Zum Inhalt

Pathogenicity of Arcobacter cryaerophilus in two human intestinal cell lines

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2025
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Background

Arcobacter cryaerophilus is considered an emerging foodborne pathogen and is associated primarily with infectious gastrointestinal disease in humans. However, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms remain poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the pathogenic potential of twelve A. cryaerophilus strains using various in vitro assays in two human colonic cell lines, HT-29/B6 and T84.

Results

All strains tested were able to adhere to and invade into both cell lines, with strain-dependent differences in their adhesion and invasion rates. In addition, two strains showed cytotoxic effects on both cell lines. The ability to disrupt the epithelial barrier function of T84 cell monolayers was shown for two strains by measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance. As structural factors correlate with the barrier dysfunction, immunofluorescence staining of the tight junction domain was performed, and revealed an altered distribution of claudin-5 in infected cells.

Conclusions

The results highlight the strain-dependent pathogenic mechanisms of A. cryaerophilus that may contribute to key symptoms such as diarrhoea. These findings also highlight the importance of further research into the pathogen A. cryaerophilus.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Arcobacter spp. are gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria belonging to the family of Arcobacteraceae [13]. To date, more than 30 species have been described, which are considered to be aerotolerant [4, 5].
Owing to their ability to adapt to different growth conditions, Arcobacter spp. have been isolated from a wide variety of different sources [6, 7]. These sources include environmental water, vegetables, seafood and various types of meat [816]. Additionally, both homothermic and poikilothermic animals were tested positive for Arcobacter spp. The majority of Arcobacter isolates were obtained from healthy animals, suggesting that Arcobacteraceae may act as a commensal in animals. However, few cases of Arcobacter isolation from aborted foetuses and cases of mastitis have been reported [1721]. Moreover, numerous human stool samples were tested positive for Arcobacter spp. [2224]. According to a prevalence study in Germany, Arcobacter spp. could be detected in 0.77% of tested human stool samples, whereby Arcobacter (A.) butzleri was the most frequently detected species (67%), and A. cryaerophilus represented the second most frequently detected species (28%) [25]. Similar results were also obtained in a survey in Belgium, with Arcobacter spp. being the fourth most frequent pathogen in human stool samples (1.3% in a 5-year survey). Consistent with the findings of Brückner et al., A. cryaerophilus was identified as the second most prevalent Arcobacter species (43%) following A. butzleri (55%) in faecal samples from humans with symptoms of enteritis [26]. Nevertheless, Houf et al. (2007) examined stool samples from healthy slaughterhouse staff and found 1.4% positive for A. cryaerophilus. No other Arcobacter species was detected in this study [27].
In addition, Arcobacter spp. are known to cause human disease, particularly gastrointestinal symptoms such as acute or prolonged watery diarrhoea, abdominal pain and nausea, but also more severe cases of bacteraemia have been reported [2836]. Most of the case reports refer to A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus as the causative pathogens [26]. Sporadic case reports also describe the detection of A. skirowii, A. thereius, and A. mytili in diseased humans [26, 37, 38]. Even though A. lanthieri has also been detected in human stool samples, no conclusion on its pathogenic potential could be drawn so far [39].
Owing to its harmful role in human health, A. cryaerophilus is classified as an emerging foodborne pathogen [40]. Despite this classification and in contrast to related species causing gastrointestinal illnesses in humans, such as A. butzleri, little is known about the clinical significance. Furthermore, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of A. cryaerophilus remain poorly understood. Previous research on A. cryaerophilus has mainly focused on prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and growth characteristics, whereas only a limited number of studies have investigated pathogenic mechanisms, such as adhesion, invasion, and cytotoxicity for this species [4, 4143]. These former studies consistently reported that A. cryaerophilus strains are capable of adhering and invading human intestinal cells, with some also observing cytotoxic effects [4446]. However, due to the use of different cell lines, strains and protocols, it has not yet been possible to draw a connection between individual pathogenicity mechanisms. Moreover, the potential of A. cryaerophilus to affect the intestinal barrier function has not yet been investigated, although this might be of importance, given that diarrhoea is the most frequently reported symptom of Arcobacter spp. infections [29, 47, 48].
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the pathogenic potential of A. cryaerophilus in two human intestinal cell lines, HT-29/B6 and T84. Adhesive, invasive and cytotoxic potentials were assessed using in vitro assays. Furthermore, the impact of A. cryaerophilus on the epithelial barrier was investigated by the measurement of the transepithelial electrical resistance and immunohistological staining of tight junction proteins. Our results provide a comprehensive in vitro analysis on the pathogenic properties of A. cryaerophilus and deeper insights into the mechanisms contributing to human diseases.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Twelve A. cryaerophilus strains isolated from several matrices, and without associated information on human clinical outcomes, were included in our study (Table 1). A. butzleri CCUG 30485 was included as control strain, except for immunofluorescence assay. All strains were stored in cryotubes (Mast Diagnostica, Reinfeld, Germany) at -80 °C. Unless otherwise stated, all bacterial cultures were cultivated under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2) generated by Anoxomat (AN2CTS, MART Microbiology, B.V., Drachten, Netherlands). All Arcobacter strains were cultivated at 30 °C.
Table 1
Strains included in the study
Species
Strain
Source
Reference
A. cryaerophilus
2486
Shrimp
[89]
2502
Shrimp
[89]
2517
Mussel
[89]
2657
human stool sample
[45]
2661
human stool sample
[45]
2695
human stool sample
[25]
2771
human stool sample
[45]
2852
chicken meat
[22]
3132
surface water
[22]
3136
ready-to-eat salad
[22]
 
3224
surface water
This study
 
3226
surface water
This study
A. butzleri
30485
human stool sample, Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (CCUG)
After the bacterial strains were streaked on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and incubated for 72 h, colonies were used to prepare precultures by inoculating Brucella Broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) overnight. The precultures were diluted 1:100 in 10 mL of Brucella Broth and further incubated for 48 h (A. cryaerophilus) or 24 h (A. butzleri) to a final concentration of approximately 109 CFU/mL. Subsequently, the achieved working cultures were centrifuged at the maximum speed of 7197 × g for 5 min, and the bacterial pellet was resuspended in 450 µL of the corresponding cell culture medium before infection of the host cells.

Cell culture and growth conditions

The in vitro assays were performed on the human colon cell lines HT-29/B6 and T84. Both cell lines are of human colonic origin, whereby HT-29/B6 is a subclone of the cell line HT-29 that was derived from a primary colon adenocarcinoma and T84 was obtained from a lung metastasis of a colon adenocarcinoma [49, 50]. Cells were grown in 75 cm2 cell culture flasks in RPMI 1640 or Dulbecco´s Modified Eagle´s Medium/Ham´s Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12) (both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum superior (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and 10 µg/mL gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Culturing conditions were 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. The medium was changed every second or third day.

Cytotoxicity assay

Potential cytotoxic effects of A. cryaerophilus on human intestinal cell lines were tested using the WST-1 colorimetric assay as described by Brückner et al. [45]. Briefly, the cell-permeable WST-1 (4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitro-phenyl)-2 H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene sulfonate) can be cleaved by mitochondrial dehydrogenases of metabolically active cells to the orange dye formazan. Spectrophotometric measurements can be used to determine the amount of formazan formed, which is proportional to the metabolic activity of the cells. The absorbance measured from cells incubated with medium only (negative control) represents 100% viable cells. In a 96-well untreated, flat-bottomed polystyrene plate (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany), 3 × 104 cells per well were seeded in 100 µL medium and differentiated for seven days at 37 °C and 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere until they formed confluent monolayers. After the cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 100 µL of fresh antibiotic-free medium was added. Subsequently, 50 µL of bacterial suspension (multiplicity of infection [MOI] = 1000) was added to each well and incubated for two days at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Afterwards, the cells were washed once with PBS and incubated for one hour with 100 µL medium supplemented with 10 µL of WST-1 solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Each supernatant was transferred to a fresh 96-well plate, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm with a Clariostar Plus microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The results were normalised to those of the negative control (medium). As a chemical positive control for cytotoxicity, 33% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Carl Roth) was used. The WST-1 assay was performed for each strain in six technical replicates and was repeated in three independent experiments.

