Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Sports Medicine 9/2020

10.07.2020 | Systematic Review

Occupational Physical Activity and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Benny Rana, Liang Hu, Andrew Harper, Chao Cao, Cheryl Peters, Darren Brenner, Lin Yang

Erschienen in: Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To deliver a systematic review of the literature synthesizing data on the association of occupational physical activity with lung cancer risk in observational studies.

Design

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Data Source

A literature search was performed in the electronic databases of PubMed/Medline and Embase.

Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies

We screened peer-reviewed articles from prospective cohort and case–control studies assessing the association of occupational physical activity with lung cancer risk. A sex-specific meta-analysis assessed the association of high (compared to low/sedentary) level occupational physical activity with lung cancer risk, estimating the relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

The systematic search identified 2065 articles, among which, eight journal articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis adjusted for age, smoking status and/or intensity, with a pooled sample size of 532,282 participants (men: 219,410; women: 312,872). A random-effect model of four prospective and four case–control studies indicated that men who engage in high-level occupational physical activity had a 15% higher risk (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04–1.28) of lung cancer than those engaging in low/sedentary-level occupational physical activity. There was no association observed among women (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.77–1.34) based on three available studies (prospective cohort: n = 2; case–control: n = 1).

Conclusions

Findings from the review suggest a higher risk of lung cancer among men reporting high-level occupational physical activity. Further prospective studies incorporating rigorous measures of domain-specific physical activity, detailed smoking status and intensity, and other occupational exposures are needed to elucidate this association.

