Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017

11.07.2017 | Original Article

Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure—results from a prospective study

verfasst von: Anneke Ullrich, Hilke M. Rath, Ullrich Otto, Christa Kerschgens, Martin Raida, Christa Hagen-Aukamp, Corinna Bergelt

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Approximately 60% of patients are able to work following a cancer diagnosis. The return-to-work (RTW) process after disability can be conceptualized as a multi-phase construct. This study investigated RTW outcomes throughout the RTW process among survivors of prostate cancer (PC) attending a cancer rehabilitation measure.

Methods

The study was based on a sample of 837 employed PC survivors enrolled in a longitudinal multicenter study. Data was collected at the beginning of the rehabilitation measure, at the end and at 12-month follow-up by means of self-report questionnaires. We compared outcomes with regard to age (<60 and ≥60 years) and socio-economic status (SES; lower, middle, higher) using t tests or univariate ANOVA for metrical and chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

Results

In the off-work phase, most survivors reported positive expectations regarding future work, including responsiveness of their work environment. Nevertheless, one fourth intended to apply for a disability pension. At 12-month follow-up, the RTW rate was 87% and 62% when applying more conservative criteria of RTW. Among survivors who had returned to work, most reported stability of the work situation. Survivors with lower SES showed least favorable outcomes throughout the RTW process, while older age was less consistently of negative impact.