Bacterial adhesion and invasion assay

A total of 1 × 105 HT-29/B6 cells and 3 × 105 T84 cells per well were seeded in 24-well untreated, flat-bottomed polystyrene plates (Sarstedt) and differentiated for seven days as described above until a confluent monolayer was achieved. One day prior to infection, the cells were incubated with antibiotic-free medium. Immediately before infection, the cells were washed once with PBS, and 500 µL of fresh antibiotic-free medium was added to each well. Then, 50 µL of bacterial suspension (MOI = 100) was added to each well, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. For the adhesion assay, infected cells were incubated for one hour to allow the bacteria to adhere to the cells. Afterwards, the cells were washed three times with PBS to remove the unbound bacteria and lysed with 500 µL of 1% Triton-X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The supernatant of each well was collected to determine the amount of adhered bacteria in the lysate by plating serial dilutions on Mueller-Hinton agar and incubating for 48 h. For the detection of invaded bacteria, a gentamicin protection assay was performed as described by Karadas et al. [51]. Briefly, 3 h post infection, the host cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated with media containing 300 µg/mL gentamicin for further two hours to ensure the killing of all extracellular bacteria. The cells were then washed three more times with PBS and lysed with 500 µL of 1% Triton-X-100. The amount of invaded bacteria was determined as described above. The ratios of adhered and invaded bacteria were calculated and compared with those of the inoculum. As a negative control, only medium was added.
All assays were performed in technical triplicates and were repeated in three independent experiments.

Epithelial barrier function

The ability of five A. cryaerophilus strains to decrease the integrity of a confluently grown monolayer of polarised T84 cells was determined by measuring the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) in Ω cm− 2.
For this purpose, 1 × 106 cells were seeded on transwell filters (pore size 3 μm, diameter 12 mm; Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and grown for two weeks until confluence, as described above. The TER between the apical and basal parts of the cell monolayer was measured via a Volt-Ohm meter and chopstick electrodes (EVOM3, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). Following the measurement of the initial resistance, four different MOIs (10, 50, 100, and 500) of A. cryaerophilus strain 3136 were added apically to each of four transwell filters, and the cell culture was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The TER was remeasured 48 h post infection, and the results were normalised to the initial TER. This assay was performed in 4 replicates. In accordance, bacterial suspensions of four further A. cryaerophilus strains were tested for their ability to decrease the TER of T84 cell monolayers with a MOI of 100. A. butzleri CCUG 30485 was included as a positive control. The TER-assays of five different A. cryaerophilus strains were performed in technical triplicates and were repeated in three independent experiments.

Immunofluorescence staining of tight junction proteins and confocal microscopy

T84 monolayers, grown on transwell filter supports and infected with A. cryaerophilus strain 3136 (MOI 100) for 48 h were fixed after TER measurement with 300 µL (150 µL each basal and apical) of ice-cold 70% ethanol (10 min, -20 °C) after being washed twice with PBS. Afterwards, the cells were washed again, and 500 µL of PBS was added apically and basally for storage at 4 °C until staining.
The fixed cells were washed twice with PBS (200 µL apical and basal) and incubated with 250 µL 0.2% Triton-X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min at room temperature, followed by a 10-minute treatment of PBS with 2% goat serum (blocking solution) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For the staining of the Zonula occludens-1 protein (ZO-1), 100 µL of a 1:100 dilution of mouse anti-human ZO-1 antibody (Cat: 610967; BD Transduction Laboratories, BD Biosciences, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added each apically and basally and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. Afterwards, the cells were washed three times with blocking solution, followed by the addition of 100 µL of a 1:100 dilution of rabbit anti-mouse claudin-5 antibody (Prod# 34-1600, Lot# SC249265, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) each apically and basally and incubation for 60 min at 37 °C. Following another three washing steps with blocking solution, the 1:500 diluted secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor-488 and goat anti-mouse AlexaFluor-594 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added (100 µL apical and basal) and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Finally, the cells were washed once with blocking solution followed by Aqua dest., before being subsequently mounted with ProTaqs MountFluor (Cat.No. 401603095, quartett, Berlin, Germany). The visualisation of the stained cells was performed by confocal laser-scanning microscopy at the Service Unit Microscopy of the Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research (TZR) with an inverted Leica Stellaris 8 FALCON microscope equipped with 405 nm laser, white light laser (WLL, 440–790 nm), acousto-optical beam splitter, Power HyD detectors and controlled by LAS X (version 4.5.0.25531). Images were acquired with a HC PL APO 63x/1.30 glycerine immersion objective. Image pixel size was 72 nm, z-step size was 333 nm, and the pinhole was set to one airy unit. The following fluorescence settings were used: Alexa 488 (excitation 499 nm; emission 504–595 nm) and Alexa 594 (excitation 590 nm; emission 595–660 nm). Line sequential acquisition mode (with line average = 4) was used to avoid bleed-through of fluorescence signals. Images were further processed linearly for brightness and contrast in ImageJ/FIJI and are displayed as maximum intensity projections [52].

Statistics

All data were analysed using GraphPad Prism Version 10.2.3 (GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts USA; www.graphpad.com). Since the data failed the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality we performed the statistical significance analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn´s post-hoc multiple comparisons. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, with significance levels indicated as *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001.

Results

Cytotoxicity of A. cryaerophilus in HT-29/B6 and T84 cells

The impact of A. cryaerophilus on the metabolic activity of the HT-29/B6 and T84 cell lines was measured by the WST-1 assay. Impaired relative metabolic activity of human cells induced by bacterial infection was classified as low (51–80% remaining metabolic activity of the infected cells), moderate (5–50%), or high (less than 5%), as described by Brückner et al. (2020) [45]. DMSO treatment completely inhibited the metabolic activity of the tested cells (0.0% in HT-29/B6 and 1.0% in T84 remaining metabolic activity after 48 h of infection). HT-29/B6 cells showed compromised metabolic activity of more than 80% following infection by ten of the twelve tested A. cryaerophilus strains (Fig. 1a). Incubation with strain 3136 induced a low decrease in metabolic activity to 73.3% (p < 0.0001), and incubation with strain 3224 resulted in a moderate decrease to 41% (p < 0.0001). The reference strain A. butzleri decreased the metabolic activity to 51.6%, indicating a low level of cytotoxicity (p < 0.0001).
Fig. 1
Induction of cytotoxicity in HT-29/B6 (a) and T84 (b) cells after infection with A. cryaerophilus. Induction of cytotoxicity after 48 h of infection with A. cryaerophilus (MOI = 1000) by measuring the metabolic activity with the WST-1 assay. Metabolic activity was normalised to the metabolic activity of uninfected cells (medium). DMSO and A. butzleri CCUG 30485 were included as controls. Three independent experiments with six replicates each were performed and are shown as medians with interquartile ranges; thresholds are displayed as red dotted lines and set for high cytotoxicity at 5%, moderate cytotoxicity at 50% and low cytotoxicity at 80% remaining relative metabolic activity; * P ≤ 0.05, **** P ≤ 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis test)
Bild vergrößern
In T84 cells, A. butzleri did not significantly affect the metabolic activity of the cells in comparison to the control (Fig. 1b). In contrast, the impact of A. cryaerophilus strains 3224 and 3136 can be classified as low, with 62.5% and 51.0% residual metabolic activity, respectively (p < 0.0001). Strain 2486 lowered the metabolic activity but not below the threshold of 80%, resulting in 85.6% residual activity (p < 0.05).
When comparing the metabolic reduction induced by the respective A. cryaerophilus strains between both cell lines, no differences were observed (Table 2). The two strains that exhibited cytotoxicity in HT-29/B6 cells demonstrated a comparable effect in T84 cells, while the other strains did not reduce the metabolic activity of either cell line below 80%. In contrast, the A. butzleri strain only reduced the metabolic activity of the HT-29/B6 but not that of the T84 cells (p < 0.0001).
Table 2
Comparison of the cytotoxic effects of A. cryaerophilus on two different cell lines, HT29/B6 and T84
 
