Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018

17.09.2018 | Breast Oncology

Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients

verfasst von: Viviana Galimberti, MD, Consuelo Morigi, MD, Vincenzo Bagnardi, PhD, Giovanni Corso, MD, Elisa Vicini, MD, Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro Fontana, MD, Paola Naninato, MD, Silvia Ratini, MD, Francesca Magnoni, MD, Antonio Toesca, MD, Andriana Kouloura, MD, Mario Rietjens, MD, Francesca De Lorenzi, MD, Andrea Vingiani, MD, Paolo Veronesi, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 13/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly used in women with breast cancer who are not eligible for conservative surgery, but extensive outcome data are lacking and indications have not been established.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes of NSM in a large series of patients with invasive or in situ breast cancer treated at a single center.

Methods

We analyzed 1989 consecutive women who had an NSM in 2003–2011, for invasive (1711 patients) or in situ cancer (278 patients) at the European Institute of Oncology, Italy, and followed-up to December 2016. Endpoints were local recurrences, recurrences in the nipple-areola complex (NAC), NAC necrosis, and overall survival (OS).

Results

After a median follow-up of 94 months (interquartile range 70–117), 91/1711 (5.3%) patients with invasive cancer had local recurrence (4.8% invasive disease, 0.5% in situ disease), and 11/278 (4.0%) patients with in situ disease had local recurrence (1.8% invasive disease, 2.2% in situ disease). Thirty-six (1.8%) patients had NAC recurrence, 9 with in situ disease (4 invasive and 5 in situ recurrences), and 27 with invasive disease (18 invasive and 9 in situ recurrences). NAC loss for necrosis occurred in 66 (3.3%) patients. There were 131 (6.6%) deaths, 109 (5.5%) as a result of breast cancer. OS at 5 years was 96.1% in women with invasive cancer and 99.2% in women with in situ disease.

