Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2018

19.12.2017 | Original Article

Parent perspectives and preferences for strategies regarding nonsedated MRI scans in a pediatric oncology population

verfasst von: Breya Walker, Heather M. Conklin, Doralina L. Anghelescu, Lacey P. Hall, Wilburn E. Reddick, Robert Ogg, Lisa M. Jacola

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Children with cancer frequently require MRI scans for clinical purposes. Sedation with general anesthesia (GA) is often used to promote compliance, reduce motion, and alleviate anxiety. The use of GA for MRI scans is costly in terms of time, personnel, and medications. In addition, prominent risks are associated with anesthesia exposure in patients with complex medical conditions. Successful behavioral interventions have been implemented in clinical research settings to promote scan success and compliance. To our knowledge, parent/caregiver acceptability of behavioral interventions to promote nonsedated MRI has not been systematically investigated in a medically complex population. As a first step toward developing a protocol-based intervention to promote nonsedated scanning, we conducted a survey to explore parental perspectives regarding acceptability of nonsedated scanning and to gain information regarding preference for specific behavioral interventions to facilitate nonsedated MRI exams.

Methods

Parents or guardians of 101 patients diagnosed with childhood cancer participated in a semi-structured survey via telephone. The sample was stratified by age group (8–12 years; 13–18 years), gender, and diagnosis (solid tumor (ST), brain tumor (BT), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)).

Results

The majority of parents indicated that nonsedated MRI scans would be acceptable. Reduced anesthesia exposure was the most frequently identified benefit, followed by decreased irritability post-MRI scan, and shorter appointment time. Challenges included fear of movement and noise during scans and change in routine, with parents of younger children and those with a history of sedated exams identifying more challenges. Behavioral intervention preference differed by patient age and gender; however, education was ranked as most preferred overall.

Conclusion

Parents of children treated for cancer consider behavior interventions to promote nonsedated scanning as acceptable. Patient characteristics should be considered when tailoring behavioral interventions. Results can inform future studies of behavioral interventions to promote nonsedated MRI scans. Future research should also investigate the risks associated with failed exams, both in terms of patient medical care and cost effectiveness.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacola LM, Anghelescu D, Hall L, White L, Russell K, Schreiber JE, Rossi M, Moore A, Gajjar A (2017) The relationship between procedural sedation during treatment and neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma. Internation Neuropsychology Society, New Orleans Jacola LM, Anghelescu D, Hall L, White L, Russell K, Schreiber JE, Rossi M, Moore A, Gajjar A (2017) The relationship between procedural sedation during treatment and neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma. Internation Neuropsychology Society, New Orleans
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters JB, Anghelescu D, Conklin HM, Hall L, Means BL, Schreiber JE, Rossi M, Wright B, Gajjar A, Jacola LM (2017) The impact of sedation for radiation therapy on performance measures and caregiver ratings of attention in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma. Internation Neuropsychology Society, New Orleans Peters JB, Anghelescu D, Conklin HM, Hall L, Means BL, Schreiber JE, Rossi M, Wright B, Gajjar A, Jacola LM (2017) The impact of sedation for radiation therapy on performance measures and caregiver ratings of attention in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma. Internation Neuropsychology Society, New Orleans
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ, Mauras N, Beck RW, Marzelli MJ, Mazaika PK, Aye T, White NH, Tsalikian E, Fox L, Kollman C, Cheng P, Reiss AL, Diabetes Research in Children N (2014) High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner—the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 44(2):181–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2798-7 CrossRefPubMed Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ, Mauras N, Beck RW, Marzelli MJ, Mazaika PK, Aye T, White NH, Tsalikian E, Fox L, Kollman C, Cheng P, Reiss AL, Diabetes Research in Children N (2014) High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner—the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 44(2):181–186. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00247-013-2798-7 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Grissom S, Boles J, Bailey K, Cantrell K, Kennedy A, Sykes A, Mandrell BN (2016) Play-based procedural preparation and support intervention for cranial radiation. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the multinational association of Support Care Cancer 24(6):2421–2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3040-y CrossRef Grissom S, Boles J, Bailey K, Cantrell K, Kennedy A, Sykes A, Mandrell BN (2016) Play-based procedural preparation and support intervention for cranial radiation. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the multinational association of Support Care Cancer 24(6):2421–2427. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-015-3040-y CrossRef
27.
29.
Metadaten
Titel
Parent perspectives and preferences for strategies regarding nonsedated MRI scans in a pediatric oncology population
verfasst von
Breya Walker
Heather M. Conklin
Doralina L. Anghelescu
Lacey P. Hall
Wilburn E. Reddick
Robert Ogg
Lisa M. Jacola
Publikationsdatum
19.12.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-4009-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.