HT-29/B6
T84
HT-29/B6 vs. T84
Strain
Median*
Quartile (lower/upper)
Median
Quartile (lower/upper)
p value a
A. cryaerophilus
     
2486
96.6
89.8 / 103.1
85.6
81.8 / 89.0
0.342
2502
89.7
81.1 / 95.3
90. 7
83.3 / 104.2
> 0.999
2517
98.3
89.4 / 102.3
101.1
82.7 / 114.4
> 0.999
2657
92.6
88.4 / 98.6
95.4
86.5 / 107.7
> 0.999
2661
90.1
85.1 / 94.0
91.3
85.9 / 108.7
> 0.999
2695
94.6
88.5 / 103.5
91.3
81.5 / 114.5
> 0.999
2771
90.0
85.3 / 100.2
88.4
81.7 / 112.7
> 0.999
2852
90.4
84.2 / 101.6
86. 7
83.0 / 105.2
> 0.999
3132
89.6
81.8 / 95.5
91.6
84.7 / 102.9
> 0.999
3136
73.3
51.8 / 82.1
51.0
43.1 / 67.4
> 0.999
3224
41.0
26.4 / 79.2
62.5
56.1 / 105.3
> 0.999
3226
91.8
85.1 / 97.8
90.7
85.2 / 116.2
> 0.999
A. butzleri
     
CCUG 30485
51.6
47.3 / 74.8
138
124.5 / 163
< 0.0001
* Median and quartiles were calculated from at least three independent experiments with six replicates each. Values were normalised to the metabolic activity of uninfected cells (medium)
a Kruskal-Wallis test; statistically significant differences are highlighted with p values in bold

Adhesion and invasion potential of A. cryaerophilus in human colonic cell lines HT-29/B6 and T84

The ability of A. cryaerophilus to adhere to and invade human colon cells lines was investigated using HT-29/B6 and T84.
All twelve A. cryaerophilus strains successfully adhered to HT-29/B6 cells, with highest indices detected for strain 2517 (5.8 × 100), followed by strains 3224 and 2486 (2.7 × 100 and 5.3 × 10− 1, respectively) (Fig. 2a). The other strains exhibited adhesion indices ranging between 3.3 × 10− 1 (strain 2657) and 2.0 × 10− 2 (strain 2852).
Fig. 2
Adhesion (a) and invasion (b) capacity of twelve A. cryaerophilus strains in HT-29/B6 cells. Determination of the adhered bacteria was performed 1 h after infection (MOI = 100), and of the invaded bacteria 3 h after infection, followed by 2 h of gentamicin treatment. The indices were calculated as percentages of the inoculum (109 CFU/mL). A. butzleri CCUG 30485 served as a positive control. Three independent experiments with three replicates each were performed and are shown together with the calculated medians
Bild vergrößern
The invasion ability was investigated following a gentamicin protection assay. The highest indices were observed for strains 3224 (5.2 × 10− 3) and 2486 (3.6 × 10− 3), whereas the lowest index was detected for strain 2771 (2.6 × 10− 5) (Fig. 2b).
The adhesion as well as the invasion indices of the control strain A. butzleri were found to be in the range of those of the tested A. cryaerophilus strains (3.2 × 10− 1 and 3.0 × 10− 4, respectively).
Two strains that were cytotoxic toward both cell lines (3136 and 3224) and three other strains displaying the whole range of invasion indices in HT-29/B6 cells (2502, 2517, and 2771) were chosen to further determine their adhesive and invasive potential on the T84 cell line (Fig. 3). The adhesion indices of all five A. cryaerophilus strains ranged between 4.2 × 10− 2 (strain 3136) and 1.5 × 10− 1 (strain 2771) in the T84 cells, which was slightly lower compared to A. butzleri (4.0 × 10− 1) (Fig. 3a). The invasion indices of all five strains in the T84 cell line were comparable with the index of A. butzleri (4.0 × 10− 4) (Fig. 3b). The highest indices were observed for strains 2502 (2.6 × 10− 3) and 2517 (1.0 × 10− 3), whereas for strains 2771, 3224 and 3136, lower indices (2.8 × 10− 4, 2.7 × 10− 4, and 1.7 × 10− 4, respectively) were detected compared with those of the A. butzleri strain.
Fig. 3
Adhesion (a) and invasion (b) capacity of five A. cryaerophilus strains in T84 cells. Indices were calculated compared with those of the inoculum (109 CFU/mL), resulting in a MOI of 100, from three independent experiments with three replicates each. Single values with calculated medians are shown. A. butzleri CCUG 30485 served as a positive control
Bild vergrößern
When comparing the two cell lines, the two A. cryaerophilus strains 2502, and 3136, and the A. butzleri strain CCUG 30485 showed no significant difference in their adhesion and invasion capabilities (Table 3). However, for three strains differences between the two cell lines were observed. Strain 3224 exhibited higher adhesion and invasions indices in HT-29/B6 cells compared to T84 cells (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). A. cryaerophilus strain 2517 exhibited only a higher adhesion index in the HT-29/B6 cell line (p < 0.05), while the invasion indices did not differ. Further, strain 2771 exhibited similar adhesion indices but a lower invasion index in HT-29/B6 cells compared to T84 cells (p < 0.05).
Table 3
Comparison of the adhesion and invasion capabilities of five A. cryaerophilus strains in HT-29/B6 and T84 cells
 
HT-29/B6
T84
HT-29/B6
vs. T84
Strain
Median*
Quartile
(lower/upper)
Median
Quartile
(lower/upper)
p value a
Adhesion
     
A. cryaerophilus
     
2502
1.1 × 10− 1
5.2 × 10− 2 / 5.3 × 10− 1
6.5 × 10− 2
3.2 × 10− 2 / 7.5 × 10− 2
0.6148
2517
5.8 × 100
3.6 × 10− 1 / 1.2 × 101
9.3 × 10− 2
7.0 × 10− 2 / 4.3 × 10− 1
0.0272
2771
3.1 × 10− 1
4.9 × 10− 2 / 6.6 × 10− 1
1.5 × 10− 1
8.2 × 10− 2 / 2.3 × 10− 1
> 0.9999
3136
4.3 × 10− 2
1.5 × 10− 2 / 5.1 × 10− 2
4.2 × 10− 2
3.4 × 10− 2 / 8.1 × 10− 2
> 0.9999
3224
2.7 × 100
7.5 × 10− 1 / 5.2 × 100
1.1 × 10− 1
4.3 × 10− 2 / 1.8 × 10− 1
0.0020
A. butzleri
     
