Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after total extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP)

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations [1]. In the Netherlands alone, as much as 30.000 elective procedures are performed each year [2]. Ever since the recurrence rates after inguinal hernia repair have dropped below 5%, the focus of scientific research has slowly shifted away from recurrence rates, surgical techniques, and postoperative complications towards ‘patient-reported outcomes’ (PROs). PROs are defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as ‘a measurement based on a report that comes directly from the patient (i.e. study subject) about the status of a patient’s health condition without amendment or interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician’ [3, 4]. Quality of life (QoL) is one of the most reported PROs and can be measured using generic QoL questionnaires, such as the SF-36(v2) [5]. These questionnaires can be used in a wide variety of populations, which is both their strength and weakness. They provide extensive multidimensional insight in the QoL, though lack the specificity to address key problems in specific populations. This led to the development of Core Outcome Measurement Indexes (COMIs), which include a set of disease-specific PROs that are important for a specific population. In 2011, Staerkle and Villiger developed a core outcome questionnaire specifically for inguinal hernia patients, the COMI-hernia questionnaire [6]. This validated questionnaire compares well to generic questionnaires such as the EQ-5D or EQ-VAS, and focuses on the patients’ perspective of specific problems for inguinal herniorrhaphy such as groin pain, testicular pain, pain during urination, work impairment, sensory disturbances, and patient satisfaction [6].

Arguably, PROs are the most important outcomes of any medical treatment. Despite the importance of these data, a 2014 review of Antonescu et al. states that between 2008 and 2012 only 16% of the 770 clinical articles published in the top five general surgery journals used at least one PRO [7]. Only ten of these articles concerned hernia-related research. Despite an increase in published PRO data during the last 2 years, to our knowledge the COMI-hernia scale has never been used to evaluate the outcome of inguinal herniorrhaphy other than in the original validation paper of Staerkle et al. [6].

This study is the first clinical prospective, single centre analysis of PROs using the COMI-hernia scale. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term postoperative quality of life, function, patient well-being, pain, and social/work disability after total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) and provide the first clinical experience of the COMI-hernia questionnaire.

Between January 2013 and December 2014, all patients of at least 18 years old who were scheduled for elective uni- or bilateral TEP herniorrhaphy in day-care surgery at a local hospital (Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands), were approached for inclusion at the outpatient clinic.

All operations were performed under general anaesthesia by four experienced surgeons (≥300 procedures/surgeon). TEP was performed using a conventional three-port midline technique without the use of a balloon dissector [8]. All patients received a pre-shaped anatomically curved polypropylene mesh (Bard Davol^® Inc., 3DMax™) that was not fixed with tackers or glue and therefore complied with the draft 2016 European hernia guidelines that states that mesh fixation in TEP is not necessary in almost all cases [9, 10].

Patients were asked to fill out the COMI-hernia questionnaire during their preoperative consultation, the 6-week postoperative consultation at the outpatient clinic, and after 1-year postoperatively. The 1-year postoperative questionnaires were sent via mail, and patients were asked to return the questionnaire within 3 weeks. Patients who did not respond within this period received one reminder by telephone; in case the patient did not return the questionnaire after the reminder they were considered lost to follow-up for that measurement. All results were analysed by two authors simultaneously (EM and DH).

The flow of patients through the study is shown in Fig. 1. One hundred and twenty patients (113 men, 7 women) with a median age of 61 years (range 32–86 years) and a complete follow-up period of 1 year were included in the analysis. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. Thirty-five patients underwent bilateral inguinal hernia repair, and the median operation time was 41 min (range 12–142 min) (Table 1). Three patients had peroperative bleeding of an epigastric vessel that was successfully sutured. Eight patients had a postoperative complication; haematoma (n = 6), seroma (n = 1), or urinary tract infection (n = 1). Six patients (5%) had a recurrence hernia within one year.

This prospective study measured five core PROs in 120 inguinal hernia patients undergoing TEP herniorrhaphy and observed that the majority of the population recovered well within the first six postoperative weeks. However, six weeks from surgery, patients still experienced clinically and statistically significant more interference in their social life and work, compared to baseline scores. This did not seem to have a negative impact on their perceived QoL or well-being scores, which notably improved six weeks after surgery. Ujiki et al. performed a similar prospective measurement of PROs after TEP repair and found that ‘social functioning’ and ‘pain’ did not improve immediately after surgery and may even worsen within the first three postoperative weeks [13]. In our series, ‘pain’ notably improved 6 weeks after surgery. These results indicate that postoperative pain seems to resolve somewhere between the third and sixth postoperative week, though social function remains impaired for a longer period of time. Both in our series as in the series of Ujiki et al. social function scores returned to normal one year after surgery. We recommend future studies to explore the timeframe between six weeks and one year postoperative in more detail to identify the duration of postoperative social and work impairment.

