-led interventions showed promise in addressing physical and daily living needs, outcomes related to psychological and emotional needs varied across studies. Additionally, nurse-led interventions were effective in addressing patient-clinician communication and health system/information needs, although statistical significance was not consistently observed. HRQOL assessments using general and cancer-specific measures yielded mixed findings.

Conclusions

Despite limitations of the risk of bias of included studies and weak study designs for evaluating nurse-led intervention effects for cancer survivors, the findings highlight the potential of nursing practice to significantly contribute to improving unmet needs of physical, psychological, and social perspectives and ultimately improving their HRQOL. However, the impact on the spiritual needs of nursing care services is limited by the low number of studies.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

By providing comprehensive support and management, nursing practice can enhance post-treatment outcomes and HRQOL for cancer survivors, contributing to more patient-centered and effective care delivery. More rigorous research considering a biopsychosocial-spiritual perspective to help cancer survivors improve HRQOL is needed.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Duijts SFA, Spelten ER. Cancer survivorship issues: dissemination and translation of evidence-based knowledge. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(22):5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225794.CrossRefPubMed

American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2019–2021. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2019.

Boyes AW, Girgis A, Zucca AC, Lecathelinais C. Anxiety and depression among long-term survivors of cancer in Australia: results of a population-based survey. Med J Aust. 2009;190(S7):S94–8. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02479.x.CrossRefPubMed

Peltier A, van Velthoven R, Roumeguère T. Current management of erectile dysfunction after cancer treatment. Curr Opin Oncol. 2009;21(4):303–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0b013e32832b9d76.CrossRefPubMed

Monterosso L, Platt V, Bulsara M, Berg M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient reported outcomes for nurse-led models of survivorship care for adult cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;73:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.12.007.CrossRefPubMed

Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ. What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(8):1117–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5.CrossRefPubMed

Corner J. The role of nurse-led care in cancer management. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(10):631–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01223-3.CrossRefPubMed

Sebri V, Triberti S, Pravettoni G. The self’s choice: priming attentional focus on bodily self promotes loss frequency bias. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(1):378–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01400-8.CrossRef

Truant TLO, Lambert LK, Thorne S. Barriers to equity in cancer survivorship care: perspectives of cancer survivors and system stakeholders. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021;8:23333936211006704. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211006703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Chan L, Dewart G. A call for nurse practitioner-led cancer survivorship clinics: the need for development and adoption within Ontario Canada. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2023;33(2):260–8. https://doi.org/10.5737/23688076332260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Mead KH, Raskin S, Willis A, Arem H, Murtaza S, Charney L, Pratt-Chapman M. Identifying patients’ priorities for quality survivorship: conceptualizing a patient-centered approach to survivorship care. J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14(6):939–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00905-8.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):W65-94. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136.CrossRefPubMed

13.

World Bank Open Data. High income [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank; [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/income-level/high-income. Accessed 19 Jun 2024.

14.

Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: the Cochrane Collaboration, Version 6.3. 2023. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current. Assessed on 1 January 2023.

15.

Moore THM, Higgins JPT, Dwan K. Ten tips for successful assessment of risk of bias in randomized trials using the RoB 2 tool: early lessons from Cochrane. Cochrane Ev Synth. 2023;1:e12031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12031.CrossRef

16.

Seo HJ, Kim SY, Lee YJ, Park JE. RoBANS 2: a revised risk of bias assessment tool for nonrandomized studies of interventions. Korean J Fam Med. 2023;44(5):249–60. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0034.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

JBI Critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Accessed 4 Aug 2024.

18.

Alemania E, Hind A, Samara J, Turner M, Ralph N, Paterson C. Nurse-led interventions among older adults affected by cancer: an integrative review. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023;10(10):100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100289.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Kusnanto H, Agustian D, Hilmanto D. Biopsychosocial model of illnesses in primary care: a hermeneutic literature review. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2018;7(3):497–500. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_145_17.CrossRef

20.