CCUG 30485
3.2 × 10− 1
1.9 × 10− 1 / 6.3 × 10− 1
4.0 × 10− 1
1.2 × 10− 1 / 6.7 × 10− 1
> 0.999
Invasion
     
A. cryaerophilus
     
2502
3.2 × 10− 3
1.5 × 10− 3 / 6.4 × 10− 3
2.6 × 10− 3
1.6 × 10− 3 / 3.6 × 10− 3
> 0.9999
2517
2.1 × 10− 4
2.1 × 10− 5 / 2.8 × 10− 3
1.0 × 10− 3
2.3 × 10− 4 / 1.2 × 10− 3
> 0.9999
2771
2.6 × 10− 5
1.2 × 10− 5 / 4.7 × 10− 5
2.8 × 10− 4
1.6 × 10− 4 / 2.5 × 10− 3
0.0159
3136
6.8 × 10− 5
2.5 × 10− 5 / 8.7 × 10− 5
1.7 × 10− 4
1.3 × 10− 4 / 4.2 × 10− 4
0.8744
3224
5.2 × 10− 3
9.6 × 10− 4 / 2.2 × 10− 2
2.7 × 10− 4
2.1 × 10− 4 / 8.5 × 10− 4
0.0336
A. butzleri
     
CCUG 30485
3.0 × 10− 4
2.0 × 10− 4 / 3.2 × 10− 3
4.0 × 10− 4
3.3 × 10− 4 / 5.1 × 10− 4
> 0.9999
* Median and quartiles were determined from at least three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Indices were calculated compared to the inoculum (109 CFU/mL)
a Kruskal-Wallis test; statistically significant differences are highlighted with p values in bold

Effect on epithelial barrier function

Transepithelial electrical resistance

The ability of A. cryaerophilus to affect the epithelial barrier function was evaluated by measuring the TER in T84 before and after infection. Herein, a high resistance is a sign for an intact barrier function, whereas a decrease in the TER hints at a disruption of the epithelial barrier, which subsequently can contribute to increased permeability against different ions, water or even larger molecules.
First, to determine the MOI for further investigations, T84 cells were infected with strain 3136 at MOIs of 10, 50, 100 and 500. After 48 h of infection, the initial TER was reduced to 49.3% by a MOI of 10, followed by a reduction to 34.1% by a MOI of 50 and to 19.5% by a MOI of 100 (p < 0.05), with the strongest reduction by a MOI of 500 to a residual TER of 6.6% (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4a). Based on these results, a MOI of 100 was chosen for subsequent assays.
Fig. 4
Transepithelial electrical resistance of T84 cells after infection with A. cryaerophilus. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) of T84 cell monolayers 48 h after infection with different MOIs (10, 50, 100, and 500) of A. cryaerophilus 3136 (a) and five strains of A. cryaerophilus, at a MOI of 100 (b). The measured resistance was normalised to the initial resistance before infection. Medium was included as a negative control, and A. butzleri CCUG 30485 was included as a positive control. Four replicates (a) and three independent experiments with three replicates each (b) were performed and are shown as medians with interquartile ranges. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, **** p ≤ 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis test)
Bild vergrößern
The impact on the epithelial barrier function of five A. cryaerophilus strains (2502, 2517, 2771, 3136, and 3224) and A. butzleri strain CCUG 30845 was assessed. The A. cryaerophilus strains were chosen, as they included the two cytotoxic strains as well as three strains with varying invasion rates. Measurements after 48 h of infection revealed that two A. cryaerophilus strains, namely 2771 and 3136, as well as the A. butzleri strain, were able to significantly decrease the TER compared to the control, resulting in 46.1%, 44.5%, and 23.9% of initial TER, respectively (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.0001; Fig. 4b). The reduced TER induced by the three A. cryaerophilus strains 2502, 2517 and 3224 (63.0%, 47.0%, and 50.2%, respectively) was not significantly different compared to that of the control.

Distribution of tight junction proteins

To further investigate how A. cryaerophilus strain 3136 affects the epithelial barrier function, the tight junction proteins claudin-5 and ZO-1 of the T84 cell monolayer from the TER-assay were visualised by immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Immunofluorescence staining of tight junction proteins in T84 cells after infection with A. cryaerophilus. Immunofluorescence staining of tight junction proteins in the T84 monolayer 48 h after infection with A. cryaerophilus strain 3136. Tight junction proteins were stained with antibodies against claudin-5 (green, a and b) and ZO-1 (red, c and d), both of which were merged (yellow, e and f). Scale bar = 5 μm
Bild vergrößern
Confocal microscopy revealed a disruption of the claudin-5 signal in the cell membrane area of infected cells (5b) compared to the uninfected control cells (5a). The ZO-1 signal remained equally distributed in the tight junction domain in both infected and control cells (5d, 5c). Merged images revealed co-localisation of claudin-5 and ZO-1, indicated by a yellow signal, exclusively in uninfected cells (5e), whereas no co-localisation was detectable in infected cells (5f).

