Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2020

10.07.2019 | Pancreas

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: variability in measurements of tumor size among computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic specimens

verfasst von: Chao Ma, Panpan Yang, Jing Li, Yun Bian, Li Wang, Jianping Lu

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the tumor size measurements assessed by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus measurements of resected pathologic specimens from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

This study included 114 patients with histologically confirmed PDAC who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and MRI before surgery. The tumor sizes from CT, MRI, and pathologic specimens were compared by using Bland–Altman analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The discrepancies in PDAC size between CT/MRI and pathologic specimens were calculated and contributing factors for the discrepancies, including tumor locations (pancreatic head/neck, body, or tail), T stages (T1, T2, or T3), and N stages (N0, N1, or N2), were analyzed with Pearson’s correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression analyses.

Results

There was significant difference among the mean tumor sizes of three measurements (P < 0.001). The difference in mean tumor size between the pathologic sizes for PDAC was 4.3 mm (ICC 0.67) on CT and 5.8 mm (ICC 0.65) on MRI. Both CT and MRI showed wide ranges of limits of agreement (LOAs) between the pathologic specimens for tumor size measurements (LOAs, − 28.9 to 21.4 and − 29.4 to 17.8, respectively). The tumor size on CT or MRI was estimated to be smaller than that on pathology when the tumor was > 30 mm. The discrepancies in the tumor size estimated between CT/MRI and pathologic specimens were significantly different for tumors of different T stages (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both contrast-enhanced CT and MRI underestimate the mean tumor size by 4.3 mm and 5.8 mm, respectively, compared to the size of pathologic specimens. A larger tumor size indicates a greater discrepancy in the PDAC size measurements between CT/MRI and pathologic specimens.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:394-424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:394-424.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7-30.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7-30.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913-2921.CrossRef Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913-2921.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:4846-4861.CrossRef McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:4846-4861.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro V, Sperduti I, Milella M. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365:768-769.CrossRef Vaccaro V, Sperduti I, Milella M. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365:768-769.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee ES, Lee JM. Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer:A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:7864-7877.CrossRef Lee ES, Lee JM. Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer:A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:7864-7877.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Treadwell JR, Zafar HM, Mitchell MD, Tipton K, Teitelbaum U, Jue J. Imaging Tests for the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Pancreas 2016; 45: 789-795.CrossRef Treadwell JR, Zafar HM, Mitchell MD, Tipton K, Teitelbaum U, Jue J. Imaging Tests for the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Pancreas 2016; 45: 789-795.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, Jessup JM, Brierley JD, Gaspar LE, Schilsky RL, Balch CM, Winchester DP, Asar EA, Madera M, Gress DM, Meyer LR. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8 ed. 2017, New Yor: Springer. 337-406. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, Jessup JM, Brierley JD, Gaspar LE, Schilsky RL, Balch CM, Winchester DP, Asar EA, Madera M, Gress DM, Meyer LR. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8 ed. 2017, New Yor: Springer. 337-406.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Huguet F, Girard N, Guerche CS, Hennequin C, Mornex F, Azria D. Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a qualitative systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2269-2277.CrossRef Huguet F, Girard N, Guerche CS, Hennequin C, Mornex F, Azria D. Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a qualitative systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2269-2277.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvold ND, Niemierko A, Mamon HJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Hong TS. Pancreatic cancer tumor size on CT scan versus pathologic specimen: implications for radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:1383-1390.CrossRef Arvold ND, Niemierko A, Mamon HJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Hong TS. Pancreatic cancer tumor size on CT scan versus pathologic specimen: implications for radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:1383-1390.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall WA, Mikell JL, Mittal P, Colbert L, Prabhu RS, Kooby DA, Nickleach D, Hanley K, Sarmiento JM, Ali AN, Landry JC. Tumor Size on Abdominal MRI Versus Pathologic Specimen in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Radiation Treatment Planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;86:102-107.CrossRef Hall WA, Mikell JL, Mittal P, Colbert L, Prabhu RS, Kooby DA, Nickleach D, Hanley K, Sarmiento JM, Ali AN, Landry JC. Tumor Size on Abdominal MRI Versus Pathologic Specimen in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Radiation Treatment Planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;86:102-107.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Legrand L, Duchatelle V, Molinié V, Boulay-Coletta I, Sibileau E, Zins M. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MRI conspicuity and pathologic correlations. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:85-94.CrossRef Legrand L, Duchatelle V, Molinié V, Boulay-Coletta I, Sibileau E, Zins M. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MRI conspicuity and pathologic correlations. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:85-94.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassardjian A, Stanzione N, Wang HL. Comparative Accuracy of Tumor Size Assessment and Stage Analysis by Imaging Modalities Versus Gross Examination for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2019;48: 223-227.CrossRef Kassardjian A, Stanzione N, Wang HL. Comparative Accuracy of Tumor Size Assessment and Stage Analysis by Imaging Modalities Versus Gross Examination for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2019;48: 223-227.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishino M. Tumor Response Assessment for Precision Cancer Therapy: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Beyond.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018;38:1019-1029. Nishino M. Tumor Response Assessment for Precision Cancer Therapy: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Beyond.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018;38:1019-1029.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-220.CrossRef Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-220.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Goel M, Arya S. Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature. HPB 2012;14:658-668CrossRef Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Goel M, Arya S. Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature. HPB 2012;14:658-668CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, Basturk O, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR, Morales-Oyarvide V, He J, Weiss MJ, Hruban RH, Gönen M, Klimstra DS, Mino-Kenudson M. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017;265:185-191. Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, Basturk O, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR, Morales-Oyarvide V, He J, Weiss MJ, Hruban RH, Gönen M, Klimstra DS, Mino-Kenudson M. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017;265:185-191.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kansu L, Aydın E, Akkaya H, Avcı S, Akalın N. Shrinkage of Nasal Mucosa and Cartilage During Formalin Fixation. Balkan Med J 2017;34:458-463.CrossRef Kansu L, Aydın E, Akkaya H, Avcı S, Akalın N. Shrinkage of Nasal Mucosa and Cartilage During Formalin Fixation. Balkan Med J 2017;34:458-463.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonmarker S, Valdman A, Lindberg A, Hellström M, Egevad L. Tissue shrinkage after fixation with formalin injection of prostatectomy specimens. Virchows Arch 2006;449:297-301.CrossRef Jonmarker S, Valdman A, Lindberg A, Hellström M, Egevad L. Tissue shrinkage after fixation with formalin injection of prostatectomy specimens. Virchows Arch 2006;449:297-301.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: variability in measurements of tumor size among computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic specimens
verfasst von
Chao Ma
Panpan Yang
Jing Li
Yun Bian
Li Wang
Jianping Lu
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02125-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Abdominal Radiology 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Candy cane sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.