Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 1/2018

30.10.2017 | Original Article

Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training

verfasst von: Matthew S. Holden, Chang Nancy Wang, Kyle MacNeil, Ben Church, Lawrence Hookey, Gabor Fichtinger, Tamas Ungi

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters.

Methods

We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked.

Results

The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices.

Conclusion

We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall JB (1995) Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 42:287–291CrossRefPubMed Marshall JB (1995) Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 42:287–291CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA (2000) Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 95:3418–3422CrossRefPubMed Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA (2000) Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 95:3418–3422CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM, Watson MO, Karamatic R, Basit TA, Wallis GM, Riek S, Burgess-Limerick R, Hewett DG (2012) Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of 4 simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 75:631–640CrossRefPubMed Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM, Watson MO, Karamatic R, Basit TA, Wallis GM, Riek S, Burgess-Limerick R, Hewett DG (2012) Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of 4 simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 75:631–640CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Preisler L, Svendsen MB, Nerup N, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2015) Simulation-based training for colonoscopy: establishing criteria for competency. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e440CrossRef Preisler L, Svendsen MB, Nerup N, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2015) Simulation-based training for colonoscopy: establishing criteria for competency. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e440CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW, Canto M, Sivak MV (1996) Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 44:54–57CrossRefPubMed Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW, Canto M, Sivak MV (1996) Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 44:54–57CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM, Sadik R, Sroka G, Anvari M, Thaler K, Adrales GL, Hazey JW, Lightdale JR, Velanovich V, Swanstrom LL, Mellinger JD, Fried GM (2010) Global assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopic skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 24:1834–1841CrossRefPubMed Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM, Sadik R, Sroka G, Anvari M, Thaler K, Adrales GL, Hazey JW, Lightdale JR, Velanovich V, Swanstrom LL, Mellinger JD, Fried GM (2010) Global assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopic skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 24:1834–1841CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, Pearl JP (2013) Simulated colonoscopy objective performance evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 27:4073–4080CrossRefPubMed Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, Pearl JP (2013) Simulated colonoscopy objective performance evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 27:4073–4080CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, Al-Haddad MA, Bakis G, Christie JA, Davila RE, DeGregorio B, DiMaio CJ, Enestvedt BK, Jorgensen J, Mullady DK, Rajan L (2014) ASGEś assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 79:1–7CrossRefPubMed Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, Al-Haddad MA, Bakis G, Christie JA, Davila RE, DeGregorio B, DiMaio CJ, Enestvedt BK, Jorgensen J, Mullady DK, Rajan L (2014) ASGEś assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 79:1–7CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, Cooper MA, Grover SC, May G, Walters TD, Rabeneck L, Reznick R, Carnahan H (2014) Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:798–807CrossRefPubMed Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, Cooper MA, Grover SC, May G, Walters TD, Rabeneck L, Reznick R, Carnahan H (2014) Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:798–807CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, Grover SC, Yu JJ, Cooper MA, Yong E, Nguyen GC, May G, Walters TD, Reznick R, Rabeneck L, Carnahan H (2015) Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: reliability and validity evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1417–1424CrossRefPubMed Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, Grover SC, Yu JJ, Cooper MA, Yong E, Nguyen GC, May G, Walters TD, Reznick R, Rabeneck L, Carnahan H (2015) Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: reliability and validity evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1417–1424CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A (2007) Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills. J Am Coll Surg 204:697–705CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A (2007) Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills. J Am Coll Surg 204:697–705CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiley CE, Lin HC, Yuh DD, Hager GD (2011) Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc 25:356–366CrossRefPubMed Reiley CE, Lin HC, Yuh DD, Hager GD (2011) Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc 25:356–366CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ansell J, Mason J, Warren N, Donnelly P, Hawkes N, Dolwani S, Torkington J (2012) Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation. Surg Endosc 26:3040–3052CrossRefPubMed Ansell J, Mason J, Warren N, Donnelly P, Hawkes N, Dolwani S, Torkington J (2012) Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation. Surg Endosc 26:3040–3052CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Triantafyllou K, Lazaridis LD, Dimitriadis GD (2014) Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6:6–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Triantafyllou K, Lazaridis LD, Dimitriadis GD (2014) Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6:6–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ (2016) Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 65:607–615CrossRefPubMed Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ (2016) Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 65:607–615CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch AD, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J, Botden SM, Veenendaal R, Jakimowicz JJ, Schoon EJ (2008) Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 22:158–162CrossRefPubMed Koch AD, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J, Botden SM, Veenendaal R, Jakimowicz JJ, Schoon EJ (2008) Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 22:158–162CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayez R, Feldman LS, Kaneva P, Fried GM (2010) Testing the construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II virtual reality colonoscopy simulator metrics: module matters. Surg Endosc 24:1060–1065CrossRefPubMed Fayez R, Feldman LS, Kaneva P, Fried GM (2010) Testing the construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II virtual reality colonoscopy simulator metrics: module matters. Surg Endosc 24:1060–1065CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDonald J, Ketchum J, Williams RG, Rogers LQ (2003) A