Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2016

08.02.2016 | Colorectal Cancer

Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Robotic Resection for Rectal Cancer

verfasst von: Ui Sup Shin, MD, Y. Nancy You, MD, MHSc, Alexander T. Nguyen, MD, Brian K. Bednarski, MD, Craig Messick, MD, Dipen M. Maru, MD, Erin M. Dean, MS, Sa T. Nguyen, Chung-Yuan Hu, MPH, Phd, George J. Chang, MD, MS

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

Background

Surgery for locally advanced rectal cancers beyond the plane of total mesorectal excision (TME) or extramesorectal nodal involvement should include complete resection. This study evaluated the oncologic feasibility and safety of robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer beyond the TME plane.

Methods

The study analyzed the operative, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes for all patients who underwent robot-assisted extended rectal cancer surgery from April 2009 to February 2015.

Results

Of 36 patients, 22 underwent multivisceral en bloc resection, and 18 underwent extramesorectal lymph node (EMRLN) dissection. The median tumor location was 5 cm [interquartile range (IQR), 2.2–9.0 cm] from the anal verge. A total of 32 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The median body mass index of the patients was 26.8 kg/m2 (IQR, 24.0–31.9 kg/m2). Conversion was required for one patient because of inability to tolerate the Trendelenburg position. All the resections were R0, and there were no incomplete TMEs. The vagina and prostate or periprostatic structures were the most commonly resected (n = 13/22), and the lateral pelvic nodes were the most common EMRLNs (n = 16/18). The median numbers of examined mesorectal lymph nodes and EMRLNs were respectively 20 (IQR, 18.0–28.0) and 2.5 (IQR, 1.0–6.0). The median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 3.0–5.5 days). Six patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications, the most common of which was deep abscess (n = 5, 13.8 %). The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rate was 3.6 %.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive resection for rectal cancer can be performed with extended lymph node dissection or en bloc multivisceral resection using the surgical robot in selected patients. This technique is feasible and has acceptable morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:535–50.CrossRefPubMed Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:535–50.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JD, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Paty PB. Multivisceral resections for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1137–43.CrossRefPubMed Smith JD, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Paty PB. Multivisceral resections for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1137–43.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y. T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Colorect Dis. 2011;13:138–43.CrossRef Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y. T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Colorect Dis. 2011;13:138–43.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KY, Hwang DW, Park YK, Lee HS. A single surgeon’s experience with 54 consecutive cases of multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: can the laparoscopic approach be performed safely? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:493–500.CrossRefPubMed Kim KY, Hwang DW, Park YK, Lee HS. A single surgeon’s experience with 54 consecutive cases of multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: can the laparoscopic approach be performed safely? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:493–500.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1163–85.CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1163–85.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zerey M, Hawver LM, Awad Z, et al. SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1–10.CrossRefPubMed Zerey M, Hawver LM, Awad Z, et al. SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, Schaible A, Hinz U, Herfarth C. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;235:217–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, Schaible A, Hinz U, Herfarth C. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;235:217–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagasue Y, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open multivisceral resection for primary colorectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1299–305.CrossRefPubMed Nagasue Y, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open multivisceral resection for primary colorectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1299–305.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai A, Melich G, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Prasad LM. Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bird’s eye view. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11:29–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pai A, Melich G, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Prasad LM. Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bird’s eye view. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11:29–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim PC. Robotic-assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:310–11.CrossRefPubMed Lim PC. Robotic-assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:310–11.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin JW, Kim J, Kwak JM, et al. First report: robotic pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorect Dis. 2014;16:9–14.CrossRef Shin JW, Kim J, Kwak JM, et al. First report: robotic pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorect Dis. 2014;16:9–14.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kagawa H, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al. Robotic-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:995–1000.CrossRefPubMed Kagawa H, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al. Robotic-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:995–1000.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae SU, Saklani AP, Hur H, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of 21 consecutive series. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86:76–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bae SU, Saklani AP, Hur H, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of 21 consecutive series. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86:76–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210–8.CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061–8.CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75–82.CrossRefPubMed Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75–82.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Clancy C, O’Leary DP, Burke JP, et al. A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Colorect Dis. 2015;17:482–90.CrossRef Clancy C, O’Leary DP, Burke JP, et al. A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Colorect Dis. 2015;17:482–90.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang TX, Morris DL, Chua TC. Pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:519–31.CrossRefPubMed Yang TX, Morris DL, Chua TC. Pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:519–31.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Georgiou P, Tan E, Gouvas N, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1053–62.CrossRefPubMed Georgiou P, Tan E, Gouvas N, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1053–62.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hultman CS, Sherrill MA, Halvorson EG, et al. Utility of the omentum in pelvic floor reconstruction following resection of anorectal malignancy: patient selection, technical caveats, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:559–62.PubMed Hultman CS, Sherrill MA, Halvorson EG, et al. Utility of the omentum in pelvic floor reconstruction following resection of anorectal malignancy: patient selection, technical caveats, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:559–62.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Robotic Resection for Rectal Cancer
verfasst von
Ui Sup Shin, MD
Y. Nancy You, MD, MHSc
Alexander T. Nguyen, MD
Brian K. Bednarski, MD
Craig Messick, MD
Dipen M. Maru, MD
Erin M. Dean, MS
Sa T. Nguyen
Chung-Yuan Hu, MPH, Phd
George J. Chang, MD, MS
Publikationsdatum
08.02.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5117-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.