Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2010

01.04.2010

Observer Study for Evaluating Potential Utility of a Super-High-Resolution LCD in the Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Digital Mammograms

verfasst von: Junji Shiraishi, Hiroyuki Abe, Katsuhiro Ichikawa, Robert A. Schmidt, Kunio Doi

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We evaluated the potential utility of a newly developed liquid-crystal display (LCD), which used an independent sub-pixel drive (ISD) technique for increasing the spatial resolution of a standard LCD three times in one direction, by use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and a two-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) method to determine improvement in radiologists’ accuracy in the detection of clustered microcalcifications (MCLs) on digital mammograms. We used a standard LCD without and with the ISD technique, which can increase the spatial resolution of the LCD three times in one direction from three mega- to nine megapixels without changes in the size of the display. We used 60 single views of digital mammograms (30 with and 30 without clustered MCLs) for ROC studies and 60 regions of interest (ROIs) with clustered MCLs for 2AFC studies. In the ROC study, seven radiologists attempted to detect clustered MCLs without and with the ISD on the same LCD. In the 2AFC study, the same observer group compared the visibility of MCLs by use of the LCD without and with the ISD. Our institutional review board approved the use of this database and the participation of radiologists in this study. The accuracy in detecting clustered MCLs in the ROC study was improved by use of the LCD with the ISD, but the improvement was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). However, the superiority of the LCD with the ISD was demonstrated as significant (p < 0.001) in the 2AFC study. An LCD with ISD can improve the visibility of clustered MCLs when high-resolution digital mammograms are available.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Doi K: Diagnostic imaging over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology. Phys Med Biol 51:R5–R27, 2006CrossRefPubMed Doi K: Diagnostic imaging over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology. Phys Med Biol 51:R5–R27, 2006CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, et al: Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 223:483–488, 2002CrossRefPubMed Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, et al: Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 223:483–488, 2002CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783, 2005CrossRefPubMed Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783, 2005CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders RS, Samei E, Baker J, et al: Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol 13:1317–1326, 2006CrossRefPubMed Saunders RS, Samei E, Baker J, et al: Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol 13:1317–1326, 2006CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Poolla A, Ulissey MJ, Lewin JM: Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays. Acad Radiol 14:539–546, 2007CrossRefPubMed Samei E, Poolla A, Ulissey MJ, Lewin JM: Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays. Acad Radiol 14:539–546, 2007CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, et al: Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study. Eur Radiol 17:1365–1371, 2007CrossRefPubMed Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, et al: Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study. Eur Radiol 17:1365–1371, 2007CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HH, Pisano ED, Cole EB, et al: Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:47–50, 2006CrossRefPubMed Kim HH, Pisano ED, Cole EB, et al: Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:47–50, 2006CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa K, Hasegawa M, Kimura N, Kodera Y: A new resolution enhancement technology using the independent sub-pixel driving for the medical liquid crystal displays. IEEE/OSA J Display Technol 4(4):377–382, 2008CrossRef Ichikawa K, Hasegawa M, Kimura N, Kodera Y: A new resolution enhancement technology using the independent sub-pixel driving for the medical liquid crystal displays. IEEE/OSA J Display Technol 4(4):377–382, 2008CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Loo LN, Doi K, Metz CE: A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. Phys Med Biol 29:837–856, 1984CrossRefPubMed Loo LN, Doi K, Metz CE: A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. Phys Med Biol 29:837–856, 1984CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiraishi J, Abe H, Engelmann R, Aoyama M, MacMahon H, Doi K: Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists’ performance–initial experience. Radiology 227:469–474, 2003CrossRefPubMed Shiraishi J, Abe H, Engelmann R, Aoyama M, MacMahon H, Doi K: Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists’ performance–initial experience. Radiology 227:469–474, 2003CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731, 1992CrossRefPubMed Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731, 1992CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz CE, Pan X: “Proper” binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psych 43:1–33, 1997CrossRef Metz CE, Pan X: “Proper” binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psych 43:1–33, 1997CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Muramatsu C, Li Q, Schmidt RA, Shiraishi J, Suzuki K, Newstead GM, Doi K: Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Med Phys 34:2890–2895, 2007CrossRefPubMed Muramatsu C, Li Q, Schmidt RA, Shiraishi J, Suzuki K, Newstead GM, Doi K: Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Med Phys 34:2890–2895, 2007CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Krupinski EA, Siddiqui K, Siegel E, Shrestha R, Grant E, Roehrig H, Fan J: Influence of 8-bit vs 11-bit digital displays on observer performance and visual search: a multi-center evaluation. J Soc Inf Disp 15:385–390, 2007CrossRef Krupinski EA, Siddiqui K, Siegel E, Shrestha R, Grant E, Roehrig H, Fan J: Influence of 8-bit vs 11-bit digital displays on observer performance and visual search: a multi-center evaluation. J Soc Inf Disp 15:385–390, 2007CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989CrossRefPubMed Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz CE: ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 1:2–12, 2008CrossRef Metz CE: ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 1:2–12, 2008CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ: Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 116:533–538, 1975PubMed Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ: Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 116:533–538, 1975PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz CE, Starr SJ, Lusted LB: Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Prediction and analysis using a generalized ROC approach. Radiology 121:337–347, 1976PubMed Metz CE, Starr SJ, Lusted LB: Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Prediction and analysis using a generalized ROC approach. Radiology 121:337–347, 1976PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner RF, Metz CE, Campbell G: Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol 14:723–748, 2007CrossRefPubMed Wagner RF, Metz CE, Campbell G: Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol 14:723–748, 2007CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Observer Study for Evaluating Potential Utility of a Super-High-Resolution LCD in the Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Digital Mammograms
verfasst von
Junji Shiraishi
Hiroyuki Abe
Katsuhiro Ichikawa
Robert A. Schmidt
Kunio Doi
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9192-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.