Background
Methods
Assessment instrument
-
Church history of wellness activities in the last 12 months; this questions was limited to the last 12 months to improve recall.
-
Interest in addressing 13 specific health issues rated from 1 = not interested to 10 = extremely interested;
-
Church leadership for implementation of wellness activities: Four items assessed how often the church leadership emphasized the importance of physical health at church, openly supported wellness activities, actively encouraged parishioners to participate in wellness activities and openly acknowledged the contributions of volunteers (never or rarely, 1–3 times a month, once a week, several times a week). Three items assessed to what extent the church leadership was involved in planning wellness activities, implementing wellness activities and problem solving (never or rarely, to a moderate extent, to a great extent, to a very great extent). Each item was scored from 1 to 4. Scores for all 7 items were averaged to compute the Church Leadership Score.
-
Church resources to implement wellness activities, including having a budget for health- related activities, number of volunteers, having a health ministry, having a kitchen and meeting rooms, and church partnerships with clinics or outside resources that could assist in wellness efforts.
-
Church willingness to implement a list of 14 activities: e.g., to ask church members to give a testimonial related to their experience with cancer or cancer screening; or to promote health as part of a research project in partnership with an academic institution (rated from 1 = not willing to 10 = extremely willing).
-
Barriers to implement wellness activities: open-ended question followed by 10 probes for specific issues. Response categories were “experienced this challenge”, “expect this challenge” and “would not be a challenge”.
-
Resources needed in order implement wellness activities: open-ended question, followed by 8 specific resources that were rated from 1 = not interested to 10 = extremely interested.
-
Basic church characteristics including denomination; size of the active congregation, counting only members who frequently attend church events; years the church had been in operation; years that the current church leader had been at this church; number of paid staff; prior partnerships with academic institutions to promote wellness; and the existence of health and wellness policies or guidelines for healthy church meals.
Statistical analysis
Total (N = 100) | Small (N = 19) | Medium (N = 37) | Large (N = 44) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
% commuters (Mean + s.d.) | 29 ± 29 | 28 ± 35 | 36 ± 31 | 24 ± 25 | NS |
% long-time members | 61 ± 27 | 64 ± 32 | 60 ± 28 | 61 ± 22 | NS |
years in operation (range 1–120) | 54 ± 32 | 35 ± 29 | 47 ± 31 | 69 ± 29 | < 0.0001 |
years of this leader at church (range 0.5–58) | 16 ± 12 | 13 ± 8 | 17 ± 13 | 15 ± 13 | NS |
number of paid staff (range 0–35) | 5 ± 5 | 2 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 | 8 ± 6 | < 0.0001 |
# of wellness activities conducted in last 12 months (range 0–5) | 1.9 ± 1.4 | 1.2 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | < 0.05 |
# of barriers to implement wellness activities (experienced or expected, range 0–8) | 4.8 ± 1.8 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 4.6 ± 1.6 | 4.8 ± 2.0 | NS |
Church Leadership Scale (7 items; range 1–4) | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 0.09 |
% of churches | |||||
in which members know each other very well | 59 | 74 | 65 | 48 | 0.10 |
with a health/wellness ministry | 41 | 21 | 30 | 59 | < 0.01 |
Denomination | |||||
Methodist | 13 | 5 | 14 | 16 | 0.10 |
Baptist | 50 | 42 | 41 | 61 | |
Non-denominational/Other | 37 | 53 | 46 | 23 |
Proportion of churches that … | Total (N = 100) | Small (N = 19) | Medium (N = 37) | Large (N = 44) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
conducted > 1 wellness activity in last 12 month | 56% | 37% | 54% | 66% | 0.10 |
ever partnered with academia to promote wellness | 53% | 42% | 46% | 64% | NS |
has health advisory program | 30% | 16% | 22% | 43% | < 0.05 |
has health or wellness policies or goals for congregation | 34% | 11% | 38% | 41% | 0.05 |
has guidelines for healthy church meals | 37% | 16% | 46% | 39% | 0.08 |
promoted physical activity from the pulpit in last 12 months | 87% | 79% | 89% | 89% | NS |
promoted good nutrition from the pulpit in last 12 months | 90% | 84% | 92% | 91% | NS |
has partnership with clinics or outside resources that could assist in wellness efforts at church | 66% | 68% | 59% | 70% | NS |
has 3 or more individuals that function as wellness champions | 67% | 37% | 65% | 82% | < 0.01 |
has high church leadership engagement to promote wellness | 50% | 42% | 41% | 61% | NS |
Total Wellness Activity Score (range 0–10), Mean ± S.D. | 5.7 ± 2.5 | 4.3 ± 2.4 | 5.5 ± 2.3 | 6.5 ± 2.5 | < 0.01 |