Discussion

With relevance to health, the emerging foodborne pathogen A. cryaerophilus has been found to be the second most common Arcobacter species in human stool samples following A. butzleri [26]. Infections caused by A. cryaerophilus induce mainly prolonged watery diarrhoea [29, 47, 48]. Also in an animal model, A. cryaerophilus induced diarrhoeal disease in infected WISTAR rats [53]. However, knowledge regarding the pathogenic mechanisms of A. cryaerophilus is still scarce [4446, 54, 55]. Nevertheless, as the few investigations regarding the adhesion and invasion rates of A. cryaerophilus have been performed on a single cell line, it is difficult to draw a general conclusion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the cytotoxicity as well as the adhesiveness and invasiveness on two further human intestinal cell lines, namely HT-29/B6 and T84. Both cell lines are able to form highly differentiated, polarised monolayers producing mucus, which is described to affect the ability of pathogens to colonize human intestinal cells [5659]. Moreover, we evaluated how A. cryaerophilus affects the epithelial barrier function on T84 cell line. This cell line is characterised by its high degree of polarisation and high TER and is therefore particularly suitable for such investigations [60].
Currently, knowledge on the impact of A. cryaerophilus infections on the viability of human epithelial cells is still limited. Villarruel-López et al. (2003) observed morphological alterations in Vero cells following infection with A. cryaerophilus, such as elongation and vacuolisation, which could indicate cytotoxic effects [54]. Our results are pointing towards a strain-dependent cytotoxic effect of the investigated strains in both human cell lines. For two strains (3136 and 3224), we observed a low or moderate decrease in residual metabolic activity in HT-29/B6 cells and in T84 cells after infection. Our results are consistent with the findings of Brückner et al. (2020), who reported that approximately 20% of the included A. cryaerophilus strains cause a cytotoxic effect on the investigated cell lines [45]. The reason why only certain strains induce cytotoxicity remains unknown. The presence of cytotoxins that induce cell death by damaging nuclear DNA, such as the cytolethal distending toxin of Campylobacter spp. or Helicobacter spp., has not yet been identified in A. cryaerophilus strains [6164]. Interestingly, for A. cryaerophilus the results of the cytotoxicity assay did not alter in comparison of the two tested cell lines, whereas this was the case for the A. butzleri strain CCUG 30845. This A. butzleri strain was able to reduce the metabolic activity to 51.6% in HT-29/B6 cells, whereas no reduction was detected in T84 cells. Differences between the cell lines might contribute to the observed differences in the cytotoxicity of the A. butzleri strain [65, 66]. For instance, variations of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4), including its expression pattern and activation, are known to exist between the two cell lines [67]. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides or lipooligosaccharides (LPS or LOS) are ligands of this receptor, leading to the induction of inflammation and possibly resulting in cell death, and T84 cells are reported to respond less towards bacterial LPS than HT-29 cells do [6769]. However, the role of TLR-4 activation by Arcobacter spp. remains controversial. Gölz et al. (2015) observed, that the A. butzleri strain CCUG 30485, which was also included in the present study, induced less colonic epithelial apoptosis and a weaker immunological response in secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice lacking TLR-4, compared to TLR-4-positive mice [70]. This suggests a potential involvement of TLR-4 in immunopathological processes and may contribute to the observed result that A. butzleri only induced cytotoxicity in HT-29/B6 but not in T84 cells. In contrast, Baztarrika et al. (2025) reported that infection of TLR-4-transfected HeLa57A cells with A. butzleri strains did not activate the TLR-4 receptor [71]. The differences in TLR-4 involvement between these studies might be due to strain-dependent differences in bacterial LOS/LPS structure or TLR-4 structures present in the different models used. Interestingly, Baztarrika et al. (2025) reported an activation of TLR-4 by A. cryaerophilus, which indicates that the LOS/LPS structure of some A. cryaerophilus strains could activate TLR-4 receptors and might induce cytotoxic effect thereby. However, despite the possible cytotoxic effect of A. cryaerophilus LOS/LPS, Johnson and Murano (2002) proposed the existence of a yet unidentified secreted toxin in A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus as they observed morphological alterations in CHO, HeLa, and INT407 cells following infection with sonicated bacterial cultures and supernatants [64]. Such a toxin might explain a strain-dependent but TLR-4-independent cytotoxicity. Therefore, future research should investigate the cytotoxicity of supernatants from Arcobacter spp. to identify possible secreted toxins.
Moreover, invasion is known to potentially lead to cell death [72]. In our study, all considered A. cryaerophilus strains were able to adhere to as well as invade both cell lines investigated, with strain-dependent differences regarding the adhesion and invasion indices. In contrast, in the study by Ho et al. (2007) only two of the four strains included were invasive in Caco-2 cells, and only one was invasive in the porcine-derived cell line IPI-2I [55]. However, our findings are in line with other studies in which all included A. cryaerophilus strains were adhesive and invasive using the Caco-2 model [4446]. Levican et al. (2013) reported adhesion capacities of A. cryaerophilus strains ranging from 5.37 to 6.31 log10 CFU/mL, and invasion levels between 2.31 and 3.06 log10 CFU/mL [46]. Based on the reported inoculum of 108 CFU/mL and applying our calculation method, this corresponds to adhesion indices of approximately 2.3 × 10− 1 to 2.0 × 100, and invasion indices ranging between 2.0 × 10− 4 and 1.2 × 10− 3, which are of similar magnitude to those observed in the present study. Similarly, Baztarrika et al. (2024) reported comparable adhesion capacities (corresponding to indices of approximately 1.9 × 10− 1 to 6.0 × 100) but slightly higher invasion indices (2.8 × 10− 3 to 1.3 × 10− 1) [44]. Furthermore, similar indices could be calculated for well-described adhesive and invasive bacterial species, like A. butzleri and Campylobacter (C.) jejuni. On different human colonic cell lines indices for both species range from 10− 4 to 100 for adhesion and from 10− 5 to 10− 1 in case of invasion [44, 46, 51, 7375]. Differences of our results and those of previous studies investigating A. cryaerophilus could be due to varying protocols, strains, incubation times, cell lines, and calculation methods used.
Nevertheless, the majority of the investigated A. cryaerophilus strains exhibited adhesive and invasive capacities in the Caco-2, HT-29/B6 and T84 cell lines, suggesting that this is a general phenotype of this species. However, for some strains differences regarding the amount of adherent and invaded bacteria on different cell lines could be observed. While for two A. cryaerophilus strains and the A. butzleri strain no differences were determined, for strain 3224 both the adhesion and invasion indices were lower in T84 cells compared to HT-29/B6 cells. In contrast, strain 2517 had a lower adhesion index, and strain 2771 had a higher invasion index for T84 cells. As there was no general shift in the adhesion or invasion index between the two cell lines, we assume that both cell lines included in our study are suitable for investigating these phenotypes of A. cryaerophilus strains. Furthermore, our results suggest that bacterial factors themselves might be responsible for the variations in the levels of adherent and invasive bacteria in these cell lines. This is in line with the high genetic heterogeneity reported for A. cryaerophilus, which might be one cause of the different observed phenotypes [1, 76, 77]. Moreover, a correlation between invasion rate and cytotoxicity can be ruled out for the investigated A. cryaerophilus strains. Strains with the highest invasion rate did not exhibit cytotoxic effects, whereas both strains being significantly cytotoxic towards both cell lines showed a lower invasion rate compared to other strains. Similarly, in other pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a lack of correlation between invasion and cytotoxicity has been confirmed [78].
As diarrhoea is the most frequently reported symptom of A. cryaerophilus infection in humans, an additional assay was conducted to assess the integrity of epithelial barrier function in the human colonic cell line T84 after infection with A. cryaerophilus. The epithelial barrier is maintained by epithelial cells and their paracellular proteins, such as tight junction proteins. These proteins are known to connect adjacent epithelial cells and are crucial for the regulation of paracellular transport and barrier function towards ions and solutes [79]. In addition to their barrier function, their fence function enables the polarisation of epithelial cells [80]. Damage to tight junction proteins can lead to a loss of cell-cell connections, resulting in a disruption of the integrity of the cell layer. A potential increase in permeability towards water and solutes can further contribute to leak-flux type of diarrhoea [81]. Moreover, a disturbed epithelial barrier can serve as an entry point for bacteria in the systemic circulation [82]. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of Arcobacter on the intestinal barrier integrity has only been investigated for A. butzleri [73, 83].
Therefore, the TER between the apical and basal sides of a T84 cell layer was evaluated after infection. The ability to reduce the TER of the T84 cell layer to 23.9% was observed for A. butzleri CCUG 30845, for which the ability to reduce the TER of a HT-29/B6 monolayer had already been demonstrated in earlier studies [73, 83]. Of the five included A. cryaerophilus strains, two reduced the initial TER to 44.5% and 46.1%. The observed reduction in TER suggests that infection with certain A. cryaerophilus strains contributes to the impairment of the epithelial barrier in T84 cells. Such disturbance of the intestinal barrier is recognised as a significant pathomechanism of diarrhoeal diseases caused by other similar bacteria, such as Campylobacter [84, 85]. Different mechanisms leading to barrier impairment have been described, including the invasion of pathogens, cytotoxicity and damage of tight junction proteins [83, 86]. However, invasion as a causative factor has not been demonstrated for the tested A. cryaerophilus strains, as all strains were able to invade T84 cells, but only certain strains caused a reduction in TER. Furthermore, no correlation was detected between the invasion rate and the TER decrease, as both strains that significantly reduced the TER exhibited lower invasion rates than most other strains did. The induction of cell death, as observed in the WST-1 cytotoxicity assay, may contribute to the dysfunction of the T84 cell barrier. However, only one of the two strains that exhibited cytotoxicity also reduced the TER significantly. Also, the A. butzleri control strain, which was not cytotoxic towards T84 cells, lowered the TER. Consequently, a direct correlation between TER reduction and cytotoxicity could not be consistently demonstrated, suggesting that additional mechanisms are responsible for the observed TER decrease.
Therefore, immunofluorescence staining of the tight junction domain was performed. The tight junction proteins claudin-5 and ZO-1 were stained and visualised by confocal microscopy.
While in the control monolayers, both tight junction proteins were properly co-localised in the tight junction domain with a yellow merge impression, we observed that infection with A. cryaerophilus strain 3136 led to a clear reduction in the immunofluorescence signal of claudin-5. At the same time, the cell borders themselves did not appear to be altered, as indicated by the unchanged ZO-1 signal in infected cells. This finding provides a molecular explanation for our functional TER measurement, in which the corresponding strain reduced the resistance to 44.5%. Furthermore, it indicates that A. cryaerophilus strain 3136 can impair epithelial barrier function and thereby may contribute to the gastrointestinal symptoms of watery diarrhoea (leak flux). It should be noted that other possibly affected tight junction proteins could have additional effects on the impairment of the epithelial barrier, but these were not analysed here. Other bacteria, such as A. butzleri and C. jejuni, are reported to affect various tight junction proteins, including claudin-1, claudin-5, and claudin-8, as well as occludin and E-cadherin [83, 87, 88]. Further studies are needed to obtain a more comprehensive understanding on the impact of A. cryaerophilus infections on the tight junction domain. Nevertheless, our observations align with those of Bücker et al. (2009), who reported a similar effect of A. butzleri on the structure of the tight junction domain in HT-29/B6 cells [83]. They showed that cells infected with A. butzleri exhibited lower protein expression levels of claudin-1, -5 and − 8. Additionally, a reduction of claudin-1 and − 5 and the redistribution of claudin-1 and − 8 into intracellular compartments were observed by confocal microscopy.

