To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7285418.
A debate on shared decision making in multiple sclerosis (MS) was led by a patient advocate and leading neurologists from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group. Key themes and salient points which emerged from the debate and audience discussions are reported in this article. Arguments against shared decision making included the fact that physicians study and practice for years to reach their level of expertise, and that the level of understanding required to make these decisions may not be possible to communicate to patients within time-limited consultations. Furthermore, unreliable online information, information overload or information with marketing bias may also cloud patients’ judgements. Arguments for patient engagement focussed on how ownership of decisions can lead to improved adherence and outcomes, and a strengthening of the physician–patient relationship. Shared decision making requires educating patients to make informed decisions and to understand the risks and consequences of their choices. However, shared decision making may not be the correct option for every patient, and the level of involvement must be driven by the patient. To support patients’ engagement and promote responsible management of their condition, physicians need to (1) foster and maintain a positive, ongoing relationship with their patients, and (2) provide patients with timely, accurate, and understandable information. There was broad agreement that the patient voice should be heard more in discussions around the future of MS care. MS in the 21st Century offers a model for patient involvement in partnership with MS healthcare specialists, and the steering group is currently considering these issues and developing tools and solutions to enhance patient–physician communication and relationships.
Funding Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
World Health Organization. Patient Engagement: Technical Series on Safer Primary Care 2016. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252269/9789241511629-eng.pdf. Accessed Oct 2018.
Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31. CrossRef
Köpke S, Giordano A, Veronese S, Christin Rahn A, Kleiter I, Basedow-Rajwich B, Fornari A, Battaglia MA, Drulovic J, Kooij L, Koops J, Mens J, Meza Murillo ER, Milanov I, Milo R, Patti F, Pekmezovic T, Sastre-Garriga J, Vosburgh J, Voltz R, Bay J, Oliver DJ, Solari A. Patient and caregiver involvement in the formulation of guideline questions: findings from the European Academy of Neurology guideline on palliative care of people with severe multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13760. CrossRefPubMed
National Health Service England. Shared decision making. https://www.england.nhs.uk/shared-decision-making/. Accessed Oct 2018.
Centre for Advancing Health (CFAH). Here to Stay: What Health Care Leaders Say About Patient Engagement. 2014. http://www.cfah.org/pdfs/here_to_stay_2014.pdf. Accessed Oct 2018.
Rieckmann P, Centonze D, Elovaara I, Giovannoni G, Havrdová E, Kesselring J, Kobelt G, Langdon D, Morrow SA, Oreja-Guevara C, Schippling S, Thalheim C, Thompson H, Vermersch P, Aston K, Bauer B, Demory C, Giambastiani MP, Hlavacova J, Nouvet-Gire J, Pepper G, Pontaga M, Rogan E, Rogalski C, van Galen P, Ben-Amor AF. Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;19:153–60. CrossRefPubMed
Rieckmann P, Boyko A, Centonze D, Elovaara I, Giovannoni G, Havrdová E, Hommes O, Kesselring J, Kobelt G, Langdon D, LeLorier J, Morrow SA, Oreja-Guevara C, Schippling S, Thalheim C, Thompson H, Vermersch P. Achieving patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A perspective from the multiple sclerosis in the 21st Century Steering Group. Mult Scler Rel Disord. 2015;4(3):202–18. CrossRef
National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Multiple sclerosis: National clinical guideline for diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care. London: Royal College of Physicians (UK); 2004.
Chase D. Patient engagement is the blockbuster drug of the century. Forbes. 9th September 2012. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davechase/2012/09/09/patient-engagement-is-the-blockbuster-drug-of-the-century/#270979295638. Accessed Oct 2018.
Department of Health. Creating a patient-led NHS – Delivering the NHS improvement plan. 2005. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4106507.pdf. Accessed Oct 2018.
Aljumah M, Alroughani R, Alsharoqi I, Bohlega SA, Dahdaleh M, Deleu D, Esmat K, Khalifa A, Sahraian MA, Szólics M, Altahan A, Yamout BI, Rieckmann P, Daif A. Future of management of multiple sclerosis in the Middle East: a consensus view from specialists in ten countries. Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:952321. PubMedPubMedCentral
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century 2001. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027&page=23. Accessed Oct 2018.
Institute of Medicine. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America 2012. https://www.nap.edu/download/13444#. Accessed Oct 2018.
Chow S, Teare G, Basky G. Shared decision making: helping the system and patients make quality health care decisions. Health Quality Council, Saskatoon (2009). https://hqc.sk.ca/Portals/0/documents/Shared_Decision_Making_Report_April_08_2010.pdf. Accessed Oct 2018.
Yermakov S, Davis M, Calnan M, Fay M, Cox-Buckley B, Sarda S, Duh MS, Iyer R. Impact of increasing adherence to disease-modifying therapies on healthcare resource utilization and direct medical and indirect work loss costs for patients with multiple sclerosis. J Med Econ. 2015;18(9):711–20. CrossRefPubMed
Bergvall N, Makin C, Lahoz R, Agashivala N, Pradhan A, Capkun G, Petrilla AA, Karkare SU, McGuiness CB, Korn JR. Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis switching from interferon to fingolimod or glatiramer acetate: a US claims database study. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88472. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Colligan E, Metzler A, Tiryaki E. Shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(2):185–90. CrossRef
Glusman M, Bruce A, Thelen J, Smith J, Lynch S, Catley D, Bennett KK, Bruce J. Discontinuing Treatment Against Medical Advice: The Role of Perceived Autonomy Support From Providers in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Behav Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay035 CrossRefPubMed
Köpke S, Solari A, Rahn A, Khan F, Heesen C, Giordano A. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10:CD008757. PubMed
Tintoré M, Alexander M, Costello K, Duddy M, Jones DE, Law N, O’Neill G, Uccelli A, Weissert R, Wray S. The state of multiple sclerosis: current insight into the patient/health care provider relationship, treatment challenges, and satisfaction. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:33–45. CrossRefPubMed
Pietrolongo E, Giordano A, Kleinefeld M, Confalonieri P, Lugaresi A, Tortorella C, Pugliatti M, Radice D, Goss C, Heesen C, Solari A. AutoMS group. Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments. PloS One. 2013;2013(8):e60721.
Kasper J, Heesen C, Köpke S, Fulcher G, Geiger F. Patients and observers perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS One. 2011;2011(6):e26255.
Rieckmann P. Comparing patient and healthcare professional perceptions on multiple sclerosis management and care – where do their priorities differ? Results from a qualitative survey. ECTRIMS Online Library. 2017;200469.
- Patient Power Revolution in Multiple Sclerosis: Navigating the New Frontier
- Springer Healthcare
Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Inneren Medizin
Mail Icon II