Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2016

29.12.2015 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse: a nationwide population-based study in Japan

verfasst von: Junichi Hasegawa, Tomoaki Ikeda, Akihiko Sekizawa, Isamu Ishiwata, Katsuyuki Kinoshita, On behalf of Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Tokyo, Japan

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To demonstrate the clinical course and the obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse.

Methods

The clinical course of reported cases of umbilical cord prolapse that occurred in Japan between 2007 and 2011 was retrospectively analyzed. The obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse were investigated by a nationwide population-based case-cohort study.

Results

Three hundred and sixty-nine cases (0.018 %) of fore-lying/prolapsed umbilical cord in 2,037,460 deliveries were analyzed. Most cases of fore-lying umbilical cord were diagnosed by an ultrasound scan (78 %), whereas umbilical cord prolapse was most frequently diagnosed by an internal examination (63 %). Umbilical cord prolapse was found to be significantly associated with the following factors: multiple pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 3.57; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.60, 4.90], non-vertex presentation (OR 4.67; 95 %CI 3.73, 5.86), preterm labor (OR 2.28; 95 %CI 1.83, 2.83), premature rupture of membranes (OR 3.84; 95 %CI 3.10, 4.77), prolapsed amniotic bag (OR 12.31; 95 %CI 9.00, 16.85), polyhydramnios (OR 2.89; 95 %CI 1.49, 5.61), and a birth weight of <2500 g (OR 2.26; 95 %CI 1.84, 2.79).

Conclusion

The current study is the largest in Japan to demonstrate the obstetric clinical course and risk factors associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Prolapsed amniotic bag, labor and rupture of membrane during premature period, and fetal abnormal presentation induced by multiple pregnancy, and polyhydramnios were high risk situation for umbilical cord prolapse.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M (2004) Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet 84:127–132CrossRef Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M (2004) Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet 84:127–132CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1999) Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 16:479–484CrossRefPubMed Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1999) Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 16:479–484CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR (1994) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in washington state. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618CrossRefPubMed Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR (1994) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in washington state. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang JP, Chen CP, Chen CP, Wang KG, Wang KL (2012) Term pregnancy with umbilical cord prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 51:375–380CrossRefPubMed Huang JP, Chen CP, Chen CP, Wang KG, Wang KL (2012) Term pregnancy with umbilical cord prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 51:375–380CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Holbrook BD, Phelan ST (2013) Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 40:1–14CrossRef Holbrook BD, Phelan ST (2013) Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 40:1–14CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyle JJ, Katz VL (2005) Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Reprod Med 50:303–306PubMed Boyle JJ, Katz VL (2005) Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Reprod Med 50:303–306PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K (1990) Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med 35:690–692PubMed Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K (1990) Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med 35:690–692PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K (2015) Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (in press) Clinical risk factors for poor neonatal outcomes in umbilical cord prolapse. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:1–5 (Epub ahead of print) Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K (2015) Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (in press) Clinical risk factors for poor neonatal outcomes in umbilical cord prolapse. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:1–5 (Epub ahead of print)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K, Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (2015) The use of balloons for uterine cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of umbilical cord prolapse: population based questionnaire survey in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K, Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (2015) The use of balloons for uterine cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of umbilical cord prolapse: population based questionnaire survey in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y (2012) Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril 98:922–928CrossRefPubMed Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y (2012) Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril 98:922–928CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Unno S, Masuzaki H, Kanayama N, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Matsuda Y (2013) Report of perinatology committee. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 65:1377–1387 Unno S, Masuzaki H, Kanayama N, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Matsuda Y (2013) Report of perinatology committee. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 65:1377–1387
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ (1995) The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:826–830CrossRefPubMed Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ (1995) The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:826–830CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz Z, Lancet M, Borenstein R (1982) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:239–241PubMed Katz Z, Lancet M, Borenstein R (1982) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:239–241PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse: a nationwide population-based study in Japan
verfasst von
Junichi Hasegawa
Tomoaki Ikeda
Akihiko Sekizawa
Isamu Ishiwata
Katsuyuki Kinoshita
On behalf of Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Tokyo, Japan
Publikationsdatum
29.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3996-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.