PROSPERO Registration ID

CRD42019137911.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analyses for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):1533–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.CrossRef Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analyses for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):1533–68. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jamaoncol.​2018.​2706.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong S, Ma T, Chen L, Chen W, Lv M, Zhang X, Zhao J. Physical activity and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26:173–81.PubMedCrossRef Zhong S, Ma T, Chen L, Chen W, Lv M, Zhang X, Zhao J. Physical activity and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26:173–81.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DR, Boffetta P, Duell E, et al. Previous lung diseases and lung cancer risk: a pooled analysis from the international lung cancer consortium. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(7):573–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brenner DR, Boffetta P, Duell E, et al. Previous lung diseases and lung cancer risk: a pooled analysis from the international lung cancer consortium. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(7):573–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and lung cancer. http://dietandcancerreport.org. Accessed 1 Nov 2019. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and lung cancer. http://​dietandcancerrep​ort.​org. Accessed 1 Nov 2019.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, et al. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sport Med. 2018;52:149–50.CrossRef Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, et al. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sport Med. 2018;52:149–50.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Steel L, Ho FK, Sillars A, Petermann-Rocha F, Li H, Lyall DM, Iliodromiti S, Welsh P, Anderson J, Mackay DF, Pell JP, Sattar N, Gill JM, Gray SR, Celis-Morales CA. Dose-response associations of cardiorepiratry fitness with all-cause mortality and incidence and moratality of caner and cardiovascular and respiratory disease: the UK Biobank cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099093.CrossRef Steel L, Ho FK, Sillars A, Petermann-Rocha F, Li H, Lyall DM, Iliodromiti S, Welsh P, Anderson J, Mackay DF, Pell JP, Sattar N, Gill JM, Gray SR, Celis-Morales CA. Dose-response associations of cardiorepiratry fitness with all-cause mortality and incidence and moratality of caner and cardiovascular and respiratory disease: the UK Biobank cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bjsports-2018-099093.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DR, Poirier A, Grundy A, Khandwala F, McFadden A, Friendenreich C. Cancer incidence attributable to inadequate physical activity in Alberta in 2012. CMAJO. 2017;5(2):E338.CrossRef Brenner DR, Poirier A, Grundy A, Khandwala F, McFadden A, Friendenreich C. Cancer incidence attributable to inadequate physical activity in Alberta in 2012. CMAJO. 2017;5(2):E338.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Akl E, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, deBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Akl E, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, deBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395–400.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395–400.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann H, Oxman A, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt G. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6.PubMedCrossRef Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann H, Oxman A, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt G. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl E, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y, Norris S, Williams J, Atkins D, Meerpohjl J, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–15.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl E, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y, Norris S, Williams J, Atkins D, Meerpohjl J, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–15.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams J, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Akl E, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277–82.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams J, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Akl E, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277–82.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori V, Freyschuss B, Vist G, Jaeschke R, Williams J, Murad M, Sinclair D, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Whittington C, Thorlund K, Andrews J, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283–93.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori V, Freyschuss B, Vist G, Jaeschke R, Williams J, Murad M, Sinclair D, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Whittington C, Thorlund K, Andrews J, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283–93.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Akl E, Norris S, Vist G, Dahm P, Shukla V, Higgins J, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–302.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Akl E, Norris S, Vist G, Dahm P, Shukla V, Higgins J, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–302.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Falck-Ytter Y, Jaeschke R, Vist G, Akl EA. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303–10.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Falck-Ytter Y, Jaeschke R, Vist G, Akl EA. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303–10.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl E, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad M, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311–6.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl E, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad M, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman A, Lord J, Sisk J, Ruiz F, Hill S, Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Helfand M, Harbour R, Davoli M, Amato L, Liberati A, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):140–50.PubMedCrossRef Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman A, Lord J, Sisk J, Ruiz F, Hill S, Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Helfand M, Harbour R, Davoli M, Amato L, Liberati A, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):140–50.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman A, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Akl E, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):151–7.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Akl E, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):151–7.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Coenen P, Huysmans MA, Holtermann A, et al. Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193, 696 participants. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1320–6.PubMedCrossRef Coenen P, Huysmans MA, Holtermann A, et al. Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193, 696 participants. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1320–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Colbert L, Hartman T, Tangrea J, Pietinen P, Virtamo J, Taylor P, Albanes D. Physical activity and lung cancer risk in male smokers. Int J Cancer. 2002;98(5):770–3.PubMedCrossRef Colbert L, Hartman T, Tangrea J, Pietinen P, Virtamo J, Taylor P, Albanes D. Physical activity and lung cancer risk in male smokers. Int J Cancer. 2002;98(5):770–3.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Thune I, Lund E. The influence of physical activity on lung-cancer risk: a prospective study of 81,516 men and women. Int J Cancer. 1997;70(1):57–62.PubMedCrossRef Thune I, Lund E. The influence of physical activity on lung-cancer risk: a prospective study of 81,516 men and women. Int J Cancer. 1997;70(1):57–62.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Dosemeci M, Hayes R, Vetter R, Hoover R, Tucker M, Engin K, Blair A. Occupational physical activity, socioeconomic status, and risks of 15 cancer sites in Turkey. Cancer Causes Control CCC. 1993;4(4):313–21.PubMedCrossRef Dosemeci M, Hayes R, Vetter R, Hoover R, Tucker M, Engin K, Blair A. Occupational physical activity, socioeconomic status, and risks of 15 cancer sites in Turkey. Cancer Causes Control CCC. 1993;4(4):313–21.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Holtermann A, Hansen JV, Burr H, et al. The health paradox of occupational and leisure-time physical activity. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:291–5.PubMedCrossRef Holtermann A, Hansen JV, Burr H, et al. The health paradox of occupational and leisure-time physical activity. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:291–5.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Holtermann A, Marott JL, Gyntelberg F, et al. Occupational and leisure-time physical activity: risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000556.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Holtermann A, Marott JL, Gyntelberg F, et al. Occupational and leisure-time physical activity: risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000556.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Clays E, Lidegaard M, De Bacquer D, et al. The combined relationship of occupational and leisure–time physical activity with all-cause mortality among men, accounting for physical fitness. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:559–66.PubMedCrossRef Clays E, Lidegaard M, De Bacquer D, et al. The combined relationship of occupational and leisure–time physical activity with all-cause mortality among men, accounting for physical fitness. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:559–66.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinner P, Folsom A, Harnack L, Eberly L, Schmitz K. The association of physical activity with lung cancer incidence in a cohort of older women: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15(12):2359–63.CrossRef Sinner P, Folsom A, Harnack L, Eberly L, Schmitz K. The association of physical activity with lung cancer incidence in a cohort of older women: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15(12):2359–63.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallman DM, Mathiassen SE, Gupta N, et al. Differences between work and leisure in temporal patterns of objectively measured physical activity among blue-collar workers. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:976.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hallman DM, Mathiassen SE, Gupta N, et al. Differences between work and leisure in temporal patterns of objectively measured physical activity among blue-collar workers. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:976.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Beenackers MA, Kamphuis CB, Giskes K, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Beenackers MA, Kamphuis CB, Giskes K, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Chida Y, Hamer M, Wardle J, Steptoe A. Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2008;5(8):466.CrossRef Chida Y, Hamer M, Wardle J, Steptoe A. Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2008;5(8):466.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Backé EM, Seidler A, Latza U, Rossnagel K, Schumann B. The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(1):67–79.PubMedCrossRef Backé EM, Seidler A, Latza U, Rossnagel K, Schumann B. The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(1):67–79.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam A-JR, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl Med Overseas Ed. 2008;358:2468–81.CrossRef Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam A-JR, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl Med Overseas Ed. 2008;358:2468–81.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadgraft N, Lynch B, Clark B, Healy G, Owen N, Dunstan D. Excessive sitting at work and at home: correlates of occupational sitting and TV viewing time in working adults. BMC Public. 2015;5:6. (https://doi.org/10.186/s12889-015-2243-y). Hadgraft N, Lynch B, Clark B, Healy G, Owen N, Dunstan D. Excessive sitting at work and at home: correlates of occupational sitting and TV viewing time in working adults. BMC Public. 2015;5:6. (https://doi.org/10.186/s12889-015-2243-y).
Metadaten
Titel
Occupational Physical Activity and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Benny Rana
Liang Hu
Andrew Harper
Chao Cao
Cheryl Peters
Darren Brenner
Lin Yang
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Sports Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01312-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Sports Medicine 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.