Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2018

03.07.2018 | Breast Oncology

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer

verfasst von: Sarah E. Tevis, MD, Ted A. James, MD MHCM, Henry M. Kuerer, MD PhD, Andrea L. Pusic, MD, Katharine A. Yao, MD, James Merlino, MD, Jill Dietz, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide insight into how patients perceive health and treatment effects, how treatments impact outcomes, and are helpful in determining how disease and surgical interventions impact many aspects of a patients’ life. Commonly utilized metrics include survival and disease control, degree of recovery and functional status, access to treatment, treatment-related complications, health-related quality of life, and long-term consequences of therapy. The key to value-based, patient-centered health care is systematically incorporating patient input into the measures that they consider to be the most important outcomes for a particular medical condition while minimizing costs of care. This manuscript reviews the development and validation of multiple available PROs in breast surgical oncology and reconstruction, their impact in improving patient-physician communication and treatment outcome, and potential for impacting reimbursement. The implementation of PROs can be complex and challenging and care must be taken to minimize the potential for survey fatigue by patients and the potential financial burden for implementation, maintenance, and analyses of collected data. Because there is an increased emphasis in providing high-value care for cancer patients, the widespread incorporation of transparent breast-specific PROs stratified by treatments received and disease stage will be essential in delivering exceptional quality care.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma R, Shulman LN, James T. The future of quality improvement in breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 2017;32:469–71.CrossRefPubMed Sharma R, Shulman LN, James T. The future of quality improvement in breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 2017;32:469–71.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Winters ZE, Benson JR, Pusic AL. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg. 2010;252:929–42.CrossRefPubMed Winters ZE, Benson JR, Pusic AL. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg. 2010;252:929–42.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Administration USDoHaHSFaD. Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. Administration USDoHaHSFaD. Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cano S, Klassen AF, Scott A, et al. Health outcome and economic measurement in breast cancer surgery: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10:583–94.CrossRefPubMed Cano S, Klassen AF, Scott A, et al. Health outcome and economic measurement in breast cancer surgery: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10:583–94.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayanju OM, Mayo TL, Spinks TE, et al. Value-based breast cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach for defining patient-centered outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23:2385–90.CrossRefPubMed Fayanju OM, Mayo TL, Spinks TE, et al. Value-based breast cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach for defining patient-centered outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23:2385–90.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat LS, KL. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2015. LS, KL. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2015.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Voineskos SH, Nelson JA, Klassen AF, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: key metrics in reconstructive surgery. Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:467–79.CrossRefPubMed Voineskos SH, Nelson JA, Klassen AF, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: key metrics in reconstructive surgery. Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:467–79.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Efficace F, Fayers P, Pusic A, et al. Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT patient-reported outcome extension: a pooled analysis of 557 trials. Cancer. 2015;121:3335–42.CrossRefPubMed Efficace F, Fayers P, Pusic A, et al. Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT patient-reported outcome extension: a pooled analysis of 557 trials. Cancer. 2015;121:3335–42.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1846–58.CrossRefPubMed Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1846–58.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–62.CrossRefPubMed Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–62.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J. 2010; 16: 587–97.CrossRefPubMed Chen CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J. 2010; 16: 587–97.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 557–65.CrossRefPubMed Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 557–65.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM, et al. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35:575–82.CrossRef Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM, et al. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35:575–82.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-based purchasing–national programs to move from volume to value. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:292–5.CrossRefPubMed VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-based purchasing–national programs to move from volume to value. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:292–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–28.CrossRefPubMed Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–28.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabhan C, Jeune-Smith Y, Klinefelter P, et al. Challenges, Perceptions, and Readiness of Oncology Clinicians for the MACRA Quality Payment Program. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:252–53.CrossRefPubMed Nabhan C, Jeune-Smith Y, Klinefelter P, et al. Challenges, Perceptions, and Readiness of Oncology Clinicians for the MACRA Quality Payment Program. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:252–53.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:823–37; discussion 838-9.CrossRefPubMed Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:823–37; discussion 838-9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Efficace F, Rees J, Fayers P, et al. Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: the PROMOTION Registry. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Efficace F, Rees J, Fayers P, et al. Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: the PROMOTION Registry. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;309:814–22.CrossRefPubMed Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;309:814–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Javid SH, Lawrence SO, Lavallee DC. Prioritizing patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer surgery quality improvement. Breast J. 2017;23:127–37.CrossRefPubMed Javid SH, Lawrence SO, Lavallee DC. Prioritizing patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer surgery quality improvement. Breast J. 2017;23:127–37.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:105–8.CrossRefPubMed Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:105–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy GD, Tevis SE, Kent KC. Is there a relationship between patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes? Ann Surg. 2014;260:592–8; discussion 598-600.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy GD, Tevis SE, Kent KC. Is there a relationship between patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes? Ann Surg. 2014;260:592–8; discussion 598-600.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tevis SE, Schmocker RK, Kennedy GD. Can patients reliably identify safe, high quality care? J Hosp Adm. 2014;3:150–60.PubMedPubMedCentral Tevis SE, Schmocker RK, Kennedy GD. Can patients reliably identify safe, high quality care? J Hosp Adm. 2014;3:150–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezold ML, Pusic AL, Cohen WA, et al. Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:930–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pezold ML, Pusic AL, Cohen WA, et al. Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:930–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunham AL, Ramirez LD, Vang CA, et al. Profiling surgeon performance for breast cancer lumpectomy by composite measurement of reoperations, cosmetic outcomes, and patient preferences. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. Dunham AL, Ramirez LD, Vang CA, et al. Profiling surgeon performance for breast cancer lumpectomy by composite measurement of reoperations, cosmetic outcomes, and patient preferences. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, et al. Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1046e–55e.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, et al. Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1046e–55e.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
verfasst von
Sarah E. Tevis, MD
Ted A. James, MD MHCM
Henry M. Kuerer, MD PhD
Andrea L. Pusic, MD
Katharine A. Yao, MD
James Merlino, MD
Jill Dietz, MD
Publikationsdatum
03.07.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6616-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.