Introduction
Minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation represents a critical advancement in orthopedic surgery for managing pelvic ring and acetabular fractures, offering significant advantages over traditional approaches [
1]. This method, gaining prominence since its introduction by Routt et al. [
2], provides several advantages over traditional open reduction and internal fixation, such as less soft-tissue trauma, reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower infection risks, early pain relief, and the possibility of early weight-bearing ambulation [
3,
4].
Despite its benefits, including lessened soft-tissue damage and expedited postoperative recovery, the technique demands high precision due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis and proximity to critical neurovascular structures [
5]. Achieving success with percutaneous interventions requires not only an intimate knowledge of pelvic anatomy and skill in radiographic imaging but also the ability to execute screw placement with extreme accuracy [
4,
6,
7]. Elmhiregh et al. [
8] demonstrated the critical role of careful radiographic assessment in avoiding intra-articular screw placement during acetabular surgery, a recognized complication with significant clinical repercussions. The authors also emphasized the efficacy of utilizing specific radiographic views for the detection of potential joint space violations, thereby underlining the importance of precise imaging in both surgical planning and postoperative evaluations [
8]. While the literature provides extensive guidance on the paths and radiographic views necessary for correct screw placement, the task remains highly technical. The narrow osseous corridors challenge even the most skilled surgeons, often necessitating repeated attempts and trajectory adjustments to navigate the guidewire safely [
9,
10].
This paper introduces a technique refinement designed to mitigate the challenges of guidewire misdirection. The focus is not only on the experiential reportage, but also on the significant findings derived from employing this technique. We detail how this method minimizes the need for multiple guidewire adjustments, thereby enhancing procedural precision and potentially reducing operative time and patient exposure to radiation. These improvements could have a substantial impact on patient outcomes and the standard of care in the management of pelvic and acetabular fractures.
Our objective is to share a practical solution that addresses a critical technical hurdle in percutaneous fixation, offering a path toward safer and more efficient surgical interventions.
Discussion
Percutaneous fixation for pelvic and acetabular fractures is a critical tool for trauma surgeons, particularly for managing minimally displaced injuries [
11]. Our study has shown that utilizing a modified guidewire technique significantly enhances the precision required for screw placement in these procedures [
7]. The results revealed a perfect technical success rate without the need for postoperative interventions or occurrence of complications, suggesting a promising improvement in the standard percutaneous fixation protocol [
12,
13].
Traditional methods for percutaneous reduction and fixation in pelvic and acetabular fractures primarily use standard guidewires [
7,
11,
12]. While these are fundamentally effective, they occasionally encounter difficulties in unique fracture patterns and anatomical contexts [
4]. Our technique, which employs a guidewire with a bent tip, skillfully addresses such misdirections. This not only provides a streamlined and invaluable method for critical corrections, saving vital operative time during percutaneous screw fixation but also facilitates medullary manipulation. This key feature allows for the realignment of displaced pelvic superior ramus and acetabulum column fractures before screw insertion. This modification provides enhanced tactile feedback, making it an alternative choice for surgeons seeking optimized real-time adjustments. While the existing techniques, which sometimes require multiple iterations and potentially heighten the risk of soft tissue damage, our described technique demonstrates a potential advantage in efficiency and precision [
7]
The minimally invasive nature of this technique also implies smaller incisions, which generally results in less postoperative pain, reduced scarring, and quicker healing. Alzobi et al. [
13] similarly endorsed percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation, deeming it a safe surgical technique for unstable pelvic trauma, with low complication rates, although they reported a complication related to screw malposition at a rate of 6%. These findings align with the existing literature. Parker et al. in their study of acetabular column fixation, noted that blood loss was under 100 mL for each patient treated with percutaneous fixation [
6]. Additionally, Bozzio et al. [
14] reported a reduction in fracture displacement with percutaneous surgical treatment and observed good-to-excellent outcomes in patients.
The success of the outcomes greatly depends on precise patient selection. Tailoring the current technique to the fracture type, location, and severity, has been instrumental in maximizing its benefits over traditional open surgeries [
15,
16]. This method effectively addressed pelvic ring fractures, notably lateral compression types (I, II, and III). Similarly, for acetabular fractures, it encompassed types from anterior or posterior column transverse and T-shape to combined varieties. While ideal for minimally displaced fractures, more complex cases sometimes required a combined approach of open and percutaneous techniques.
Despite its benefits, the technique presents certain challenges, particularly during the removal of the guidewire after insertion of the cannulated screw. The primary issue arises from the bent-tip part of the guidewire. To address this challenge, several options can be considered. Advancing the guidewire and removing it from the opposite site may be a good solution, but it is only useful in cases of retrograde pubic ramus screw placement. Another strategy involves avoiding hyper-bending of the guidewire tip during insertion. Our recommendation is to limit the degree of bending to 25–30 degrees, thus minimizing the risk of entanglement during removal. Alternatively, the use of a smaller caliber guidewire, such as size 2 or 2.5 mm, for 6.5 cannulated screws can mitigate this issue. However, it is important to note that a smaller guidewire may not serve as an effective reduction tool to correct minor displacements at the fracture site. Following cannulated drilling with a 4.5-mm drill over the guidewire, replacing the bent-tip guidewire with a similar or smaller size straight guidewire is another potential solution.
The main limitation of this technique lies in its infrequent necessity. It is typically required in specific cases, making its application less common. However, surgeons who are familiar with percutaneous fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures can apply this technique with a relatively small learning curve. Moreover, it is important to note that not all acetabular fracture types are suitable for percutaneous fixation. At our institution, when faced with fractures unsuitable for this approach, we revert to the standard open techniques, using well-established extensile approaches. Weaknesses of this study include its retrospective nature. Additionally, standardized functional outcomes were not systematically collected during routine follow-up appointments with the patients. It is important to note that the purpose of this manuscript was to report on a practical and simple solution addressing the challenges of guidewire misdirection, thereby minimizing the need for multiple guidewire adjustments in patients with narrow and challenging osseous corridors in the pelvic ring or acetabulum. Our focus was not on evaluating the clinical or functional outcomes of a diverse group of pelvic ring injuries and acetabular fractures.
In summary, the utilization of a modified guidewire with a bent tip offers a versatile solution for trauma surgeons in enhancing the precision of percutaneous screw placement within pelvic and acetabular fractures. This technique not only facilitates minor yet crucial corrections to the initially misaligned screw trajectory but also proven effective in addressing specific fracture malalignments prior to percutaneous screw fixation. However, additional research involving a larger cohort is essential to conclusively ascertain the effectiveness of this construct compared to established alternatives.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.