This paper analyses self-declared aims and representation of dementia patient organizations and advocacy groups (POs) in relation to two recent upheavals: the critique of social stigmatization and biomedical research focusing on prediction. Based on twenty-six semi-structured interviews conducted in 2016–2017 with members, service recipients, and board representatives of POs in Germany and Israel, a comparative analysis was conducted, based on a grounded theory approach, to detect emerging topics within and across the POs and across national contexts. We identified a heterogeneous landscape, with the only Israeli PO focusing strongly on caretakers, whereas in Germany several POs claim to represent this patient collective. Shared aims of all POs were fighting social stigma, balancing the loss of patients’ individual autonomy, and the well-being of caretakers. By highlighting the emergence of new groups of dementia self-advocacy against the more traditional advocacy by others, this study highlights how advocacy and representation in the context of AD are embedded in the discursive context of stigmatization and revised disease conception. Future developments in early diagnosis and prediction of dementia, with more affected people likely to conduct dementia self-advocacy, might challenge existing representation structures even more.
Beard, R.L. 2004. Advocating voice: Organisational, historical and social milieux of the Alzheimer’s disease movement. Sociology of Health and Illness 26(6): 797–819.
Chamak, B. 2008. Autism and social movements: French parents’ associations and international autistic individuals’ organisations. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(1): 76–96.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 1–21.
Dent, M. 2006. Patient choice and medicine in health care: Responsibilisation, governance and proto-professionalisation. Public Management Review 8(3): 449–462.
Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dubois, B., H. Hampel, H.H. Feldman, et al. 2016. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dementia 12(3): 292–323.
Elster, J. 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, S. 1998. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gilad, D., and A. Rimmerman. 2014. The mission and development processes of the disability movement in Israel and the United States: A comparison. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 24(4): 227–237.
Gilmour, J.A., and T. Brannelly. 2010. Representation of people with dementia—subaltern, person, citizen. Nursing Inquiry 17(3): 240–247.
Golander, H., and A.E. Raz. 2000. The mask of dementia: Images of ‘demented residents’ in a nursing ward. In Aging and everyday life, edited by J. Gubrium and J. Holstein, 357–369. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hazan, H. 2014. Against hybridity. Social impasses in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heyer, K.C. 2002. The ADA on the road: Disability rights in Germany. Law & Social Inquiry 27(2): 723–762.
Le Couteur, D.G., J. Doust, H. Creasey, and C. Brayne. 2013. Political drive to screen for pre-dementia: Not evidence based and ignores the harms of diagnosis. British Medical Journal (Online) 347(7925).
Lock, M. 2013. The Alzheimer conundrum: Entanglements of dementia and aging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Luce, J., L. Giorgi, K. Paul, et al. 2011. Health matters: A social science and ethnographic study of patient and professional involvement in the governance of converging technologies in medicine. HealthGovMatters project report. http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/91215_en.html. Accessed June 20, 2018.
Mor, S. 2009. Disability rights in Israel: Between socio-political and legal recognition. In Access to justice and social rights, edited by J. Gal and M. Eisenstadt, 80–130. Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.
Moreira, T., O. O’Donavan, and E. Howlett. 2014. Assembling dementia care: Patient organisations and social research. BioSocieties 9(2): 173–193.
O’Donovan, O., T. Moreira, and E. Howlett. 2013. Tracking transformations in health movement organisations: Alzheimer’s disease organisations and their changing “cause regimes”. Social Movement Studies 12(3): 316–334.
Rabeharisoa, V., T. Moreira, and M. Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties 9(2): 111–128.
Raz, A., K.R. Jongsma, N. Rimon-Zarfaty, E. Späth, B. Bar-Nadav, E. Vaintropov, and S. Schicktanz. 2018. Representing autism: Challenges of collective representation in German and Israeli associations for and of autistic people. Social Science & Medicine 200: 65–72.
Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2016. Comparative empirical bioethics: Dilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany. Heidelberg: Springer.
Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2009. Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: Moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12(4): 433–442.
Schicktanz, S. 2017: The visionary shaping of dementia research: Imaginations and scenarios. in biopolitical narratives and ethical reflections. In Planning later life—Bioethics and public health in ageing societies, edited by M. Schweda, L. Pfaller, K. Brauer, F. Adloff, and S. Schicktanz, 205–227. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schicktanz, S., and I. Jordan. 2013. Kollektive patientenautonomie. Theorie und praxis eines neuen bioethischen konzepts. In Patientenautonomie. Theoretische grundlagen—Praktische anwendungen, edited by C. Wiesemann and A. Simon, 287–302. Münster: Mentis.
Schicktanz, S., A. Raz, and C. Shalev. 2010. The cultural context of end-of-life ethics: A comparison of Germany and Israel. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19(3): 381–394.
Shalev, C., and Y. Hashiloni-Dolev. 2011. Bioethics governance in Israel: An expert regime. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 8(3): 157–160.
Swinnen, A., and M. Schweda, eds. 2015. Popularizing dementia. Public expressions and representations of forgetfulness. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Werner, P., S. Mittelman, D. Goldstein, and J. Heinik. 2012. Family stigma and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease. Gerontologist 52(1): 89–97.
Williams, M. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Williams M. 2014. Introduction—On the use and abuse of recognition in politics. In Recognition versus self-determination—Dilemmas of emancipatory politics, edited by A. Eisenberg, J. Webber, G. Coulthard, and A. Boisselle, 3–20. Toronto: UBC Press.
- Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel
- Springer Singapore
- Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
An interdisciplinary forum for ethical and legal debate
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II