Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019

02.03.2019 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Obstetrical outcomes of embryo reduction and fetal reduction compared to non-reduced twin pregnancies

verfasst von: Mi Sun Kim, Sukho Kang, Eun Duc Na, Jisun Im, Eunhee Ahn, Ji Eun Shin, Myoung Jin Moon

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To prevent perinatal morbidity and mortality of high-order multiple pregnancy (HOMP), multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) is offered to some patients. In this study, we investigated whether twin pregnancies derived from MPRs carry a higher adverse obstetrical outcome compared to non-reduced control group of twins.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data from HOMPs on which transvaginal ER (n = 153) at a mean gestational age of 7.6 weeks or transabdominal FR (n = 59) at a mean gestational age of 12.4 weeks was performed between December 2006 and January 2018. The risk of each procedure was evaluated by comparing obstetrical outcome with that of a control population of 157 non-reduced twins conceived by infertility treatment.

Results

The mean gestational ages at delivery were 35.2 weeks in the ER group, 35.7 weeks in the FR group, and 34.1 weeks in the control group (P = NS). Compared with those in the control group, the ER group had higher miscarriage (1.3% vs. 6.5%; P = 0.047; OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.45–0.898) and higher overall fetal loss (3.8% vs. 14.4%; P = 0.003; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09–0.60) rates. Differently compared with those in the control group, the FR group had no statistical difference in miscarriage (2.5% vs. 1.7%; P=NS) and overall fetal loss (3.8% vs. 6.8%; P=NS) rates.

Conclusions

Compared with the control group, ER in twins had a higher miscarriage and fetal loss rate, whereas FR in twins was similar to the control group. So, the FR procedure is overall a better and safer approach of MPR in reducing morbidity and mortality in HOMPs.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wang H, Chen GC, Yang J, Yu H, Yang TB (2017) Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection among multiple births: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(3):577–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4291-2 CrossRefPubMed Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wang H, Chen GC, Yang J, Yu H, Yang TB (2017) Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection among multiple births: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(3):577–597. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00404-017-4291-2 CrossRefPubMed
5.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, Lau TK, Papageorghiou AT, Raine-Fenning NJ, Stirnemann J, Suresh S, Tabor A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Toi A, Yeo G (2013) ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41(1):102–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12342 CrossRef Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, Lau TK, Papageorghiou AT, Raine-Fenning NJ, Stirnemann J, Suresh S, Tabor A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Toi A, Yeo G (2013) ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41(1):102–113. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​uog.​12342 CrossRef
11.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Coffler MS, Kol S, Drugan A, Itskovitz-Eldor J (1999) Early transvaginal embryo aspiration: a safer method for selective reduction in high order multiple gestations. Hum Reprod 14(7):1875–1878CrossRefPubMed Coffler MS, Kol S, Drugan A, Itskovitz-Eldor J (1999) Early transvaginal embryo aspiration: a safer method for selective reduction in high order multiple gestations. Hum Reprod 14(7):1875–1878CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, Sartor BM, Storment JM, Rye PH, Pelletier WD, Zender JL, Matulich EM (2002) Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(1):77–83CrossRefPubMed Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, Sartor BM, Storment JM, Rye PH, Pelletier WD, Zender JL, Matulich EM (2002) Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(1):77–83CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang YL, Wang XY, Wang F, Su YC, Sun YP (2015) Clinical analysis of spontaneous pregnancy reduction in the patients with multiple pregnancies undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(3):4575–4580PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang YL, Wang XY, Wang F, Su YC, Sun YP (2015) Clinical analysis of spontaneous pregnancy reduction in the patients with multiple pregnancies undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(3):4575–4580PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Kamal A, Amin YM (1999) Multifetal pregnancy reduction: modification of the technique and analysis of the outcome. Fertil Steril 71(2):380–384CrossRefPubMed Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Kamal A, Amin YM (1999) Multifetal pregnancy reduction: modification of the technique and analysis of the outcome. Fertil Steril 71(2):380–384CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Antsaklis AJ, Drakakis P, Vlazakis GP, Michalas S (1999) Reduction of multifetal pregnancies to twins does not increase obstetric or perinatal risks. Hum Reprod 14(5):1338–1340CrossRefPubMed Antsaklis AJ, Drakakis P, Vlazakis GP, Michalas S (1999) Reduction of multifetal pregnancies to twins does not increase obstetric or perinatal risks. Hum Reprod 14(5):1338–1340CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Obstetrical outcomes of embryo reduction and fetal reduction compared to non-reduced twin pregnancies
verfasst von
Mi Sun Kim
Sukho Kang
Eun Duc Na
Jisun Im
Eunhee Ahn
Ji Eun Shin
Myoung Jin Moon
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05089-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.