Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 3/2020

01.06.2020 | Original Paper

Outcomes following high- versus low-volume fat transfer following breast reconstruction and conservation—the Canniesburn Experience

verfasst von: Kavita S. Sharma, John Biddlestone, Adeeb Naasan, Eva M. Weiler-Mithoff

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Fat transfer is increasingly being used following oncological breast surgery to improve contour irregularities, provide symmetry and treat radiotherapy changes. Our study aims to compare patients receiving high-volume (HV) (> 200 mls of fat transferred in one session) versus low-volume (LV) (< 200 mls fat transferred per session) fat transfer to determine differences in outcomes using these two approaches.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing lipomodelling for breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2018. Data collected included patient demographics, type of reconstruction, number of lipomodelling sessions and volume of aspirate and fat reinjected. The primary endpoints were a comparison of complication rates, need for additional imaging and biopsies and cancer recurrence between the two groups. Secondary endpoints were a subgroup analysis of the patients who had received radiotherapy in each group for the above parameters.

Results

Two hundred fifty-seven patients underwent 407 episodes of LV and 126 patients underwent 179 episodes of HV fat transfer. Patients were matched for body mass index (BMI), ASA grade and smoking status. The donor site had a higher rate of complications following HV fat transfer (4.47 vs. 1.47%; p = 0.029*). There were no significant differences in the requirement for additional imaging and biopsies and tumour recurrence between the two groups. Secondary endpoints: No significant differences in recipient site complication rates and need for further imaging and biopsies were noted in patients receiving radiotherapy.

