Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2016

07.01.2016

Optimal visualization of focal nodular hyperplasia: quantitative and qualitative evaluation of single and multiphasic arterial phase acquisition at 1.5 T MR imaging

verfasst von: Caroline Rousseau, Maxime Ronot, Valérie Vilgrain, Marc Zins

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative benefit of multiple arterial phase acquisitions for the depiction of hypervascularity in FNH explored MR imaging using an extracellular contrast agent.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2014, all patients who underwent MR imaging for the exploration of FNH were included. The protocol included a single or a triple arterial phase (“single” and “triple” group, respectively). Arterial phases were visually divided into four types: (1) angiographic, (2) early, (3) late, and (4) portal. Signal intensity on arterial phase images was visually recorded as intense, moderate, or low for each lesion. Lesion-to-liver contrast (LLC) and relative lesion enhancement (RE) were calculated and compared between the two groups using the Mann–Whitney test.

Results

Thirty-five women were included (mean 45-year old, range 20–66), with 50 FNH (mean size 30 mm). Single and triple groups included 20 patients (30 FNH) and 15 patients (20 FNH), respectively. Signal intensity was intense in all lesions in the triple group and in 22/30 (73%) in the single group (p = 0.041). Intense signals were more frequently found in the early arterial phase (p < 0.001). RE was not significantly different (1.78 ± 0.84 vs. 1.98 ± 1.81 p = 0.430, in the single and triple groups, respectively) but LLC was significantly higher in the triple group (0.32 ± 0.10 vs. 0.22 ± 0.10, p = 0.005). LLC was significantly higher in the first two arterial phases in the triple group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Acquisition of three arterial phases improves the visualization of hypervascularity of FNH, as lesions show high visual signal intensity and contrast. Optimal visualization is obtained in the early arterial phase.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain SM, Terkivatan T, Zondervan PE, et al. (2004) Focal nodular hyperplasia: findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis. Radiographics 24:3–17 (discussion 18–19)CrossRefPubMed Hussain SM, Terkivatan T, Zondervan PE, et al. (2004) Focal nodular hyperplasia: findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis. Radiographics 24:3–17 (discussion 18–19)CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Soussan M, Aubé C, Bahrami S, et al. (2010) Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1715–1725CrossRefPubMed Soussan M, Aubé C, Bahrami S, et al. (2010) Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1715–1725CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortele KJ, Praet M, Van Vlierberghe H, et al. (2002) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: detection and characterization with plain and dynamic-enhanced MRI. Abdom Imaging 27:700–707CrossRefPubMed Mortele KJ, Praet M, Van Vlierberghe H, et al. (2002) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: detection and characterization with plain and dynamic-enhanced MRI. Abdom Imaging 27:700–707CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ba-Ssalamah A, Schima W, Schmook MT, et al. (2002) Atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: imaging features of nonspecific and liver-specific MR contrast agents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1447–1456CrossRefPubMed Ba-Ssalamah A, Schima W, Schmook MT, et al. (2002) Atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: imaging features of nonspecific and liver-specific MR contrast agents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1447–1456CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, et al. (2005) Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:63–69CrossRefPubMed Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, et al. (2005) Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:63–69CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi N, Yoshioka H, Yamaguchi M, Saida Y, Itai Y (2003) Accelerated dynamic MR imaging with a parallel imaging technique for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: usefulness of a test bolus in examination and subtraction imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:80–89CrossRefPubMed Takahashi N, Yoshioka H, Yamaguchi M, Saida Y, Itai Y (2003) Accelerated dynamic MR imaging with a parallel imaging technique for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: usefulness of a test bolus in examination and subtraction imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:80–89CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, Yamaguchi M, et al. (2002) Double arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:259–266CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, Yamaguchi M, et al. (2002) Double arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:259–266CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Budjan J, Ong M, Riffel P, et al. (2014) CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) for dynamic liver imaging: comparison of gadoterate meglumine, gadobutrol and gadoxetic acid. Eur J Radiol 83:2007–2012CrossRefPubMed Budjan J, Ong M, Riffel P, et al. (2014) CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) for dynamic liver imaging: comparison of gadoterate meglumine, gadobutrol and gadoxetic acid. Eur J Radiol 83:2007–2012CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Salmani Rahimi M, Korosec FR, Wang K, et al. (2015) Combined dynamic contrast-enhanced liver MRI and MRA using interleaved variable density sampling. Magn Reson Med 73:973–983CrossRefPubMed Salmani Rahimi M, Korosec FR, Wang K, et al. (2015) Combined dynamic contrast-enhanced liver MRI and MRA using interleaved variable density sampling. Magn Reson Med 73:973–983CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hope