Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

10.01.2022 | Original Scientific Report

P-POSSUM and the NELA Score Overpredict Mortality for Laparoscopic Emergency Bowel Surgery: An Analysis of the NELA Database

verfasst von: Alexander R. Darbyshire, Ina Kostakis, Philip H. Pucher, David Prytherch, Stuart J. Mercer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Risk stratification has become a key part of the care processes for patients having emergency bowel surgery. This study aimed to determine if operative approach influences risk-model performance, and risk-adjusted mortality rates in the United Kingdom.

Methods

A prospectively planned analysis was conducted using National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) data from December 2013 to November 2018. The risk-models investigated were P-POSSUM and the NELA Score, with model performance assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. Risk-adjusted mortality was assessed using Standardised Mortality Ratios (SMR). Analysis was performed for the total cohort, and cases performed open, laparoscopically and converted to open. Sub-analysis was performed for cases with ≤ 20% predicted mortality.

Results

Data were available for 116 396 patients with P-POSSUM predicted mortality, and 46 935 patients with the NELA score. Both models displayed excellent discrimination with little variation between operative approaches (c-statistic: P-POSSUM 0.801–0.836; NELA Score 0.811–0.862). The NELA score was well calibrated across all deciles of risk, but P-POSSUM over-predicted risk beyond 20% mortality. Calibration plots for operative approach demonstrated that both models increasingly over-predicted mortality for laparoscopy, relative to open and converted to open surgery. SMRs calculated using both models consistently demonstrated that risk-adjusted mortality with laparoscopy was a third lower than open surgery.

