Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 10/2019

16.01.2019 | Original Article

Patient satisfaction with adjustable transobturator male system in the Iberian multicenter study

verfasst von: Javier C. Angulo, Ignacio Arance, Antonio Ojea, Manuel Carballo, Andrés Rodríguez, Javier Pereira, Miguel Rebassa, Antoine Teyrouz, Gregorio Escribano, Fernando Teba, Blanca Madurga, Francisco E. Martins, Francisco Cruz

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Backgrounds

Patient-reported outcome measurements are important for urinary incontinence. We analyze self-assessed patient satisfaction and define the clinical profile of patient with highest satisfaction with the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS).

Methods

Patient perception of results was evaluated in a series of 181 patients after ATOMS adjustment. Baseline incontinence severity was defined in pads-per-day (PPD) as mild (2), moderate (3–5) or severe (≥ 6), and dryness as use of none or one security PPD. Post-operative pain at discharge was evaluated by 0–10 visual analogue scale and complications by Clavien–Dindo classification. Multivariate analysis was performed to anticipate “very much better” than baseline perception on patient global impression of improvement and a predictive nomogram was developed.

Results

Dryness was achieved in 80.7% (94.9% mild, 80.8% moderate and 65.8% severe groups). Mean pad-test and pad-count decrease with respect to baseline was 458 ± 330 ml and 3.2 ± 1.9 PPD, respectively (both p < .0001). Complications presented in 25 (13.8%). The proportion of patients that self-declared satisfied with the procedure was 87.1%; 90.6% perceived their situation “better” and 48.1% “very much better” than before. Multivariate analysis revealed best perception is defined by dryness after adjustment (p < .0001), baseline severity of incontinence (p = .007), low post-operative pain at discharge (p = .0018) and lack of complications (p = .007).