Conclusions

The observed effects of the investigated A. cryaerophilus strains revealed a strain-dependent pathogenic phenotype in two human intestinal cell lines. All strains were able to adhere to and invade both cell lines, and two strains significantly decreased the metabolic activity of the infected cell lines. Additionally, the integrity of the epithelial barrier was compromised by two strains, as determined by a TER measurement, and a reduction of claudin-5 was shown for one strain by confocal microscopy. In conclusion, A. cryaerophilus is assumed to exhibit a potential risk to human health in a strain-dependent manner.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Prof. Dr. Malakauskas for providing some of the Arcobacter cryaerophilus strains used in the current study. We would like to express our gratitude to Ms. Kutz-Lohroff for her valuable advice on handling the cell culture. We would also like to thank Ms. Lee for preparing the cell culture for the TER measurement. Furthermore, we would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Nerlich for his help in preparing the confocal laser-scanning microscopy images.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Pathogenicity of Arcobacter cryaerophilus in two human intestinal cell lines
Verfasst von
Antonia Bachus
Sarah Beyer
Roland Bücker
Soroush Sharbati
Thomas Alter
Greta Gölz
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Gut Pathogens / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1757-4749
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-025-00721-4
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pérez-Cataluña A, Collado L, Salgado O, Lefiñanco V, Figueras MJ. A polyphasic and taxogenomic evaluation uncovers Arcobacter cryaerophilus as a species complex that embraces four genomovars. Front Microbiol. 2018;9.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C, Parks DH, Zhang Y, Takai K, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov). Front Microbiol. 2017;8:682.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chieffi D, Fanelli F, Fusco V. Arcobacter butzleri: up-to-date taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of an emerging pathogen. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020;19(4):2071–109.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mateus C, Martins R, Luís A, Oleastro M, Domingues F, Pereira L, et al. Prevalence of Arcobacter: from farm to retail - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Control. 2021;128.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boudreau M, Higgins R, Mittal KR. Biochemical and serological characterization of Campylobacter cryaerophila. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(1):54–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjeldgaard J, Jorgensen K, Ingmer H. Growth and survival at chiller temperatures of Arcobacter butzleri. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;131(2–3):256–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Sa EM, Harrison MA. Effect of pH, NaCl content, and temperature on growth and survival of Arcobacter spp. J Food Prot. 2005;68(1):18–25.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Collado L, Inza I, Guarro J, Figueras MJ. Presence of Arcobacter spp. in environmental waters correlates with high levels of fecal pollution. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10(6):1635–40.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Arias Echandi ML, Huete Soto A, Castillo Blanco JM, Fernández F, Fernandez Jaramillo H. Occurrence of Aliarcobacter spp. in fresh and pre-cut vegetables of common use in San Jose, Costa Rica. Ital J Food Saf. 2023;12(4):10344.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Barel M, Yildirim Y. Arcobacter species isolated from various seafood and water sources; virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes and molecular characterization. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;39(7).
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivas L, Fegan N, Vanderlinde P. Isolation and characterisation of Arcobacter butzleri from meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;91(1):31–41.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Collado L, Guarro J, Figueras MJ. Prevalence of Arcobacter in meat and shellfish. J Food Prot. 2009;72(5):1102–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Houf K, Devriese LA, De Zutter L, Van Hoof J, Vandamme P. Development of a new protocol for the isolation and quantification of Arcobacter species from poultry products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;71(2–3):189–96.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pejchalová M, Dostalíková E, Slámová M, Brozková I, Vytfrasová J. Prevalence and diversity of Arcobacter spp. in the Czech Republic. J Food Prot. 2008;71(4):719–27.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Barboza K, Angulo I, Zumbado L, Redondo-Solano M, Castro E, Arias ML. Isolation and identification of Arcobacter species from Costa Rican poultry production and retail sources. J Food Prot. 2017;80(5):779–82.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schönknecht A, Alter T, Gölz G. Detection of Arcobacter species in different intestinal compartments of broiler chicken during slaughter and processing. Microbiologyopen. 2020;9(10):e1106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Altan F, Alp SY. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus isolated from buffalo milk with subclinical mastitis: a different approach. J Hell Vet Med Soc. 2022;73(2):4227–34.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van Driessche E, Houf K, van Hoof J, De Zutter L, Vandamme P. Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;229(2):243–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Golla SC, Murano EA, Johnson LG, Tipton NC, Cureington EA, Savell JW. Determination of the occurrence of Arcobacter butzleri in beef and dairy cattle from Texas by various isolation methods. J Food Prot. 2002;65(12):1849–53.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma B, Thille K, Belmar VM, Thomas RN, Sharma RN. Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Arcobacter butzleri isolated from red-footed pet tortoises suspected for Campylobacter spp. from Grenada, West Indies. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0230390.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bath GF, Leask R, Pettey KP, Coetzee DJ. Abortions in sheep associated with Arcobacter skirrowii infection. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2013;84(1).
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Uljanovas D, Gölz G, Brückner V, Grineviciene A, Tamuleviciene E, Alter T, et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence gene profiles of Arcobacter species isolated from human stool samples, foods of animal origin, ready-to-eat salad mixes and environmental water. Gut Pathog. 2021;13(1).
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabucci C, Baldelli G, Amagliani G, Schiavano GF, Savelli D, Russo I, et al. Widespread multidrug resistance of Arcobacter butzleri isolated from clinical and food sources in central Italy. Antibiot (Basel). 2023;12(8).
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenberg O, Dediste A, Houf K, Ibekwem S, Souayah H, Cadranel S, et al. Arcobacter species in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(10):1863–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brückner V, Fiebiger U, Ignatius R, Friesen J, Eisenblätter M, Höck M, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Arcobacter species in human stool samples derived from out- and inpatients: the prospective German Arcobacter prevalence study Arcopath. Gut Pathog. 2020;12(1).
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Abeele AM, Vogelaers D, Van Hende J, Houf K. Prevalence of Arcobacter species among humans, Belgium, 2008–2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(10):1731–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Houf K, Stephan R. Isolation and characterization of the emerging foodborn pathogen Arcobacter from human stool. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;68(2):408–13.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Baztarrika I, Salazar-Sánchez A, Hernaez Crespo S, López Mirones JI, Canut A, Alonso R, et al. Virulence genotype and phenotype of two clinical isolates of Arcobacter butzleri obtained from patients with different pathologies. Arch Microbiol. 2023;205(12):369.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Barboza K, Cubillo Z, Castro E, Redondo-Solano M, Fernández-Jaramillo H, Arias Echandi ML. First isolation report of Arcobacter cryaerophilus from a human diarrhea sample in Costa Rica. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2017;59:e72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerner J, Brumberger V, Preac-Mursic V. Severe diarrhea associated with Arcobacter butzleri. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13(8):660–2.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández H, Krause S, Villanueva MP. Arcobacter butzleri an emerging enteropathogen: communication of two cases with chronic diarrhea. Braz J Microbiol. 2004;35(3):216–8.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rathore A, Patel F, Gupta N, Asiimwe DD, Rollini F, Ravi M. First case of Arcobacter species isolated in pericardial fluid in an HIV and COVID-19 patient with worsening cardiac tamponade. IDcases. 2023;32.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Soelberg KK, Danielsen TKL, Martin-Iguacel R, Justesen US. Arcobacter butzleri is an opportunistic pathogen: recurrent bacteraemia in an immunocompromised patient without diarrhoea. Access Microbiol. 2020;2(8):acmi000145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Arguello E, Otto CC, Mead P, Babady NE. Bacteremia caused by Arcobacter butzleri in an immunocompromised host. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(4):1448–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsueh PR, Teng LJ, Yang PC, Wang SK, Chang SC, Ho SW, et al. Bacteremia caused by Arcobacter cryaerophilus 1B. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(2):489–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz de Alegría Puig C, Fernández Martínez M, Pablo Marcos D, Agüero Balbin J, Calvo Montes J. Outbreak of Arcobacter butzleri? An emerging enteropathogen. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023;41(3):169–72.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wybo I, Breynaert J, Lauwers S, Lindenburg F, Houf K. Isolation of Arcobacter skirrowii from a patient with chronic diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(4):1851–2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasiljevic M, Fenwick AJ, Nematollahi S, Gundareddy VP, Romagnoli M, Zenilman J, et al. First case report of human bacteremia with Malarcobacter (Arcobacter) mytili. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(7).
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerkhof PJ, Van den Abeele AM, Strubbe B, Vogelaers D, Vandamme P, Houf K. Diagnostic approach for detection and identification of emerging enteric pathogens revisited: the (Ali)arcobacter lanthieri case. New Microb New Infec. 2021;39.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat ICMSF ICoMSfF. In: Tompkin RB, editor. Microbiological testing in food safety management. Volume 7. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2002. p. 171.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang P, Liu Y, Fu M, Wang B, Ding S, Ma X, et al. Meta-analysis on the global prevalence of Arcobacter in food-producing aninmals and humans. One Heath Adv. 2024;2(13).CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Buzzanca D, Chiarini E, Alessandria V. Arcobacteraceae: an exploration of antibiotic resistance featuring the latest research updates. Antibiot (Basel). 2024;13(7).
