Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2015

01.07.2015 | Review Article

Organisational structure of liver transplantation in the UK

verfasst von: James Neuberger

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

This review aims to outline the delivery of liver transplant services in the UK.

Background

Liver transplantation in the UK is based on seven designated transplant units serving a population of just over 60 million people. Nearly 900 liver transplants were done in 2013/2014.

Process

Potential deceased donors are identified and referred to centrally employed specialist nurses for obtaining family consent and for donor characterisation. Organs are retrieved by a National Organ Retrieval Service, based on seven abdominal and six cardiothoracic retrieval teams providing a 24/7 service which has shown to be capable of retrieving organs from up to ten donors a day. Donated organs are allocated first nationally to those who qualify for super-urgent listing. The next priority is for splitting livers, and if there is no suitable recipient or the liver is not suitable for splitting, then livers are offered first to the local centre; each centre has a designated donor zone, adjusted annually to ensure equity between the number of patients listed and the number of donors. The allocation scheme is being reviewed, and national schemes based on need, utility and benefit are being assessed.

Governance

Outcomes are monitored by National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), and if there is a possibility of adverse deviation, then further inquiries are made. Outcomes, both from listing and from transplantation, are published by the centre on the NHSBT website (www.​odt.​nhs.​uk). NHSBT works closely with stakeholders primarily through the advisory groups with clinicians, patients, lay members and professional societies and aims to provide openness and transparency.

Conclusions

The system for organ donation and delivery of liver transplant in the UK has developed and is now providing an effective and efficient service, but there remains room for improvement.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber K, Madden S, Allen J, Collett D, Neuberger J, Gimson AE, United Kingdom Liver Transplant Selection and Allocation Working Party (2011) Elective liver transplant mortality: development of a United Kingdom end-stage liver disease score. Transplantation 92:469–476PubMedCrossRef Barber K, Madden S, Allen J, Collett D, Neuberger J, Gimson AE, United Kingdom Liver Transplant Selection and Allocation Working Party (2011) Elective liver transplant mortality: development of a United Kingdom end-stage liver disease score. Transplantation 92:469–476PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Newsletter Transplant International. Figures on Donation and Transplantation 2012. 18:1.2013 Newsletter Transplant International. Figures on Donation and Transplantation 2012. 18:1.2013
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson R, Bradbury LL, Martin K, Neuberger J, UK Transplant Registry (2014) Organ donation and transplantation in the UK—the last decade: a report from the UK national transplant registry. Transplantation 97(Suppl 1):S1–S27 Johnson R, Bradbury LL, Martin K, Neuberger J, UK Transplant Registry (2014) Organ donation and transplantation in the UK—the last decade: a report from the UK national transplant registry. Transplantation 97(Suppl 1):S1–S27
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuberger J, Madden S, Collett D (2010) Review of methods for measuring and comparing center performance after organ transplantation. Liver Transpl 16:1119–1128PubMedCrossRef Neuberger J, Madden S, Collett D (2010) Review of methods for measuring and comparing center performance after organ transplantation. Liver Transpl 16:1119–1128PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Saidi RF, Razavi M, Cosimi AB, Ko DS (2015) Competition in liver transplantation: helpful or harmful? Liver Transpl 21:145–150PubMedCrossRef Saidi RF, Razavi M, Cosimi AB, Ko DS (2015) Competition in liver transplantation: helpful or harmful? Liver Transpl 21:145–150PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Halldorson JB, Paarsch HJ, Didge JL, Segre AM, Lai J, Roberts JP (2013) Center competition and outcomes following liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 19:96–104PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Halldorson JB, Paarsch HJ, Didge JL, Segre AM, Lai J, Roberts JP (2013) Center competition and outcomes following liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 19:96–104PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Macomber CW, Shaw JJ, Santry H, Saidi RF, Jabbour N, Tseng JF, Bozorgzadeh A, Shah SA (2012) Center volume and resource consumption in liver transplantation. HPB 14:554–559PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Macomber CW, Shaw JJ, Santry H, Saidi RF, Jabbour N, Tseng JF, Bozorgzadeh A, Shah SA (2012) Center volume and resource consumption in liver transplantation. HPB 14:554–559PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guba M (2014) Center volume, competition and outcome in German liver transplant centers. Transp Res 3:6CrossRef Guba M (2014) Center volume, competition and outcome in German liver transplant centers. Transp Res 3:6CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijboer A, Ulrich F, Bechstein WO, Schnitzbauer AA (2014) Volume and outcome relation in German liver transplant centers: what lessons can be learned? Transpl Res 3:4CrossRef Nijboer A, Ulrich F, Bechstein WO, Schnitzbauer AA (2014) Volume and outcome relation in German liver transplant centers: what lessons can be learned? Transpl Res 3:4CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burroughs A, Sabin CA, Rolles K, Delvart V, Karam V, Buckels J et al (2006) 3-month and 12-month mortality after first liver transplant in adults in Europe: predictive models for outcome. Lancet 367:225–232PubMedCrossRef Burroughs A, Sabin CA, Rolles K, Delvart V, Karam V, Buckels J et al (2006) 3-month and 12-month mortality after first liver transplant in adults in Europe: predictive models for outcome. Lancet 367:225–232PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts JP (2012) Impact of outcomes monitoring on innovation and risk in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 18(Suppl 2):S59–S63PubMedCrossRef Roberts JP (2012) Impact of outcomes monitoring on innovation and risk in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 18(Suppl 2):S59–S63PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abercassis MM, Burke R, Klintmalm GB, Matas AJ, Merion RM, Millman D, Olthoff K et al (2009) American Society of Transplant Surgeons transplant center outcomes requirements—a threat to innovation. Am J Transplant 9:1279–1286CrossRef Abercassis MM, Burke R, Klintmalm GB, Matas AJ, Merion RM, Millman D, Olthoff K et al (2009) American Society of Transplant Surgeons transplant center outcomes requirements—a threat to innovation. Am J Transplant 9:1279–1286CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Organisational structure of liver transplantation in the UK
verfasst von
James Neuberger
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1296-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.