Harrison S, Jones HE, Martin RM, Lewis SJ, Higgins JPT. The albatross plot: a novel graphical tool for presenting results of diversely reported studies in a systematic review. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8(3):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1239.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, Katikireddi SV, Brennan SE, Ellis S, Hartmann-Boyce J, Ryan R, Shepperd S, Thomas J, Welch V, Thomson H. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Stiller A, Zajdlewicz L, Nielsen L, Wittman D, Oliffe JL, Ralph N, Dunn J. Five-year outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of a couples-based intervention for men with localised prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2019;28(4):775–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5019.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Girgis A, Breen S, Stacey F, Lecathelinais C. Impact of two supportive care interventions on anxiety, depression, quality of life, and unmet needs in patients with nonlocalized breast and colorectal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6180–90. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8718.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Harrison JD, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Butow PN, Secomb R, Masya L. Randomized pilot evaluation of the supportive care intervention “CONNECT” for people following surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(5):622–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820bc152.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Jefford M, Gough K, Drosdowsky A, Russell L, Aranda S, Butow P, Phipps-Nelson J, Young J, Krishnasamy M, Ugalde A, King D, Strickland A, Franco M, Blum R, Johnson C, Ganju V, Shapiro J, Chong G, Charlton J, Haydon A, Schofield P. A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led supportive care package (SurvivorCare) for survivors of colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2016;21(8):1014–23. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Malmström M, Ivarsson B, Klefsgård R, Persson K, Jakobsson U, Johansson J. The effect of a nurse led telephone supportive care programme on patients’ quality of life, received information and health care contacts after oesophageal cancer surgery-a six month RCT-follow-up study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;64:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.009.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Schofield P, Gough K, Lotfi-Jam K, Bergin R, Ugalde A, Dudgeon P, Crellin W, Schubach K, Foroudi F, Tai KH, Duchesne G, Sanson-Fisher R, Aranda S. Nurse-led group consultation intervention reduces depressive symptoms in men with localised prostate cancer: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:637. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2687-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Stevenson W, Bryant J, Watson R, Sanson-Fisher R, Oldmeadow C, Henskens F, Brown C, Ramanathan S, Tiley C, Enjeti A, Guest J, Tzelepis F, Paul C, D’Este C. A multi-center randomized controlled trial to reduce unmet needs, depression, and anxiety among hematological cancer patients and their support persons. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020;38(3):272–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2019.1692991.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Watson EK, Shinkins B, Matheson L, Burns RM, Frith E, Neal D, Hamdy F, Walter FM, Weller D, Wilkinson C, Faithfull S, Sooriakumaran P, Kastner C, Campbell C, Neal RD, Butcher H, Matthews M, Perera R, Wolstenholme J, Rose PW. Supporting prostate cancer survivors in primary care: findings from a pilot trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention (PROSPECTIV). Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;32:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2017.12.002.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Young JM, Butow PN, Walsh J, Durcinoska I, Dobbins TA, Rodwell L, Harrison JD, White K, Gilmore A, Hodge B, Hicks H, Smith S, O’Connor G, Byrne CM, Meagher AP, Jancewicz S, Sutherland A, Ctercteko G, Pathma-Nathan N, Curtin A, Townend D, Abraham NS, Longfield G, Rangiah D, Young CJ, Eyers A, Lee P, Fisher D, Solomon MJ. Multicenter randomized trial of centralized nurse-led telephone-based care coordination to improve outcomes after surgical resection for colorectal cancer: the CONNECT intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3585–91. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.1036.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Young J, Harrison J, Solomon M, Butow P, Dennis R, Robson D, Auld S. Development and feasibility assessment of telephone-delivered supportive care to improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer: pilot study of the CONNECT intervention. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(4):461–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0689-0.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Jefford M, Lotfi-Jam K, Baravelli C, Grogan S, Rogers M, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Milne D, Aranda S, King D, Shaw B, Schofield P. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led posttreatment support package for bowel cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(3):E1-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f22f02.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Reb A, Ruel N, Fakih M, Lai L, Salgia R, Ferrell B, Sampath S, Kim JY, Raz DJ, Sun V. Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;29:125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Ahern T, Gardner A, Courtney M. Exploring patient support by breast care nurses and geographical residence as moderators of the unmet needs and self-efficacy of Australian women with breast cancer: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;23:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2016.05.001.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Cockle-Hearne J, Charnay-Sonnek F, Denis L, Fairbanks HE, Kelly D, Kav S, Leonard K, van Muilekom E, Fernandez-Ortega P, Jensen BT, Faithfull S. The impact of supportive nursing care on the needs of men with prostate cancer: a study across seven European countries. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(8):2121–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Cox K, Wilson E, Heath L, Collier J, Jones L, Johnston I. Preferences for follow-up after treatment for lung cancer: assessing the nurse-led option. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(3):176–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200605000-00003.CrossRefPubMed

