Oncocytoma managed by active surveillance in a transplant allograft kidney: a case report

The ethical implications of the utilization of kidneys that have been found to have solid renal masses (SRMs) in transplantation are the subject of lively debate in the transplantation community and beyond. One of such implications is that as the life expectancy of renal transplant patients improve, the prevalence of SRMs in donors is likely to increase [1, 2]. A recent review of the literature on SRMs in transplant allograft kidneys proposed a detailed management algorithm for the tumors in allograft kidneys that mirrors the clinical decision-making in the non-transplant population [3]. We report a case of an oncocytoma in a renal allograft complicating a deceased-donor kidney transplant in a 60-year-old woman.

The deceased donor was a 67-year-old man with a kidney Doppler ultrasound (DUS) that was negative for any nodular lesion. As part of the routine postoperative follow-up management, the recipient underwent DUS to assess the patency of the graft on postoperative day 1. The DUS finding was suspicious for an acute arterial thrombosis but did not reveal any focal irregularities. Consequently, a computed tomography (CT) scan was urgently obtained but it did not show any arterial complications. However, it serendipitously revealed a 2.4-cm lesion on the upper pole of the renal allograft which was not detected during the back-table or ultrasonography monitoring. A biopsy of the lesion was performed, and its histology revealed an epithelial proliferation of large cells with finely granular cytoplasm and medium round nucleus vesicular acidophilus, arranged tubules, and alveoli and cords immersed in a connective tissue stroma. This picture was consistent with oncocytoma. However, because the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may morphologically resemble renal oncocytoma, immunohistochemical staining was performed using Ki-67 antibodies and RCC antigens. The results were negative, ruling out chromophobe RCC. The therapeutic options and potential related outcomes were clearly discussed with the patient. Given the low risk of malignant transformation in an oncocytoma [4], we found no reason for resection of the lesion or an allograft nephrectomy. Consequently, we opted for active surveillance of the benign tumor with ultrasonography, every 2 months, for the first year and, then, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), every year (Fig. 1). The patient received mycophenolate-mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisone throughout the 5-year follow-up period and the regimen for immunosuppression was not changed despite the presence of the renal mass. After 60 months of active surveillance, we report that radiological studies have shown no growth, regression, or any other interim morphological changes to the lesion, and the patient is alive and well (Fig. 2).

Renal oncocytomas are considered benign kidney tumors [5] with an incidence of 3–7% among all solid renal neoplasms [6]. They are often diagnosed incidentally as SRMs and have traditionally been managed by nephrectomy as it is often suspected to be chromophobe RCC [6]. Treatment results are excellent, with only one case of metastatic tissue proven as oncocytoma reported in the literature [7, 8]. Thus, making a correct preoperative diagnosis of renal oncocytoma is vital as it can allow for the prevention of unnecessary and aggressive surgical procedures in both transplant and non-transplant patients. A recent study in the UK on the surgical management of renal oncocytomas showed a 0.4% 60-day mortality rate and a 20% in-hospital complication rate, including bleeding, pneumothorax, chest infection, splenectomy, wound infection, ileus, and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus [9]. Furthermore, an accurate preoperative diagnosis could be of benefit when an SRM is detected during living kidney donor evaluation or is found in kidneys from deceased donors. However, cohort studies are needed to better understand the effect of the active surveillance approach in the management of asymptomatic renal oncocytoma in the transplant population. This could, potentially, help alleviate some of the burden of an increasing demand for kidneys for transplantation as kidneys that were once abandoned could be put into good use in the right patients.

There are case reports of coexistent RCC associated with or even within oncocytomas, and we are not aware of any reports indicating that immunosuppressive regimen facilitates oncocytoma malignant transformation [4, 10]. Nevertheless, we recommend that clinicians remain mindful that the growth patterns of renal oncocytoma and those of RCC can be similar. Transparency and clinical clarity are two cornerstones in this act of sharing experiences with the medical community at large. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of oncocytoma managed by active surveillance in a transplant allograft kidney. Whether this scarcity in the literature reflects the rarity of the clinical phenomenon or a reluctance to report it when detected is not for our institute to speculate [3]. We would suggest to consider this clinical entity as a non-surgical oncologic disease, believing that although the risk of malignant transformation of oncocytoma is low in the non-transplant population, awareness of the risk and the use of appropriate protocols for informed consent and surgical decision-making is paramount for continued success in this delicate field of medicine.

We report a case of an oncocytoma in a renal allograft complicating a deceased-donor kidney transplant in a 60-year-old woman, managed by active surveillance.