Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021

12.05.2021 | Innovative Techniques

One-Stage Mastopexy–Lipofilling in Cosmetic Breast Surgery: A Prospective Study

verfasst von: Maria Lucia Mangialardi, Camille Ozil, Cristophe Lepage

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Mastopexy in combination with implant breast augmentation still remains a controversial topic in plastic surgery because of its complexity and its relative high rate of complications. To obviate the need of a breast implant, numerous authors described glandular rearrangement techniques to optimize upper pole fullness and breast projection. More recently, the combination of mastopexy and lipofilling has been described. The aim of this study is to report our experience on one-stage mastopexy–lipofilling in cosmetic breast surgery, describing our surgical technique and focusing on long-term esthetic results and patient-reported outcomes.

Material and Method

A prospective observational study was performed including all patients underwent cosmetic one-stage mastopexy–lipofilling. Collected data included patient’s age and BMI, smoking, preoperative and postoperative cup size and grade of ptosis, preoperative and postoperative distances between the upper part of the nipple areola complex and the inframammary fold and between the upper part of the nipple areola complex and the sternal notch, mean liposuction and fat injection volume, mean operating time and postoperative complications. Cosmetic results and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the 5 points Likert scale considering breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple areola complex and donor site shape and global satisfaction.

Results

A total of 21 patients (42 breasts) were included with a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. Mean liposuction and injection volumes were 1070 mL and 230 mL, respectively. With respect to breast size, 11 patients (52.4%) showed an increase in one-cup size, while 10 patients (47.6%) showed a slight increase in volume without changing cup size. The mean NAC-SN and NAC-IMF distances decreased by an average of 3.7 cm and 1.7 cm, respectively. Regarding esthetic outcomes, the mean scores for breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple areola complex and donor site shape were 4.1, 4.2, 4.9, 4, 4.6 and 5, respectively. With respect to patient satisfaction, mean scores for breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple areola complex and donor site shape were 4.2, 5, 5, 4.7, 5 and 5, respectively. The achievement of a satisfactory outcome (> 4) was obtained in all patients but 1 with a mean score of 4.5 (3–5).