Conclusions

The findings in this large series, with a median follow-up of nearly 8 years, indicate that NSM is oncologically safe for selected patients. The rate of NAC loss was acceptably low.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Luini A, et al. Breast cancer: from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment. Front Oncol. 2012;2:125.PubMedPubMedCentral Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Luini A, et al. Breast cancer: from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment. Front Oncol. 2012;2:125.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, et al. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast. 2007;16:387–95.CrossRef Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, et al. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast. 2007;16:387–95.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.CrossRef Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J. 2016;22:10–7.CrossRef Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J. 2016;22:10–7.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.CrossRef Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:591–95.CrossRef Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:591–95.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:885–99.CrossRef Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:885–99.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, et al. Patient satisfaction and nipple-areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: NSM versus SSM. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:145–52.CrossRef Van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, et al. Patient satisfaction and nipple-areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: NSM versus SSM. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:145–52.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRef Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sisco M, Yao KA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:883–90.CrossRef Sisco M, Yao KA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:883–90.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, et al. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1521–27.CrossRef Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, et al. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1521–27.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, et al. An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:156–64.CrossRef Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, et al. An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:156–64.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:905–9.CrossRef Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:905–9.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortunato L, Loreti A, Andrich R, et al. When mastectomy is needed: is the nipple-sparing procedure a new standard with very few contraindications? J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:207–12.CrossRef Fortunato L, Loreti A, Andrich R, et al. When mastectomy is needed: is the nipple-sparing procedure a new standard with very few contraindications? J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:207–12.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Özkurt E, Tükenmez M, Güven E, et al. Favorable outcome with close margins in patients undergoing nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: 5-year follow-up. Balkan Med J. 2018;35:84–92.CrossRef Özkurt E, Tükenmez M, Güven E, et al. Favorable outcome with close margins in patients undergoing nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: 5-year follow-up. Balkan Med J. 2018;35:84–92.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Orecchia R, Veronesi U. Intraoperative electrons. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:76–83.CrossRef Orecchia R, Veronesi U. Intraoperative electrons. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:76–83.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Gatti G, Luini A, et al. Intraoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer: technical notes. Breast J. 2003;9:106–12.CrossRef Veronesi U, Gatti G, Luini A, et al. Intraoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer: technical notes. Breast J. 2003;9:106–12.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorai K, Inoue K, Saegusa N, et al. Prediction of skin necrosis after mastectomy for breast cancer using indocyanine green angiography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(4):e1321.CrossRef Gorai K, Inoue K, Saegusa N, et al. Prediction of skin necrosis after mastectomy for breast cancer using indocyanine green angiography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(4):e1321.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat De Lorenzi F, Yamaguchi S, Petit JY, et al. Evaluation of skin perfusion after nipple-sparing mastectomy by indocyanine green dye. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005;24(3):347–54.PubMed De Lorenzi F, Yamaguchi S, Petit JY, et al. Evaluation of skin perfusion after nipple-sparing mastectomy by indocyanine green dye. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005;24(3):347–54.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;6:1141–54.CrossRef Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;6:1141–54.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, De Stavola BL, Love SB, et al. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:511–18.CrossRef Altman DG, De Stavola BL, Love SB, et al. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:511–18.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimo A, Tsugawa K, Tsuchiya S, et al. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:851–860.CrossRef Shimo A, Tsugawa K, Tsuchiya S, et al. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:851–860.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686–93.CrossRef Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686–93.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol. 2013;30:481.CrossRef Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol. 2013;30:481.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurberg T, Tramm T, Nielsen T, et al. Intrinsic subtypes and benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy in node-positive premenopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy: results from two independent randomized trials. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:38–43.CrossRef Laurberg T, Tramm T, Nielsen T, et al. Intrinsic subtypes and benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy in node-positive premenopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy: results from two independent randomized trials. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:38–43.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai SF, Chen YH, Kuo WH, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk for postmastectomy breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive lymph nodes receiving modern systemic treatment without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3860–69.CrossRef Lai SF, Chen YH, Kuo WH, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk for postmastectomy breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive lymph nodes receiving modern systemic treatment without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3860–69.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheer AS, Zih FS, Maki E, et al. Post-mastectomy radiation: should subtype factor into the decision? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2462–70.CrossRef Scheer AS, Zih FS, Maki E, et al. Post-mastectomy radiation: should subtype factor into the decision? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2462–70.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dominici LS, Mittendorf EA, Wang X, et al. Implications of constructed biologic subtype and its relationship to locoregional recurrence following mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R82.CrossRef Dominici LS, Mittendorf EA, Wang X, et al. Implications of constructed biologic subtype and its relationship to locoregional recurrence following mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R82.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12,358 procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43:328–38.CrossRef Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12,358 procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43:328–38.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:990–6.CrossRef Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:990–6.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.CrossRef Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Setälä L, Papp A, Joukainen S, et al. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:195–99.CrossRef Setälä L, Papp A, Joukainen S, et al. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:195–99.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A. A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:736–42.CrossRef O’Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A. A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:736–42.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, et al. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3241–49.CrossRef De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, et al. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3241–49.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:814–19.CrossRef Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:814–19.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowe JP Jr, Gordon NH, Antunez AR, et al. Local-regional breast cancer recurrence following mastectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:429–32.CrossRef Crowe JP Jr, Gordon NH, Antunez AR, et al. Local-regional breast cancer recurrence following mastectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:429–32.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokin C, Weiss A, Wang-Rodriguez J, et al. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:921821.PubMedPubMedCentral Tokin C, Weiss A, Wang-Rodriguez J, et al. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:921821.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients
verfasst von
Viviana Galimberti, MD
Consuelo Morigi, MD
Vincenzo Bagnardi, PhD
Giovanni Corso, MD
Elisa Vicini, MD
Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro Fontana, MD
Paola Naninato, MD
Silvia Ratini, MD
Francesca Magnoni, MD
Antonio Toesca, MD
Andriana Kouloura, MD
Mario Rietjens, MD
Francesca De Lorenzi, MD
Andrea Vingiani, MD
Paolo Veronesi, MD
Publikationsdatum
17.09.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 13/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6759-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 13/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.