Our series showed no clinically significant differences between patients with a unilateral and bilateral hernia despite a better well-being score in the bilateral group one year postoperative, which can be explained by the vast majority of patients with chronic pain having a unilateral hernia (82%), which is consistent with the previously published randomised controlled trial of Peeters et al. that compared lightweight and heavyweight meshes for inguinal hernia repair in terms of quality of life. They did not observe any clinically or statistically significant differences between unilateral and bilateral hernia repairs in terms of QoL scores, return to work, or pain perception, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, regardless of the mesh used [14].

In our series, eight patients developed delayed onset (≥6 weeks postoperative) of chronic groin pain, a phenomenon that was previously observed in anterior repairs by Delikoukos et al. [15]. They report that the origin of the delayed onset of pain can be found in mesh fixation and irritation of the ilioinguinal nerve, though this explanation does not translate well to endoscopic repairs, since the mesh is not fixed, making mechanical stimulation of the ilioinguinal nerve less likely [16]. Thermal irritation of the inguinal nerves has been suggested previously as a possible cause for the delayed onset of pain, though in our series no thermal cauterisation was used [17]. The delayed onset of the pain does suggest a neuropathic basis, therefore an inflammatory stimulation of the inguinal nerves or mechanical stimulation by ‘kinking’ of the inguinal nerves due to scar formation can serve as a possible explanation.

The overall incidence of chronic pain was slightly higher than anticipated (14% VAS ≥ 2; 10% VAS ≥ 3) and seemed to have a negative impact on the patient’s sense of well-being. However, this negative impact of chronic pain did not limit the patients in their perceived QoL, social or work function. Eighty-eight percent of the patients with chronic pain had preoperative pain versus 67% of the remaining population (p = 0.147 FEX), which could serve as an explanation for the relatively high incidence of chronic pain, since preoperative pain is a known risk factor for chronic postoperative pain [18, 19].

A previous study of Bansal et al. reported a lower incidence of chronic pain (1.25%, 3 months postoperative VAS ≥ 3) after TEP repair [4]. Other studies such as Ujiki et al. reported a chronic pain incidence <2% based on the Carolina Comfort Scale outcome, though using the SF-36 13% of the population reported more pain one year after surgery compared to baseline [13]. Burgmans et al. included 473 patients to evaluate postoperative pain with a VAS score and Inguinal Pain Questionnaire [20]. In their series, they found a chronic pain incidence of 10% defined as ‘any pain’ one year postoperative, as did Eklund et al. who reported a similar incidence of 10% chronic pain one year after surgery in their prospective trial of 665 patients [21]. A 2016 registry-based study of Gutlic et al. reported a 7.7% incidence of chronic pain using a cross-sectional analysis of 1110 patients [22]. Overall, the incidence of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair varies from 0 to 54% in published literature [17, 23]. The wide variety of chronic pain incidence can be explained by the overwhelming amount of data concerning the complex, multidimensional problem of postoperative pain, combined with inconsistent outcome definitions and measurement tools [24]. This stipulates the need for standardised PROs, measured with standardised instruments to increase inter-study comparability.

The COMI-hernia questionnaire has made an attempt to standardise the most important PROs in inguinal hernia repair. The use of a single question to evaluate QoL worked well in clinical practice and seemed to provide an overall estimation of the self-perceived health status of the patient. However, the authors would argue that the COMI-hernia scale is difficult to interpret for the patient and the physician. The distinction between question five ‘during the past 4 weeks, how many days did you cut down on the things you usually do because of your groin problem’ and question six ‘during the past 4 weeks, how many days did your groin problem keep you from going to work (job, school, housework)’ confused the patients due to the similarity in outcome. Unemployed or retired patients frequently skipped question six because they felt it did not apply to them. Moreover, the subdomain ‘function’ defined as interference of the groin problem with normal work during the past week, closely resembles the subdomain of ‘work and social impairment’. A suitable alternative to the COMI-hernia questionnaire could be the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire which was recently validated for inguinal hernia patients [25]. This nine-item questionnaire is short, focuses on pain, function impairment, and cosmetic result.

The present study has limitations. Only 75% of the included patients (120 of 161 patients) completed the follow-up period of one year. The COMI-hernia questionnaire is a valid, reliable and relatively short questionnaire, though it is not a powerful tool in discriminating different origins of pain (i.e. during strenuous physical exercise, walking, or lifting heavy objects). The original COMI-hernia questionnaire is validated in German, though published in English. For the present study a Dutch translation was used. Despite these limitations, the authors feels that this prospective, single centre series with experienced surgeons and clear description of mesh and fixation method provides enough evidence for the following conclusion.

The vast majority of patients recovered well after TEP repair with a good quality of life, and fast restore of function. Patient well-being was lower than expected, possibly due to a relatively high incidence of chronic pain (VAS ≥ 2; 14% of the population). Chronic pain did not seem to affect long-term social and work disability. There were no clinically relevant differences between patients with a unilateral or bilateral hernias. The COMI-hernia questionnaire provided reasonable insight in the patient’s experience, though was difficult to interpret for both patient and physician.