lay person versus a trained endoscopist: can the preop endoscopy simulator detect a difference? Surg Endosc 17:896–898CrossRefPubMed MacDonald J, Ketchum J, Williams RG, Rogers LQ (2003) A lay person versus a trained endoscopist: can the preop endoscopy simulator detect a difference? Surg Endosc 17:896–898CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Haycock AV, Bassett P, Bladen J, Thomas-Gibson S (2009) Validation of the second-generation Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment. Endoscopy 41:952–958CrossRefPubMed Haycock AV, Bassett P, Bladen J, Thomas-Gibson S (2009) Validation of the second-generation Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment. Endoscopy 41:952–958CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS, Cresp AS, Watson MO, Ooi SY, Riek S, Wallis GM, Burgess-Limerick R, Hewett DG (2012) Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 76:144–150CrossRefPubMed Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS, Cresp AS, Watson MO, Ooi SY, Riek S, Wallis GM, Burgess-Limerick R, Hewett DG (2012) Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 76:144–150CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Svendsen MB, Preisler L, Hillingsoe JG, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2014) Using motion capture to assess colonoscopy experience level. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6:193–199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Svendsen MB, Preisler L, Hillingsoe JG, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2014) Using motion capture to assess colonoscopy experience level. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6:193–199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem DA, Rattner DW, Gee DW (2014) Endoscopic simulator curriculum improves colonoscopy performance in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model. Surg Endosc 28:1494–1499CrossRefPubMed Telem DA, Rattner DW, Gee DW (2014) Endoscopic simulator curriculum improves colonoscopy performance in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model. Surg Endosc 28:1494–1499CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat MacNeil K, Wang CN, Holden MS, Ungi T, Fichtinger G, Hookey L (2016) System for objectively evaluating colonoscopy procedural skills using motion analysis. In: 14th annual imaging network Ontario symposium MacNeil K, Wang CN, Holden MS, Ungi T, Fichtinger G, Hookey L (2016) System for objectively evaluating colonoscopy procedural skills using motion analysis. In: 14th annual imaging network Ontario symposium
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Fichtinger G (2014) PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61:2527–2537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Fichtinger G (2014) PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61:2527–2537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ungi T, Sargent D, Moult E, Lasso A, Pinter C, McGraw RC, Fichtinger G (2012) Perk Tutor: an open-source training platform for ultrasound-guided needle insertions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:3475–3481CrossRefPubMed Ungi T, Sargent D, Moult E, Lasso A, Pinter C, McGraw RC, Fichtinger G (2012) Perk Tutor: an open-source training platform for ultrasound-guided needle insertions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:3475–3481CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat McGraw R, Chaplin T, McKaigney C, Rang L, Jaeger M, Redfearn D, Davison C, Ungi T, Holden M, Yeo C, Keri Z, Fichtinger G (2016) Development and evaluation of a simulation-based curriculum for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. In: CJEM, pp 1–9 McGraw R, Chaplin T, McKaigney C, Rang L, Jaeger M, Redfearn D, Davison C, Ungi T, Holden M, Yeo C, Keri Z, Fichtinger G (2016) Development and evaluation of a simulation-based curriculum for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. In: CJEM, pp 1–9
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohankumar D, Garner H, Ruff K, Ramirez FC, Fleischer D, Wu Q, Santello M (2014) Characterization of right wrist posture during simulated colonoscopy: an application of kinematic analysis to the study of endoscopic maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 79:480–489CrossRefPubMed Mohankumar D, Garner H, Ruff K, Ramirez FC, Fleischer D, Wu Q, Santello M (2014) Characterization of right wrist posture during simulated colonoscopy: an application of kinematic analysis to the study of endoscopic maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 79:480–489CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, Carnahan H (2009) Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med 84:S54–S57CrossRefPubMed Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, Carnahan H (2009) Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med 84:S54–S57CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Romano J, Kromrey JD, Coraggio J, Skowronek J (2006) Appropriate statistics for ordinal level data: should we really be using t-test and Cohen’s d for evaluating group differences on the NSSE and other surveys. In: Annual meeting of the Florida Association of Institutional Research Romano J, Kromrey JD, Coraggio J, Skowronek J (2006) Appropriate statistics for ordinal level data: should we really be using t-test and Cohen’s d for evaluating group differences on the NSSE and other surveys. In: Annual meeting of the Florida Association of Institutional Research
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bond CF, Titus LJ (1983) Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol Bull 94:265–292CrossRefPubMed Bond CF, Titus LJ (1983) Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol Bull 94:265–292CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nerup N, Preisler L, Svendsen MBS, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2015) Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool. Gastrointest Endosc 81:548–554CrossRefPubMed Nerup N, Preisler L, Svendsen MBS, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2015) Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool. Gastrointest Endosc 81:548–554CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Preisler L, Svendsen SMB, Søndergaard B, Brink L, Nordentoft T, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2016) Automatic and unbiased assessment of competence in colonoscopy: exploring validity of the Colonoscopy Progression Score CoPS. Endosc Int Open 4:E1238–E1243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Preisler L, Svendsen SMB, Søndergaard B, Brink L, Nordentoft T, Svendsen LB, Konge L (2016) Automatic and unbiased assessment of competence in colonoscopy: exploring validity of the Colonoscopy Progression Score CoPS. Endosc Int Open 4:E1238–E1243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Konge L, Svendsen MBS, Preisler L, Svendsen LB, Park YS (2017) Combining different methods improves assessment of competence in colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 52:601–605CrossRefPubMed Konge L, Svendsen MBS, Preisler L, Svendsen LB, Park YS (2017) Combining different methods improves assessment of competence in colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 52:601–605CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training
verfasst von
Matthew S. Holden
Chang Nancy Wang
Kyle MacNeil
Ben Church
Lawrence Hookey
Gabor Fichtinger
Tamas Ungi
Publikationsdatum
30.10.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.