Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Research

Parents’ Perspectives on Variants of Uncertain Significance from Chromosome Microarray Analysis

verfasst von: Lesli A. Kiedrowski, Kailey M. Owens, Beverly M. Yashar, Jane L. Schuette

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for unexplained anomalies and developmental delay has improved diagnosis rates, but results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) may challenge both clinicians and families. We explored the impact of such results on families, including parental knowledge, understanding and interpretation. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with parents (N = 14) who received genetic counseling for a VUS in their child. Transcripts were analyzed through an iterative coding process. Participants demonstrated a range of recall and personal interpretation regarding whether test results provided a causal explanation for their children’s health issues. Participants maintained contradictory interpretations, describing results as answers while maintaining that little clarification of their child’s condition had been provided. Reported benefits included obtaining medical services and personal validation. Parents described adaptation/coping processes similar to those occurring after positive test results. Recall of terminology, including “VUS” and precise CMA abnormalities, was poor. However, most demonstrated conceptual understanding of scientific uncertainty. All participants expressed intentions to return for recommended genetics follow-up but had misconceptions about how this would occur. These results provide insight into the patient-and-family experience when receiving uncertain genomic findings, emphasize the importance of exploring uncertainty during the communication process, and highlight areas for potential attention or improvement in the clinical encounter.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ashtiani, S., Makela, N., Carrion, P., & Austin, J. (2014). Parents’ experiences of receiving their child’s genetic diagnosis: A qualitative study to inform clinical genetics practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164(6), 1496–1502. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36525.PubMedCentralCrossRef Ashtiani, S., Makela, N., Carrion, P., & Austin, J. (2014). Parents’ experiences of receiving their child’s genetic diagnosis: A qualitative study to inform clinical genetics practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164(6), 1496–1502. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​36525.PubMedCentralCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biesecker, B. B., Klein, W., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Wright, M. F., Biesecker, L. G., & Han, P. K. (2014). How do research participants perceive “uncertainty” in genome sequencing? Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 16(12), 977–980. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.57.CrossRef Biesecker, B. B., Klein, W., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Wright, M. F., Biesecker, L. G., & Han, P. K. (2014). How do research participants perceive “uncertainty” in genome sequencing? Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 16(12), 977–980. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2014.​57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coughlin, C. R., Scharer, G. H., & Shaikh, T. H. (2012). Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns. Genome Medicine, 4(10), 80. doi:10.1186/gm381.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Coughlin, C. R., Scharer, G. H., & Shaikh, T. H. (2012). Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns. Genome Medicine, 4(10), 80. doi:10.​1186/​gm381.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. doi:10.1177/1525822X10388468.CrossRef DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. doi:10.​1177/​1525822X10388468​.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 189–190. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.17.CrossRef Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 189–190. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graungaard, A. H., & Skov, L. (2007). Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 296–307. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00666.x. Graungaard, A. H., & Skov, L. (2007). Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 296–307. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2214.​2006.​00666.​x.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, C., Iafrate, A. J., & Brothman, A. R. (2007). Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nature Genetics, 39(7 Suppl), S48–54. doi:10.1038/ng2092.CrossRefPubMed Lee, C., Iafrate, A. J., & Brothman, A. R. (2007). Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nature Genetics, 39(7 Suppl), S48–54. doi:10.​1038/​ng2092.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lipinski, S. E., Lipinski, M. J., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: The role of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 232–240. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30107.CrossRefPubMed Lipinski, S. E., Lipinski, M. J., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: The role of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 232–240. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​c.​30107.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Rangel, E., Mickelson, E. C. R., & Lewis, M. E. S. (2008). The value of a genetic diagnosis for individuals with intellectual disabilities: optimising healthcare and function across the lifespan. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 54(Part 2), 69–82.CrossRef Lopez-Rangel, E., Mickelson, E. C. R., & Lewis, M. E. S. (2008). The value of a genetic diagnosis for individuals with intellectual disabilities: optimising healthcare and function across the lifespan. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 54(Part 2), 69–82.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manning, M., Hudgins, L., Practice, P., & Committee, G. (2010). Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 12(11), 742–745. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f8baad.CrossRef Manning, M., Hudgins, L., Practice, P., & Committee, G. (2010). Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 12(11), 742–745. doi:10.​1097/​GIM.​0b013e3181f8baad​.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Michie, S., Marteau, T. M., & Bobrow, M. (1997). Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients’ expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34(3), 237–241.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Michie, S., Marteau, T. M., & Bobrow, M. (1997). Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients’ expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34(3), 237–241.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., & Ledbetter, D. H. (2010a). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., & Ledbetter, D. H. (2010a). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajhg.​2010.​04.​006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer, E., Speirs, H., Taylor, P. J., Mullan, G., Turner, G., Einfeld, S., & Mowat, D. (2014). Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164A(2), 377–385. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36279.CrossRefPubMed Palmer, E., Speirs, H., Taylor, P. J., Mullan, G., Turner, G., Einfeld, S., & Mowat, D. (2014). Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164A(2), 377–385. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​36279.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 250–258. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.52.CrossRef Reiff, M., Bernhardt, B. A., Mulchandani, S., Soucier, D., Cornell, D., Pyeritz, R. E., & Spinner, N. B. (2012). “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(2), 250–258. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal, E. T., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2001). Parental attitudes toward a diagnosis in children with unidentified multiple congenital anomaly syndromes. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(2), 106–114.CrossRefPubMed Rosenthal, E. T., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2001). Parental attitudes toward a diagnosis in children with unidentified multiple congenital anomaly syndromes. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(2), 106–114.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer, L. G., Coppinger, J., Alliman, S., Torchia, B. A., Theisen, A., Ballif, B. C., & Bejjani, B. A. (2008). Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenatal Diagnosis, 28(9), 789–795. doi:10.1002/pd.2053.CrossRefPubMed Shaffer, L. G., Coppinger, J., Alliman, S., Torchia, B. A., Theisen, A., Ballif, B. C., & Bejjani, B. A. (2008). Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenatal Diagnosis, 28(9), 789–795. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​2053.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Turbitt, E., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2014). Preferences for results from genomic microarrays: comparing parents and health care providers. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.1111/cge.12398.PubMed Turbitt, E., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2014). Preferences for results from genomic microarrays: comparing parents and health care providers. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.​1111/​cge.​12398.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Vos, J., Otten, W., van Asperen, C., Jansen, A., Menko, F., & Tibben, A. (2008). The counsellees’ view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: Recall, interpretation, and impact on life. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 822–830. doi:10.1002/pon.1311.CrossRefPubMed Vos, J., Otten, W., van Asperen, C., Jansen, A., Menko, F., & Tibben, A. (2008). The counsellees’ view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: Recall, interpretation, and impact on life. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 822–830. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1311.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Parents’ Perspectives on Variants of Uncertain Significance from Chromosome Microarray Analysis
verfasst von
Lesli A. Kiedrowski
Kailey M. Owens
Beverly M. Yashar
Jane L. Schuette
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9847-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.