Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019

03.12.2018 | Original Research

Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study

verfasst von: Claire Wilson, PhD, Ann S. O’Malley, MD, MPH, Carla Bozzolo, MPH, Nancy McCall, ScD, Sai Ma, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

As of 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays for chronic care management (CCM) services for Medicare beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions. CMS requires eligible providers to first obtain patients’ verbal (and, prior to 2017, written) consent, to ensure that patients who participate in CCM services understand their rights and agree to any applicable cost sharing. CCM providers must also enhance patients’ access to continuous and coordinated care, including ongoing care management.

Objective

To understand patients’ perceptions of the consent process, their reasons for choosing to participate, and their experiences receiving CCM services.

Design

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Medicare beneficiaries who had two or more CCM claims submitted by an eligible provider. Beneficiaries were selected from a sampling frame of Medicare claims submitted between January and September 2015.

Key Results

Most patients reported no concerns about being asked to participate in CCM. The majority of patients had secondary insurance (or Medicaid) that covered any coinsurance for CCM and therefore could not say with certainty whether they would participate if they had to pay for CCM services out-of-pocket. Reasons for participating included having insurance that covered the copay and peace of mind about having access to the CCM team. Patients reported multiple benefits of participating in CCM services, including better access to their primary care team, improved continuity of care, and improved care coordination. Most patients reported no downside to participating in CCM services, although some felt they were relatively healthy and questioned whether they needed CCM services.

Conclusions

These findings on patients’ experiences participating in CCM services during the first 9 months of the policy’s implementation can help providers and policymakers understand their perceived benefits and unintended consequences. Our findings also have implications for providers when approaching patients about CCM services.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, et al. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. AHRQ Publications No. 14-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, et al. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. AHRQ Publications No. 14-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, Chartbook: 2012 edition. Baltimore, MD; 2012. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, Chartbook: 2012 edition. Baltimore, MD; 2012.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma MA, Cheng N, Moore M, Coffman M, Bazemore AW. Patients with high-cost chronic conditions rely heavily on primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med, 2014; 27(1), 11–12.CrossRefPubMed Sharma MA, Cheng N, Moore M, Coffman M, Bazemore AW. Patients with high-cost chronic conditions rely heavily on primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med, 2014; 27(1), 11–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Holahan J, Schoen C, McMorrow S. The potential savings from enhanced chronic care management policies. Washington DC: Urban Institute; 2011. Holahan J, Schoen C, McMorrow S. The potential savings from enhanced chronic care management policies. Washington DC: Urban Institute; 2011.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. (2015). Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care. 21(5):355–362.PubMed Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. (2015). Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care. 21(5):355–362.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleich SN, Sherrod C, Chiang A, et al. Systematic review of programs treating high-need and high-cost people with multiple chronic diseases or disabilities in the United States, 2008–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:150275.CrossRef Bleich SN, Sherrod C, Chiang A, et al. Systematic review of programs treating high-need and high-cost people with multiple chronic diseases or disabilities in the United States, 2008–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:150275.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. The outcomes of implementing the patient- centered medical home interventions. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2009. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. The outcomes of implementing the patient- centered medical home interventions. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2009.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McCall N, Cromwell J, Urato C. Evaluation of Medicare care management for high cost beneficiaries (CMHCB) demonstration: Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts General Physicians Organization (MGH). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2010. McCall N, Cromwell J, Urato C. Evaluation of Medicare care management for high cost beneficiaries (CMHCB) demonstration: Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts General Physicians Organization (MGH). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2010.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schurrer J, O’Malley A, Wilson C, McCall N, Jain N. Evaluation of the diffusion and impact of the chronic care management (CCM) services: final report. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.:2017. Schurrer J, O’Malley A, Wilson C, McCall N, Jain N. Evaluation of the diffusion and impact of the chronic care management (CCM) services: final report. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.:2017.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd edition. Sage Newcastle upon Tyne; 2014. Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd edition. Sage Newcastle upon Tyne; 2014.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons; 1998. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons; 1998.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley AS, Sarwar RS, Keith R, Balke P, Ma S, McCall N. Provider experiences with chronic care management (CCM) services and fees: a qualitative research study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(12):1294–1300.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed O’Malley AS, Sarwar RS, Keith R, Balke P, Ma S, McCall N. Provider experiences with chronic care management (CCM) services and fees: a qualitative research study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(12):1294–1300.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study
verfasst von
Claire Wilson, PhD
Ann S. O’Malley, MD, MPH
Carla Bozzolo, MPH
Nancy McCall, ScD
Sai Ma, PhD
Publikationsdatum
03.12.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4750-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.