Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017

18.05.2016

Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications

verfasst von: Ashley D. Willoughby, Robert B. Lim, Michael B. Lustik

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Open inguinal hernia repair is felt to be a less expensive operation than a laparoscopic one. Performing open repair on patients with an obese body mass index (BMI) results in longer operative times, longer hospital stay, and complications that will potentially impose higher cost to the facility and patient. This study aims to define the ideal BMI at which a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be advantageous over open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

The NSQIP database was analyzed for (n = 64,501) complications, mortality, and operating time for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs during the time period from 2005 to 2012. Bilateral and recurrent hernias were excluded. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess associations between type of surgery and categorical variables including demographics, risk factors, and 30-day outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine whether odds ratios differed by level of BMI. The HCUP database was used for determining difference in cost and length of stay between open and laparoscopic procedures.

Results

There were 17,919 laparoscopic repairs and 46,582 open repairs in the study period. The overall morbidity (across all BMI categories) is statistically greater in the open repair group when compared to the laparoscopic group (p = 0.03). Postoperative complications (including wound disruption, failure to wean from the ventilator, and UTI) were greater in the open repair group across all BMI categories. Deep incisional surgical site infections (SSI) were more common in the overweight open repair group (p = 0.026). The return to the operating room across all BMI categories was statistically significant for the open repair group (n = 269) compared to the laparoscopic repair group (n = 70) with p = 0.003. There was no difference in the return to operating room between the BMI categories. The odds ratio (OR) was found to be statistically significant when comparing the obese category to both normal and overweight populations for the open procedure.

Conclusion

Open hernia repairs have more complications than do laparoscopic ones; however, there does not appear to be a difference in treating obese patients with hernias using a laparoscopic approach versus an open one. One may consider using a laparoscopic approach in overweight patients (BMI 25–29.9) as there appears to be fewer deep SSI.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyhus L, Baker R, Fischer J (1997) Surgery of hernia. Mastery of Surgery, 3rd edn. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp 1795–1877 Nyhus L, Baker R, Fischer J (1997) Surgery of hernia. Mastery of Surgery, 3rd edn. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp 1795–1877
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wantz GE (1999) Abdominal wall hernias. Principles of Surgery, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1585–1611 Wantz GE (1999) Abdominal wall hernias. Principles of Surgery, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1585–1611
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hynes DM et al (2006) Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh operation: results of a department of veterans affairs randomized clinical trial. J Am College Surg 203(4):447–457CrossRef Hynes DM et al (2006) Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh operation: results of a department of veterans affairs randomized clinical trial. J Am College Surg 203(4):447–457CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, 2002–2012 [cited 2012 Jan 17]. Available from: www.acsnsqip.org National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, 2002–2012 [cited 2012 Jan 17]. Available from: www.​acsnsqip.​org
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Park C, Kim J, Kim D et al (2011) Inguinal hernia repair in overweight and obese patients. J Kor Surg Soc 81:205–210CrossRef Park C, Kim J, Kim D et al (2011) Inguinal hernia repair in overweight and obese patients. J Kor Surg Soc 81:205–210CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindstrom D, Azodi O, Belloco R et al (2007) The effect of tobacco consumption and body mass index on complications and hospital stay after inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia. Springer 11:117–123 Lindstrom D, Azodi O, Belloco R et al (2007) The effect of tobacco consumption and body mass index on complications and hospital stay after inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia. Springer 11:117–123
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruhl CE, Everhart JE (2007) Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol 165(10):1154–1161CrossRefPubMed Ruhl CE, Everhart JE (2007) Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol 165(10):1154–1161CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ (2011) Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 253(6):1082–1093CrossRefPubMed Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ (2011) Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 253(6):1082–1093CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat The Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:653–661CrossRef The Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:653–661CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence K et al (1995) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Br Med J 311:981–985CrossRef Lawrence K et al (1995) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Br Med J 311:981–985CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications
verfasst von
Ashley D. Willoughby
Robert B. Lim
Michael B. Lustik
Publikationsdatum
18.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.