Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2017

14.03.2017

Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen

verfasst von: Erik Velez, Andriy Fedorov, Kemal Tuncali, Olutayo Olubiyi, Christopher B. Allard, Adam S. Kibel, Clare M. Tempany

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the accuracy of in-bore transperineal 3-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided prostate biopsies for predicting final Gleason grades in patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods

A retrospective review of men who underwent transperineal MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy (tpMRGB) with subsequent radical prostatectomy within 1 year was conducted from 2010 to 2015. All patients underwent a baseline 3-T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with endorectal coil and were selected for biopsy based on MR findings of a suspicious prostate lesion and high degree of clinical suspicion for cancer. Spearman correlation was performed to assess concordance between tpMRGB and final RP pathology among patients with and without previous transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies.

Results

A total of 24 men met all eligibility requirements, with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 11.7). The median time from biopsy to RP was 85 days (IQR 50.5). Final pathology revealed Gleason 3 + 4 = 7 in 12 patients, 4 + 3 = 7 in 10 patients, and 4 + 4 = 8 in 2 patients. A strong correlation (ρ: +0.75, p < 0.001) between tpMRGB and RP results was observed, with Gleason scores concordant in 17 cases (71%). 16 of the 24 patients underwent prior TRUS biopsies. Subsequent tpMRGB revealed Gleason upgrading in 88% of cases, which was concordant with RP Gleason scores in 69% of cases (ρ: +0.75, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Final Gleason scores diagnosed by tpMRGB at 3-T correlate strongly with final RP surgical pathology. This may facilitate prostate cancer diagnosis, particularly in patients with negative or low-grade TRUS biopsy results in whom clinically significant cancer is suspected or detected on mpMRI.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman KE, Niu J, Shen Y, et al. (2014) Physician variation in management of low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 174(9):1450–1459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoffman KE, Niu J, Shen Y, et al. (2014) Physician variation in management of low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 174(9):1450–1459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer VA (2012) Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 157(2):120–134CrossRefPubMed Moyer VA (2012) Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 157(2):120–134CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannarini G, Briganti A, Crestani A, et al. (2015) Dismiss systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided and embrace targeted magnetic resonance imaging-informed prostate biopsy: is the paradigm ready to shift? Eur Urol 69(3):381–383CrossRefPubMed Giannarini G, Briganti A, Crestani A, et al. (2015) Dismiss systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided and embrace targeted magnetic resonance imaging-informed prostate biopsy: is the paradigm ready to shift? Eur Urol 69(3):381–383CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin CR, Yu X, Loeb S, et al. (2007) Pathological features after radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring. J Urol 178(3 Pt 1):860–863 (discussion 863)CrossRefPubMed Griffin CR, Yu X, Loeb S, et al. (2007) Pathological features after radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring. J Urol 178(3 Pt 1):860–863 (discussion 863)CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lellig E, Gratzke C, Kretschmer A, Stief C (2015) Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS). World J Urol 33(7):917–922CrossRefPubMed Lellig E, Gratzke C, Kretschmer A, Stief C (2015) Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS). World J Urol 33(7):917–922CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H, Presti JC (2004) Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):386–391CrossRefPubMed King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H, Presti JC (2004) Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):386–391CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cookson MS, Fleshner NE, Soloway SM, Fair WR (1997) Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications. J Urol 157(2):559–562CrossRefPubMed Cookson MS, Fleshner NE, Soloway SM, Fair WR (1997) Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications. J Urol 157(2):559–562CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat King CR (2000) Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading: trends and clinical implications. Int J Cancer 90(6):305–311CrossRefPubMed King CR (2000) Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading: trends and clinical implications. Int J Cancer 90(6):305–311CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson NL, Emberton M, Moore CM (2013) MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results. Nat Rev Urol 10(10):589–597CrossRefPubMed Robertson NL, Emberton M, Moore CM (2013) MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results. Nat Rev Urol 10(10):589–597CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegde JV, Mulkern RV, Panych LP, et al. (2013) Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(5):1035–1054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hegde JV, Mulkern RV, Panych LP, et al. (2013) Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(5):1035–1054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Futterer JJ, Heijmink SWTPJ, Scheenen TWJ, et al. (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 241(2):449–458CrossRefPubMed Futterer JJ, Heijmink SWTPJ, Scheenen TWJ, et al. (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 241(2):449–458CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamauchi FI, Penzkofer T, Fedorov A, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer discrimination in the peripheral zone with a reduced field-of-view T2-mapping MRI sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 33(5):525–530CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamauchi FI, Penzkofer T, Fedorov A, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer discrimination in the peripheral zone with a reduced field-of-view T2-mapping MRI sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 33(5):525–530CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson AW, Harvey RC, Parker RA, et al. (2013) Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy. PLoS One 8(2):e57480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson AW, Harvey RC, Parker RA, et al. (2013) Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy. PLoS One 8(2):e57480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Penzkofer T, Tuncali K, Fedorov A, et al. (2015) Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study. Radiology 274(1):170–180CrossRefPubMed Penzkofer T, Tuncali K, Fedorov A, et al. (2015) Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study. Radiology 274(1):170–180CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. (2014) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68(1):8–19CrossRefPubMed Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. (2014) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68(1):8–19CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, et al. (2001) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 220(1):263–268CrossRefPubMed Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, et al. (2001) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 220(1):263–268CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang DT, Challacombe B, Lawrentschuk N (2013) Transperineal biopsy of the prostate—is this the future? Nat Rev Urol 10(12):690–702CrossRefPubMed Chang DT, Challacombe B, Lawrentschuk N (2013) Transperineal biopsy of the prostate—is this the future? Nat Rev Urol 10(12):690–702CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bott SR, Henderson A, Halls JE, et al. (2006) Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results. Urology 68(5):1037–1041CrossRefPubMed Bott SR, Henderson A, Halls JE, et al. (2006) Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results. Urology 