Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2020

08.04.2020 | Original Article

Patient-reported symptom burden and supportive care needs at cancer diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study

verfasst von: Colleen A. Cuthbert, Devon J. Boyne, Xu Yuan, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Winson Y. Cheung

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to assess patients’ symptoms and supportive care needs. While PROs are increasingly employed in clinical practice, research utilizing these data remains limited. Our goal was to evaluate PROs from a provincial cancer program.

Methods

A retrospective, population-based cohort study using administrative health data of patients in Alberta, Canada, diagnosed with cancer between January 1, 2016, and October 23, 2017. Adults who completed PROs (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, ESAS) and supportive care needs inventory (Canadian Problem Checklist)) within ± 60 days of diagnosis were included. Patients were stratified by tumor types (breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, hematological, or other). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize symptom burden and supportive care needs. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with higher symptom severity.

Results

We included 1310 patients (mean age 64 years; 51% female), the majority of whom had breast (19%), lung (25%), or other cancers (26%). For the cohort, severity of symptoms based on ESAS was low, but prevalence of specific symptoms was high including tiredness (84%), anxiety (60%), pain (60%), and low well-being (80%). Seventy percent of the cohort reported at least one supportive care need. The highest-ranking problems were fears and worries and needing information about illness/treatment. There were differences across tumor types with respect to symptoms and supportive care needs. Comorbidity and having a high number of supportive care needs were associated with higher symptom severity.

Discussion

Our results underscore the need to develop and implement tumor-specific supportive care interventions.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gapstur RL (2007) Symptom burden: a concept analysis and implications for oncology nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(3):673–680CrossRef Gapstur RL (2007) Symptom burden: a concept analysis and implications for oncology nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(3):673–680CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe S, Nekoliachuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A (2009) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: what do patients think? Support Care Cancer 17:675–683CrossRef Watanabe S, Nekoliachuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A (2009) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: what do patients think? Support Care Cancer 17:675–683CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe SM, Nekoliachuk C, Beaumont C, Johnson L, Myers J, Strasser F (2011) A multicenter study comparing two numerical versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in palliative care patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 41:456–468CrossRef Watanabe SM, Nekoliachuk C, Beaumont C, Johnson L, Myers J, Strasser F (2011) A multicenter study comparing two numerical versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in palliative care patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 41:456–468CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nekolaichuk C, Watanabe S, Beaumont C (2008) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15 year retrospective review of validation studies (1991–2006). Palliat Med 22:111–122CrossRef Nekolaichuk C, Watanabe S, Beaumont C (2008) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15 year retrospective review of validation studies (1991–2006). Palliat Med 22:111–122CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui D, Bruera E (2017) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 years later: past, present and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manage 53:630–643CrossRef Hui D, Bruera E (2017) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 years later: past, present and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manage 53:630–643CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung WY, Le LW, Zimmermann C (2009) Symptom clusters in patients with advanced cancers. Support Care Cancer 17:1223–1230CrossRef Cheung WY, Le LW, Zimmermann C (2009) Symptom clusters in patients with advanced cancers. Support Care Cancer 17:1223–1230CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung WY, Le LL, Gagliese G, Zimmermann C (2011) Age and gender differences in symptom intensity and symptom clusters among patients with metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 19:417–423CrossRef Cheung WY, Le LL, Gagliese G, Zimmermann C (2011) Age and gender differences in symptom intensity and symptom clusters among patients with metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 19:417–423CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashbury RD, Findlay H, Reynolds B, McKerracher K (1998) A Canadian survey of cancer patient’s experiences: are their needs being met? J Pain Symptom Manag 16:298–306CrossRef Ashbury RD, Findlay H, Reynolds B, McKerracher K (1998) A Canadian survey of cancer patient’s experiences: are their needs being met? J Pain Symptom Manag 16:298–306CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Blais MC, St-Hilaire A, Fillion L, De Serres M, Tremblay A (2014) What to do with screening for distress scores? Integrating descriptive data into clinical practice. Palliat Support Care 12:25–38CrossRef Blais MC, St-Hilaire A, Fillion L, De Serres M, Tremblay A (2014) What to do with screening for distress scores? Integrating descriptive data into clinical practice. Palliat Support Care 12:25–38CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sogaard M, Thomsen R, Bossen K, Sorensen HT, Horgaard M (2013) The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a review. Clin Epidemiol 5:3–29CrossRef Sogaard M, Thomsen R, Bossen K, Sorensen HT, Horgaard M (2013) The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a review. Clin Epidemiol 5:3–29CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo R, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRef Deyo R, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Field A Discoveering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles Field A Discoveering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stata/SE 15.1 for Windows. StataCorp LLC. College Station, TX Stata/SE 15.1 for Windows. StataCorp LLC. College Station, TX
30.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Khan N, Hemmelgarn BR, Tu K, Chen G, Campbell N, Hill MD, Ghali WA, McAlister F, Hypertension Outcome and Surveillance Team of the Canadian Hypertension Education Programs (2009) Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data. Hypertension 54(6):1423–1428CrossRef Quan H, Khan N, Hemmelgarn BR, Tu K, Chen G, Campbell N, Hill MD, Ghali WA, McAlister F, Hypertension Outcome and Surveillance Team of the Canadian Hypertension Education Programs (2009) Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data. Hypertension 54(6):1423–1428CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43(11):1130–1139CrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43(11):1130–1139CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patient-reported symptom burden and supportive care needs at cancer diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study
verfasst von
Colleen A. Cuthbert
Devon J. Boyne
Xu Yuan
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
Winson Y. Cheung
Publikationsdatum
08.04.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05415-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.