Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2016

08.08.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Pancreatic Duct Holder and Mucosa Squeeze-out Technique for Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreatojejunostomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

verfasst von: Masanori Sugiyama, Yutaka Suzuki, Tetsuya Nakazato, Masaaki Yokoyama, Masaharu Kogure, Nobutsugu Abe

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy can be technically difficult, particularly in cases with a non-dilated pancreatic duct. We devised a novel procedure employing a pancreatic duct holder and mucosa squeeze-out technique facilitating duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. We compared the perioperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy between the novel and conventional procedures.

Methods

Our pancreatic holder has a cone-shaped tip with a slit. The holder can expand the pancreatic duct and provides a good surgical field for anastomosis. A small incision for anastomosis is made on the jejunum, while the jejunum is grasped around the incision. Then, the jejunal mucosa becomes squeezed-out and everted. This mucosa squeeze-out technique facilitates suturing the full thickness of the jejunum. Propensity score matching yielded 113 cases each undergoing the novel and the conventional procedure, among 308 cases receiving pancreatoduodenectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy.

Results

The overall morbidity rate was significantly lower in the novel procedure group. The pancreatic fistula (ISGPF grade B/C) rate was significantly lower in the novel (5 %) than in the conventional (13 %) procedure group. For cases with a non-dilated pancreatic duct (≤3 mm), the rate was significantly lower in the novel (10 %) than in the conventional procedure group (24 %). Multivariate analysis identified a non-dilated pancreatic duct, soft pancreas, and the conventional procedure as factors independently predicting the complication of pancreatic fistula formation.

Conclusions

Our novel procedure facilitates duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy and decreases the pancreatic fistula rate. This procedure is simple, rational, and useful for achieving anastomosis, particularly in cases with a non-dilated pancreatic duct.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sikora SS, Posner MC (1995) Management of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 82:1590–1597CrossRefPubMed Sikora SS, Posner MC (1995) Management of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 82:1590–1597CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YJ, Lai EC, Lau WY et al (2014) Enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature. Int J Surg 12:706–711CrossRefPubMed Chen YJ, Lai EC, Lau WY et al (2014) Enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature. Int J Surg 12:706–711CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100:1597–1605CrossRefPubMed Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100:1597–1605CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:1196–2108CrossRefPubMed Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:1196–2108CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Que W, Fang H, Yan B et al (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 209:1074–1082CrossRefPubMed Que W, Fang H, Yan B et al (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 209:1074–1082CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C et al (2011) External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 253:879–885CrossRefPubMed Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C et al (2011) External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 253:879–885CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br J Surg 99:524–531CrossRefPubMed Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br J Surg 99:524–531CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Q, He XR, Tian JH et al (2013) Pancreatic duct stents at pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Dig Surg 30:415–424CrossRefPubMed Wang Q, He XR, Tian JH et al (2013) Pancreatic duct stents at pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Dig Surg 30:415–424CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordback I, Lämsä T, Laukkarinen J et al (2008) Pancreatico-jejunostomy with a biodegradable pancreatic stent and without stitches through the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 55:319–322PubMed Nordback I, Lämsä T, Laukkarinen J et al (2008) Pancreatico-jejunostomy with a biodegradable pancreatic stent and without stitches through the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 55:319–322PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:247–251CrossRefPubMed Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:247–251CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2005) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598CrossRef Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2005) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Abe N et al (2009) Pancreatic duct holder for facilitating duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 197:e18–e20CrossRefPubMed Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Abe N et al (2009) Pancreatic duct holder for facilitating duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 197:e18–e20CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L et al (2014) Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg 259:18–25CrossRefPubMed Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L et al (2014) Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg 259:18–25CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T (2001) History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:230–237CrossRefPubMed Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T (2001) History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:230–237CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely-available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRefPubMed Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely-available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong Z, Xu J, Wang Z et al (2013) Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD008914 Dong Z, Xu J, Wang Z et al (2013) Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD008914
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Imaizumi T, Hatori T, Tobita K et al (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube. Hepatogastroenterology 54:1266–1268PubMed Imaizumi T, Hatori T, Tobita K et al (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube. Hepatogastroenterology 54:1266–1268PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Karavias DD, Karavias DD, Chaveles IG et al (2015) “True” duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, with secure eversion of the enteric mucosa, in Whipple operation. J Gastrointest Surg 19:498–505CrossRefPubMed Karavias DD, Karavias DD, Chaveles IG et al (2015) “True” duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, with secure eversion of the enteric mucosa, in Whipple operation. J Gastrointest Surg 19:498–505CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Satoi S, Toyokawa H, Yanagimoto H et al (2010) Is a nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis using the modified Kakita method a safe procedure? Pancreas 39:165–170CrossRefPubMed Satoi S, Toyokawa H, Yanagimoto H et al (2010) Is a nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis using the modified Kakita method a safe procedure? Pancreas 39:165–170CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pancreatic Duct Holder and Mucosa Squeeze-out Technique for Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreatojejunostomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Propensity Score Matching Analysis
verfasst von
Masanori Sugiyama
Yutaka Suzuki
Tetsuya Nakazato
Masaaki Yokoyama
Masaharu Kogure
Nobutsugu Abe
Publikationsdatum
08.08.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3659-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

World Journal of Surgery 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.