Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2016

26.05.2016 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer

verfasst von: Hiroyuki Kitagawa, Tsutomu Namikawa, Masaya Munekage, Kazune Fujisawa, Eri Munekgae, Michiya Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Hanazaki

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed in the prone position (TSE-PP) followed by laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) compared with open thoracotomy and LGM, for esophageal cancers.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 105 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with LGM for esophageal cancer at Kochi Medical School. Among the study patients, 60 patients underwent TSE-PP, while 45 underwent open thoracotomy (OPEN group). The perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results

Compared to the OPEN group, the TSE-PP group had lower blood loss (TSE-PP, 150 mL; OPEN, 430 mL; P < 0.001), longer operative time (TSE-PP, 609 min; OPEN, 570 min; P = 0.012), more lymph nodes dissected around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (TSE-PP, 6; OPEN, 2; P < 0.001), and a shorter length of hospital stay (TSE-PP, 16.5 days; OPEN, 35 days; P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups. Though the recurrence rate and overall survival were not significantly different in the two groups, the TSE-PP group had better overall survival rates than the OPEN group (P = 0.122).

Conclusions

Patients who underwent TSE-PP with LGM for esophageal cancers recovered earlier after surgery compared to those who underwent open thoracotomy with LGM.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J et al (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240:962–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J et al (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240:962–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H et al (1995) Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 222:654–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H et al (1995) Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 222:654–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113CrossRefPubMed Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494PubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa H, Namikawa T, Iwabu J et al (2013) Efficacy of laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy: comparison with open thoraco-abdominal approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:452–455CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa H, Namikawa T, Iwabu J et al (2013) Efficacy of laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy: comparison with open thoraco-abdominal approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:452–455CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T et al (2009) Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:617–621CrossRefPubMed Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T et al (2009) Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:617–621CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M et al (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491CrossRefPubMed Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M et al (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nozaki I, Kato K, Igaki H et al (2015) Evaluation of safety profile of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 cancer using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29:3519–3526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nozaki I, Kato K, Igaki H et al (2015) Evaluation of safety profile of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 cancer using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29:3519–3526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Noshiro H, Miyake S (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using prone positioning. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 19:399–408CrossRefPubMed Noshiro H, Miyake S (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using prone positioning. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 19:399–408CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973CrossRefPubMed Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H et al (2014) Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg 38:410–418CrossRefPubMed Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H et al (2014) Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg 38:410–418CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Garas G, Kayani B, Tolley N et al (2013) Is there a role for intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during high mediastinal lymph node dissection in three-stage oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer? Int J Surg 11:370–373CrossRefPubMed Garas G, Kayani B, Tolley N et al (2013) Is there a role for intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during high mediastinal lymph node dissection in three-stage oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer? Int J Surg 11:370–373CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 17:515–519CrossRefPubMed Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 17:515–519CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ninomiya I, Osugi H, Fujimura T et al (2008) Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer during the induction period. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56:119–125CrossRefPubMed Ninomiya I, Osugi H, Fujimura T et al (2008) Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer during the induction period. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56:119–125CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng F, Li Y, Ma H et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer. J Thorac Dis 6:1218–1224PubMedPubMedCentral Meng F, Li Y, Ma H et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer. J Thorac Dis 6:1218–1224PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K et al (2013) Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today 43:386–391CrossRefPubMed Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K et al (2013) Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today 43:386–391CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H et al (2012) Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position? J Am Coll Surg 214:838–844CrossRefPubMed Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H et al (2012) Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position? J Am Coll Surg 214:838–844CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y et al (2014) The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectably esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res 34:2399–2404PubMed Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y et al (2014) The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectably esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res 34:2399–2404PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F et al (2011) Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer 11:310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F et al (2011) Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer 11:310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Oshikiri T, Yasuda T, Kawasaki K et al (2016) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surgery 159:459–466CrossRefPubMed Oshikiri T, Yasuda T, Kawasaki K et al (2016) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surgery 159:459–466CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitagawa H, Namikawa T, Munekage M et al (2015) Visualization of the stomach’s arterial networks during esophageal surgery using the Hypereye Medical System. Anticancer Res 35:6201–6205PubMed Kitagawa H, Namikawa T, Munekage M et al (2015) Visualization of the stomach’s arterial networks during esophageal surgery using the Hypereye Medical System. Anticancer Res 35:6201–6205PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ninomiya I, Okamoto K, Fujimura T et al (2014) Oncologic outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection: 10-year experience from a single center. World J Surg 38:120–130CrossRefPubMed Ninomiya I, Okamoto K, Fujimura T et al (2014) Oncologic outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection: 10-year experience from a single center. World J Surg 38:120–130CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson IG, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2010) Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence. Ann Surg 252:281–291CrossRefPubMed Thomson IG, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2010) Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence. Ann Surg 252:281–291CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefPubMed Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer
verfasst von
Hiroyuki Kitagawa
Tsutomu Namikawa
Masaya Munekage
Kazune Fujisawa
Eri Munekgae
Michiya Kobayashi
Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Publikationsdatum
26.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1446-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.