Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020

06.12.2019 | 2019 SAGES Oral

Outcomes following laparoscopic internal drainage of walled off necrosis of pancreas: experience of 134 cases from a tertiary care centre

verfasst von: Virinder Kumar Bansal, Asuri Krishna, Om Prakash Prajapati, Aditya Baksi, Subodh Kumar, Pramod Garg, Mahesh Chandra Misra

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Internal drainage of walled of necrosis of pancreas has been considered as the standard of care. For symptomatic walled off necrosis (WON) of pancreas with the advent of laparoscopy and refinement of techniques and instrumentation, laparoscopic internal drainage is becoming the standard surgical drainage procedure for these patients. However, there is a dearth of literature regarding outcomes following laparoscopic drainage. Most of the studies have small number of patients with limited follow-up. We in this study describe our experience of laparoscopic internal drainage of walled off necrosis over the last 13 years.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients with WON undergoing laparoscopic internal drainage between January 2005 and December 2018 were included. Primary outcome measure was successful drainage. Secondary outcome measures included morbidity, hospital stay, re-intervention rate and mortality. Patients were followed up post-operatively at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and then annually thereafter. Ultrasonography was done periodically for the assessment of cyst resolution.

Results

Between 2005 and 2018, 154 surgical drainage procedures were performed for symptomatic pseudocyst/walled off necrosis. Out of these, 134 underwent laparoscopic drainage; 129 patients (96.3%) underwent laparoscopic cystogastrostomy and 5 (3.7%) underwent laparoscopic cystojejunostomy. Majority of the patients were male (male:female = 6:1) with a mean age of 36 ± 12.9 years (range 15–58 years). The mean operative time was 94 min (range 64–144 min). There were three conversions because of intra-operative bleeding. The overall post-operative morbidity was 8.9%. The average hospital stay was 4.4 days (2–19 days). The mean duration of follow-up was 5.5 years (range 6 months–13 years). Complete cyst resolution was achieved in 95.5% (n = 128) patients. There has been no mortality till date.

Conclusion

In conclusion, laparoscopic internal drainage is a very effective technique for drainage of WON with an excellent success rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Isayama H, Nakai Y, Rerknimitr R, Khor C, Lau J, Wang H-P et al (2016) Asian consensus statements on endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis. Part 1: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31(9):1546–1554CrossRef Isayama H, Nakai Y, Rerknimitr R, Khor C, Lau J, Wang H-P et al (2016) Asian consensus statements on endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis. Part 1: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31(9):1546–1554CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerch MM, Stier A, Wahnschaffe U, Mayerle J (2009) Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection? Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 106(38):614–621 Lerch MM, Stier A, Wahnschaffe U, Mayerle J (2009) Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection? Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 106(38):614–621
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aljarabah M, Ammori BJ (2007) Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc 21(11):1936–1944CrossRef Aljarabah M, Ammori BJ (2007) Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc 21(11):1936–1944CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu T-M, Jin Z-K, He Q, Zhao X, Kou J-T, Fan H (2017) Treatment of retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts by laparoscopic transgastric cystogastrostomy. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci Hua Zhong Ke Ji Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ying Wen Ban Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao Yixue Yingdewen Ban 37(5):726–731 Wu T-M, Jin Z-K, He Q, Zhao X, Kou J-T, Fan H (2017) Treatment of retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts by laparoscopic transgastric cystogastrostomy. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci Hua Zhong Ke Ji Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ying Wen Ban Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao Yixue Yingdewen Ban 37(5):726–731
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu Z, Wu Z, Han J, Zhou H, Jiao Z (2014) Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy with posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 39(10):1035–1038PubMed Yu Z, Wu Z, Han J, Zhou H, Jiao Z (2014) Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy with posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 39(10):1035–1038PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik AA, Isnain HG, Khan A, Toor AA, Nawaz A, Mansoor R et al (2015) Laparoscopic cystgastrostomy: a Pakistani perspective. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc 65(5):565–568PubMed Malik AA, Isnain HG, Khan A, Toor AA, Nawaz A, Mansoor R et al (2015) Laparoscopic cystgastrostomy: a Pakistani perspective. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc 65(5):565–568PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111CrossRef Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta R, Suvarna D, Sadasivan S, John A, Raj V, Nair P et al (2004) Natural course of asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol 23(4):140–142PubMed Mehta R, Suvarna D, Sadasivan S, John A, Raj V, Nair P et al (2004) Natural course of asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol 23(4):140–142PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori T, Abe N, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2002) Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(5):548–554CrossRef Mori T, Abe N, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2002) Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(5):548–554CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P, Lombard M, Smart HL, Evans J et al (2003) Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg 20(5):397–406CrossRef Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P, Lombard M, Smart HL, Evans J et al (2003) Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg 20(5):397–406CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM (2013) Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 145(3):583–590.e1CrossRef Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM (2013) Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 145(3):583–590.e1CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2003) Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13(3):141–148CrossRef Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2003) Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13(3):141–148CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC et al (2009) Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 23(2):267–271CrossRef Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC et al (2009) Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 23(2):267–271CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes following laparoscopic internal drainage of walled off necrosis of pancreas: experience of 134 cases from a tertiary care centre
verfasst von
Virinder Kumar Bansal
Asuri Krishna
Om Prakash Prajapati
Aditya Baksi
Subodh Kumar
Pramod Garg
Mahesh Chandra Misra
Publikationsdatum
06.12.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07282-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.