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramees TP, Dhama K, Karthik K, Rathore RS, Kumar A, Saminathan M, et al. Arcobacter: an emerging food-borne zoonotic pathogen, its public health concerns and advances in diagnosis and control - a comprehensive review. Vet Quart. 2017;37(1):136–61.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Baztarrika I, Salazar-Sánchez A, Laorden L, Martínez-Ballesteros I, Alonso R, Martinez-Malaxetxebarria I. Foodborne and waterborne Arcobacter species exhibit a high virulent activity in Caco-2. Food Microbiol. 2024;118.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Brückner V, Fiebiger U, Ignatius R, Friesen J, Eisenblätter M, Höck M, et al. Characterization of Arcobacter strains isolated from human stool samples: results from the prospective German prevalence study Arcopath. Gut Pathog. 2020;12:3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Levican A, Alkeskas A, Günter C, Forsythe SJ, Figueras MJ. Adherence to and invasion of human intestinal cells by Arcobacter species and their virulence genotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(16):4951–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueras MJ, Levican A, Pujol I, Ballester F, Rabada Quilez MJ, Gomez-Bertomeu F. A severe case of persistent diarrhoea associated with Arcobacter cryaerophilus but attributed to Campylobacter sp. and a review of the clinical incidence of Arcobacter spp. New Microb New Infect. 2014;2(2):31–7.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Tee W, Baird R, Dyall-Smith M, Dwyer B. Campylobacter cryaerophila isolated from a human. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(12):2469–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreusel KM, Fromm M, Schulzke JD, Hegel U. Cl- secretion in epithelial monolayers of mucus-forming human colon cells (HT-29/B6). Am J Physiol. 1991;261:C574–82.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Dharmsathaphorn K, McRoberts JA, Mandel KG, Tisdale LD, Masui H. A human colonic tumor cell line that maintains vectorial electrolyte transport. Am J Physiol. 1984;246(2 Pt 1):G204–8.PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Karadas G, Sharbati S, Hänel I, Messelhäußer U, Glocker E, Alter T, et al. Presence of virulence genes, adhesion and invasion of Arcobacter butzleri. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;115(2):583–90.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Adesiji YO. Faecal shedding of Arcobacter species following experimental infection in rats: public health implications. Cent Eur J Med. 2010;5(4):470–4.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Villarruel-López A, Márquez-González M, Garay-Martínez LE, Zepeda H, Castillo A, de la Mota L, et al. Isolation of Arcobacter spp. from retail meats and cytotoxic effects of isolates against vero cells. J Food Prot. 2003;66(8):1374–8.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho HT, Lipman LJ, Hendriks HG, Tooten PC, Ultee T, Gaastra W. Interaction of Arcobacter spp. with human and porcine intestinal epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;50(1):51–8.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Devriese S, Van den Bossche L, Van Welden S, Holvoet T, Pinheiro I, Hindryckx P, et al. T84 monolayers are superior to Caco-2 as a model system of colonocytes. Histochem Cell Biol. 2017;148(1):85–93.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat McCool DJ, Marcon MA, Forstner JF, Forstner GG. The T84 human colonic adenocarcinoma cell-line produces mucin in culture and releases it in response to various secretagogues. Biochem J. 1990;267(2):491–500.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Buzzanca D, Botta C, Ferrocino I, Alessandria V, Houf K, Rantsiou K. Functional pangenome analysis reveals high virulence plasticity of Aliarcobacter butzleri and affinity to human mucus. Genomics. 2021;113(4):2065–76.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat de Melo MA, Pechère JC. Effect of mucin on Campylobacter jejuni association and invasion on HEp-2 cells. Microb Pathog. 1988;5(1):71–6.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoultz I, Keita AV. The intestinal barrier and current techniques for the assessment of gut permeability. Cells. 2020;9(8).
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitehouse CA, Balbo PB, Pesci EC, Cottle DL, Mirabito PM, Pickett CL. Campylobacter jejuni cytolethal distending toxin causes a G2-phase cell cycle block. Infect Immun. 1998;66(5):1934–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang DD, Scheutz F, Ahrens P, Pedersen K, Blom J, Madsen M. Prevalence of cytolethal distending toxin (cdt) genes and CDT production in Campylobacter spp. isolated from Danish broilers. J Med Microbiol. 2001;50(12):1087–94.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Young VB, Knox KA, Schauer DB. Cytolethal distending toxin sequence and activity in the enterohepatic pathogen Helicobacter hepaticus. Infect Immun. 2000;68(1):184–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson LG, Murano EA. Lack of a cytolethal distending toxin among Arcobacter isolates from various sources. J Food Prot. 2002;65(11):1789–95.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Donato RP, El-Merhibi A, Gundsambuu B, Mak KY, Formosa ER, Wang X, et al. Studying permeability in a commonly used epithelial cell line: T84 intestinal epithelial cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;763:115–37.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Maqueda D, Miralles B, Recio I. HT29 cell line. In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, Lopez-Exposito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, et al. editors. The impact of food bioactives on health: in vitro and ex vivo models. Cham (CH): Springer; 2015. Chapter 11.
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvestegui A, Olivares-Morales M, Muñoz E, Smith R, Nataro JP, Ruiz-Perez F, et al. TLR4 participates in the inflammatory response induced by the AAF/II fimbriae from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli on intestinal epithelial cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:143.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Park BS, Lee JO. Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes. Exp Mol Med. 2013;45(12):e66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Abreu MT, Vora P, Faure E, Thomas LS, Arnold ET, Arditi M. Decreased expression of Toll-like receptor-4 and MD-2 correlates with intestinal epithelial cell protection against dysregulated proinflammatory gene expression in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 2001;167(3):1609–16.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Gölz G, Karadas G, Fischer A, Göbel UB, Alter T, Bereswill S, et al. Toll-like receptor-4 is essential for Arcobacter butzleri-induced colonic and systemic immune responses in gnotobiotic IL-10(-/-) mice. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2015;5(4):321–32.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Baztarrika I, Martinez-Malaxetxebarria I, Martínez-Ballesteros I, Wösten MM. Human toll-like receptor activation by pathogenic Arcobacter species. Microb Pathog. 2025;198:107189.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Monack DM, Raupach B, Hromockyj AE, Falkow S. Salmonella typhimurium invasion induces apoptosis in infected macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(18):9833–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Karadas G, Bücker R, Sharbati S, Schulzke JD, Alter T, Gölz G. Arcobacter butzleri isolates exhibit pathogenic potential in intestinal epithelial cell models. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(1):218–25.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Haddad N, Maillart G, Garenaux A, Jugiau F, Federighi M, Cappelier JM. Adhesion ability of Campylobacter jejuni to HT-29 cells increases with the augmentation of oxidant agent concentration. Curr Microbiol. 2010;61(6):500–PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng J, Meng J, Zhao S, Singh R, Song W. Adherence to and invasion of human intestinal epithelial cells by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from retail meat products. J Food Prot. 2006;69(4):768–74.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller E, Hotzel H, Ahlers C, Hänel I, Tomaso H, Abdel-Glil MY. Genomic analysis and antimicrobial resistance of Aliarcobacter cryaerophilus strains from German water poultry. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1549.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou G, Wang M, Wang H, Chen X, Gu Y, Shao Z, et al. Species classification and novel plasmid identifications in Arcobacter cryaerophilus and Arcobacter cryaerophilus-like organisms. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:984450.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DJ, Frank DW, Finck-Barbançon V, Wu C, Fleiszig SM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa invasion and cytotoxicity are independent events, both of which involve protein tyrosine kinase activity. Infect Immun. 1998;66(4):1453–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Horowitz A, Chanez-Paredes SD, Haest X, Turner JR. Paracellular permeability and tight junction regulation in gut health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;20(7):417–32.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartsock A, Nelson WJ. Adherens and tight junctions: structure, function and connections to the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(3):660–9.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Spitz J, Yuhan R, Koutsouris A, Blatt C, Alverdy J, Hecht G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adherence to intestinal epithelial monolayers diminishes barrier function. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(2 Pt 1):G374–9.PubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Violi F, Cammisotto V, Bartimoccia S, Pignatelli P, Carnevale R, Nocella C. Gut-derived low-grade endotoxaemia, atherothrombosis and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(1):24–37.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Bücker R, Troeger H, Kleer J, Fromm M, Schulzke JD. Arcobacter butzleri induces barrier dysfunction in intestinal HT-29/B6 cells. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(5):756–64.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Bücker R, Krug SM, Moos V, Bojarski C, Schweiger MR, Kerick M, et al. Campylobacter jejuni impairs sodium transport and epithelial barrier function via cytokine release in human colon. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11(2):575–7.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen HL, Nielsen H, Ejlertsen T, Engberg J, Günzel D, Zeitz M, et al. Oral and fecal Campylobacter concisus strains perturb barrier function by apoptosis induction in HT-29/B6 intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e23858.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Wine E, Chan VL, Sherman PM. Campylobacter jejuni mediated disruption of polarized epithelial monolayers is cell-type specific, time dependent, and correlates with bacterial invasion. Pediatr Res. 2008;64(6):599–604.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehm M, Hoy B, Rohde M, Tegtmeyer N, Bæk KT, Oyarzabal OA, et al. Rapid paracellular transmigration of Campylobacter jejuni across polarized epithelial cells without affecting TER: role of proteolytic-active HtrA cleaving E-cadherin but not fibronectin. Gut Pathog. 2012;4(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrer A, Bücker R, Boehm M, Zarzecka U, Tegtmeyer N, Sticht H, et al. Campylobacter jejuni enters gut epithelial cells and impairs intestinal barrier function through cleavage of occludin by serine protease HtrA. Gut Pathog. 2019;11:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Alter T, Gölz G. Characterization of Arcobacter spp. isolated from retail seafood in Germany. Food Microbiol. 2019;82:254–8.PubMedCrossRef