Conclusion

The current study suggests that one-stage mastopexy–lipofilling is a safe technique, which leads with satisfactory outcomes allowing breast contouring and breast volume increase.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.​
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinker B, Veneracion M, Walsh CP (2010) Breast ptosis: causes and cure. Ann Plast Surg 64(5):579–584CrossRef Rinker B, Veneracion M, Walsh CP (2010) Breast ptosis: causes and cure. Ann Plast Surg 64(5):579–584CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons 2018 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank. New York, NY: ASAPS Communications Office American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons 2018 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank. New York, NY: ASAPS Communications Office
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203CrossRef Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Spring MA, Hartmann EC, Stevens WG (2015) Strategies and challenges in simultaneous augmentation mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):505–518 (Epub 2015 Aug 25)CrossRef Spring MA, Hartmann EC, Stevens WG (2015) Strategies and challenges in simultaneous augmentation mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):505–518 (Epub 2015 Aug 25)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall-Findlay EJ (2002) Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg 29:379–391CrossRef Hall-Findlay EJ (2002) Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg 29:379–391CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypertrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15–26CrossRef Gonzalez-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypertrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15–26CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31CrossRef Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahai F, Fisher J, Maxwell PG et al (2007) Augmentation mastopexy: to stage or not. Aesthet Surg J 27:297–305CrossRef Nahai F, Fisher J, Maxwell PG et al (2007) Augmentation mastopexy: to stage or not. Aesthet Surg J 27:297–305CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott LS, Gerald HP, Sharon YG (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 20(2):155–164CrossRef Scott LS, Gerald HP, Sharon YG (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 20(2):155–164CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Karnes J, Morrison W, Salisbury M et al (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:148–154CrossRef Karnes J, Morrison W, Salisbury M et al (2000) Simultaneous breast augmentation and lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:148–154CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gryskiewicz J (2012) Dual-plane breast augmentation for minimal ptosis pseudoptosis (the “in-between” patient). Aesthet Surg J 33:43–65 (6)CrossRef Gryskiewicz J (2012) Dual-plane breast augmentation for minimal ptosis pseudoptosis (the “in-between” patient). Aesthet Surg J 33:43–65 (6)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott LF (2002) Circumareolar mastopexy with augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 29:337–347 (2003;27:13–9)CrossRef Elliott LF (2002) Circumareolar mastopexy with augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 29:337–347 (2003;27:13–9)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez OM (2002) Reduction mammaplasty with the “owl” incision and no undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:512–524CrossRef Ramirez OM (2002) Reduction mammaplasty with the “owl” incision and no undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:512–524CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barutcu A, Baytekin C (2009) One-stage augmentationmastopexy with wise pattern and inverted-T scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:784–785 (17)CrossRef Barutcu A, Baytekin C (2009) One-stage augmentationmastopexy with wise pattern and inverted-T scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:784–785 (17)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Persoff MM (2003) Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:13–19CrossRef Persoff MM (2003) Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:13–19CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME et al (2006) Is onestage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–681CrossRef Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME et al (2006) Is onestage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–681CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Khavanin N, Jordan SW, Rambachan A, Kim JY (2014) A systematic review of single-stage augmentation-mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(5):922–931CrossRef Khavanin N, Jordan SW, Rambachan A, Kim JY (2014) A systematic review of single-stage augmentation-mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(5):922–931CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Honig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM, Hasselberg J (2009) Autoaugmentation mastopexy with an inferior-based pedicle. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:302–307CrossRef Honig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM, Hasselberg J (2009) Autoaugmentation mastopexy with an inferior-based pedicle. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:302–307CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat De la Plaza R, Cruz L, Moreno C (2005) Mastopexy utilizing a dermoglandular hammock flap. Aesthetic Surg J 25:31–36CrossRef De la Plaza R, Cruz L, Moreno C (2005) Mastopexy utilizing a dermoglandular hammock flap. Aesthetic Surg J 25:31–36CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg T (2012) Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: a technique for maximum en bloc skin resection using the inverted-T pattern regardless of implant size, asymmetry, or ptosis. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:349–354CrossRef Eisenberg T (2012) Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: a technique for maximum en bloc skin resection using the inverted-T pattern regardless of implant size, asymmetry, or ptosis. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:349–354CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsa AA, Jackowe DJ, Parsa FD (2010) A new algorithm for breast mastopexy/augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:75e–77eCrossRef Parsa AA, Jackowe DJ, Parsa FD (2010) A new algorithm for breast mastopexy/augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:75e–77eCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceydeli A, Freund RM (2003) Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy: a technique to augment superior pole hollow. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:425–32; discussion 433 Ceydeli A, Freund RM (2003) Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy: a technique to augment superior pole hollow. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:425–32; discussion 433
