nach oben

Erschienen in:

25.09.2018 | Interventional

Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

verfasst von: Johannes Uhlig, Arne Strauss, Gerta Rücker, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Joachim Lotz, Lutz Trojan, Hyun S. Kim, Annemarie Uhlig

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA) and microwave ablation (MWA) regarding oncologic, perioperative and functional outcomes.

Material and methods

The MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE libraries were searched for studies comparing PN, RFA, CRA or MWA and reporting on any-cause or cancer-specific mortality, local recurrence, complications or renal function. Network meta-analyses were performed.

Results

Forty-seven studies with 24,077 patients were included. Patients receiving RFA, CRA or MWA were older and had more comorbidities compared with PN. All-cause mortality was higher for CRA and RFA compared with PN (incidence rate ratio IRR = 2.58, IRR = 2.58, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in cancer-specific mortality were evident. Local recurrence was higher for CRA, RFA and MWA compared with PN (IRR = 4.13, IRR = 1.79, IRR = 2.52, p < 0.05 respectively). A decline in renal function was less pronounced after RFA versus PN, CRA and MWA (mean difference in GFR MD = 6.49; MD = 5.82; MD = 10.89, p < 0.05 respectively).

Conclusion

Higher overall survival and local control of PN compared with ablative therapies did not translate into significantly better cancer-specific mortality. Most studies carried a high risk of bias by selecting younger and healthier patients for PN, which may drive superior survival and local control. Physicians should be aware of the lack of high-quality evidence and the potential benefits of ablative techniques for certain patients, including a superior complication profile and renal function preservation.

Key Points

• Patients selected for ablation of small renal masses are older and have more comorbidities compared with those undergoing partial nephrectomy.

• Partial nephrectomy yields lower all-cause mortality, which is probably biased by patient selection and does not translate into prolonged cancer-free survival.

• The decline of renal function is smallest after radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Bray F (2015) International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur Urol 67:519–530CrossRefPubMed

Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997). Urology 56:58–62CrossRefPubMed

Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924

Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME et al (2017) Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol 198:520–529

Higgins LJ, Hong K (2015) Renal ablation techniques: state of the art. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:735–741CrossRefPubMed

Katsanos K, Mailli L, Krokidis M, McGrath A, Sabharwal T, Adam A (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of thermal ablation versus surgical nephrectomy for small renal tumours. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:427–437CrossRefPubMed

Patel HD, Pierorazio PM, Johnson MH et al (2017) Renal functional outcomes after surgery, ablation, and active surveillance of localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1057-1069

Klatte T, Shariat SF, Remzi M (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic cryoablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal tumors. J Urol 191:1209–1217CrossRefPubMed

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162:777-784

10.

Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP (2005) Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 331:897–900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346

12.

Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

13.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7:iii-x, 1-173

14.

Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration

16.

Rücker G (2012) Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Res Synth Methods 3:312–324CrossRefPubMed

17.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRefPubMed

18.

Krahn U, Binder H, König J (2014) Visualizing inconsistency in network meta-analysis by independent path decomposition. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Rücker G, Schwarzer G (2015) Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org, Vienna, Austria

21.

RStudio Team (2015) RStudio: Integrated Development for R, Boston, MA, USA, https://www.rstudio.com

22.

Schwarzer G (2007) meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R News 7:40–45

23.

Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Krahn U, König J (2017) netmeta: Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=netmeta

24.

Abboud SE, Patel T, Soriano S, Giesler J, Alvarado N, Kang P (2017) Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma at a Single VA Medical Center. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.05.006

25.

Alekseev B, Kalpinskiy A, Nyushko K et al (2017) Better nephron sparing option for patients with cT1 stage renal masses: Comparison of open, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation. Eur Urol, Supplements 16 (3):e632-e633

26.

Arnoux V, Descotes JL, Sengel C, Terrier N, Rambeaud JJ, Long JA (2013) Perioperative outcomes and mid-term results of radiofrequency ablation and partial nephrectomy in indications of renal tumor treatment and imperative nephron-sparing procedure. Prog Urol 23:99–104CrossRefPubMed

27.

Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA et al (2013) Percutaneous ablation of renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:461–466CrossRefPubMed

28.

Bensalah K, Zeltser I, Tuncel A, Cadeddu J, Lotan Y (2008) Evaluation of costs and morbidity associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating small renal tumours. BJU Int 101:467–471PubMed

29.

Bhindi B, Mason RJ, Haddad MM et al (2017) Outcomes after cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for sporadic renal tumors in a solitary kidney: a propensity score analysis. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.009

30.

Bird VG, Carey RI, Ayyathurai R, Bird VY (2009) Management of renal masses with laparoscopic-guided radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 23:81–88CrossRefPubMed

31.

