Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

01.03.2016

Outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single incision with SPIDER surgical system are comparable to conventional multiport technique: one surgeon’s experience

verfasst von: Jose E. Escobar-Dominguez, Pedro Garcia-Quintero, Christian Hernandez-Murcia, Juan-Carlos Verdeja

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy has emerged as an alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Technical difficulty, prolonged surgical times and increased complication rates have been reported in single-incision laparoscopic surgery. One of the concerns is lack of triangulation of instruments. The SPIDER® surgical system is a single-incision laparoscopic device that utilizes flexible instruments with the purpose of achieving adequate triangulation. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of SPIDER versus LC.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent LC and SPIDER cholecystectomy by a single surgeon during a concurrent 44-month period at Baptist Health South Florida hospitals was performed focusing on demographics, indication for surgery, complications and incisional hernia rates. Exclusion criteria were concomitant surgery and hernia repair at the time of surgery.

Results

A total of 612 patients underwent minimally invasive cholecystectomy: 279 cases for SPIDER cholecystectomy and 333 for multiport LC. Baseline differences in patient characteristics between the SPIDER and LC groups were statistically significant. The SPIDER group had younger and healthier patients (lower ASA classification scores) with predominant diagnosis of cholelithiasis (69 %) compared to the LC group which had more complex cases. Total complications rate for both SPIDER and LC were 0.4 % (n = 1) and 3 % (n = 10), respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy occurred in one patient from the LC group (0.3 %). Conversion rate from SPIDER to additional ports or LC was performed in 5 cases (1.8 %) with no conversions to open surgery. Hemoperitoneum was reported in 2 cases, one for each approach, requiring reoperation.

Conclusion

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with SPIDER is a safe and feasible technique with similar outcomes to multiport LC. However, statistical significant difference was reported in baseline characteristics of both groups. No incisional hernias were reported in this case series for either technique.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 14:771–772 Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 14:771–772
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Souba Wiley W, Fink Mitchell P, Jurkovich Gregory J, Kaiser Larry P, Pearce William H, Pemberton John H, Soper Nathaniel J (2007) ACS surgery: principles and practice, 6th edn. WebMD Inc., New York Souba Wiley W, Fink Mitchell P, Jurkovich Gregory J, Kaiser Larry P, Pearce William H, Pemberton John H, Soper Nathaniel J (2007) ACS surgery: principles and practice, 6th edn. WebMD Inc., New York
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hao L, Liu M, Zhu H, Li Z (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:487–497CrossRefPubMed Hao L, Liu M, Zhu H, Li Z (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:487–497CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Davila FJ, Tsin DA, Gutierrez LS, Lemus J, Jesus R, Davila MR, Torres-Morales J (2011) Transvaginal single port cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 21:203–206CrossRefPubMed Davila FJ, Tsin DA, Gutierrez LS, Lemus J, Jesus R, Davila MR, Torres-Morales J (2011) Transvaginal single port cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 21:203–206CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6CrossRefPubMed Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047CrossRefPubMed Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMed Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27:4524–4531CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27:4524–4531CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J et al (2011) First human surgery with novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 25:3566–3573CrossRefPubMed Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J et al (2011) First human surgery with novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 25:3566–3573CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146:1122–1127CrossRefPubMed Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146:1122–1127CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barband A, Fakhree MB, Kakaei F, Daryani A (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:17–20CrossRefPubMed Barband A, Fakhree MB, Kakaei F, Daryani A (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:17–20CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Orozakunov E, Akyol C, Tantoglu U, Basceken SI, Kayilioglu IS, Bumin CS, Cakmak A (2013) Surgical glove-port single-incision laparoscopic gastric wedge resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: initial experience with 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:e160–e161. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828b891b CrossRefPubMed Orozakunov E, Akyol C, Tantoglu U, Basceken SI, Kayilioglu IS, Bumin CS, Cakmak A (2013) Surgical glove-port single-incision laparoscopic gastric wedge resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: initial experience with 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:e160–e161. doi:10.​1097/​SLE.​0b013e31828b891b​ CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, Mcgregor CG, Purkayastha S, Malhotra S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2014) Pain, well-being, body image and cosmesis: a comparison of single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:223–229CrossRefPubMed Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, Mcgregor CG, Purkayastha S, Malhotra S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2014) Pain, well-being, body image and cosmesis: a comparison of single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:223–229CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355CrossRefPubMed Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu J, Yuan H, Chen S, He Z, Han P, Wu H (2013) Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23:815–831CrossRef Qiu J, Yuan H, Chen S, He Z, Han P, Wu H (2013) Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23:815–831CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO, Schirnhofer J, Pimpl K, Mittermair C, Obrist C, Brunner E, Hell T (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259:89–95CrossRefPubMed Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO, Schirnhofer J, Pimpl K, Mittermair C, Obrist C, Brunner E, Hell T (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259:89–95CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehetner J, Pelipad D, Darehzereshki A, Mason RJ, Lipham JC, Katkhouda N (2013) Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 23:235–243CrossRefPubMed Zehetner J, Pelipad D, Darehzereshki A, Mason RJ, Lipham JC, Katkhouda N (2013) Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 23:235–243CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mir Labrador J, Sánchez Artigues, de Rojas E, Albors Baga P, Fabra Ramis R (2014) Single port cholecystectomy. Glove Port Cir Esp 92:374–375CrossRefPubMed Mir Labrador J, Sánchez Artigues, de Rojas E, Albors Baga P, Fabra Ramis R (2014) Single port cholecystectomy. Glove Port Cir Esp 92:374–375CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Oruc MT, Ugurlu MU (2013) Extraumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard laparoscopic instruments. Scand J Surg 102:209–214CrossRefPubMed Oruc MT, Ugurlu MU (2013) Extraumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard laparoscopic instruments. Scand J Surg 102:209–214CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA, Paetau AA, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118CrossRefPubMed Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA, Paetau AA, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain A (2011) Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: current evidence and strategies of management. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:211–217CrossRefPubMed Hussain A (2011) Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: current evidence and strategies of management. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:211–217CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2000) The difficult gallbladder: technical tips for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:249–252PubMed Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2000) The difficult gallbladder: technical tips for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:249–252PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vivek MA, Augustine AJ, Rao RA (2014) comprehensive predictive scoring method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg 10:62–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vivek MA, Augustine AJ, Rao RA (2014) comprehensive predictive scoring method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg 10:62–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham A, Cohen M, Ko C, Hall B (2010) A current profile and assessment of North American Cholecystectomy: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 211:176–186CrossRefPubMed Ingraham A, Cohen M, Ko C, Hall B (2010) A current profile and assessment of North American Cholecystectomy: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 211:176–186CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Keus F, de Jong JA, Goozsen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cohcrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006231 Keus F, de Jong JA, Goozsen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cohcrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD006231
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single incision with SPIDER surgical system are comparable to conventional multiport technique: one surgeon’s experience
verfasst von
Jose E. Escobar-Dominguez
Pedro Garcia-Quintero
Christian Hernandez-Murcia
Juan-Carlos Verdeja
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4809-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.