Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2018

22.09.2017 | 2017 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Optimal Therapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: a National Cancer Database Analysis

verfasst von: William M Whited, Jaimin R. Trivedi, Emily R. Bond, Victor H. van Berkel, Matthew P. Fox

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

There are over 16,000 new patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer each year in the USA.1 With the overall 5-year survival of approximately 18%, it is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths.1 In patients with esophageal cancer, undergoing a complete (R0) resection is the most important predictor of overall survival.2,3 In patients fortunate enough to have their cancer diagnosed at an early stage (stages I–IIA), resection alone without neoadjuvant therapy is currently recommended and has proved to be an acceptable therapy with good long-term survival.4,5 Unfortunately, patients often present at an advanced stage due to the absence of symptoms during the early stages of the disease. There have been several trials over the past decade designed to determine the optimal treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The MAGIC trial published in 2006 was a randomized control trial comparing survival in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone.6 This trial demonstrated that patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery had improved survival compared to the surgery alone group. Published in 2008, the CALGB 9781 trial, despite closing early due to poor accrual, did demonstrate a survival advantage in patients undergoing chemoradiation followed by surgery compared to surgery alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. More recently, the CROSS Trial demonstrated a survival benefit in patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgery compared to surgery alone and is arguably the most notable trial to date regarding neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.7 Today, most consider the recommended course of treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer to be neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy.5,8 The purpose of this study is to determine what proportion of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer receive the optimal treatment (neoadjuvant chemotherapy ± radiation followed by an R0 resection) and what factors influence whether patients receive this treatment. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Esophageal Cancer. 2016 08/01/2016]; Available from: http: //seer.cancer. gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Esophageal Cancer. 2016 08/01/2016]; Available from: http: //seer.cancer. gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelsen, D.P., et al., Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2007.25 (24): p. 3719–25.CrossRefPubMed Kelsen, D.P., et al., Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2007.25 (24): p. 3719–25.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Javidfar, J., et al., Impact of Positive Margins on Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016.101(3): p. 1060–7.CrossRefPubMed Javidfar, J., et al., Impact of Positive Margins on Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016.101(3): p. 1060–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Speicher, P.J., et al., Induction therapy does not improve survival for clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2014.9(8): p. 1195–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Speicher, P.J., et al., Induction therapy does not improve survival for clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2014.9(8): p. 1195–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajani, J.A., et al., Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015 J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2015.13(2): p. 194–227.CrossRefPubMed Ajani, J.A., et al., Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015 J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2015.13(2): p. 194–227.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham, D., et al., Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2006. 355(1): p. 11–20.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham, D., et al., Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2006. 355(1): p. 11–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hagen, P., et al., Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366 (22): p. 2074–84.CrossRefPubMed van Hagen, P., et al., Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366 (22): p. 2074–84.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tepper, J., et al., Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(7): p. 1086–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tepper, J., et al., Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(7): p. 1086–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Samson, P., et al., Adhering to Quality Measures in Esophagectomy Is Associated With Improved Survival in All Stages of Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017. 103(4): p. 1101–1108.CrossRefPubMed Samson, P., et al., Adhering to Quality Measures in Esophagectomy Is Associated With Improved Survival in All Stages of Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017. 103(4): p. 1101–1108.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, L.J., et al., Utilization of surgical treatment for local and locoregional esophageal cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer, 2016. Taylor, L.J., et al., Utilization of surgical treatment for local and locoregional esophageal cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer, 2016.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubecz, A., et al., Surgical resection for locoregional esophageal cancer is underutilized in the United States. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 211(6): p. 754–61.CrossRefPubMed Dubecz, A., et al., Surgical resection for locoregional esophageal cancer is underutilized in the United States. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 211(6): p. 754–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paulson, E.C., et al., Underuse of esophagectomy as treatment for resectable esophageal cancer. Arch Surg, 2008. 143(12): p. 1198–203; discussion 1203.CrossRefPubMed Paulson, E.C., et al., Underuse of esophagectomy as treatment for resectable esophageal cancer. Arch Surg, 2008. 143(12): p. 1198–203; discussion 1203.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Speicher, P.J., et al., Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg, 2016. Speicher, P.J., et al., Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg, 2016.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs, H.F., et al., Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc, 2016. Fuchs, H.F., et al., Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc, 2016.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, S., et al., Esophageal cancer located at the neck and upper thorax treated with concurrent chemoradiation: a single-institution experience. J Thorac Oncol, 2006. 1(3): p. 252–9.CrossRefPubMed Wang, S., et al., Esophageal cancer located at the neck and upper thorax treated with concurrent chemoradiation: a single-institution experience. J Thorac Oncol, 2006. 1(3): p. 252–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedenne, L., et al., Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(10): p. 1160–8.CrossRefPubMed Bedenne, L., et al., Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(10): p. 1160–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita, H., et al., A single institutional non-randomized retrospective comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in 82 Japanese patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus, 2008. 21(5): p. 430–6.CrossRefPubMed Yamashita, H., et al., A single institutional non-randomized retrospective comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in 82 Japanese patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus, 2008. 21(5): p. 430–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Best, L.M., M. Mughal, and K.S. Gurusamy, Non-surgical versus surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016. 3: p. CD011498. Best, L.M., M. Mughal, and K.S. Gurusamy, Non-surgical versus surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016. 3: p. CD011498.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Castoro, C., et al., Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic oesophagus: is surgery always necessary? J Gastrointest Surg, 2013. 17(8): p. 1375–81.CrossRefPubMed Castoro, C., et al., Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic oesophagus: is surgery always necessary? J Gastrointest Surg, 2013. 17(8): p. 1375–81.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Swisher, S.G., et al., Final Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0246: An Organ-Preserving Selective Resection Strategy in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation. J Thorac Oncol, 2017. 12(2): p. 368–374.CrossRefPubMed Swisher, S.G., et al., Final Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0246: An Organ-Preserving Selective Resection Strategy in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation. J Thorac Oncol, 2017. 12(2): p. 368–374.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Optimal Therapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: a National Cancer Database Analysis
verfasst von
William M Whited
Jaimin R. Trivedi
Emily R. Bond
Victor H. van Berkel
Matthew P. Fox
Publikationsdatum
22.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3548-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.