Conclusions

Self-assessed satisfaction with ATOMS is very high. Factors that predict best perception of improvement include dryness, baseline SUI severity, presence of complications and pain level during admission. Radiotherapy and device generation were not independent predictors. A nomogram to predict patients that are completely satisfied with ATOMS after adjustment is proposed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Radadia KD, Farber NJ, Shinder B, Polotti CF, Milas LJ, Tunuguntla HSGR (2018) Management of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review. Urology 113:13–19CrossRef Radadia KD, Farber NJ, Shinder B, Polotti CF, Milas LJ, Tunuguntla HSGR (2018) Management of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review. Urology 113:13–19CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nitti VW, Mourtzinos A, Brucker BM, SUFU Pad Test Study Group (2014) Correlation of patient perception of pad use with objective degree of incontinence measured by pad test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence: the SUFU Pad Test Study. J Urol 192:836–842CrossRef Nitti VW, Mourtzinos A, Brucker BM, SUFU Pad Test Study Group (2014) Correlation of patient perception of pad use with objective degree of incontinence measured by pad test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence: the SUFU Pad Test Study. J Urol 192:836–842CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Savage C, Maschino AC, Lowrance WT, Sandhu JS (2012) Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists. J Urol 188:205–210CrossRef Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Savage C, Maschino AC, Lowrance WT, Sandhu JS (2012) Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists. J Urol 188:205–210CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat VanderAa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN, Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group (2013) The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol 63:681–689CrossRef VanderAa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN, Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group (2013) The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol 63:681–689CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Comiter CV, Dobberfuhl AD (2016) The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure? Investig Clin Urol 57:3–13CrossRef Comiter CV, Dobberfuhl AD (2016) The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure? Investig Clin Urol 57:3–13CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahai A, Abrams P, Dmochowski R, Anding R (2017) The role of male slings in post prostatectomy incontinence: ICI-RS 2015. Neurourol Urodyn 36:927–934CrossRef Sahai A, Abrams P, Dmochowski R, Anding R (2017) The role of male slings in post prostatectomy incontinence: ICI-RS 2015. Neurourol Urodyn 36:927–934CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Seweryn J, Bauer W, Ponholzer A, Schramek P (2012) Initial experience and results with a new adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 187:956–961CrossRef Seweryn J, Bauer W, Ponholzer A, Schramek P (2012) Initial experience and results with a new adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 187:956–961CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mühlstädt S, Friedl A, Mohammed N, Schumann A, Weigand K, Kawan F, Göllert C, Kahlert C, Theil G, Fischer K, Fornara P (2017) Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation. World J Urol 35:145–151CrossRef Mühlstädt S, Friedl A, Mohammed N, Schumann A, Weigand K, Kawan F, Göllert C, Kahlert C, Theil G, Fischer K, Fornara P (2017) Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation. World J Urol 35:145–151CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Angulo JC, Arance I, Esquinas C, Dorado JF, Marcelino JP, Martins FE (2017) Outcome measures of adjustable transobturator male system with pre-attached scrotal port for male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective study. Adv Ther 34:1173–1183CrossRef Angulo JC, Arance I, Esquinas C, Dorado JF, Marcelino JP, Martins FE (2017) Outcome measures of adjustable transobturator male system with pre-attached scrotal port for male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective study. Adv Ther 34:1173–1183CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Angulo JC, Cruz F, Esquinas C, Arance I, Manso M, Rodríguez A, Pereira J, Ojea A, Carballo M, Rabassa M, Teyrouz A, Escribano G, Rodríguez E, Teba F, Celada G, Madurga B, Álvarez-Ossorio JL, Marcelino JP, Martins FE (2018) Treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with the adjustable transobturator male system: outcomes of a multi-center Iberian study. Neurourol Urodyn 37:1458–1466CrossRef Angulo JC, Cruz F, Esquinas C, Arance I, Manso M, Rodríguez A, Pereira J, Ojea A, Carballo M, Rabassa M, Teyrouz A, Escribano G, Rodríguez E, Teba F, Celada G, Madurga B, Álvarez-Ossorio JL, Marcelino JP, Martins FE (2018) Treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with the adjustable transobturator male system: outcomes of a multi-center Iberian study. Neurourol Urodyn 37:1458–1466CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoda MR, Primus G, Fischereder K, Von Heyden B, Mohammed N, Schmid N, Moll V, Hamza A, Karsch JJ, Brössner C, Fornara P, Bauer W (2013) Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. BJU Int 111:296–303CrossRef Hoda MR, Primus G, Fischereder K, Von Heyden B, Mohammed N, Schmid N, Moll V, Hamza A, Karsch JJ, Brössner C, Fornara P, Bauer W (2013) Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. BJU Int 111:296–303CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Herschorn S (2008) The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J 2:536–539CrossRef Herschorn S (2008) The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J 2:536–539CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahlon B, Baverstock RJ, Carlson KV (2011) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter. Can Urol Assoc J 5:268–272CrossRef Kahlon B, Baverstock RJ, Carlson KV (2011) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter. Can Urol Assoc J 5:268–272CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer MC, Huckabay C, Nitti VW (2007) The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome. J Urol 177:1414–1418CrossRef Fischer MC, Huckabay C, Nitti VW (2007) The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome. J Urol 177:1414–1418CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Viers BR, Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS (2016) Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes among primary and secondary artificial urinary sphincter implantations in men with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 196:838–843CrossRef Viers BR, Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS (2016) Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes among primary and secondary artificial urinary sphincter implantations in men with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 196:838–843CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM (1988) Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 57:109–112CrossRef Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM (1988) Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 57:109–112CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcos J, Beaulieu S, Donovan J, Naughton M, Gotoh M, Symptom Quality of Life Assesment Committee of the First International Consultation on Incontinence (2002) Quality of life assessment in men and women with urinary incontinence. J Urol 168:896–905CrossRef Corcos J, Beaulieu S, Donovan J, Naughton M, Gotoh M, Symptom Quality of Life Assesment Committee of the First International Consultation on Incontinence (2002) Quality of life assessment in men and women with urinary incontinence. J Urol 168:896–905CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Twiss CO, Fischer MC, Nitti VW (2007) Comparison between reduction in 24-h pad weight, International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Post-Operative Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score in patient evaluation after male perineal sling. Neurourol Urodyn 26:8–13CrossRef Twiss CO, Fischer MC, Nitti VW (2007) Comparison between reduction in 24-h pad weight, International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Post-Operative Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score in patient evaluation after male perineal sling. Neurourol Urodyn 26:8–13CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat González SP, Cansino JR, Portilla MA, Rodriguez SC, Hidalgo L, De la Peña J (2014) First experience with the ATOMS(®) implant, a new treatment option for male urinary incontinence. Cent Eur J Urol 67:387–391CrossRef González SP, Cansino JR, Portilla MA, Rodriguez SC, Hidalgo L, De la Peña J (2014) First experience with the ATOMS(®) implant, a new treatment option for male urinary incontinence. Cent Eur J Urol 67:387–391CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedl A, Mühlstädt S, Rom M, Kivaranovic D, Mohammed N, Fornara P, Brössner C (2016) Risk factors for treatment failure with the adjustable transobturator male system incontinence device: Who will succeed, who will fail? Results of a multicenter study. Urology 90:189–194CrossRef Friedl A, Mühlstädt S, Rom M, Kivaranovic D, Mohammed N, Fornara P, Brössner C (2016) Risk factors for treatment failure with the adjustable transobturator male system incontinence device: Who will succeed, who will fail? Results of a multicenter study. Urology 90:189–194CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedl A, Mühlstädt S, Zachoval R, Giammò A, Kivaranovic D, Rom M, Fornara P, Brössner C (2017) Long-term outcome of the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS): results of a European multicentre study. BJU Int 119:785–792CrossRef Friedl A, Mühlstädt S, Zachoval R, Giammò A, Kivaranovic D, Rom M, Fornara P, Brössner C (2017) Long-term outcome of the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS): results of a European multicentre study. BJU Int 119:785–792CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chertack N, Gill BC, Angermeier KW, Montague DK, Wood HM (2017) Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: Which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively? Transl Androl Urol 6:1138–1143CrossRef Chertack N, Gill BC, Angermeier KW, Montague DK, Wood HM (2017) Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: Which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively? Transl Androl Urol 6:1138–1143CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR (1996) Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol 156:1975–1980CrossRef Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR (1996) Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol 156:1975–1980CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE, Leach GE (1997) Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J Urol 158:435–439CrossRef Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE, Leach GE (1997) Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J Urol 158:435–439CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 166:1755–1758CrossRef Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 166:1755–1758CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Paolone DR (2001) Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. J Urol 166:547–549CrossRef Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Paolone DR (2001) Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. J Urol 166:547–549CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth CC, Winters JC (2006) Insertion of artificial urinary sphincter with preservation of bulbospongiosus muscle in patients at risk for sphincter erosion: an assessment of patient satisfaction. Ochsner J 6:54–58PubMedPubMedCentral Roth CC, Winters JC (2006) Insertion of artificial urinary sphincter with preservation of bulbospongiosus muscle in patients at risk for sphincter erosion: an assessment of patient satisfaction. Ochsner J 6:54–58PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Angulo JC, Esquinas C, Arance I, Rodríguez A, Pereira J, Rabassa M, Teyrouz A, Teba F, Celada G, Marcelino JP, Martins FE, Manso M, Cruz F (2018) Adjustable transobturator male system after failed surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a feasibility study. Urol Int 101:106–113CrossRef Angulo JC, Esquinas C, Arance I, Rodríguez A, Pereira J, Rabassa M, Teyrouz A, Teba F, Celada G, Marcelino JP, Martins FE, Manso M, Cruz F (2018) Adjustable transobturator male system after failed surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a feasibility study. Urol Int 101:106–113CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patient satisfaction with adjustable transobturator male system in the Iberian multicenter study
verfasst von
Javier C. Angulo
Ignacio Arance
Antonio Ojea
Manuel Carballo
Andrés Rodríguez
Javier Pereira
Miguel Rebassa
Antoine Teyrouz
Gregorio Escribano
Fernando Teba
Blanca Madurga
Francisco E. Martins
Francisco Cruz
Publikationsdatum
16.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02639-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

World Journal of Urology 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.