Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2017

03.05.2017 | Review

Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review

verfasst von: N. J. Curtis, J. Davids, J. D. Foster, N. K. Francis

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown.

Aim

To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials.

Methods

A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs.

Results

A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool.

Conclusion

Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003145
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer On pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer On pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363CrossRefPubMed Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Leonard D, Penninckx F, Laenen A, Kartheuser A (2015) Scoring the quality of total mesorectal excision for the prediction of cancer-specific outcome. Colorectal Dis 17(5):O115–O122CrossRefPubMed Leonard D, Penninckx F, Laenen A, Kartheuser A (2015) Scoring the quality of total mesorectal excision for the prediction of cancer-specific outcome. Colorectal Dis 17(5):O115–O122CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Sickle KR, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2007) The effect of escalating feedback on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 21(2):220–224CrossRefPubMed Van Sickle KR, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2007) The effect of escalating feedback on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 21(2):220–224CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349(22):2117–2127CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349(22):2117–2127CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW, Wexner SD, Park A, Marks J et al (2008) Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(5):746–750CrossRefPubMed Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW, Wexner SD, Park A, Marks J et al (2008) Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(5):746–750CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster JD, Mackenzie H, Nelson H, Hanna GB, Francis NK (2014) Methods of quality assurance in multicenter trials in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 260(2):220–229CrossRefPubMed Foster JD, Mackenzie H, Nelson H, Hanna GB, Francis NK (2014) Methods of quality assurance in multicenter trials in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 260(2):220–229CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: Is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18(1):19–36CrossRefPubMed Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: Is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18(1):19–36CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg [Epub ahead of print] Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg [Epub ahead of print]
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar SR, Wiggins T, Ni M, Steyerberg EW, Van Lanschot JJ, Sasako M et al (2015) Assessment of the quality of surgery within randomised controlled trials for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 16(1):e23–e31CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Wiggins T, Ni M, Steyerberg EW, Van Lanschot JJ, Sasako M et al (2015) Assessment of the quality of surgery within randomised controlled trials for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 16(1):e23–e31CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets GL, Pierie JP, Wiggers T et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005200 Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets GL, Pierie JP, Wiggers T et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005200
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52(6):377–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52(6):377–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarker SK, Kumar I, Delaney C (2010) Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34(7):1594–1603CrossRefPubMed Sarker SK, Kumar I, Delaney C (2010) Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34(7):1594–1603CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarker SK, Delaney C (2011) Feasibility of self-appraisal in assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 13(7):805–810CrossRefPubMed Sarker SK, Delaney C (2011) Feasibility of self-appraisal in assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 13(7):805–810CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Kennedy RH, Francis NK, Parvaiz A et al (2013) Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Ann Surg 257(3):476–482CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Kennedy RH, Francis NK, Parvaiz A et al (2013) Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Ann Surg 257(3):476–482CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB (2012) Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc 26(3):796–803CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB (2012) Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc 26(3):796–803CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25(4):1136–1142CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25(4):1136–1142CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins JT, Currie A, Sala S, Kennedy RH (2016) A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain. Surg Endosc 30(7):3007–3013CrossRefPubMed Jenkins JT, Currie A, Sala S, Kennedy RH (2016) A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain. Surg Endosc 30(7):3007–3013CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Costanzi A, Rigamonti L, Mari GM, Miranda A, Crippa J, Berardi V et al (2015) A prospective video-controlled study of genito-urinary disorders in 35 consecutive laparoscopic TMEs for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29(7):1721–1728CrossRefPubMed Costanzi A, Rigamonti L, Mari GM, Miranda A, Crippa J, Berardi V et al (2015) A prospective video-controlled study of genito-urinary disorders in 35 consecutive laparoscopic TMEs for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29(7):1721–1728CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster JD, Ewings P, Falk S, Cooper EJ, Roach H, West NP et al (2016) Surgical timing after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, analysis of technique (STARRCAT): results of a feasibility multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 20(10):683–693CrossRefPubMed Foster JD, Ewings P, Falk S, Cooper EJ, Roach H, West NP et al (2016) Surgical timing after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, analysis of technique (STARRCAT): results of a feasibility multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 20(10):683–693CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Marriott J, Purdie H, Crossley J, Beard JD (2011) Evaluation of procedure-based assessment for assessing trainees’ skills in the operating theatre. Br J Surg 98(3):450–457CrossRefPubMed Marriott J, Purdie H, Crossley J, Beard JD (2011) Evaluation of procedure-based assessment for assessing trainees’ skills in the operating theatre. Br J Surg 98(3):450–457CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Penna M, Hompes R, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Francis NK (2016) First international training and assessment consensus workshop on transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Tech Coloproctol 20(6):343–352CrossRefPubMed Penna M, Hompes R, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Francis NK (2016) First international training and assessment consensus workshop on transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Tech Coloproctol 20(6):343–352CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenzie H, Ni M, Miskovic D, Motson RW, Gudgeon M, Khan Z et al (2015) Clinical validity of consultant technical skills assessment in the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 102(8):991–997CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie H, Ni M, Miskovic D, Motson RW, Gudgeon M, Khan Z et al (2015) Clinical validity of consultant technical skills assessment in the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 102(8):991–997CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster JD, Miskovic D, Allison AS, Conti JA, Ockrim J, Cooper EJ et al (2016) Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 20(6):361–367CrossRefPubMed Foster JD, Miskovic D, Allison AS, Conti JA, Ockrim J, Cooper EJ et al (2016) Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 20(6):361–367CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R (2011) The national training programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13(6):614–616CrossRefPubMed Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R (2011) The national training programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13(6):614–616CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery—a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29(6):409–414CrossRefPubMed Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery—a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29(6):409–414CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang B, Hanna GB, Joice P, Cuschieri A (2004) Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139(11):1215–1220CrossRefPubMed Tang B, Hanna GB, Joice P, Cuschieri A (2004) Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139(11):1215–1220CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645CrossRefPubMed Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R, Blazeby JM, Quirke P, West NP et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32(17):1804–1811CrossRefPubMed Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R, Blazeby JM, Quirke P, West NP et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32(17):1804–1811CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRefPubMed Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Rickles AS, Dietz DW, Chang GJ, Wexner SD, Berho ME, Remzi FH et al (2015) High rate of positive circumferential resection margins following rectal cancer surgery: a call to action. Ann Surg 262(6):891–898CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rickles AS, Dietz DW, Chang GJ, Wexner SD, Berho ME, Remzi FH et al (2015) High rate of positive circumferential resection margins following rectal cancer surgery: a call to action. Ann Surg 262(6):891–898CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Gravante G, Hemingway D, Stephenson JA, Sharpe D, Osman A, Haines M et al (2016) Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors. J Surg Oncol 114(5):642–648CrossRefPubMed Gravante G, Hemingway D, Stephenson JA, Sharpe D, Osman A, Haines M et al (2016) Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors. J Surg Oncol 114(5):642–648CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H et al (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261(4):716–722CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H et al (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261(4):716–722CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C et al (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215CrossRefPubMed Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C et al (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review
verfasst von
N. J. Curtis
J. Davids
J. D. Foster
N. K. Francis
Publikationsdatum
03.05.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1614-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.