37.

van Hezewijk M, Ranke GM, van Nes JG, Stiggelbout AM, de Bock GH, van de Velde CJ. Patients’ needs and preferences in routine follow-up for early breast cancer; an evaluation of the changing role of the nurse practitioner. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(9):765–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.007.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bidstrup PE, Johansen C, Kroman N, Belmonte F, Duriaud H, Dalton SO, Andersen KG, Mertz B. Effect of a nurse navigation intervention on mental symptoms in patients with psychological vulnerability and breast cancer: the REBECCA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2319591. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19591.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

DeGuzman PB, Horton BJ, Bernacchi V, Jameson MJ. A Telemedicine-delivered nursing intervention for cancer-related distress in rural survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2022;49(5):455–60. https://doi.org/10.1188/22.ONF.455-460.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Miller M, Vachon E, Kwekkeboom K. Cancer-related symptom frameworks using a biopsychosocial-spiritual perspective: a scoping review. West J Nurs Res. 2023;45(10):963–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459231193698.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Moghaddam N, Coxon H, Nabarro S, Hardy B, Cox K. Unmet care needs in people living with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(8):3609–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3221-3.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Lisy K, Langdon L, Piper A, Jefford M. Identifying the most prevalent unmet needs of cancer survivors in Australia: a systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(5):e68–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13176.CrossRefPubMed

43.

de Leeuw J, Prins JB, Teerenstra S, Merkx MA, Marres HA, van Achterberg T. Nurse-led follow-up care for head and neck cancer patients: a quasi-experimental prospective trial. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(2):537–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1553-1.CrossRefPubMed

44.

van der Meulen IC, May AM, de Leeuw JR, Koole R, Oosterom M, Hordijk GJ, Ros WJ. Long-term effect of a nurse-led psychosocial intervention on health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(3):593–601. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.733.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Carey M, Lambert S, Smits R, Paul C, Sanson-Fisher R, Clinton-McHarg T. The unfulfilled promise: a systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(2):207–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1327-1.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Puchalski CM. Spirituality in the cancer trajectory. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 3):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds088.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Saad M, de Medeiros R, Mosini AC. Are we ready for a true biopsychosocial-spiritual model? The many meanings of “spiritual.” Medicines (Basel). 2017;4(4):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4040079.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Li T, Hu X, Chi I. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on interventions adopting body-mind-spirit (BMS) model on holistic well-being. J Evid Based Integr Med. 2022;27:2515690X221103303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X221103303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Chen YH, Lin LC, Hsiung Y, Wu SC. Effects of a biopsychosocial-spiritual group therapy on quality of life among institutionalized older adults with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023;32(5):1335–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13172.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Nursing care services to address unmet supportive care needs among cancer survivors: a systematic review
verfasst von: Hyun Jin Song
Hyun-Ju Seo
Eun Jeong Choi
Ji Sung Lee
Yumi Choi
Publikationsdatum: 06.09.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01661-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Polypen bei nahen Verwandten – erhöhtes Darmkrebsrisiko

20.01.2025
Risikofaktoren für Krebserkrankungen
Nachrichten

Werden bei erstgradigen Verwandten gutartige Darmpolypen identifiziert, ist das Risiko, selbst an einem Kolorektalkarzinom zu erkranken, deutlich erhöht – vor allem das für eine früh beginnende Erkrankung. Hier könnte sich eine frühe Koloskopie besonders lohnen.

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

16.01.2025
Künstliche Intelligenz im Gesundheitswesen
Nachrichten

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Welche Krebserkrankungen bei Zöliakie häufiger auftreten

16.01.2025
Zöliakie
Nachrichten

Eine große Kohortenstudie hat den Zusammenhang zwischen Zöliakie und gastrointestinalen Krebserkrankungen und inflammatorischen Krankheiten untersucht. Neben gastrointestinalen Tumoren ist auch ein nicht solider Krebs häufiger.

Adjuvanter PD-L1-Hemmer verhindert Rezidive bei Hochrisiko-Urothelkarzinom

15.01.2025
Urothelkarzinom
Nachrichten

Sind Menschen mit muskelinvasivem Urothelkarzinom für die neoadjuvante platinbasierte Therapie nicht geeignet oder sprechen sie darauf nicht gut an, ist Pembrolizumab eine adjuvante Alternative: Die krankheitsfreie Lebenszeit wird dadurch mehr als verdoppelt.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen