Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2/2011

01.03.2011 | Original Article

Pancreaticoduodenectomies with a duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis with and without a stenting tube showed no differences in long-term follow-up

verfasst von: Shuji Suzuki, Satoshi Kaji, Nobusada Koike, Nobuhiko Harada, Tsuneo Hayashi, Mamoru Suzuki, Toshihide Imaizumi, Fujio Hanyu

Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background/purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy with a duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis without a stenting tube.

Methods

Patients were followed for at least 3 years after pancreaticoduodenectomy. They were classified into two groups: duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis with a stenting tube (group A: 24) and without a stenting tube (group B: 21). Outcomes, including complications and dilatation of the pancreatic duct, were reported retrospectively.

Results

The following complication rates were found for group A: morbidity 29.1%, cholangitis 12.5%, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis 4.2%, liver abscess 4.2%, intrahepatic stones 4.2%, abnormal glucose tolerance (progression of diabetes) 20.8%, and dilatation of the pancreatic duct 20.8%. In group B, the rates for morbidity (14.3%) and abnormal glucose tolerance (19%), and dilatation of the pancreatic duct (4.8%) were lower than those in group A, but all results lacked statistical significance.

Conclusions

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis of pancreaticojejunostomy with or without a stenting tube showed no difference in long-term follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:247–51.PubMedCrossRef Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:247–51.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:580–92.PubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:580–92.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections. Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391–8.PubMedCrossRef Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections. Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Butturini G, Marcucci S, Morinari E, Mascetta G, Landoni L, Crippa S, et al. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:207–11.PubMedCrossRef Butturini G, Marcucci S, Morinari E, Mascetta G, Landoni L, Crippa S, et al. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:207–11.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Trede M, Saeger HD, Schwall G, Rumstadt B. Resection of pancreatic cancer: surgical achievements. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:121–8.PubMed Trede M, Saeger HD, Schwall G, Rumstadt B. Resection of pancreatic cancer: surgical achievements. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:121–8.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–57.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–57.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinkenbijl JH, van der Schelling GP, Hop WC, van Pel R, Bruining HA, Jeekel J. The advantages of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in malignant disease of the pancreas and periampullary region. Ann Surg. 1992;216:142–5.PubMedCrossRef Klinkenbijl JH, van der Schelling GP, Hop WC, van Pel R, Bruining HA, Jeekel J. The advantages of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in malignant disease of the pancreas and periampullary region. Ann Surg. 1992;216:142–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA. Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg. 1998;227:821–31.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA. Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg. 1998;227:821–31.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:293–300.PubMedCrossRef Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:293–300.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtsuka T, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Kinukawa N, Tanaka M. Quality of life after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182:230–6.PubMedCrossRef Ohtsuka T, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Kinukawa N, Tanaka M. Quality of life after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182:230–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Imaizumi T, Hatori T, Tobita K, Fukuda A, Takasaki K, Makuuchi H. Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:194–201.PubMedCrossRef Imaizumi T, Hatori T, Tobita K, Fukuda A, Takasaki K, Makuuchi H. Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:194–201.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki S, Kaji S, Koike N, Harada N, Tanaka S, Hayashi T, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct to mucosa anastomosis can be performed more safely without than with a stenting tube. Am J Surg. 2009;198:51–4.PubMedCrossRef Suzuki S, Kaji S, Koike N, Harada N, Tanaka S, Hayashi T, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct to mucosa anastomosis can be performed more safely without than with a stenting tube. Am J Surg. 2009;198:51–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Nishioka R, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy is acceptable for periampullary tumors in the elderly, even in patients over 80 years of age. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:675–80.PubMedCrossRef Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Nishioka R, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy is acceptable for periampullary tumors in the elderly, even in patients over 80 years of age. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:675–80.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, Kulli C, Wagener V, Z’Graggen K. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87:883–9.PubMedCrossRef Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, Kulli C, Wagener V, Z’Graggen K. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87:883–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Adham M, Jaeck D, Le Borgne J, Oussoultzouglou E, Chenard-Neu MP, Mosnier JF, et al. Long-term survival (5–20 years) after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a series of 30 patients collected from 3 institutions. Pancreas. 2008;37:352–7.PubMedCrossRef Adham M, Jaeck D, Le Borgne J, Oussoultzouglou E, Chenard-Neu MP, Mosnier JF, et al. Long-term survival (5–20 years) after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a series of 30 patients collected from 3 institutions. Pancreas. 2008;37:352–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Han SS, Kim SW, Jang JY, Park YH. A comparison of the long-term functional outcomes of standard pancreatoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1831–5.PubMed Han SS, Kim SW, Jang JY, Park YH. A comparison of the long-term functional outcomes of standard pancreatoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1831–5.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shyr YM, Chen TH, Su CH, Wu CW, Lui WY. Non-stented pancreaticogastrostomy for 111 patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:253–7.PubMed Shyr YM, Chen TH, Su CH, Wu CW, Lui WY. Non-stented pancreaticogastrostomy for 111 patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:253–7.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Imaizumi T, Harada N, Hatori T, Fukuda A, Takasaki K. Stenting is unnecessary in duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy even in the normal pancreas. Pancreatology. 2002;2:116–21.PubMedCrossRef Imaizumi T, Harada N, Hatori T, Fukuda A, Takasaki K. Stenting is unnecessary in duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy even in the normal pancreas. Pancreatology. 2002;2:116–21.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujino Y, Suzuki Y, Matsumoto I, Sakai T, Ajiki T, Ueda T, et al. Long-term assessments after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreatic duct invagination anastomosis. Surg Today. 2007;37:860–6.PubMedCrossRef Fujino Y, Suzuki Y, Matsumoto I, Sakai T, Ajiki T, Ueda T, et al. Long-term assessments after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreatic duct invagination anastomosis. Surg Today. 2007;37:860–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Eguchi H, Yokoyama S, Yamada T, Takachi K, et al. Long-term follow-up of glucose tolerance function after pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison between pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy. Surgery. 2004;136:617–23.PubMedCrossRef Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Eguchi H, Yokoyama S, Yamada T, Takachi K, et al. Long-term follow-up of glucose tolerance function after pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison between pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy. Surgery. 2004;136:617–23.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang JY, Kim SW, Han JK, Park SJ, Park YC, Joon Ahn Y, et al. Randomized prospective trial of the effect of induced hypergastrinemia on the prevention of pancreatic atrophy after pancreatoduodenectomy in humans. Ann Surg. 2003;237:522–9.PubMedCrossRef Jang JY, Kim SW, Han JK, Park SJ, Park YC, Joon Ahn Y, et al. Randomized prospective trial of the effect of induced hypergastrinemia on the prevention of pancreatic atrophy after pancreatoduodenectomy in humans. Ann Surg. 2003;237:522–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn YJ, Kim SW, Park YC, Jang JY, Yoon YS, Park YH, et al. Duodenal-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas and pancreatic head resection with second-portion duodenectomy for benign lesions, low-grade malignancies, and early carcinoma involving the periampullary region. Arch Surg. 2003;138:162–8. (discussion 168).PubMedCrossRef Ahn YJ, Kim SW, Park YC, Jang JY, Yoon YS, Park YH, et al. Duodenal-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas and pancreatic head resection with second-portion duodenectomy for benign lesions, low-grade malignancies, and early carcinoma involving the periampullary region. Arch Surg. 2003;138:162–8. (discussion 168).PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pancreaticoduodenectomies with a duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis with and without a stenting tube showed no differences in long-term follow-up
verfasst von
Shuji Suzuki
Satoshi Kaji
Nobusada Koike
Nobuhiko Harada
Tsuneo Hayashi
Mamoru Suzuki
Toshihide Imaizumi
Fujio Hanyu
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1868-6974
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-6982
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0339-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.