Results
Church characteristics
Wellness activities conducted by churches
Barriers to implementing wellness activities
Total (N = 100) | Small (N = 19) | Medium (N = 37) | Large (N = 44) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insufficient budget | 85% | 95% | 84% | 82% | NS |
Lack of other resources | 81% | 84% | 78% | 82% | NS |
Not sure how to implement wellness activities | 61% | 63% | 62% | 59% | NS |
Not enough volunteers | 58% | 53% | 62% | 57% | NS |
Members not interested | 47% | 63% | 38% | 48% | NS |
Not sure what topics members would be interested in | 37% | 32% | 38% | 39% | NS |
Lack of commitment from church leadership | 36% | 37% | 30% | 41% | NS |
Too many activities already ongoing | 32% | 16% | 27% | 43% | 0.07 |
Members don’t like to participate in research | 24% | 37% | 22% | 20% | NS |
Size of membership | 21% | 47% | 19% | 11% | < 0.01 |
# of barriers to implement wellness activities (Mean ± standard deviation) | 4.8 ± 1.8 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 4.6 ± 1.6 | 4.8 ± 2.0 | NS |
Resources to implement wellness activities
Churches’ willingness to conduct selected activities
Activity (10 point scale from not willing (1) to extremely willing (10) | M ± S.D. |
---|---|
Distribute print information on various health topics | 9.5 ± 1.3 |
Plan and conduct a health fair at your church | 9.3 ± 1.3 |
Partner with an academic institution to promote health | 9.3 ± 1.5 |
Host a speaker and advertise the event at your church | 9.2 ± 1.5 |
Survey or debrief parishioners to determine the success of a wellness activity | 9.0 ± 1.7 |
Conduct a survey with parishioners to identify health concerns | 8.9 ± 1.6 |
Host a health program at your church and help to recruit members, but the program itself would be delivered by an outside expert | 8.9 ± 1.6 |
Promote health as part of a research study | 8.8 ± 1.8 |
Identify volunteers who would be trained to provide counseling | 8.5 ± 2.1 |
Ask church members to give a testimonial | 8.3 ± 2.0 |
Raise funds to support a wellness activity at your church | 8.2 ± 2.2 |
Regularly incorporate health messages into the sermon | 8.1 ± 2.1 |
Institute policies regarding the food that can be served at church | 7.7 ± 2.4 |
Incorporate 5–10 min exercise breaks into church activities | 7.1 ± 2.6 |
Exploring inner setting factors associated with implementation of wellness activities
Church Characteristics | Bivariate relationship between each item and outcome | Adjusted relationship between domain and outcome | Full Model R-square = 0.45 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items | β | P | R2 | β | P | R2 | β | P |
Structural Characteristics (Organization social architecture, age, maturity and size) | ||||||||
Size of active congregationa | 1.11 | < 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.36 | NS | 0.18 | 0.19 | NS |
Years church has been in operation | 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.005 | NS | 0.008 | 0.09 | |
Number of paid staffa | 1.60 | < 0.01 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.02 | 1.05 | < 0.05 | |
Culture (Organization norms and values | ||||||||
Denomination (reference group: non-denominational/other) | ||||||||
Methodist | 1.10 | < 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.32 | NS | |
Baptist | −0.50 | 0.08 | −0.58 | 0.03 | 0.25 | −0.94 | < 0.01 | |
Ever partnered with academia to promote wellness at church 1 = yes, 0 = no | 0.64 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.01 | NS | |
Has guidelines for healthy church meals 1 = yes 0 = no | 0.76 | < 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.77 | < 0.01 | −0.25 | NS | |
Leadership Engagement (Commitment, involvement and accountability of leaders with the implementation) | ||||||||
Church leadership scale, 7 items | 0.59 | < 0.01 | 0.08 | – | 0.05 | NS | ||
Resources (level of resources dedicated for implementation and ongoing operations, including money, training, education, physical space, time) | ||||||||
Has a health/wellness ministry? 1 = yes,0 = no | 1.01 | < 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.46 | NS | 0.23 | −0.01 | NS |
Number of members who frequently volunteera | 1.20 | < 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.60 | 0.10 | −0.17 | NS | |
Has a budget for health-related activities 1 = yes, 0 = no | 1.01 | < 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.50 | NS | −0.47 | NS | |
# Barriers to implement wellness activities, experienced or expectedb | −0.13 | < 0.01 | 0.09 | −0.09 | 0.03 | −0.07 | NS | |
Networks and Communication (The nature and quality of webs of social networks) | ||||||||
Has partnerships with clinics or outside resources that could assist in wellness efforts 1 = yes, 0 = no | 0.83 | < 0.01 | 0.08 | – | −0.36 | NS | ||
Method of survey administration 1 = face-to-face, 0 = phone | .60 | 0.04 | 0.04 | – | −0.18 | NS |