Conclusions

Survivors reported many favorable RTW outcomes, but low SES might be a barrier at various stages of the RTW process. Thus, special attention must be paid to the role of social inequalities during rehabilitation and work reintegration to help survivors managing the RTW process.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, Patient to Cancer Survivor (2005) Lost in transition. Institute of Medicine and National Research, Washington Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, Patient to Cancer Survivor (2005) Lost in transition. Institute of Medicine and National Research, Washington
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Peteet JR (2005) Cancer and the meaning of work. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 22:200–205CrossRef Peteet JR (2005) Cancer and the meaning of work. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 22:200–205CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehnert A (2011) Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol/ Hematol 77:109–130CrossRef Mehnert A (2011) Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol/ Hematol 77:109–130CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat van Muijen P, Weevers NL, Snels IA et al (2013) Predictors of return to work and employment in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care 22:144–160CrossRef van Muijen P, Weevers NL, Snels IA et al (2013) Predictors of return to work and employment in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care 22:144–160CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC et al (2010) Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv 4:415–437CrossRefPubMed Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC et al (2010) Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv 4:415–437CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT et al (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17:766–781CrossRefPubMed Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT et al (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17:766–781CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehnert A, Koch U (2012) Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation—a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39:76–87CrossRefPubMed Mehnert A, Koch U (2012) Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation—a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39:76–87CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Böttcher H, Steimann M, Ullrich A et al (2013) Work-related predictors of not returning to work after inpatient rehabilitation in cancer patients. Acta Oncol 52:1067–1075CrossRefPubMed Böttcher H, Steimann M, Ullrich A et al (2013) Work-related predictors of not returning to work after inpatient rehabilitation in cancer patients. Acta Oncol 52:1067–1075CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert Koch-Institute and the Society of the Epidemiological Cancer Registries in Germany (2015) [Cancer in Germany 2011/2012 (Vol. 10)]. Berlin Robert Koch-Institute and the Society of the Epidemiological Cancer Registries in Germany (2015) [Cancer in Germany 2011/2012 (Vol. 10)]. Berlin
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z et al (2005) Employment outcomes of men treated for PC. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:958–965CrossRefPubMed Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z et al (2005) Employment outcomes of men treated for PC. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:958–965CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley CJ, Oberst K, Schenk M (2006) Absenteeism from work: the experience of employed breast and PC patients in the months following diagnosis. Psychooncology 15:739–747CrossRefPubMed Bradley CJ, Oberst K, Schenk M (2006) Absenteeism from work: the experience of employed breast and PC patients in the months following diagnosis. Psychooncology 15:739–747CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahl S, Steinsvik E, Dahl A et al (2014) Return to work and sick leave after radical prostatectomy: a prospective clinical study. Acta Oncol 53:744–751CrossRefPubMed Dahl S, Steinsvik E, Dahl A et al (2014) Return to work and sick leave after radical prostatectomy: a prospective clinical study. Acta Oncol 53:744–751CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Oberst K, Bradley CJ, Gardiner JC et al (2010) Work task disability in employed breast and PC patients. J Cancer Surviv 4:322–330CrossRefPubMed Oberst K, Bradley CJ, Gardiner JC et al (2010) Work task disability in employed breast and PC patients. J Cancer Surviv 4:322–330CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ et al (2011) Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD007569 de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ et al (2011) Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD007569
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellbom M, Bergelt C, Bergenmar M et al (2011) Cancer rehabilitation: a Nordic and European perspective. Acta Oncol 50:179–186CrossRefPubMed Hellbom M, Bergelt C, Bergenmar M et al (2011) Cancer rehabilitation: a Nordic and European perspective. Acta Oncol 50:179–186CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerdes N, Zwingmann C, Jäckel WH (2006) The system of rehabilitation in Germany. In: Jäckel WH, Bengel J, Herdt J (eds) Research in rehabilitation. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 3–19 Gerdes N, Zwingmann C, Jäckel WH (2006) The system of rehabilitation in Germany. In: Jäckel WH, Bengel J, Herdt J (eds) Research in rehabilitation. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 3–19
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ullrich A, Böttcher HM, Bergelt C (2012) Gender-related aspects of returning to work in cancer survivors. A systematic review. Bundesgesundheitsbla 55:516–532CrossRef Ullrich A, Böttcher HM, Bergelt C (2012) Gender-related aspects of returning to work in cancer survivors. A systematic review. Bundesgesundheitsbla 55:516–532CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Young A, Roessler RT, Wasiak R et al (2005) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15:557–568CrossRefPubMed Young A, Roessler RT, Wasiak R et al (2005) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15:557–568CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bürger W, Deck R (2009) SIBAR—a short screening instrument for the assessment of need for occupation related treatment in medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 48:211–221CrossRefPubMed Bürger W, Deck R (2009) SIBAR—a short screening instrument for the assessment of need for occupation related treatment in medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 48:211–221CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bürger W, Dietsche S, Morfeld M et al (2001) Multiperspective estimates on the probability of patient return to work following orthopaedic rehabilitation: findings and predictive relevancy. Rehabilitation 40:217–225CrossRefPubMed Bürger W, Dietsche S, Morfeld M et al (2001) Multiperspective estimates on the probability of patient return to work following orthopaedic rehabilitation: findings and predictive relevancy. Rehabilitation 40:217–225CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A et al (1998) Work ability index, 2nd, revised edn. Helsinki, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A et al (1998) Work ability index, 2nd, revised edn. Helsinki, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Winkler J, Stolzenberg H (2009) Adjustment of the social class index for use in the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS) 2003/2006. Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Winkler J, Stolzenberg H (2009) Adjustment of the social class index for use in the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS) 2003/2006. Hochschule Wismar, Wismar
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruber J, Wise D (1998) Social security and retirement: an international comparison. American Econ Rev 88:158–163 Gruber J, Wise D (1998) Social security and retirement: an international comparison. American Econ Rev 88:158–163
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schils T (2008) Early retirement in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom: a longitudinal analysis of individual factors and institutional regimes. Eur Soc Rev 24:319–324 Schils T (2008) Early retirement in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom: a longitudinal analysis of individual factors and institutional regimes. Eur Soc Rev 24:319–324
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J (1988) Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bethge M (2016) Effects of graded return-to-work: a propensity-score-matched analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 42:273–279CrossRefPubMed Bethge M (2016) Effects of graded return-to-work: a propensity-score-matched analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 42:273–279CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Torp S, Gudbergsson SB, Dahl AA et al (2011) Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health 39:33–42CrossRefPubMed Torp S, Gudbergsson SB, Dahl AA et al (2011) Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health 39:33–42CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Taskila-Brandt T, Martikainen R, Virtanen SV et al (2004) The impact of education and occupation on the employment status of cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 40:2488-2493 Taskila-Brandt T, Martikainen R, Virtanen SV et al (2004) The impact of education and occupation on the employment status of cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 40:2488-2493
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindbohm ML, Kuosma E, Taskila T et al (2011) Cancer as the cause of changes in work situation (a NOCWO study). Psychooncology 20:805–812CrossRefPubMed Lindbohm ML, Kuosma E, Taskila T et al (2011) Cancer as the cause of changes in work situation (a NOCWO study). Psychooncology 20:805–812CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure—results from a prospective study
verfasst von
Anneke Ullrich
Hilke M. Rath
Ullrich Otto
Christa Kerschgens
Martin Raida
Christa Hagen-Aukamp
Corinna Bergelt
Publikationsdatum
11.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3790-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.