Unfortunately, only a small percent of pathological gamblers seek the professional help they need. In the current study, we test the idea that individual differences in reward sensitivity should predict whether a pathological gambler has sought treatment—the odds of treatment seeking should decrease as reward sensitivity increases. This hypothesis rests on the proposition that reward sensitive pathological gamblers should find treatment seeking aversive because doing so would remove a route to reward. We also tested those motivations to gamble that are positively reinforcing (social affliction and self-enhancement) as a possible mechanism by which reward sensitivity undermines treatment seeking—we did not anticipate negatively reinforcing motivations (e.g., coping) to be a mechanistic variable. Ninety-two pathological gamblers completed a large-scale survey that contained the variables of interest. As predicted, pathological gamblers were less likely to have sought treatment as reward sensitivity increased. Moreover, this relationship was mediated by social affiliation motivations to gamble, but not self-enhancement or coping motives. Reward sensitive gamblers did not wish to seek treatment to the extent that they were motivated to gamble for the social interactions it provides—seeking treatment would cut this avenue of affiliation with others. In light of these results, we suggest health care professionals take reward sensitivity into account when trying to promote treatment seeking, to say nothing of the social affiliation motives that underlie the reward sensitivity-treatment seeking link.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Boyd, W. H. (1976). Excitement: The gambler’s drug. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and society (pp. 371–375). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishments: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. CrossRef
Cloninger, C. R. (1988). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states: A reply to commentaries. Psychiatric Developments, 5, 83–120.
Coventry, K. R., & Brown, R. L. (2006). Sensation seeking, gambling and gambling addictions. Addiction, 88, 541–554. CrossRef
Fowles, D. C. (1987). Application of a behavioral theory of motivation to the concepts of anxiety and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 417–435. CrossRef
Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). New York: Springer. CrossRef
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kambouropoulos, N., & Staiger, P. K. (2002). The influence of sensitivity to reward on reactivity to alcohol-related cues. Addiction, 96, 1175–1185. CrossRef
Lesieur, H. R. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Books.
Li, C. S. R., Huang, C. Y., Lin, W. Y., & Sun, C. W. V. (2007). Gender differences in punishment and reward sensitivity in a sample of Taiwanese college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 475–483. CrossRef
Neighbours, C., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2002). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 361–370. CrossRef
Papini, M. R., Wood, M., Daniel, A. M., & Norris, J. N. (2006). Reward loss as psychological pain. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 182–213.
Prochaska, J. Q., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change (pp. 3–27). New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef
Reuter, M., Schmitz, A., Conrr, P., & Hennig, J. (2005). Molecular genetics support Gray’s personality theory: The interaction of COMT and DRD2 polymorphisms predicts the behavioural approach system. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 1, 1–12.
Smillie, L. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2005). The appetitive motivation scale and other BAS measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 981–994. CrossRef
Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Molto, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862. CrossRef
Wohl, M. J. A., Young, M. M., & Hart, K. E. (2005). Untreated young gamblers with game-specific problems: Self concept involving luck, gambling ecology and delay in seeking professional treatment. Addiction Research and Theory, 13, 445–459. CrossRef
Wynne, H. (1994). A description of problem gamblers in Alberta: A secondary analysis of the gambling and problem gambling in Alberta study. Edmonton: Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission.
- On Being Attracted to the Possibility of a Win: Reward Sensitivity (via Gambling Motives) Undermines Treatment Seeking Among Pathological Gamblers
Michael J. A. Wohl
Justin F. McManus
John D. H. Stead
- Springer US