Camacho JC, Kokabi N, Small WC, Kies D, Kim HS (2016) Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. Cryoablation (Cryo) vs. Microwave ablation (MCW) of T1 renal cell carcinomas (RCC): Outcome prediction in an intermediate-long term cohort. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 27(6):e68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.006

32.

Caputo PA, Zargar H, Ramirez D et al (2017) Cryoablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: A Matched Group Comparative Analysis. Eur Urol 71:111–117CrossRefPubMed

33.

Chang X, Liu T, Zhang F et al (2015) Radiofrequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal-cell carcinoma: long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes based on a propensity score analysis. J Endourol 29:518–525CrossRefPubMed

34.

Chang X, Zhang F, Liu T et al (2015) Radio frequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma: long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes. J Urol 193:430–435CrossRefPubMed

35.

Chehab M, Friedlander JA, Handel J et al (2016) Percutaneous Cryoablation vs Partial Nephrectomy: Cost Comparison of T1a Tumors. J Endourol 30:170–176CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cooper CJ, Teleb M, Dwivedi A et al (2015) Comparative Outcome of Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation, Partial Nephrectomy or Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma. Rare Tumors 7:5583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Danzig MR, Ghandour RA, Chang P et al (2015) Active Surveillance is Superior to Radical Nephrectomy and Equivalent to Partial Nephrectomy for Preserving Renal Function in Patients with Small Renal Masses: Results from the DISSRM Registry. J Urol 194:903–909CrossRefPubMed

38.

Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS (2005) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology 66:23–28CrossRefPubMed

39.

Emara AM, Kommu SS, Hindley RG, Barber NJ (2014) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass: redefining the minimally invasive 'gold standard'

40.

Evans R, Abusanade O, Thwaini A, Keane J, Loan W (2017) Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for small renal lesions; a comparison of efficacy and safety. Eur Urol, Supplements 16(3):e639–e640CrossRef

41.

Foyil KV, Ames CD, Ferguson GG et al (2008) Longterm changes in creatinine clearance after laparoscopic renal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206:511–515CrossRefPubMed

42.

Guan W, Bai J, Liu J et al (2012) Microwave ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Surg Oncol 106:316–321CrossRefPubMed

43.

Guillotreau J, Haber GP, Autorino R et al (2012) Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass. Eur Urol 61:899–904CrossRefPubMed

44.

Haber GP, Lee MC, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Gill IS (2012) Tumour in solitary kidney: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation. BJU Int 109:118–124CrossRefPubMed

45.

Haramis G, Graversen JA, Mues AC et al (2012) Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small (<3.5 cm) cortical renal masses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:152–157CrossRefPubMed

46.

Hegarty NJ, Gill IS, Desai MM, Remer EM, O'Malley CM, Kaouk JH (2006) Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology 68:7–13CrossRefPubMed

47.

Hinshaw JL, Best S, Wells SA et al (2016) Comparison of percutaneous microwave ablation, cryoablation and surgery for treatment of sporadic RCC <=4cm. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 27 (6):e68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.006

48.

Ji C, Zhao X, Zhang S et al (2016) Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1a Renal Tumors: Long-Term Outcome of 179 Patients. Urol Int 96:345–353CrossRefPubMed

49.

Kim SH, Lee ES, Kim HH et al (2015) A propensity-matched comparison of perioperative complications and of chronic kidney disease between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablative therapy. Asian J Surg 38:126–133CrossRefPubMed

50.

Klatte T, Mauermann J, Heinz-Peer G et al (2011) Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy: a matched pair analysis. J Endourol 25:991–997CrossRefPubMed

51.

Liu N, Huang D, Cheng X et al (2017) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for renal cell carcinoma vs. partial nephrectomy: Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes in both clear cell and non-clear cell of the most common subtype. Urol Oncol 35:530.e531–530.e536CrossRef

52.

Lucas SM, Stern JM, Adibi M, Zeltser IS, Cadeddu JA, Raj GV (2008) Renal Function Outcomes in Patients Treated for Renal Masses Smaller Than 4 cm by Ablative and Extirpative Techniques. J Urol 179:75–80CrossRefPubMed

53.

Lughezzani G, Cestari A, Buffi NM et al (2009) 24 Nephron sparing surgery for the treatment of small renal masses: comparison between open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation. Eur Urol Supplements 8:126

54.

Mason RJ, Atwell TD, Lohse C et al (2017) Renal functional outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for a solitary renal mass. BJU Int 120:544–549CrossRefPubMed

55.

O'Malley RL, Berger AD, Kanofsky JA, Phillips CK, Stifelman M, Taneja SS (2007) A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses. BJU Int 99:395–398CrossRefPubMed

56.

Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Best SL, Trimmer C, Cadeddu JA (2012) Radiofrequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy in patients with solitary clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma: comparable oncologic outcomes at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 61:1156–1161CrossRefPubMed

57.

Pantelidou M, Challacombe B, McGrath A et al (2016) Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 39:1595–1603CrossRef

58.

Panumatrassamee K, Kaouk JH, Autorino R et al (2013) Cryoablation versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for small renal masses in the solitary kidney: impact of approach on functional outcomes. J Urol 189:818–822CrossRefPubMed

59.

Psutka S, McDougal WS, Dahl D et al (2013) 1199 Radiofrequency ablation achieves comparable local oncological control to partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 189:e491

60.

Raman JD, Raj GV, Lucas SM et al (2010) Renal functional outcomes for tumours in a solitary kidney managed by ablative or extirpative techniques. BJU Int 105:496–500CrossRefPubMed

61.

Stern JM, Svatek R, Park S et al (2007) Intermediate comparison of partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for clinical T1a renal tumours. BJU Int 100:287–290CrossRefPubMed

62.

Sung HH, Park BK, Kim CK, Choi HY, Lee HM (2012) Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of size- and location-matched renal masses. Int J Hyperthermia 28:227–234CrossRefPubMed

63.

Takaki H, Yamakado K, Soga N et al (2010) Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 28:460–468CrossRefPubMed

64.

Tanagho YS, Bhayani SB, Kim EH, Figenshau RS (2013) Renal cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Washington University long-term experience. J Endourol 27:1477–1486CrossRefPubMed

65.

Thompson RH, Atwell T, Schmit G et al (2015) Comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses. Eur Urol 67:252-259

66.

Turna B, Kaouk JH, Frota R et al (2009) Minimally invasive nephron sparing management for renal tumors in solitary kidneys. J Urol 182:2150-2157

67.

Wan S, Park BK, Kim CK et al (2017) MP100-07 Comparison of oncologic results, functional outcomes and complications after partial nephrectomy versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in small sized (4cm or less) Bosniak iii or iv cystic renal lesions. J Urol 197:e1332

68.

Weinberg AC, Woldu SL, Wen T, Deibert CM, Korets R, Badani KK (2015) Utilization and perioperative complications of laparoscopic cryoablation vs. robotic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors. Int Braz J Urol 41:473–485CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Youn CS, Park JM, Lee JY et al (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy in patients with a small renal mass. Korean J Urol 54:603–608CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Zechlinski JJ, Dybul S, Hohenwalter E et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous renal ablation: Comparison of cryoablation and microwave ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27(6):e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.006

71.

Sterrett SP, Nakada SY, Wingo MS, Williams SK, Leveillee RJ (2008) Renal thermal ablative therapy. Urol Clin North Am 35:397–414 viiiCrossRefPubMed

72.

Lee SH, Son HS, Cho S et al (2015) Which Patients Should We Follow up beyond 5 Years after Definitive Therapy for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma? Cancer Res Treat 47:489–494CrossRefPubMed

73.

Tomaszewski JJ, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A et al (2014) Assessing the burden of complications following surgery for clinically localized kidney cancer by age and co-morbidity status. Urology 83:843–850CrossRefPubMed

74.

Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM et al (2006) Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7:735–740CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Weight CJ, Larson BT, Fergany AF et al (2010) Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol 183:1317–1323CrossRefPubMed

76.

Floridi C, De Bernardi I, Fontana F et al (2014) Microwave ablation of renal tumors: state of the art and development trends. Radiol Med 119:533–540CrossRefPubMed

77.

de Castro Abreu AL, Papalia R, Gill I et al (2015) MP59-12 Functional & Trifecta outcomes in solitary kidney: unclamped vs clamped partial nephrectomy. J Urol 193:e734CrossRef

Titel: Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
verfasst von: Johannes Uhlig
Arne Strauss
Gerta Rücker
Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
Joachim Lotz
Lutz Trojan
Hyun S. Kim
Annemarie Uhlig
Publikationsdatum: 25.09.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5660-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Key Points

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Key Points

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Early white matter injuries associated with dopamine transporter dysfunction in patients with acute CO intoxication: A diffusion kurtosis imaging and Tc-99m TRODAT-1 SPECT study

Cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with mitral valve prolapse: Focus on late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping

Role of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for unsatisfactory benign thyroid nodules after first treatment

CT texture analysis of pancreatic cancer

Background parenchymal enhancement in pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a hindrance to diagnosis?

Extent of enhancement on multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images is a potential prognostic factor of stage I–III colon cancer

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie