Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 12/2020

20.07.2020 | Original Contributions

Patient Risk Factors Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality Following Revisional Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery for Inadequate Weight Loss or Weight Recidivism: an Analysis of the ACS-MBSAQIP Database

verfasst von: Ivy N. Haskins, Erik J. DeAngelis, Jacob Lambdin, Richard L. Amdur, Hope T. Jackson, Khashayar Vaziri

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Revisional bariatric operations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with primary bariatric operations. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative patient variables are associated with an increased risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality following revisional laparoscopic bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss or weight recidivism and to generate expected model probabilities in order to risk stratify individual patients undergoing these operations.

Materials and Methods

All patients undergoing revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from 2015 to 2016 were identified with the American College of Surgeons Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-MBSAQIP) database. The association of preoperative patient variables with 30-day morbidity and mortality was investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Predictive outcome models were developed for each outcome of interest.

Results

A total of 13,551 patients met inclusion criteria; 5310 (39.2%) underwent revisional RYGB. Each of the available preoperative variables was associated with one or more of the 30-day morbidity and mortality outcomes of interest. The strength of the predictive models, as reflected by the area under the curve, ranged from 0.63 for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission to 0.92 for cardiac events.

Conclusion

Preoperative patient and surgical variables are associated with an increased risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery. With these results, we have built a risk calculator that can be used as a resource for prehabilitation and patient counseling prior to revisional bariatric surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, et al. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS data brief, no 288. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. p. 2017. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, et al. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS data brief, no 288. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. p. 2017.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat MBSAQIP. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011-2018. In:American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery; 2018. MBSAQIP. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011-2018. In:American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery; 2018.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):259–63.CrossRef English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):259–63.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1766–73.CrossRef Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1766–73.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gumbs AA, Pomp A, Gagner M. Revisional bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17(9):1137–45.CrossRef Gumbs AA, Pomp A, Gagner M. Revisional bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17(9):1137–45.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones Jr KB. Revisional bariatric surgery--safe and effective. Obes Surg. 2001;11(2):183–9.CrossRef Jones Jr KB. Revisional bariatric surgery--safe and effective. Obes Surg. 2001;11(2):183–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, et al. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1316–20.CrossRef Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, et al. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1316–20.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, et al. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):952–72.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, et al. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):952–72.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu J, Lundberg PW, Javier Birriel T, et al. Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with? Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2789–95.CrossRef Qiu J, Lundberg PW, Javier Birriel T, et al. Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with? Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2789–95.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Keren D, Romano-Zelekha O, Rainis T, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery in Israel: findings from the Israeli Bariatric Surgery Registry. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3514–22.CrossRef Keren D, Romano-Zelekha O, Rainis T, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery in Israel: findings from the Israeli Bariatric Surgery Registry. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3514–22.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Spyropoulos C, Kehagias I, Panagiotopoulos S, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: 13-year experience from a tertiary institution. Arch Surg. 2010;145(2):173–7.CrossRef Spyropoulos C, Kehagias I, Panagiotopoulos S, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: 13-year experience from a tertiary institution. Arch Surg. 2010;145(2):173–7.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nesset EM, Kendrick ML, Houghton SG, et al. A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):25–30.CrossRef Nesset EM, Kendrick ML, Houghton SG, et al. A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):25–30.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J, Melitics M, et al. 30-day outcomes of revisional bariatric stapling procedures: first report based on MBSAQIP Data Registry. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2233–40.CrossRef El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J, Melitics M, et al. 30-day outcomes of revisional bariatric stapling procedures: first report based on MBSAQIP Data Registry. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2233–40.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Inabnet 3rd WB, Belle SH, Bessler M, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after non-LapBand primary and revisional bariatric surgical procedures from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):22–30.CrossRef Inabnet 3rd WB, Belle SH, Bessler M, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after non-LapBand primary and revisional bariatric surgical procedures from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):22–30.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brolin RE, Cody RP. Impact of technological advances on complications of revisional bariatric operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(6):1137–44.CrossRef Brolin RE, Cody RP. Impact of technological advances on complications of revisional bariatric operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(6):1137–44.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefanidis D, Malireddy K, Kuwada T, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4504–10.CrossRef Stefanidis D, Malireddy K, Kuwada T, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4504–10.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim MA, Ghaferi AA, Thumma JR, et al. Variation in outcomes at bariatric surgery centers of excellence. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):629–36.CrossRef Ibrahim MA, Ghaferi AA, Thumma JR, et al. Variation in outcomes at bariatric surgery centers of excellence. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):629–36.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jafari MD, Jafari F, Young MT, et al. Volume and outcome relationship in bariatric surgery in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4539–46.CrossRef Jafari MD, Jafari F, Young MT, et al. Volume and outcome relationship in bariatric surgery in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4539–46.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Allison PD. Logistic regression using SAS: theory and application. 2nd ed. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc; 1999. Allison PD. Logistic regression using SAS: theory and application. 2nd ed. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc; 1999.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker SG, Schuit E, Steyerberg EW, et al. How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through. Stat Med. 2014;33(22):3946–59.CrossRef Baker SG, Schuit E, Steyerberg EW, et al. How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through. Stat Med. 2014;33(22):3946–59.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6.CrossRef Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Torrente JE, Cooney RN, Rogers AM, et al. Importance of hospital versus surgeon volume in predicting outcomes for gastric bypass procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):247–52.CrossRef Torrente JE, Cooney RN, Rogers AM, et al. Importance of hospital versus surgeon volume in predicting outcomes for gastric bypass procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):247–52.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen KJ, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ, et al. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):76–86.CrossRef Janssen KJ, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ, et al. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):76–86.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W. Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(10):751–60.CrossRef Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W. Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(10):751–60.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):337–47.CrossRef Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):337–47.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patient Risk Factors Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality Following Revisional Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery for Inadequate Weight Loss or Weight Recidivism: an Analysis of the ACS-MBSAQIP Database
verfasst von
Ivy N. Haskins
Erik J. DeAngelis
Jacob Lambdin
Richard L. Amdur
Hope T. Jackson
Khashayar Vaziri
Publikationsdatum
20.07.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04861-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Obesity Surgery 12/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.