Conclusions

HV fat transfer was associated with an increased donor site morbidity; however, it is acceptable in suitable patients following radiotherapy.
Level of evidence III, therapeutic study
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Katzel EB, Bucky LP (2017) Fat grafting to the breast: clinical applications and outcomes for reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):69S–76SCrossRef Katzel EB, Bucky LP (2017) Fat grafting to the breast: clinical applications and outcomes for reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):69S–76SCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Debald M, Pech T, Kaiser C, Keyver-Paik MD, Walgenbach-Bruenagel G, Kalff JC, Kuhn W, Walgenbach KJ (2017) Lipofilling effects after breast cancer surgery in post-radiation patients: an analysis of results and algorithm proposal. Eur J Plast Surg 40(5):447–454CrossRef Debald M, Pech T, Kaiser C, Keyver-Paik MD, Walgenbach-Bruenagel G, Kalff JC, Kuhn W, Walgenbach KJ (2017) Lipofilling effects after breast cancer surgery in post-radiation patients: an analysis of results and algorithm proposal. Eur J Plast Surg 40(5):447–454CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Vecchio DA, Del Vecchio SJ (2014) The graft-to-capacity ratio: volumetric planning in large-volume fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):561–569CrossRef Del Vecchio DA, Del Vecchio SJ (2014) The graft-to-capacity ratio: volumetric planning in large-volume fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):561–569CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB, Sarfati I, Ihrai T, Rietjens M, Veronesi P, Rossetto F, Scevola A, Delay E (2011) The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study—Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):341–346CrossRef Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB, Sarfati I, Ihrai T, Rietjens M, Veronesi P, Rossetto F, Scevola A, Delay E (2011) The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study—Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):341–346CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutowski KA (2009) ASPS Fat Graft Task Force. Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):272–280CrossRef Gutowski KA (2009) ASPS Fat Graft Task Force. Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):272–280CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29(5):360–376CrossRef Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29(5):360–376CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang CS, Lanni MA, Lamelas AM, Tecce MG, Bucky LP (2016) Abstract: identifying risk factors for fat necrosis after autologous fat transplantation to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(9 Suppl):135–136CrossRef Chang CS, Lanni MA, Lamelas AM, Tecce MG, Bucky LP (2016) Abstract: identifying risk factors for fat necrosis after autologous fat transplantation to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(9 Suppl):135–136CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Noor L, Reeves HR, Kumar D, Alozairi O, Bhaskar P (2016) Imaging changes after breast reconstruction with fat grafting—retrospective study of 90 breast cancer. Pak J Med Sci 32(1):8–12CrossRef Noor L, Reeves HR, Kumar D, Alozairi O, Bhaskar P (2016) Imaging changes after breast reconstruction with fat grafting—retrospective study of 90 breast cancer. Pak J Med Sci 32(1):8–12CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinell-White XA, Etra J, Newell M, Tuscano D, Shin K, Losken A (2015) Radiographic implications of fat grafting to the reconstructed breast. Breast J 21(5):520–525CrossRef Pinell-White XA, Etra J, Newell M, Tuscano D, Shin K, Losken A (2015) Radiographic implications of fat grafting to the reconstructed breast. Breast J 21(5):520–525CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin JP, Coon D, Zuley M, Toy J, Asano Y, Kurita M, Aoi N, Harii K, Yoshimura K (2012) Mammographic changes after fat transfer to the breast compared with changes after breast reduction: a blinded study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1029–1038CrossRef Rubin JP, Coon D, Zuley M, Toy J, Asano Y, Kurita M, Aoi N, Harii K, Yoshimura K (2012) Mammographic changes after fat transfer to the breast compared with changes after breast reduction: a blinded study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1029–1038CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar P, Combs TP, Shah SJ, Gouon-Evans V, Pollard JW, Albanese C, Flanagan L, Tenniswood MP, Guha C, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG, Scherer PE (2003) Adipocyte-secreted factors synergistically promote mammary tumorigenesis through induction of anti-apoptotic transcriptional programs and proto-oncogene stabilization. Oncogene. 22(41):6408–6423CrossRef Iyengar P, Combs TP, Shah SJ, Gouon-Evans V, Pollard JW, Albanese C, Flanagan L, Tenniswood MP, Guha C, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG, Scherer PE (2003) Adipocyte-secreted factors synergistically promote mammary tumorigenesis through induction of anti-apoptotic transcriptional programs and proto-oncogene stabilization. Oncogene. 22(41):6408–6423CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Manabe Y, Toda S, Miyazaki K, Sugihara H (2003) Mature adipocytes, but not preadipocytes, promote the growth of breast carcinoma cells in collagen gel matrix culture through cancer-stromal cell interactions. J Pathol 201(2):221–228CrossRef Manabe Y, Toda S, Miyazaki K, Sugihara H (2003) Mature adipocytes, but not preadipocytes, promote the growth of breast carcinoma cells in collagen gel matrix culture through cancer-stromal cell interactions. J Pathol 201(2):221–228CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schäffler A, Schölmerich J, Buechler C (2007) Mechanisms of disease: adipokines and breast cancer—endocrine and paracrine mechanisms that connect adiposity and breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 3(4):345–354CrossRef Schäffler A, Schölmerich J, Buechler C (2007) Mechanisms of disease: adipokines and breast cancer—endocrine and paracrine mechanisms that connect adiposity and breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 3(4):345–354CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Massa M, Gasparini S, Baldelli I, Scarabelli L, Santi P, Quarto R, Repaci E (2016) Interaction between breast cancer cells and adipose tissue cells derived from fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 36(3):358–363CrossRef Massa M, Gasparini S, Baldelli I, Scarabelli L, Santi P, Quarto R, Repaci E (2016) Interaction between breast cancer cells and adipose tissue cells derived from fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 36(3):358–363CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Waked K, Colle J, Doornaert M, Cocquyt V, Blondeel P (2017) Systematic review: the oncological safety of adipose fat transfer after breast cancer surgery. Breast. 31:128–136CrossRef Waked K, Colle J, Doornaert M, Cocquyt V, Blondeel P (2017) Systematic review: the oncological safety of adipose fat transfer after breast cancer surgery. Breast. 31:128–136CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Krastev TK, Schop SJ, Hommes J, Piatkowski AA, Heuts EM, van der Hulst RRWJ (2018) Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer. Br J Surg 105(9):1082–1097CrossRef Krastev TK, Schop SJ, Hommes J, Piatkowski AA, Heuts EM, van der Hulst RRWJ (2018) Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer. Br J Surg 105(9):1082–1097CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Delay E, Streit L, Toussoun G, La Marca S, Ho QC (2013) Lipomodelling: an important advance in breast surgery. Acta Chir Plast 55(2):34–43PubMed Delay E, Streit L, Toussoun G, La Marca S, Ho QC (2013) Lipomodelling: an important advance in breast surgery. Acta Chir Plast 55(2):34–43PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Romics L Jr, Chew BK, Weiler-Mithoff E, Doughty JC, Brown IM, Stallard S, Wilson CR, Mallon EA, George WD (2012) Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 99(6):799–806CrossRef Romics L Jr, Chew BK, Weiler-Mithoff E, Doughty JC, Brown IM, Stallard S, Wilson CR, Mallon EA, George WD (2012) Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 99(6):799–806CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes following high- versus low-volume fat transfer following breast reconstruction and conservation—the Canniesburn Experience
verfasst von
Kavita S. Sharma
John Biddlestone
Adeeb Naasan
Eva M. Weiler-Mithoff
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01597-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.