Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020

17.06.2019

Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case–controlled study of the MBSAQIP database

verfasst von: Edwin Acevedo Jr., Michael Mazzei, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Rohit Soans, Michael A. Edwards

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery is increasingly performed. There remains controversy about the overall benefit of robotic-assisted (RBS) compared to conventional laparoscopic (LBS) bariatric surgery. In this study, we used a large national risk-stratified bariatric clinical database to compare outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass (RNYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the 2015 and 2016 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use Data File (PUF) was performed. Primary robotic and laparoscopic RYNGB and SG were analyzed. Descriptive analysis was performed of the unmatched cohorts, followed by 1:3 case-controlled matching. Cases and controls were matched by patient demographics and pre-operative comorbidities, and peri-operative outcomes compared.

Results

77,991 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RnYGB) (7.5% robotic-assisted) and 189,503 SG (6.8% robotic-assisted) cases were identified. Operative length was significantly higher in both the robotic-assisted RnYGB and SG cohorts (p < 0.0001). Outcomes were similar between the robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RnYGB cohorts, except a lower mortality rate (p = 0.05), transfusion requirement (p = 0.005), aggregate bleeding (p = 0.04), and surgical site infections (SSI) (p = 0.006) in the robotic-assisted cohort. Outcomes were also similar between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic SG, except for a longer length of stay (p < 0.0001) and higher rates of conversion (p < 0.0001), 30-day intervention (p = 0.01), operative drain present (p < 0.0001), sepsis (p = 0.01), and organ space SSI (p = 0.0002) in the robotic cohort. Bleeding was lower in the robotic SG cohort and mortality was similar.

Conclusion

Both robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RnYGB and SG are overall very safe. Robotic-assisted gastric bypass is associated with a lower mortality and morbidity; however, a clear benefit for robotic-assisted SG compared to laparoscopic SG was not seen. Given the longer operative and hospital duration, robotic SG is not cost-effective.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason EE, Ito C (1996) Gastric Bypass in Obesity. Obes Res 4(3):316–319CrossRef Mason EE, Ito C (1996) Gastric Bypass in Obesity. Obes Res 4(3):316–319CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Elias AA et al (2018) Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: case series analysis and comparison with the laparoscopic approach. Rev Col Bras Cir 45(3):e1806CrossRef Elias AA et al (2018) Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: case series analysis and comparison with the laparoscopic approach. Rev Col Bras Cir 45(3):e1806CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Zhu C, Wen X, Li L, Rampersad S, Lu L, Zhou D, Qian C, Cui R, Zhang M, Yang P, Qu S, Bu L (2017) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves body composition and alleviates insulin resistance in obesity related acanthosis nigricans. Lipids Health Dis 16(1):209CrossRef Zhang Y, Zhu C, Wen X, Li L, Rampersad S, Lu L, Zhou D, Qian C, Cui R, Zhang M, Yang P, Qu S, Bu L (2017) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves body composition and alleviates insulin resistance in obesity related acanthosis nigricans. Lipids Health Dis 16(1):209CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yska JP et al (2015) Remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients after different types of bariatric surgery: a population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom. JAMA Surg 150(12):1126–1133CrossRef Yska JP et al (2015) Remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients after different types of bariatric surgery: a population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom. JAMA Surg 150(12):1126–1133CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribaric G, Buchwald JM, McGlennon TW (2014) Diabetes and weight in comparative studies of bariatric surgery vs conventional medical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 24(3):437–455CrossRef Ribaric G, Buchwald JM, McGlennon TW (2014) Diabetes and weight in comparative studies of bariatric surgery vs conventional medical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 24(3):437–455CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Courcoulas AP et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health Symposium. JAMA Surg 149(12):1323–1329CrossRef Courcoulas AP et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health Symposium. JAMA Surg 149(12):1323–1329CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey JG et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc 28:414–426CrossRef Bailey JG et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc 28:414–426CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Li K et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3031–3044CrossRef Li K et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3031–3044CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Alizadeh RF et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 33:917–922CrossRef Alizadeh RF et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 33:917–922CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg 4(12):2031–2039CrossRef Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg 4(12):2031–2039CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogula et al (2018) Does robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provide outcome advantages over standard laparoscopic approaches? Obes Surg 28(9):2589–2596CrossRef Rogula et al (2018) Does robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provide outcome advantages over standard laparoscopic approaches? Obes Surg 28(9):2589–2596CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Smeenk RM, Van’t Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PGBM (2016) The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume centre experience. Obes Surg 26:1266–1273CrossRef Smeenk RM, Van’t Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PGBM (2016) The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume centre experience. Obes Surg 26:1266–1273CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad A, Carleton JD, Ahmad ZF, Agarwala A (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital. Surg Endosc 30:3792–3796CrossRef Ahmad A, Carleton JD, Ahmad ZF, Agarwala A (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital. Surg Endosc 30:3792–3796CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood MH et al (2014) A comparison of outcomes between the traditional laparoscopic and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. J Robotic Surg 8:29–34CrossRef Wood MH et al (2014) A comparison of outcomes between the traditional laparoscopic and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. J Robotic Surg 8:29–34CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon RC et al (2016) Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it safer than laparoscopic bypass? Obes Surg 26:1016–1020CrossRef Moon RC et al (2016) Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it safer than laparoscopic bypass? Obes Surg 26:1016–1020CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Celio AC et al (2017) Perioperative safety of laparoscopic versus robotic gastric bypass: a propensity matched analysis of early experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 13(11):1847–1852CrossRef Celio AC et al (2017) Perioperative safety of laparoscopic versus robotic gastric bypass: a propensity matched analysis of early experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 13(11):1847–1852CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebastian R, Howell MH, Chang KH, Adrales G, Magnuson T, Schweitzer M, Nguyen H (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015 = 2016 MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc 33(5):1600–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7 CrossRefPubMed Sebastian R, Howell MH, Chang KH, Adrales G, Magnuson T, Schweitzer M, Nguyen H (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015 = 2016 MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc 33(5):1600–1612. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-018-6422-7 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Sioka E, Zacharoulis D (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 17(1):245–253CrossRef Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Sioka E, Zacharoulis D (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 17(1):245–253CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger ER et al (2016) The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies: The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264(3):464–473CrossRef Berger ER et al (2016) The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies: The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264(3):464–473CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 13(1):185–192CrossRef Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 13(1):185–192CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K, et al (2017) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; (CADTH Technology Report, No. 137). Table 16, Capital and Operating Costs of da Vinci Surgical System Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K, et al (2017) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; (CADTH Technology Report, No. 137). Table 16, Capital and Operating Costs of da Vinci Surgical System
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case–controlled study of the MBSAQIP database
verfasst von
Edwin Acevedo Jr.
Michael Mazzei
Huaqing Zhao
Xiaoning Lu
Rohit Soans
Michael A. Edwards
Publikationsdatum
17.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06915-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.