68(5):1037–1041CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, et al. (2014) Sepsis and ‘superbugs’: should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int 114(3):384–388PubMed Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, et al. (2014) Sepsis and ‘superbugs’: should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int 114(3):384–388PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Barqawi AB, Rove KO, Gholizadeh S, et al. (2011) The role of 3-dimensional mapping biopsy in decision making for treatment of apparent early stage prostate cancer. J Urol 186(1):80–85CrossRefPubMed Barqawi AB, Rove KO, Gholizadeh S, et al. (2011) The role of 3-dimensional mapping biopsy in decision making for treatment of apparent early stage prostate cancer. J Urol 186(1):80–85CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Taira AV, Merrick GS, Bennett A, et al. (2013) Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy as a staging procedure to select patients best suited for active surveillance. Am J Clin Oncol 36(2):116–120CrossRefPubMed Taira AV, Merrick GS, Bennett A, et al. (2013) Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy as a staging procedure to select patients best suited for active surveillance. Am J Clin Oncol 36(2):116–120CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-van de KC, et al. (2012) Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 61(1):177–184CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-van de KC, et al. (2012) Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 61(1):177–184CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM, et al. (2013) Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol 189(3):860–866CrossRefPubMed Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM, et al. (2013) Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol 189(3):860–866CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedorov A, Fedorov A, Pursley J, et al. (2012) Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(4):987–992CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fedorov A, Fedorov A, Pursley J, et al. (2012) Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(4):987–992CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Oguro S, Tokuda J, Elhawary H, et al. (2009) MRI signal intensity based B-spline nonrigid registration for pre- and intraoperative imaging during prostate brachytherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(5):1052–1058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oguro S, Tokuda J, Elhawary H, et al. (2009) MRI signal intensity based B-spline nonrigid registration for pre- and intraoperative imaging during prostate brachytherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(5):1052–1058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-van de KC, et al. (2011) Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 259(2):453–461CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-van de KC, et al. (2011) Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 259(2):453–461CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Puech P, Potiron E, Lemaitre L, et al. (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 74(5):1094–1099CrossRefPubMed Puech P, Potiron E, Lemaitre L, et al. (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 74(5):1094–1099CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, et al. (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 188(5):1732–1738CrossRefPubMed Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, et al. (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 188(5):1732–1738CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, et al. (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63(1):125–140CrossRefPubMed Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, et al. (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63(1):125–140CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Overduin CG, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO (2013) MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results. Curr Urol Rep 14(3):209–213CrossRefPubMed Overduin CG, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO (2013) MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results. Curr Urol Rep 14(3):209–213CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein EA (2015) Prostate cancer: MR-TRUS fusion biopsy—defining a new standard. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(5):253–254CrossRefPubMed Klein EA (2015) Prostate cancer: MR-TRUS fusion biopsy—defining a new standard. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(5):253–254CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Jama 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Jama 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Radtke JP, Schwab C, Wolf MB, et al. (2016) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Eur Urol 70(5):846–853CrossRefPubMed Radtke JP, Schwab C, Wolf MB, et al. (2016) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Eur Urol 70(5):846–853CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Novella G, et al. (2006) Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 50(2):266–271CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Novella G, et al. (2006) Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 50(2):266–271CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrentschuk N, Haider MA, Daljeet N, et al. (2010) ‘Prostatic evasive anterior tumours’: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int 105(9):1231–1236CrossRefPubMed Lawrentschuk N, Haider MA, Daljeet N, et al. (2010) ‘Prostatic evasive anterior tumours’: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int 105(9):1231–1236CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouzzane A, Puech P, Lemaitre L, et al. (2011) Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology 78(6):1356–1362CrossRefPubMed Ouzzane A, Puech P, Lemaitre L, et al. (2011) Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology 78(6):1356–1362CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, et al. (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):126–131CrossRefPubMed Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, et al. (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):126–131CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, Pennisi M (2016) Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance? World J Urol 34(9):1249–1253CrossRefPubMed Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, Pennisi M (2016) Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance? World J Urol 34(9):1249–1253CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Russo F, Armando E, Giannini V, et al. (2016) Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) using whole-mount histological sections as the reference standard. BJU Int 118(1):84–94CrossRefPubMed Russo F, Armando E, Giannini V, et al. (2016) Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) using whole-mount histological sections as the reference standard. BJU Int 118(1):84–94CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedorov A, Penzkofer T, Hirsch MS, et al. (2015) The role of pathology correlation approach in prostate cancer index lesion detection and quantitative analysis with multiparametric MRI. Acad Radiol 22(5):548–555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fedorov A, Penzkofer T, Hirsch MS, et al. (2015) The role of pathology correlation approach in prostate cancer index lesion detection and quantitative analysis with multiparametric MRI. Acad Radiol 22(5):548–555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Panebianco V, Barchetti F, Sciarra A, et al. (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study. Urol Oncol 33(1):17.e1–17.e7CrossRef Panebianco V, Barchetti F, Sciarra A, et al. (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study. Urol Oncol 33(1):17.e1–17.e7CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen
verfasst von
Erik Velez
Andriy Fedorov
Kemal Tuncali
Olutayo Olubiyi
Christopher B. Allard
Adam S. Kibel
Clare M. Tempany
Publikationsdatum
14.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1102-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

Abdominal Radiology 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Snowstorm testes

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “polka-dot” sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.