Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2017

04.10.2016

Optimizing a living kidney donation program: transition to hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy and introduction of a passive polarizing three-dimensional display system

verfasst von: Roger Wahba, Robert Kleinert, Martin Hellmich, Nadine Heiermann, Georg Dieplinger, Hans A. Schlößer, Denise Buchner, Christine Kurschat, Dirk L. Stippel

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Optimizing a living kidney donation program is important to guarantee a high grade of acceptance among potential donors. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARP) is an alternative to the open anterior approach (AA) technique. Problems associated to the learning curve could hinder a transition. 3D display technique seems to ease minimally invasive surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve during the transition from AA to HARP and the influence of the 3D display system on the established technique.

Methods

Observational study (n = 207) during transition to HARP and introduction of 3D display technique.

Results

Operation time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT) and blood loss (BL) of HARP decreased during transition. Pairwise group comparison for OT showed a significant learning effect for the first 30 out of 50 HARPs without influence on graft function. Between AA and HARP no significant difference in OT (133 ± 24 vs. 127 ± 19 min, p = 0.25) but for WIT (23 ± 28 vs. 126 ± 40 s, p < 0.005) and BL (328 ± 207 vs. 54 ± 35 ml, p < 0.005) was seen. There was neither a significant difference in donors’ nor recipients’ eGFR. OT (98 ± 16 vs. 106 ± 19 min, p = 0.036) and WIT (97 ± 37 vs. 120 ± 57 s, p = 0.023) were significantly shorter for the 3D technique compared to 2D.

Conclusion

A transition to HARP is possible without additional risk for the donor or loss of quality for the recipient. The learning curve for HARP is steep and short. The introduction of 3D display technique after transition facilitates the surgical preparation and could further help to optimize HARP.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eurotransplant Foundation (2014) Annual report 2014, April 2014 Eurotransplant Foundation (2014) Annual report 2014, April 2014
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA et al (2016) OPTN/SRTR annual data report 2014 Kidney. Am J Transplant 16(S2):11–46CrossRefPubMed Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA et al (2016) OPTN/SRTR annual data report 2014 Kidney. Am J Transplant 16(S2):11–46CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Klop KW, Dols LF, Kok NF, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN (2012) Attitudes among surgeons towards live-donor nephrectomy: a European update. Transplantation 94(3):263–268CrossRefPubMed Klop KW, Dols LF, Kok NF, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN (2012) Attitudes among surgeons towards live-donor nephrectomy: a European update. Transplantation 94(3):263–268CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dols LF, Kok NF, d’Ancona FC et al (2014) Randomized controlled trial comparing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 97(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed Dols LF, Kok NF, d’Ancona FC et al (2014) Randomized controlled trial comparing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 97(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Klop KW, Kok NF, Dols LF et al (2014) Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study. Transpl Int 27(2):162–169CrossRefPubMed Klop KW, Kok NF, Dols LF et al (2014) Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study. Transpl Int 27(2):162–169CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat He B, Bremner A, Han Y, Hamdorf JM (2016) Determining the superior technique for living-donor nephrectomy: the laparoscopic intraperitoneal versus the retroperitoneoscopic approach. Exp Clin Transplant 14(2):129–138PubMed He B, Bremner A, Han Y, Hamdorf JM (2016) Determining the superior technique for living-donor nephrectomy: the laparoscopic intraperitoneal versus the retroperitoneoscopic approach. Exp Clin Transplant 14(2):129–138PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 30(1):11–23CrossRefPubMed Sorensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 30(1):11–23CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith R, Schwab K, Day A et al (2014) Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Br J Surg 101(11):1453–1459CrossRefPubMed Smith R, Schwab K, Day A et al (2014) Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Br J Surg 101(11):1453–1459CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakata S, Watson MO, Grove PM, Stevenson AR (2016) The conflicting evidence of three-dimensional displays in laparoscopy: a review of systems old and new. Ann Surg 263(2):234–239CrossRefPubMed Sakata S, Watson MO, Grove PM, Stevenson AR (2016) The conflicting evidence of three-dimensional displays in laparoscopy: a review of systems old and new. Ann Surg 263(2):234–239CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wadstrom J, Lindstrom P (2002) Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: initial 10 cases. Transplantation 73(11):1839–1840CrossRefPubMed Wadstrom J, Lindstrom P (2002) Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: initial 10 cases. Transplantation 73(11):1839–1840CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon R (1958) An anterior extraperitoneal incision for kidney surgery. J Urol 79(3):383–392PubMed Lyon R (1958) An anterior extraperitoneal incision for kidney surgery. J Urol 79(3):383–392PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor WT, Van Buren CT, Floyd M, Kahan BD (1981) Anterior extraperitoneal donor nephrectomy. J Urol 126(4):443–447PubMed Connor WT, Van Buren CT, Floyd M, Kahan BD (1981) Anterior extraperitoneal donor nephrectomy. J Urol 126(4):443–447PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones KW, Peters TG, Walker GW (1999) Anterior-retroperitoneal living donor nephrectomy: technique and outcomes. Am Surg 65(3):197–204PubMed Jones KW, Peters TG, Walker GW (1999) Anterior-retroperitoneal living donor nephrectomy: technique and outcomes. Am Surg 65(3):197–204PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB et al (2006) Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology 67(5):927–931CrossRefPubMed Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB et al (2006) Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology 67(5):927–931CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wadstrom J, Biglarnia A, Gjertsen H, Sugitani A, Fronek J (2011) Introducing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: learning curves and development based on 413 consecutive cases in four centers. Transplantation 91(4):462–469PubMed Wadstrom J, Biglarnia A, Gjertsen H, Sugitani A, Fronek J (2011) Introducing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: learning curves and development based on 413 consecutive cases in four centers. Transplantation 91(4):462–469PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin EH, Hazzan D, Edye M et al (2009) The first decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: effect of surgeon and institution experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006. J Am Coll Surg 209(1):106–113CrossRefPubMed Chin EH, Hazzan D, Edye M et al (2009) The first decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: effect of surgeon and institution experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006. J Am Coll Surg 209(1):106–113CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dols LF, Kok NF, Terkivatan T et al (2010) Optimizing left-sided live kidney donation: hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic as alternative to standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 23(4):358–363CrossRefPubMed Dols LF, Kok NF, Terkivatan T et al (2010) Optimizing left-sided live kidney donation: hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic as alternative to standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 23(4):358–363CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Optimizing a living kidney donation program: transition to hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy and introduction of a passive polarizing three-dimensional display system
verfasst von
Roger Wahba
Robert Kleinert
Martin Hellmich
Nadine Heiermann
Georg Dieplinger
Hans A. Schlößer
Denise Buchner
Christine Kurschat
Dirk L. Stippel
Publikationsdatum
04.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5264-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.