Conclusion

Risk-adjusted mortality for emergency bowel surgery is lower for laparoscopy than open surgery, with P-POSSUM and NELA score both over-predicting mortality for laparoscopy. Operative approach should be considered in the development of future risk-models that rely on operative data.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver CM et al (2018) Organisational factors and mortality after an emergency laparotomy: multilevel analysis of 39 903 national emergency laparotomy audit patients. BJA 121:1346–1356CrossRef Oliver CM et al (2018) Organisational factors and mortality after an emergency laparotomy: multilevel analysis of 39 903 national emergency laparotomy audit patients. BJA 121:1346–1356CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal G et al (2019) Evaluation of the collaborative use of an evidence-based care bundle in emergency laparotomy. JAMA Surg 154:e190145–e190210CrossRef Aggarwal G et al (2019) Evaluation of the collaborative use of an evidence-based care bundle in emergency laparotomy. JAMA Surg 154:e190145–e190210CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Prytherch DR et al (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220CrossRef Prytherch DR et al (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eugene N et al (2018) Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the national emergency laparotomy audit risk model. Br J Anaesth 121:739–748CrossRef Eugene N et al (2018) Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the national emergency laparotomy audit risk model. Br J Anaesth 121:739–748CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Das P, Rowan KM, Grocott MPW (2013) Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery. Anesthesiology 119:959–981CrossRef Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Das P, Rowan KM, Grocott MPW (2013) Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery. Anesthesiology 119:959–981CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver CM, Walker E, Giannaris S, Grocott MPW, Moonesinghe SR (2015) Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. BJA 115:849–860CrossRef Oliver CM, Walker E, Giannaris S, Grocott MPW, Moonesinghe SR (2015) Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. BJA 115:849–860CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd-Carson H et al (2020) The association of pre-operative anaemia with morbidity and mortality after emergency laparotomy. Anaesthesia 75:904–912CrossRef Boyd-Carson H et al (2020) The association of pre-operative anaemia with morbidity and mortality after emergency laparotomy. Anaesthesia 75:904–912CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarman B et al (1999) Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. BMJ 318:1515–1520CrossRef Jarman B et al (1999) Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. BMJ 318:1515–1520CrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou PJ et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 365:1718–1726CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRef Jayne DG et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Biere SSAY et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 379:1887–1892CrossRef Biere SSAY et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 379:1887–1892CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRef van der Pas MH et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef Bonjer HJ et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariette C et al (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 380:152–162CrossRef Mariette C et al (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 380:152–162CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Calster BV et al (2019) Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med 17:230–237CrossRef Calster BV et al (2019) Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med 17:230–237CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRef DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349CrossRef von Elm E et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammed MA et al (2009) Evidence of methodological bias in hospital standardised mortality ratios: retrospective database study of English hospitals. BMJ 338:b780–b788CrossRef Mohammed MA et al (2009) Evidence of methodological bias in hospital standardised mortality ratios: retrospective database study of English hospitals. BMJ 338:b780–b788CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Heywood N et al (2021) The laparoscopy in emergency general surgery (LEGS) study: a questionnaire survey of UK practice. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 103:120–129CrossRef Heywood N et al (2021) The laparoscopy in emergency general surgery (LEGS) study: a questionnaire survey of UK practice. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 103:120–129CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Badrick E, et al. (2020) Laparoscopy in emergency general surgery (The LEGS Study): NELA database analysis. B J Surg Badrick E, et al. (2020) Laparoscopy in emergency general surgery (The LEGS Study): NELA database analysis. B J Surg
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am College Surg 217(5):833-842.e3CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am College Surg 217(5):833-842.e3CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Cohen ME, Hall BL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2016) Evaluation and enhancement of calibration in the American college of surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator. J Am Coll Surg 223:231–239CrossRef Liu Y, Cohen ME, Hall BL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2016) Evaluation and enhancement of calibration in the American college of surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator. J Am Coll Surg 223:231–239CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA (2018) Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based predictive optimal trees in emergency surgery risk (POTTER) calculator. Ann Surg 268:574–583CrossRef Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA (2018) Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based predictive optimal trees in emergency surgery risk (POTTER) calculator. Ann Surg 268:574–583CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sallinen V et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for adhesive small bowel obstruction (LASSO): an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:278–286CrossRef Sallinen V et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for adhesive small bowel obstruction (LASSO): an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:278–286CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Harji DP et al (2020) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the acute setting (LaCeS trial): a multicentre randomized feasibility trial. Br J Surg 107:1595–1604CrossRef Harji DP et al (2020) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the acute setting (LaCeS trial): a multicentre randomized feasibility trial. Br J Surg 107:1595–1604CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Søreide K, Thorsen K, Søreide JA (2014) Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 101:e51-64CrossRef Søreide K, Thorsen K, Søreide JA (2014) Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 101:e51-64CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Shibata J et al (2015) Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Tech Coloproctol 19:275–280CrossRef Shibata J et al (2015) Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Tech Coloproctol 19:275–280CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Crippa J, Mari GM, Miranda A, Costanzi ATM, Maggioni D (2018) Surgical stress response and enhanced recovery after laparoscopic surgery - a systematic review. Chirurgia 113:455–510CrossRef Crippa J, Mari GM, Miranda A, Costanzi ATM, Maggioni D (2018) Surgical stress response and enhanced recovery after laparoscopic surgery - a systematic review. Chirurgia 113:455–510CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Foss NB, Kehlet H (2020) Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy. Anaesthesia 75:A4876–A4877 Foss NB, Kehlet H (2020) Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy. Anaesthesia 75:A4876–A4877
Metadaten
Titel
P-POSSUM and the NELA Score Overpredict Mortality for Laparoscopic Emergency Bowel Surgery: An Analysis of the NELA Database
verfasst von
Alexander R. Darbyshire
Ina Kostakis
Philip H. Pucher
David Prytherch
Stuart J. Mercer
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06404-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Verbände und Cremes gegen Dekubitus: „Wir wissen nicht, was sie bringen!“

Die Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Verbänden oder topischen Mitteln zur Prävention von Druckgeschwüren sei schlecht, so die Verfasser einer aktuellen Cochrane-Studie. Letztlich bleibe es unsicher, ob solche Maßnahmen den Betroffenen nutzen oder schaden.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.