Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

29.09.2017 | Original Paper

Pacemaker implantation after TAVI: predictors of AV block persistence

verfasst von: Luise Gaede, Won-Keun Kim, Christoph Liebetrau, Oliver Dörr, Johannes Sperzel, Johannes Blumenstein, Alexander Berkowitsch, Thomas Walther, Christian Hamm, Albrecht Elsässer, Holger Nef, Helge Möllmann

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

Approximately every fifth patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) requires a permanent pacemaker (PPM) after the procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse predictors of atrioventricular block III° (AVBIII) persistence with concurrent PPM dependency after TAVI.

Methods and results

Between 2010 and 2015 a total of 1198 patients underwent TAVI at the Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Germany. After exclusion of patients with prior PPM (n = 173) 14.7% (n = 176) of the patients underwent PPM implantation after the procedure. Independent predictors of PPM implantation were pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB, p < 0.001) and implantation of a CoreValve prosthesis (p < 0.001). A subgroup of patients with a newly implanted PPM (n = 102) were followed-up for a median of 73 (IQR 62–85) days. The leading indication for PPM implantation was AVBIII in 74.5% (76/102). Of these patients only 22.4% (17/76) had persistent AVBIII at follow-up. Predictors of AVBIII persistence were prior RBBB (p = 0.04), postdilatation (p = 0.006) and higher mean aortic valve gradient prior to implantation (p = 0.013). PPMs were implanted earlier in patients with persisting AVBIII [1 day (IQR0–2.5) vs. 4 days (IQR2–7); p < 0.001]. Early PPM implantation after TAVI was the only independent predictor of persistent AVBIII [OR 1.36 (95% 1.05–1.75); p = 0.02].

Conclusion

The long-term persistence of AVBIII is generally low after TAVI. Therefore, it may be wise to postpone the indication for PPM implantation for a couple of days. The only predictors of a lack of recovery of the AVB are prior RBBB, higher mean aortic valve gradients and postdilatation of the prosthesis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith C, Leon M, Mack M et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed Smith C, Leon M, Mack M et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Leon M, Smith C, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607CrossRefPubMed Leon M, Smith C, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaede L, Möllmann H (2015) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): current perspectives. Herz 54:742–751CrossRef Gaede L, Möllmann H (2015) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): current perspectives. Herz 54:742–751CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaede L, Kim W-K, Blumenstein J et al (2017) Temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Herz 42:316–324CrossRefPubMed Gaede L, Kim W-K, Blumenstein J et al (2017) Temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Herz 42:316–324CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaede L, Blumenstein J, Kim W-K et al (2017) Trends in aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2015: transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve repair. Clin Res Cardiol 106:411–419CrossRefPubMed Gaede L, Blumenstein J, Kim W-K et al (2017) Trends in aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2015: transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve repair. Clin Res Cardiol 106:411–419CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis—complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis—complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Doenst T, Strüning C, Moschovas A et al (2016) Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 105:801–814CrossRefPubMed Doenst T, Strüning C, Moschovas A et al (2016) Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 105:801–814CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidler T, M H, Puls M et al (2016) Feasibility and outcomes of interventional treatment for vascular access site complications following transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 106:183–191CrossRefPubMed Seidler T, M H, Puls M et al (2016) Feasibility and outcomes of interventional treatment for vascular access site complications following transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 106:183–191CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Arsalan M, Filardo G, Kim WK et al (2016) Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 105:1042–1048CrossRefPubMed Arsalan M, Filardo G, Kim WK et al (2016) Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 105:1042–1048CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A et al (2012) Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:391–397CrossRefPubMed Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A et al (2012) Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:391–397CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G et al (2015) Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY). J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2173–2180CrossRefPubMed Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G et al (2015) Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY). J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2173–2180CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ et al (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med NEJM 374:1609–1620CrossRefPubMed Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ et al (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med NEJM 374:1609–1620CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ et al (2017) Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 376:1321–1331CrossRefPubMed Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ et al (2017) Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 376:1321–1331CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohr FW, Holzhey D, Möllmann H et al (2014) The German Aortic Valve Registry: 1-year results from 13,680 patients with aortic valve disease†. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surg 46:808–816CrossRef Mohr FW, Holzhey D, Möllmann H et al (2014) The German Aortic Valve Registry: 1-year results from 13,680 patients with aortic valve disease†. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surg 46:808–816CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraccaro C, Buja G, Tarantini G et al (2011) Incidence, predictors, and outcome of conduction disorders after transcatheter self-expandable aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 107:747–754CrossRefPubMed Fraccaro C, Buja G, Tarantini G et al (2011) Incidence, predictors, and outcome of conduction disorders after transcatheter self-expandable aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 107:747–754CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT et al (2015) Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:60–69CrossRefPubMed Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT et al (2015) Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:60–69CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Urena M, Rodés-Cabau J (2015) Permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:70–73CrossRefPubMed Urena M, Rodés-Cabau J (2015) Permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:70–73CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schymik G, Tzamalis P, Bramlage P et al (2015) Retro Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort. Clin Res Cardiol 104:351–362CrossRefPubMed Schymik G, Tzamalis P, Bramlage P et al (2015) Retro Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort. Clin Res Cardiol 104:351–362CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonska B, Seeger J, Keßler M et al (2017) Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. Clin Res Cardiol. doi:10.1007/s00392-017-1093-2 (epub ahead of print) PubMed Gonska B, Seeger J, Keßler M et al (2017) Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. Clin Res Cardiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00392-017-1093-2 (epub ahead of print) PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kempfert J, Meyer A, Kim W-K et al (2016) Comparison of two valve systems for transapical aortic valve implantation: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg 49:486–492CrossRef Kempfert J, Meyer A, Kim W-K et al (2016) Comparison of two valve systems for transapical aortic valve implantation: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg 49:486–492CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim W-K, Rolf A, Liebetrau C et al (2014) Detection of myocardial injury by CMR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:349–357CrossRefPubMed Kim W-K, Rolf A, Liebetrau C et al (2014) Detection of myocardial injury by CMR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:349–357CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Möllmann H, Kim W-K, Kempfert J et al (2014) Transfemoral aortic valve implantation of edwards SAPIEN XT without predilatation is feasible. Clin Cardiol 37:667–671CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Kim W-K, Kempfert J et al (2014) Transfemoral aortic valve implantation of edwards SAPIEN XT without predilatation is feasible. Clin Cardiol 37:667–671CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Walther T, Möllmann H, van Linden A, Kempfert J (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation transapical: step by step. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:55–61CrossRefPubMed Walther T, Möllmann H, van Linden A, Kempfert J (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation transapical: step by step. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:55–61CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Möllmann H, Kempfert J, Hamm CW, Walther T (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Herz 35:62–68CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Kempfert J, Hamm CW, Walther T (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Herz 35:62–68CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Wahab M, Mehilli J, Frerker C et al (2014) Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAMA 311:1503–1514CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Wahab M, Mehilli J, Frerker C et al (2014) Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAMA 311:1503–1514CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramazzina C, Knecht S, Jeger R et al (2014) Pacemaker implantation and need for ventricular pacing during follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1592–1601CrossRefPubMed Ramazzina C, Knecht S, Jeger R et al (2014) Pacemaker implantation and need for ventricular pacing during follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1592–1601CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Boerlage -VAN, Dijk K, Kooiman KM, Yong ZY et al (2014) Predictors and permanency of cardiac conduction disorders and necessity of pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1520–1529CrossRef Boerlage -VAN, Dijk K, Kooiman KM, Yong ZY et al (2014) Predictors and permanency of cardiac conduction disorders and necessity of pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1520–1529CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Vasa-Nicotera M et al (2009) Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve bioprosthesis. Am Heart J 157:860–866CrossRefPubMed Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Vasa-Nicotera M et al (2009) Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve bioprosthesis. Am Heart J 157:860–866CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Boon RMA, Van Mieghem NM, Theuns DA et al (2013) Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve System. Int J Cardiol 168:1269–1273CrossRefPubMed van der Boon RMA, Van Mieghem NM, Theuns DA et al (2013) Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve System. Int J Cardiol 168:1269–1273CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C et al (2014) Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation 129:1233–1243CrossRefPubMed Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C et al (2014) Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation 129:1233–1243CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Urena M, Rodés-cabau J, Hospital BB, Heart Q (2015) EuroIntervention Managing heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from monitoring to device selection and pacemaker indications. EuroIntervention 11:W101–W105CrossRefPubMed Urena M, Rodés-cabau J, Hospital BB, Heart Q (2015) EuroIntervention Managing heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from monitoring to device selection and pacemaker indications. EuroIntervention 11:W101–W105CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329CrossRefPubMed Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Boon RM, Nuis R-J, Van Mieghem NM et al (2012) New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:454–463CrossRefPubMed van der Boon RM, Nuis R-J, Van Mieghem NM et al (2012) New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:454–463CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J et al (2006) Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1927–1937CrossRefPubMed Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J et al (2006) Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1927–1937CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JYS, Fang F, Zhang Q et al (2011) Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function: 2-year results of the PACE trial. Eur Heart J 32:2533–2540CrossRefPubMed Chan JYS, Fang F, Zhang Q et al (2011) Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function: 2-year results of the PACE trial. Eur Heart J 32:2533–2540CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Stockburger M, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G et al (2011) Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail 13:633–641. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfr041 CrossRefPubMed Stockburger M, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G et al (2011) Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail 13:633–641. doi:10.​1093/​eurjhf/​hfr041 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pacemaker implantation after TAVI: predictors of AV block persistence
verfasst von
Luise Gaede
Won-Keun Kim
Christoph Liebetrau
Oliver Dörr
Johannes Sperzel
Johannes Blumenstein
Alexander Berkowitsch
Thomas Walther
Christian Hamm
Albrecht Elsässer
Holger Nef
Helge Möllmann
Publikationsdatum
29.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1158-2

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Lp(a) zur Risikoeinschätzung bei Thoraxschmerzen

Der Lp(a)-Wert kann dazu beitragen, bei stabilen Patienten mit neu aufgetretenen Thoraxschmerzen und ohne KHK-Diagnose die Wahrscheinlichkeit für das Vorliegen von Koronarstenosen abzuschätzen.

Finerenon bei eGFR-Verlust nicht gleich absetzen!

Der Mineralokortikoid-Rezeptor-Antagonist Finerenon verbessert die Prognose bei Herzinsuffizienz mit leicht reduzierter oder erhaltener Ejektionsfraktion. Ein Rückgang der eGFR zu Beginn der Therapie scheint diese Wirkung nicht wesentlich zu mindern.

LVAD auch bei kalt-trockener terminaler Herzinsuffizienz wirksam

Auch Personen mit kalt-trockener terminaler Herzinsuffizienz profitieren von einem linksventrikulären Unterstützungssystem (LVAD), wie Daten aus einem US-Register nahelegen. Doch es gibt Besonderheiten.     

Koronare Herzkrankheit: Das waren die Top-Studien 2024

Zum Thema Koronare Herzkrankheit gab es 2024 wichtige neue Studien. Beleuchtet wurden darin unter anderem der Stellenwert von Betablockern nach Herzinfarkt, neue Optionen für eine Lipidsenkung sowie die Therapie bei infarktbedingtem kardiogenem Schock.

EKG Essentials: EKG befunden mit System (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

In diesem CME-Kurs können Sie Ihr Wissen zur EKG-Befundung anhand von zwölf Video-Tutorials auffrischen und 10 CME-Punkte sammeln.
Praxisnah, relevant und mit vielen Tipps & Tricks vom Profi.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.