Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2017

16.02.2017 | Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY

P.F.C Sigma® cruciate retaining fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study with minimum 10-year follow-up

verfasst von: O. Riaz, A. Aqil, G. Sisodia, G. Chakrabarty

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

To prospectively compare long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following a cruciate retaining fixed-bearing (FB) and a mobile-bearing (MB) primary total knee replacement (TKR).

Methods

We prospectively reviewed 113 TKRs in 99 patients (14 bilateral) with a PFC sigma cruciate retaining rotating platform system, at an average follow-up of 11.1 years (range 10–12). Results were contrasted with those from 89 TKRs in 72 patients (17 bilateral) with a PFC sigma cruciate fixed-bearing prosthesis, at an average follow-up of 12.1 years (range 10–14.1). Outcomes collected included pre- and post-operative range of motion, Oxford Knee Scores, complications encountered, as well as radiographical assessments of polyethylene wear.

Results

In the MB group, mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 16 pre-operatively to 42 at final follow-up. The mean range of motion was 115° (75–130). In the FB group, mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 16.2 pre-operatively to 42.5 at final follow-up. The mean range of motion was 111.2 (80–135) degrees at final follow-up.

Conclusion

We failed to elicit an objectively demonstrable clinical difference between the MB- and FB-implanted knees. Similarly, radiological benefits of the MB implants with regard to polyethylene wear were not evident at a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M (2005) A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:2290–2296 Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M (2005) A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:2290–2296
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, Kim HJ (2012) Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:866–873CrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, Kim HJ (2012) Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:866–873CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS et al (2001) Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50:431–449PubMed Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS et al (2001) Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50:431–449PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ashour A, Saintmard B, Aubaniac JM (2012) The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:638–644CrossRef Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ashour A, Saintmard B, Aubaniac JM (2012) The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:638–644CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatt H, Rambani R, White W, Chakrabarty G (2012) Primary total knee arthroplasty using the P.F.C Sigma(R)-rotating platform cruciate retaining endoprosthesis—a 6 year follow up. Knee. 19:856–859CrossRefPubMed Bhatt H, Rambani R, White W, Chakrabarty G (2012) Primary total knee arthroplasty using the P.F.C Sigma(R)-rotating platform cruciate retaining endoprosthesis—a 6 year follow up. Knee. 19:856–859CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L (2005) Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:145–153CrossRefPubMed Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L (2005) Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:145–153CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Geiger F, Mau H, Kruger M, Thomsen M (2008) Comparison of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a matched pair analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:285–291CrossRefPubMed Geiger F, Mau H, Kruger M, Thomsen M (2008) Comparison of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a matched pair analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:285–291CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D et al (2003) A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85:62–67CrossRef Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D et al (2003) A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85:62–67CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Stern R, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee 15:206–210CrossRefPubMed Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Stern R, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee 15:206–210CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng Y, Shen B, Yang J et al (2013) Is there reduced polyethylene wear and longer survival when using a mobile-bearing design in total knee replacement? A meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Bone Jt J 95-b:1057–1063CrossRef Zeng Y, Shen B, Yang J et al (2013) Is there reduced polyethylene wear and longer survival when using a mobile-bearing design in total knee replacement? A meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Bone Jt J 95-b:1057–1063CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:1041–1051CrossRef Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:1041–1051CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McEwen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ et al (2005) The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:357–365CrossRefPubMed McEwen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ et al (2005) The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:357–365CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 386:235–242CrossRef D’Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 386:235–242CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith H, Jan M, Mahomed NN, Davey JR, Gandhi R (2011) Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed Smith H, Jan M, Mahomed NN, Davey JR, Gandhi R (2011) Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fransen BL, van Duijvenbode DC, Hoozemans MJ, Burger BJ (2016) No differences between fixed-and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Epub ahead of print] Fransen BL, van Duijvenbode DC, Hoozemans MJ, Burger BJ (2016) No differences between fixed-and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Epub ahead of print]
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan LR, Olivo JL, Voorhorst PE (1997) Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 338:119–123CrossRef Jordan LR, Olivo JL, Voorhorst PE (1997) Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 338:119–123CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J (2001) Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:41–50CrossRef Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J (2001) Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:41–50CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
P.F.C Sigma® cruciate retaining fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study with minimum 10-year follow-up
verfasst von
O. Riaz
A. Aqil
G. Sisodia
G. Chakrabarty
Publikationsdatum
16.02.2017
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1920-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.