24.
Zurück zum Zitat De Fazio D, Cingozoglu CAC (2020) Combined mastopexy and augmentation with autologous fat grafting: first results with lipopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(2):e1957CrossRef De Fazio D, Cingozoglu CAC (2020) Combined mastopexy and augmentation with autologous fat grafting: first results with lipopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(2):e1957CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Raafat SS, Ezzat SZ, Khachaba YA, Aboul-Nasr LA (2020) Autologous mastopexy and autoaugmention of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(10):e3126CrossRef Raafat SS, Ezzat SZ, Khachaba YA, Aboul-Nasr LA (2020) Autologous mastopexy and autoaugmention of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(10):e3126CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Khouri RK, Eisenmann-Klein M, Cardoso E et al (2012) Brava and autologous fat transfer is a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative: results of a 6-year, 81-patient, prospective multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1173–1187CrossRef Khouri RK, Eisenmann-Klein M, Cardoso E et al (2012) Brava and autologous fat transfer is a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative: results of a 6-year, 81-patient, prospective multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1173–1187CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Khouri RK, Rigotti G, Cardoso E et al (2014) Megavolume autologous fat transfer: part I. Theory and principles. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:550–557CrossRef Khouri RK, Rigotti G, Cardoso E et al (2014) Megavolume autologous fat transfer: part I. Theory and principles. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:550–557CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rigotti G (2013) Discussion: the volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:192–193CrossRef Rigotti G (2013) Discussion: the volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:192–193CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Groen JW, Negenborn VL, Twisk JW, Ket JC, Mullender MG, Smit JM (2016) Autologous fat grafting in cosmetic breast augmentation: a systematic review on radiological safety, complications, volume retention, and patient/surgeon satisfaction. Aesthet Surg J 36(9):993–1007CrossRef Groen JW, Negenborn VL, Twisk JW, Ket JC, Mullender MG, Smit JM (2016) Autologous fat grafting in cosmetic breast augmentation: a systematic review on radiological safety, complications, volume retention, and patient/surgeon satisfaction. Aesthet Surg J 36(9):993–1007CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):436–447CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):436–447CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Abboud MH, Dibo SA (2015) Immediate large-volume grafting of autologous fat to the breast following implant removal. Aesthet Surg J 35(7):819–829CrossRef Abboud MH, Dibo SA (2015) Immediate large-volume grafting of autologous fat to the breast following implant removal. Aesthet Surg J 35(7):819–829CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng DN, Li QF, Lei H et al (2008) Autologous fat grafting to the breast for cosmetic enhancement: experience in 66 patients with long-term follow up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:792–798CrossRef Zheng DN, Li QF, Lei H et al (2008) Autologous fat grafting to the breast for cosmetic enhancement: experience in 66 patients with long-term follow up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:792–798CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Groen JW, Piatkowski AA, Sawor JH, Wilschut JA, Ritt MJPF, van der Hulst RRJW (2018) European survey study among plastic/breast surgeons on the use of and opinion toward autologous fat transfer: with emphasis on breast surgery. Surg Innov 25(6):602–615 (Epub 2018 Sep 24)CrossRef Groen JW, Piatkowski AA, Sawor JH, Wilschut JA, Ritt MJPF, van der Hulst RRJW (2018) European survey study among plastic/breast surgeons on the use of and opinion toward autologous fat transfer: with emphasis on breast surgery. Surg Innov 25(6):602–615 (Epub 2018 Sep 24)CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ørholt M, Larsen A, Hemmingsen MN, Mirian C, Zocchi ML, Vester-Glowinski PV, Herly M (2020) Complications after breast augmentation with fat grafting: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(3):530e–537eCrossRef Ørholt M, Larsen A, Hemmingsen MN, Mirian C, Zocchi ML, Vester-Glowinski PV, Herly M (2020) Complications after breast augmentation with fat grafting: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(3):530e–537eCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Qureshi AA, Myckatyn TM, Tenenbaum MM (2018) Mastopexy and mastopexy–augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 38(4):374–384CrossRef Qureshi AA, Myckatyn TM, Tenenbaum MM (2018) Mastopexy and mastopexy–augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 38(4):374–384CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters J, Bourn L, Tessler O, Patterson C, Khoobehi K (2020) Single staged mastopexy with autologous fat grafting: an alternative to augmentation mastopexy with implants. Aesthet Surg J 40(4):NP152–NP158PubMed Walters J, Bourn L, Tessler O, Patterson C, Khoobehi K (2020) Single staged mastopexy with autologous fat grafting: an alternative to augmentation mastopexy with implants. Aesthet Surg J 40(4):NP152–NP158PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRef Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
One-Stage Mastopexy–Lipofilling in Cosmetic Breast Surgery: A Prospective Study
verfasst von
Maria Lucia Mangialardi
Camille Ozil
Cristophe Lepage
Publikationsdatum
12.05.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02327-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.