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Süßungsmittel Erythritol könnte Thromboserisiko erhöhen

Weniger Zuckerkonsum ist ein großer Hebel für die Prävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen. Stattdessen auf Süßstoffe zu setzen, scheint aber nicht der richtige Weg zu sein.

„Bei KHK routinemäßig auf Niereninsuffizienz screenen!“

Ein internationales Forschungsteam drängt, Menschen mit koronarer Herzkrankheit routinemäßig auf eine chronische Nierenerkrankung zu screenen, um so ein stark erhöhtes kardiovaskuläres Risiko rechtzeitig zu erkennen. Dafür soll nicht nur die eGFR, sondern auch der Albumin-Kreatinin-Quotient im Urin herangezogen werden.

Wie „digitale Zwillinge“ die Arrhythmie-Therapie optimieren können

Mithilfe sogenannter „digitaler Zwillinge“ konnten in einer kleinen Studie zur Ablationstherapie bei Patienten mit ventrikulären Tachykardien sehr gute Behandlungsergebnisse erzielt werden.

ASS als Option zur Thromboseprophylaxe nach Gelenkersatz

Zur medikamentösen Thromboseprophylaxe nach Gelenkersatz kann in bestimmten Fällen die Einnahme von Azetylsalizylsäure (ASS) als kostengünstige Alternative zu Heparinspritzen oder DOAK (direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien) erwogen werden. Dazu müssen allerdings bestimmte Voraussetzungen erfüllt sein.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Medizinisches Personal untersucht das Bein eines Erkankten/© Stratocaster / Stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Blutprobe wird bei Patient abgenommen/© Tashi-Delek / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Patientin im Klinikbett spricht mit Arzt/© © sturti / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen)