Skip to main content
main-content

21.06.2017 | Ausgabe 3-4/2017

Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 3-4/2017

On the use of summary comorbidity measures for prognosis and survival treatment effect estimation

Zeitschrift:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology > Ausgabe 3-4/2017
Autoren:
Elizabeth A. Gilbert, Robert T. Krafty, Richard J. Bleicher, Brian L. Egleston
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s10742-017-0171-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Prognostic scores have been proposed as outcome based confounder adjustment scores akin to propensity scores. However, prognostic scores have not been widely used in the substantive literature. Instead, comorbidity scores, which are limited versions of prognostic scores, have been used extensively by clinical and health services researchers. A comorbidity is an existing disease an individual has in addition to a primary condition of interest, such as cancer. Comorbidity scores are used to reduce the dimension of a vector of comorbidity variables into a single scalar variable. Such scores are often added to regression models with other non-comorbidity variables such as age and sex, both for analyzing prognosis and for confounder adjustment when analyzing treatment effects. Despite their widespread use, the properties of and conditions under which comorbidity scores are valid dimension reduction tools in statistical models is largely unknown. In this article, we show that under relatively standard assumptions, comorbidity scores can have equal prognostic and confounder-adjustment abilities as the individual comorbidity variables, but that biases can occur if there are additional effects, such as interactions, of covariates beyond that captured by the comorbidity score. Simulations were performed to illustrate empirical properties and a data example using breast cancer data from the SEER Medicare Database demonstrates the application of these results.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Zusatzmaterial
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 93 KB)
10742_2017_171_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2017

Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 3-4/2017 Zur Ausgabe