TA, Saranathan M, Petkovska I, et al. (2013) Improvement of gadoxetate arterial phase capture with a high spatio-temporal resolution multiphase three-dimensional SPGR-dixon sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:938–945CrossRefPubMed Hope TA, Saranathan M, Petkovska I, et al. (2013) Improvement of gadoxetate arterial phase capture with a high spatio-temporal resolution multiphase three-dimensional SPGR-dixon sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:938–945CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385CrossRefPubMed Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heverhagen JT (2007) Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. Radiology 245:638–639CrossRefPubMed Heverhagen JT (2007) Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. Radiology 245:638–639CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertin C, Egels S, Wagner M, et al. (2014) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of focal nodular hyperplasia: a matter of size. Eur Radiol 24:2561–2571CrossRefPubMed Bertin C, Egels S, Wagner M, et al. (2014) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of focal nodular hyperplasia: a matter of size. Eur Radiol 24:2561–2571CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Roche V, Pigneur F, Tselikas L, et al. (2014) Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenomas with low-mecanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS): effect of size on diagnostic confidence. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3363-y PubMed Roche V, Pigneur F, Tselikas L, et al. (2014) Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenomas with low-mecanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS): effect of size on diagnostic confidence. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-014-3363-y PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami T, Kim T, Takamura M, et al. (2001) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 218:763–767CrossRefPubMed Murakami T, Kim T, Takamura M, et al. (2001) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 218:763–767CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC (1997) Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: optimization with a test examination and a power injector. Radiology 202:268–273CrossRefPubMed Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC (1997) Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: optimization with a test examination and a power injector. Radiology 202:268–273CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Goncalves Neto JA, Altun E, Vaidean G, et al. (2009) Early contrast enhancement of the liver: exact description of subphases using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 27:792–800CrossRefPubMed Goncalves Neto JA, Altun E, Vaidean G, et al. (2009) Early contrast enhancement of the liver: exact description of subphases using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 27:792–800CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Low RN, Bayram E, Panchal NJ, Estkowski L (2010) High-resolution double arterial phase hepatic MRI using adaptive 2D centric view ordering: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:947–956CrossRefPubMed Low RN, Bayram E, Panchal NJ, Estkowski L (2010) High-resolution double arterial phase hepatic MRI using adaptive 2D centric view ordering: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:947–956CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, et al. (2006) Double hepatic arterial phase MRI of the liver with switching of reversed centric and centric K-space reordering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:464–472CrossRefPubMed Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, et al. (2006) Double hepatic arterial phase MRI of the liver with switching of reversed centric and centric K-space reordering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:464–472CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong HS, Kim HS, Kim MJ, et al. (2008) Single breath-hold multiarterial dynamic MRI of the liver at 3T using a 3D fat-suppressed keyhole technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:396–402CrossRefPubMed Hong HS, Kim HS, Kim MJ, et al. (2008) Single breath-hold multiarterial dynamic MRI of the liver at 3T using a 3D fat-suppressed keyhole technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:396–402CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Beers BE, Materne R, Lacrosse M, et al. (1999) MR imaging of hypervascular liver tumors: timing optimization during the arterial phase. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:562–567CrossRefPubMed Van Beers BE, Materne R, Lacrosse M, et al. (1999) MR imaging of hypervascular liver tumors: timing optimization during the arterial phase. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:562–567CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain HK, Londy FJ, Francis IR, et al. (2003) Hepatic arterial phase MR imaging with automated bolus-detection three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled-echo sequence: comparison with test-bolus method. Radiology 226:558–566CrossRefPubMed Hussain HK, Londy FJ, Francis IR, et al. (2003) Hepatic arterial phase MR imaging with automated bolus-detection three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled-echo sequence: comparison with test-bolus method. Radiology 226:558–566CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Optimal visualization of focal nodular hyperplasia: quantitative and qualitative evaluation of single and multiphasic arterial phase acquisition at 1.5 T MR imaging
verfasst von
Caroline Rousseau
Maxime Ronot
Valérie Vilgrain
Marc Zins
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0630-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Abdominal Radiology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “gallbladder pearl necklace” sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.