The
Stat1
−/− tumors exhibited a pronounced local inflammatory response at the interface of tumor cells and surrounding stroma. In contrast to mammary tumors from other GMM models [
5], each 129:
Stat1
−/−
tumor was surrounded by a thick mantle of host inflammatory cells and fibrosis (Fig.
7, Additional file
2: Figure S9). The inflammation consisted primarily of a nearly equal mixture of F4/80
+ macrophages and CD3
+ T lymphocytes in tumor-adjacent stroma. Quantitation of IHC marker-positive cell density in tumor and tumor-associating stroma in spontaneous
Stat1-null tumors (Additional file
2: Figure S9) indicated tumor-infiltrated F4/80
+ cells were at a significantly (
p < 0.0001) lower density (6 cells/mm
2, SE = 2) than the cellular density in the stroma (2580 cells/mm
2, SE = 473). CD3
+ cells were also significantly (
p < 0.0001) less densely populated in tumors (262 cells/mm
2, SE = 59) compared with the stroma (3590 cells/mm
2, SE = 439). Thus, significantly fewer immune cells penetrated the tumor, with more intratumoral infiltration of T lymphocytes than macrophages. In addition, the density of B-cell lymphocytes was significantly (
p < 0.0001) lower in tumors (34 cells/mm
2, SE = 6) than in the stroma (381 cells/mm
2, SE = 64), and the total number of B cells was significantly lower than both macrophages (
p = 0.0002) and T lymphocytes (
p = 0.0001).
The microenvironmental effect was further characterized in the grafts where primary tumor tissue was transplanted into mammary glands in WT host or KO host animals. The IHC results showed a predominance of F4/80
+ macrophages and CD3
+ T-lymphocytes in the tumor-associated stroma (Fig.
7c–
f). The mean density of F4/80
+ cells in the tumor interstices from a WT host was 19 cells/mm
2 (SE = 3). By comparison, there was a significantly higher density of F4/80
+ cells in the surrounding WT stroma (2472 cells/mm
2, SE = 243). Similarly, transplants of the same primary tumor into the age-matched KO host also showed a predominance of macrophages in the stroma, with only 5 cells/mm
2 (SE = 2) in the tumor interstices and 2102 cells/mm
2 (SE = 233) in the stroma. The density of tumor-infiltrated macrophages was significantly higher in the tumors engrafted into a WT host than either the KO host or the spontaneous
Stat1-null tumors (Additional file
2: Figure S9b). Similarly, CD3
+ T lymphocytes were found in greater density in the stroma of WT hosts (1990 cells/mm
2, SE = 218) than in the tumors (463 cells/mm
2, SE = 54) (
p < 0.0001). CD3
+ cell density in KO hosts was significantly lower in both tumors (353 cells/mm
2, SE = 65) and stroma (1530 cells/mm
2, SE = 194) than in the WT hosts, but the CD3
+ cell density was still higher in stroma than in tumors (Additional file
2: Figure S9d). The ratios of tumor-infiltrated immune cells to total cell count in WT, KO host, and spontaneous
Stat1-null tumors were 8%, 4.5%, and 2.2%, respectively, for CD3
+ T lymphocytes and 0.77%, 0.24%, and 0.23% for F4/80 macrophages, respectively. In contrast, the cell density of B lymphocytes in stroma was lower in transplants than spontaneous 129:
Stat1
−/−
tumors. The density of B lymphocytes was higher in the stroma of WT hosts than the tumors, but there was no significant difference between the tumor and stroma in KO hosts (Additional file
2: Figure S9f). Thus, as with the primary tumors, the host immune cells, especially macrophages, rarely invaded the interstices of solid tumors. This pattern of immune cell reaction to tumors has been described as the “excluded infiltrate” phenotype, in contrast to tumors with a sparse or absent immune reaction, as well as those with an intratumoral “inflamed” phenotype [
39].