Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2011

01.12.2011

Pain characteristics after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

verfasst von: Mette A. Tolver, Pernille Strandfelt, Jacob Rosenberg, Thue Bisgaard

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown different pain characteristics in different types of laparoscopic operations, but pain pattern has not been studied in detail after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. To optimise preoperative patient information and postoperative analgesic treatment the present study investigated postoperative pain in terms of time course, pain intensity and individual pain components during the first 4 days after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP).

Methods

The study was a single-centre prospective trial including 50 consecutive male patients with primary or recurrent inguinal and/or femoral hernia undergoing elective repair. Several pain components (visceral pain, incisional pain and shoulder pain) were studied as well as pain at the three different trocar incisions. Pain was recorded before operation and on a daily basis during the first four postoperative days using a visual analogue and a verbal rating scale. We used 1 × 12 and 2 × 5 mm trocars for TAPP.

Results

A total of 46 patients were available for analyses (age median 58 years, range 27–69 years). Visceral pain dominated significantly compared with incisional pain (P < 0.01), which again dominated over shoulder pain intensity and incidence (P < 0.01). Pain intensity did not significantly differ between different trocar incisions (5 and 12 mm) (P > 0.05). The overall pain intensity (a conglomerate of the different pain components) was most intense 3 h after TAPP and declined to preoperative levels on day 3 (P > 0.5).

Conclusion

Pain was most intense 3 h after the operation and declined to low levels within the first 3 days. Visceral pain was by far the dominating pain component compared with incisional and shoulder pain.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, Khalil R (2010) Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg 8:25–28PubMedCrossRef Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, Khalil R (2010) Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg 8:25–28PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001785 McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001785
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Guaglio M, Croce E (2007) Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery 142:40–46PubMedCrossRef Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Guaglio M, Croce E (2007) Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery 142:40–46PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau H, Patil NG (2004) Acute pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty: multivariate analysis of predictive factors. Surg Endosc 18:92–96PubMedCrossRef Lau H, Patil NG (2004) Acute pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty: multivariate analysis of predictive factors. Surg Endosc 18:92–96PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pavlin DJ, Chen C, Penaloza DA, Polissar NL, Buckley FP (2002) Pain as a factor complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 95:627–634PubMed Pavlin DJ, Chen C, Penaloza DA, Polissar NL, Buckley FP (2002) Pain as a factor complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 95:627–634PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (2005) Procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 23:203–210PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H (2005) Procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 23:203–210PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilkinson RC, Fischer HB, Camu F (2007) PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 21:149–159PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Wilkinson RC, Fischer HB, Camu F (2007) PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 21:149–159PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 90:261–269PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 90:261–269PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, Weerts J, Lamy M (1995) Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 81:379–384PubMed Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, Weerts J, Lamy M (1995) Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 81:379–384PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisgaard T, Stockel M, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2004) Prospective analysis of convalescence and early pain after uncomplicated laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 91:1473–1478PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Stockel M, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2004) Prospective analysis of convalescence and early pain after uncomplicated laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 91:1473–1478PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis-Andersen HU, Rosenberg J (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:13–21PubMedCrossRef Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis-Andersen HU, Rosenberg J (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:13–21PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1062–1066PubMedCrossRef Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1062–1066PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Oehlenschlager J, Hjorne FP, Albers M, Forsberg G, Skovdal J, Stryger V, Bisgaard T (2010) Fewer urological complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without indwelling catheter. Dan Med Bull 57:A4176PubMed Oehlenschlager J, Hjorne FP, Albers M, Forsberg G, Skovdal J, Stryger V, Bisgaard T (2010) Fewer urological complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without indwelling catheter. Dan Med Bull 57:A4176PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M (2008) Current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark. Hernia 12:583–587PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M (2008) Current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark. Hernia 12:583–587PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura T, Wada H, Yoshida M, Kobayashi T, Kawabe A, Isogaki J, Ban S, Kazui T (1998) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:300–303PubMedCrossRef Kimura T, Wada H, Yoshida M, Kobayashi T, Kawabe A, Isogaki J, Ban S, Kazui T (1998) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:300–303PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau H, Lee F (2002) A prospective comparative study of needlescopic and conventional endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16:1737–1740PubMedCrossRef Lau H, Lee F (2002) A prospective comparative study of needlescopic and conventional endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16:1737–1740PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pain characteristics after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
verfasst von
Mette A. Tolver
Pernille Strandfelt
Jacob Rosenberg
Thue Bisgaard
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1810-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.